105 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Assessment of flash flood risk based on improved analytic hierarchy process method and integrated maximum likelihood clustering algorithm K. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124696
2. Actionable and understandable? Evidence-based recommendations for the design of (multi-)hazard warning messages I. Dallo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102917
3. Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0508-7
4. The influence of tailored risk communication on individual adaptive behaviour M. Attems et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101618
5. Flood Risk Communications Through Maps: Challenges, Perception Theories and Approaches N. Yousaf et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70179
6. Living with floods – Household perception and satellite observations in the Barotse floodplain, Zambia X. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2016.10.011
7. More than a one-size-fits-all approach – tailoring flood risk communication to plural residents’ perspectives K. Snel et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1663825
8. A Fusion Visualization Method for Disaster Information Based on Self-Explanatory Symbols and Photorealistic Scene Cooperation W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8030104
9. Vulnérabilité non-structurelle et résilience territoriale en situation de multi-risque. Perception et préférences cartographiques des aléas effondrement et inondation (val d’Orléans, Loiret, France) K. Serrhini et al. https://doi.org/10.7202/1100216ar
10. A spatiotemporal optimization model for the evacuation of the population exposed to flood hazard H. Alaeddine et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-687-2015
11. Flood hazard, Santa Cruz do Bispo Sector, Leça River, Portugal: a methodological contribution to improve land use planning P. Gonçalves et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.974226
12. Note éditoriale – Quelle planification spatiale pour quelle résilience territoriale ? L’enjeu de la gouvernance locale A. Hamdouch et al. https://doi.org/10.7202/1100209ar
13. Implementation of Risk-Based Approaches in Urban Land Use Planning—The Example of the City of Erftstadt, Germany S. Greiving et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115340
14. Influence of Flood Risk Awareness and Communication on Real Estate Investment Decision-Making A. Oyetunji et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251387868
15. Exploring local perspectives on flood risk: A participatory GIS approach for bridging the gap between modelled and perceived flood risk zones J. Bullen & A. Miles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103176
16. Smartphone applications for communicating avalanche risk information – a study on how they are developed and evaluated by their providers M. Charrière & T. Bogaard https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1175-2016
17. Towards democratized flood risk management: An advanced AI assistant enabled by GPT-4 for enhanced interpretability and public engagement R. Martelo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106821
18. A framework for the case-specific assessment of Green Infrastructure in mitigating urban flood hazards J. Schubert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.07.009
19. A Framework for Flood Disaster Detection From Remote Sensing Images Using Spatiotemporal Fusion With Digital Twin Technology S. Lim et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3559205
20. Addressing Pluvial Flash Flooding through Community-Based Collaborative Research in Tijuana, Mexico K. Goodrich et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051257
21. Investigations of disaster information representation from a geospatial perspective: Progress, challenges and recommendations W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12922
22. Insights From Homeowners on the Impact of Flood Risk Communication on Adaptive Behavior at the Property Level From the 2021 Flood Event in Germany H. Meyer & G. Johann https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70038
23. An augmented representation method of debris flow scenes to improve public perception W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1833016
24. READY: a web-based geographical information system for enhanced flood resilience through raising awareness in citizens R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1645-2015
25. The importance of indicator weights for vulnerability indices and implications for decision making in disaster management M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101103
26. Development of an inverse method for coastal risk management D. Idier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-999-2013
27. Estimating the Economic Losses Value Caused by Flood Disaster in Sampang Regency Using Tangible Damage Assessment C. Prihantini https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/469/1/012091
28. Using off-grid hydropower for community-led flood resilience: an integrated systems approach S. Schismenos et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2021.1961773
29. Models of best practice in flood risk communication and management D. Demeritt & S. Nobert https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2014.924897
30. Participatory Assessment of Multi Risks in Urban Regions—The Case of Critical Infrastructures in Metropolitan Lima S. Greiving et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052813
31. Flood Risk in Urban Areas: Modelling, Management and Adaptation to Climate Change. A Review L. Cea & P. Costabile https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9030050
32. An opportunity missed is an opportunity lost. Flood maps and their (non-)utilization by local government bodies in the Czech Republic K. Klemešová et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2024-0011
33. SAFE—Fit for the Future: a Transdisciplinary Living Lab R. Obenaus-Emler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-025-01570-z
34. Towards dynamics in flood risk assessment B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3571-2012
