124 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Effects of artificial barriers on the propagation of debris avalanches S. Cuomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01155-1
2. Dissipative effects of baffles on the dynamics of debris flow and its impact on downstream structure T. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107246
3. Modelling the impact of landslides on geosyntethics-reinforced barrier using DEM-FDM analyses S. Cuomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1260/1/012035
4. A time-independent reliability based design approach for debris flow flexible barriers M. Marchelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341507010
5. A new flow-path energy-based approach for the preliminary design of debris flow risk mitigation measures: the real case of Favazzina M. Pisano et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2024-0709
6. Quantifying the transition of impact mechanisms of geophysical flows against flexible barrier Y. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106188
7. Experimental tests for the application of an analytical model for flexible debris flow barrier design A. Ferrero et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.12.002
8. Flume investigation of the influence of rigid barrier deflector angle on dry granular overflow mechanisms C. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0248
9. Overview: Documentation and monitoring of landslides and debris flows for mathematical modelling and design of mitigation measures – outcomes of the EGU 2011, NH session L. Franzi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2013-2013
10. Impacts on Embankments, Rigid and Flexible Barriers Against Rockslides: Model Experiments vs. DEM Simulations S. Berger et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03721-5
11. Regulation effect of the grille spacing of a funnel-type grating water–sediment separation structure on the debris flow performance S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-024-8604-1
12. Mechanical, Degradation, and Impact Resistance of a Sustainable Coir Geotextile Composite Barrier for Landslide Mitigation H. Nelson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10020089
13. Impact dynamics of granular flow on rigid barriers: insights from numerical investigation using material point method F. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-024-9032-y
14. Numerical estimation of debris flow impact pressure on barriers using Froude number-based empirical coefficient C. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108259
15. Experimental study on the structural parameters of an optimized sloping roof grill barrier for the prevention of debris flows in Yanmen gully R. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105751
16. Laboratory tests for the optimization of mesh size for flexible debris-flow barriers C. Wendeler & A. Volkwein https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2597-2015
17. Control and Interception Characteristics of the Debris-Flow Flexible Net Barrier Based on Orthogonal Design Z. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15101809
18. The Effect of Entrainment Model on Debris-Flow Simulation—Comparison of Two Simple 1D Models S. Eu & S. Im https://doi.org/10.3390/w17050761
19. Numerical Simulation of Granular Flow Obstruction by the Rigid Actively Moving Netting Barrier C. Ma & Y. Fan https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-025-03171-6
20. Numerical simulation of mud-flows impacting structures M. Greco et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5279-5
21. Impact mechanisms of granular and viscous flows on rigid and flexible barriers C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0128
22. Progressive damage processes and quantitative vulnerability assessment of buildings under debris flow and mudflow impacts B. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121113
23. Experimental and numerical study of dynamic soil debris impact load on reinforced concrete debris-resisting barriers H. Lam & A. Wong https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01529-w
24. Quantitative analysis of artificial dam failure effects on debris flows – A case study of the Zhouqu ‘8.8’ debris flow in northwestern China Y. Chong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148439
25. Quantifying the impact of a debris avalanche against a flexible barrier by coupled DEM-FEM analyses C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01267-8
26. A Case Study on the Energy Capacity of a Flexible Rockfall Barrier in Resisting Landslide Debris L. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091384
27. Longitudinal spreading of granular flow in trapezoidal channels C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.04.016
28. Dynamical evolution properties of debris flows controlled by different mesh-sized flexible net barriers M. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3786-x
29. Effect of slit size on the impact load against debris-flow mitigation dams H. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105764
30. Experimental and numerical investigation of debris flow interception using multiple stepped flexible barriers F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2024.2373112
31. New Simple Method for Calculating Impact Force on Flexible Barrier Considering Partial Muddy Debris Flow Passing Through D. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002133
32. Dry granular masses impacting on rigid obstacles: numerical analysis and theoretical modelling I. Redaelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01337-z
33. Studies on passive flexible protection to resist landslides caused by the May 12, 2008, Wenchuan earthquake C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1372
34. Characteristics of debris flow impact on a double-row slit dam Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-022-7462-y
35. Numerical study on the damage evaluation of a check dam under boulder-enriched debris flow impact W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108479
36. Assessing strategies to mitigate debris-flow risk in Abancay province, south-central Peruvian Andes C. Rodríguez-Morata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.06.012
37. Analysis on the mechanical properties of the crossbeam of a new ground anchor counterfort grille dam considering bearings displacement Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105867
38. A New Approach to Debris Flow Study S. Bosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/603/3/032068
39. Debris flow hazard mitigation: A simplified analytical model for the design of flexible barriers R. Brighenti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.05.010
40. Probabilistic Analyses of Root-Reinforced Slopes Using Monte Carlo Simulation M. Pisano & G. Cardile https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13030075
41. Application and design of an efficient siphon dewatering system for debris flow mitigation: A case study of a small catchment in Zhejiang Province, China Z. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.06.004