35. Invited perspectives: Four reasons DRR does not work as intended – lessons from the 2025 California wildfires and beyond S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1785-2026
36. Communicating the risk of erosion: the effects of map-based communication on risk perception and affect N. Aude et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100738
37. Towards a flood risk assessment ontology – Knowledge integration into a multi-criteria risk assessment approach S. Scheuer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.07.007
38. Communicating disaster risk? An evaluation of the availability and quality of flood maps D. Henstra et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-313-2019
39. Ecohydrologic modelling of water resources and land use for watershed conservation P. Pamukcu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.09.005
40. Risk communication and adaptive behaviour in flood-prone areas of Austria: A Q-methodology study on opinions of affected homeowners M. Attems et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233551
41. Keep it simple: user-focused flood risk visualisation J. Clarke et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/cien.13.00016
42. Flood management in India: A focussed review on the current status and future challenges M. Mohanty et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101660
43. The role of the courts in conflict resolution in UK flood risk management K. Khalil & E. Penning‐Rowsell https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12939
44. Collaborative Modeling With Fine‐Resolution Data Enhances Flood Awareness, Minimizes Differences in Flood Perception, and Produces Actionable Flood Maps B. Sanders et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001391
45. Review article: Assessing the costs of natural hazards – state of the art and knowledge gaps V. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
46. A systemic approach to complex landslide risk reduction in coastal tourist areas: The case of Sirolo, central Italy E. Mammoliti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105810
47. Cooperating for added value: Using participatory game theory in implementing nature-based flood defences H. Vreugdenhil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106507
48. Zielgruppenspezifische Darstellung von Hochwassergefahren und -risiko M. Wenk et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00506-018-0470-z
49. Flood risk assessment – Practices in flood prone Swedish municipalities V. Norén et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.003
50. The role of local stakeholder participation in flood defence decisions in the United Kingdom and Germany C. Begg et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12305
51. Using participatory Multi-Criteria Assessments for assessing disaster risk reduction measures K. Barquet & L. Cumiskey https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.08.006
52. Deconstructing the legal framework for flood protection in Austria: individual and state responsibilities from a planning perspective M. Rauter et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1627641
53. Terrestrial and airborne laser scanning and 2-D modelling for 3-D flood hazard maps in urban areas: new opportunities and perspectives P. Costabile et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104889
54. Internal communication a prerequisite for risk governance: hazard zone planning in South Tyrol, Italy S. Link & J. Stötter https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2014.993580
55. Analysing and communicating vulnerability to crime at micro-places: An empirical application of how to improve the visual representation of a spatial crime risk assessment in Iztapalapa, Mexico City M. Dugato https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paac076
56. Can Citizen Science Promote Flood Risk Communication? W. Cheung & D. Feldman https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101961
57. Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009
58. Flash-flood potential assessment and mapping by integrating the weights-of-evidence and frequency ratio statistical methods in GIS environment – case study: Bâsca Chiojdului River catchment (Romania) R. Costache & L. Zaharia https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0828-9
59. The mixed blessing of shifting responsibilities: Challenges for introducing compulsory elemental insurance in Germany J. Plass & J. Zinn https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105670
60. Effective flood risk visualisation S. Percival et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04173-8
61. A general methodological framework for hazard assessment in remote mountain areas combining geomorphological mapping with UAV survey E. Garova et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-024-9096-8
62. A Framework for Mechanistic Flood Inundation Forecasting at the Metropolitan Scale J. Schubert et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031279
63. Flood hazard mapping using GIS-based statistical model in vulnerable riparian regions of sub-tropical environment A. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2023.2285355
64. A Spatial Decision Support System for Coastal Inundation Risk Atlas A. Immanuel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-025-02359-w
65. Enhancing flood risk maps by a participatory and collaborative design process G. Minucci et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101747
66. Harnessing Game Engines and Digital Twins: Advancing Flood Education, Data Visualization, and Interactive Monitoring for Enhanced Hydrological Understanding W. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16172528
67. Flood Maps in the Czech Republic: Content, Perception and Information value K. Klemešová et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160710006
68. Implementing the European “Floods Directive”: the Case of the Po River Basin D. Molinari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1248-3