42. 3D-SPH-DEM coupling simulation for the large deformation failure process of check dams under debris flow impact incorporating the nonlinear collision-constraint bond model Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.105877
43. Structural Performance Evaluation and Field Validation of Reinforced Masonry Walls for Slope Failure Mitigation Y. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2025.25.5.153
44. Deformation mechanisms of deformable geosynthetics-reinforced barriers (DGRB) impacted by debris avalanches S. Cuomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01589-w
45. Estado del arte sobre el impacto de deslizamientos de suelo y roca en puentes M. Canales Alvarado & J. Salazar Garrido https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.rdp.2020.1.02
46. Calculation of the separation grid design length in a new water–sediment separation structure for debris flow defense T. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0726-9
47. Research on the distribution of debris flow impact on the upstream surface of the check dam X. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76558-9
48. Experimental Study on Performance of Frame Structure Strengthened with Foamed Aluminum under Debris Flow Impact Z. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001403
49. Dynamic analysis of coupled train–track–bridge system subjected to debris flow impact X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433218785643
50. Efficient intensity measures for vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings under flow-type and slow to moderately moving landslides M. Kulariya & S. Saha https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107267
51. Material point method (MPM) hydro-mechanical modelling of flows impacting rigid walls S. Cuomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0344
52. Laboratory investigation of performance of a screen type debris-flow countermeasure A. Yifru et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023697X.2018.1462104
53. Load model for designing flexible steel barriers for debris flow mitigation C. Wendeler et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0157
54. Interaction of a dam-break wave with an obstacle over an erodible floodplain C. Di Cristo et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2019.014
55. Translational Inertial Effects and Scaling Considerations for Coarse Granular Flows Impacting Landslide-Resisting Barriers S. Goodwin & C. Choi https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002661
56. Empirical formulation for debris flow impact and energy release A. Di Perna et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-022-00210-9
57. INVESTIGATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE AND LOAD TRANSFER MECHANISMS OF FLEXIBLE BARRIER IN SMALL TORRENTS Y. MIYAHARA & T. HORIGUCHI https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.25-00225
58. Particle–Fluid–Structure Interaction for Debris Flow Impact on Flexible Barriers A. Leonardi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12165
59. A depth-averaged SPH study on spreading mechanisms of geophysical flows in debris basins: Implications for terminal barrier design requirements S. Goodwin & C. Choi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104503
60. Experimental and numerical study on the load and deformation mechanism of a flexible net barrier under debris flow impact R. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01692-y
61. Model Experiment Exploration of the Kinetic Dissipation Effect on the Slit Dam with Baffles Tilted in the Downstream Direction Y. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14182772
62. Assessing Granular Debris-Flow Impact Forces on Bridge Superstructures C. Friedl et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6439
63. Analytical and numerical models of debris flow impact S. Cuomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106818
64. Capture of near-critical debris flows by flexible barriers: an experimental investigation M. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4115-2025
65. Large-scale physical modelling study of a flexible barrier under the impact of granular flows D. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2625-2018
66. A comprehensive approach for understanding debris flow interaction with pipelines through dynamic impact pressure modeling M. Ali Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108383
67. Studies of Flexible Barriers Under Debris Flow Impact: An Application to an Alpine Basin F. Vagnon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2015.08.041
68. The quantitative estimation of the vulnerability of brick and concrete wall impacted by an experimental boulder J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-299-2016
69. Experimental study of viscous debris flow characteristics in drainage channel with oblique symmetrical sills T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.024
70. GIS-Based Three-Dimensional SPH Simulation for the 11 April 2018 Yabakei Landslide at Oita Nakatsu, Japan Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13213012
71. Mudline interpretation for superelevation-based velocity estimation: A perspective for practical applications A. Åberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108815
72. Experimental Study on Dynamic Performance of Tubular Flange Grid-Type Dam under Impact Load X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071486
73. Investigation of influence of an obstacle on granular flows by virtue of a depth-integrated theory X. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2020.06.014
74. Estimating total resisting force in flexible barrier impacted by a granular avalanche using physical and numerical modeling W. Ashwood & O. Hungr https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0481
75. An Equivalent Stiffness Flexible Barrier for Protection Against Boulders Transported by Debris Flow S. Sha et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00914-5
76. Multiscale numerical approach to assess impact forces on cylindrical barriers by debris flows W. Jang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107605
77. Effects of a flexible net barrier on the dynamic behaviours and interception of debris flows in mountainous areas M. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4373-4
78. Debris flow impact on a flexible barrier: laboratory flume experiments and force-based mechanical model validation R. Brighenti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04489-5
79. Interaction between granular flows and flexible obstacles: A grain-scale investigation C. Choi & S. Goodwin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103800
80. Progressive failure of buildings under landslide impact H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01164-0
81. A novel dynamic impact pressure model of debris flows and its application on reliability analysis of the rock mass surrounding tunnels X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105694