69. Enjeux d’inégalités associées aux solutions d’adaptation aux changements climatiques : qu'est-ce qu'on en sait ? N. Bleau & E. Després https://doi.org/10.4000/12er0
70. RETRACTED: A 3D virtual geographic environment for flood representation towards risk communication W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.103757
71. Criteria-based visualization design for hazard maps M. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2505-2023
72. Shaping flood risk governance through science-policy interfaces: Insights from England, France and the Netherlands D. Hegger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.002
73. Investigating ways to better communicate flood risk: the tight coupling of perceived flood map usability and accuracy K. Stephens et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2023.2224956
74. Analysis of a risk prevention document using dependability techniques: a first step towards an effectiveness model L. Ferrer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1201-2018
75. A spatiotemporal multi-hazard exposure assessment based on property data S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2127-2015
76. Using web-based observations to identify thresholds of a person's stability in a flow L. Milanesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019182
77. Flood Risk Management in Flanders: Past Developments and Future Challenges W. Kellens et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0366-4
78. Enhancing local action planning through quantitative flood risk analysis: a case study in Spain J. Castillo-Rodríguez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1699-2016
79. Risk Communication on Floodings: Insights Into the Risk Awareness of Migrants in Rural Communities in Austria K. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-18-00060.1
80. Exploring local risk managers' use of flood hazard maps for risk communication purposes in Baden-Württemberg S. Kjellgren https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1857-2013
81. Going beyond the flood insurance rate map: insights from flood hazard map co-production A. Luke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018
82. Cartes et prévention des risques de submersion : deux approches interdisciplinaires impliquant les citoyens E. Banton et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/15chl
83. “Garbage in, Garbage Out” Does Not Hold True for Indigenous Community Flood Extent Modeling in the Prairie Pothole Region A. Thapa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122486
84. A user-centered mapping design for geomorphological hazard thematic map S. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2023.2251510
85. Improving flood risk analysis for effectively supporting the implementation of flood risk management plans: The case study of “Serio” Valley R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.017
86. Crisis Maps—Observed Shortcomings and Recommendations for Improvement A. Kuveždić Divjak & M. Lapaine https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7110436
87. PRIMo: Parallel raster inundation model B. Sanders & J. Schubert https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.02.007
88. An on-demand construction method of disaster scenes for multilevel users W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03879-z
89. A knowledge-guided visualization framework of disaster scenes for helping the public cognize risk information J. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2023.2298299
90. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: a contribution to the socio-hydrology debate S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
91. Spatial counterfactuals to explore disastrous flooding B. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad22b9
92. Fluoride contamination of groundwater resources in Ghana: Country-wide hazard modeling and estimated population at risk D. Araya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118083
93. What Role for Public Participation in Implementing the EU Floods Directive? A Comparison With the Water Framework Directive, Early Evidence from Germany and a Research Agenda J. Newig et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1650
94. Moving to 3-D flood hazard maps for enhancing risk communication F. Macchione et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.005
95. Towards personalised public warnings: harnessing technological advancements to promote better individual decision-making in the face of disasters Y. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2017.1302007
96. The Influence of Hazard Maps and Trust of Flood Controls on Coastal Flood Spatial Awareness and Risk Perception D. Houston et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517748711
97. Creating effective flood warnings: A framework from a critical review M. Kuller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126708
98. Implications of Simulating Global Digital Elevation Models for Flood Inundation Studies L. Hawker et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023279
99. Volcanic hazard map visualisation affects cognition and crisis decision-making M. Thompson Clive et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102102
100. Difficulties in explaining complex issues with maps: evaluating seismic hazard communication – the Swiss case M. Marti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2677-2019
101. The impact of flood action groups on the uptake of flood management measures R. Dittrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1752-8
102. Applying systems thinking to flood disaster management for a sustainable development J. Rehman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101101
103. Participatory and User-Centered Design for Hazard Mapping: A Case Study from Achoma, Peru C. Grady et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2024.2355171
104. A generic physical vulnerability model for floods: review and concept for data-scarce regions M. Malgwi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2067-2020
105. Rethinking flood risk communication E. Rollason et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3273-4