82. Effect of Uncertainty in Geotechnical and Flow Parameters on Landslide-induced Force for Building Response Analysis Under Flow-type Landslides Using Uncoupled Approach M. Kulariya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-01074-6
83. Effectiveness of debris flow mitigation measures through T-spherical fuzzy Soft Dombi aggregation operators with EDAS-based multi-criteria decision making in mountainous regions H. Dhumras et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2025.100968
84. Analysis of the load exerted by debris flows on filter barriers: Comparison between numerical results and field measurements A. Leonardi & M. Pirulli https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103311
85. A simple method to evaluate the performance of an intercept dam for debris-flow mitigation W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105771
86. Dynamic Response of Granular Flows on a Rigid Barrier: Dense versus Dilute Flow Z. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002421
87. On the efficiency of slit-check dams in retaining granular flows M. Marchelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.044
88. Spatio-Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Debris Flow Impact Pressure and Impact Velocity on the Check Dam Upstream Surface X. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01662-2
89. Earth Pressure Buildup in Impacting Earth Flow behind a Barrier H. Luo & L. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001567
90. Reliability-based vulnerability analysis of bridge pier subjected to debris flow impact H. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2074468
91. Study on hydraulic characteristics of sabo dam with a flap structure for debris flow Y. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2017.05.001
92. Challenges and perspectives in designing engineering structures against debris-flow disaster Y. Huang & B. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1854126
93. Experimental study on a debris flow water-sediment separation structure of a funnel-type grating and its sorting characteristics S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03160-0
94. Experimental study of the viscoplastic dambreak wave dynamics and the impact force exerted on rigid structures S. Martínez-Aranda et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0293276
95. Experimental analysis on impact load of flash flood against a passable structure S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287848
96. Froude characteristics of both dense granular and water flows in flume modelling C. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0628-8
97. Practical guide for debris flow and hillslope debris flow protection nets and its application in case studies N. Feiger et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341507006
98. Performance of debris flow barriers: an energy perspective H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-024-02430-9
99. Debris flow impact estimation on a rigid barrier F. Vagnon & A. Segalini https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1691-2016
100. Preliminary Study on the Damping Effect of a Lateral Damping Buffer under a Debris Flow Load Z. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7020201
101. Small-Scale Modeling of Flexible Barriers. I: Mechanical Similitude of the Structure S. Lambert et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-13070
102. Application of artificial step-pools in natural hazard mitigation K. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106658
103. A unified CFD‐DEM approach for modeling of debris flow impacts on flexible barriers D. Felix et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2806
104. Debris flow amplification in a moraine terrace and related engineering measures in the Zongzhai Valley, Southeastern Tibetan Plateau M. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1508507
105. Design of active debris flow mitigation measures: a comprehensive analysis of existing impact models F. Vagnon https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01278-5
106. New light-weight concrete foam to absorb debris-flow-entrained boulder impact: Large-scale pendulum modelling Y. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105724
107. Experimental validation of a new semi-empirical impact force model of the dry granular flow impact against a rigid barrier Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01555-8
108. Finite-Element Model of Impact Loading and Deformation of a Flexible Steel Ring-Net Debris-Flow Barrier A. Debelak et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000392
109. Comparison of depth-averaged and 3D models for dense granular flows A. Pasqua et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012101
110. A Factor Strength Approach for the Design of Rock Fall and Debris Flow Barriers F. Vagnon et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0269-x
111. Lahars and debris flows: Characteristics and impacts J. Thouret et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.103003
112. Coupling Depth-Averaged and 3D numerical models for the simulation of granular flows A. Pasqua et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104879
113. Prediction of impact force of debris flows based on distribution and size of particles S. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5180-2
114. Study on dynamic loading effects and disaster mitigation performance of open-type check dams B. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04473-y
115. Failure analysis of a transmission tower by non-Newtonian debris flow impact with user-defined SPH particles and finite elements D. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107183
116. Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debris-barrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio D. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5314-6
117. Impact of barrier configurations on flow mitigation and barrier interaction at fixed porosity: Water floods and viscoplastic debris flows in complex terrain G. Kefayati et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0313196
118. The normal impact stiffness of a debris-flow flexible barrier M. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30664-2
119. Multi-hazard performance evaluation of hillside buildings under earthquakes and landslides M. Kulariya & S. Saha https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.22.00132
120. Impact of Debris Flows on Filter Barriers: Analysis Based on Site Monitoring Data A. Leonardi et al. https://doi.org/10.2113/EEG-D-20-00013
121. Impacts and depositional behaviors of debris flows on natural boulder-negative Poisson's ratio anchor cable baffles F. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.03.027
122. Dendrogeomorphic reconstruction of flash floods in the Patagonian Andes A. Casteller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.08.022
123. Role of baffle shape on debris flow impact in step-pool channel: an SPH study S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01410-w
124. An experimental study of dilute debris flow characteristics in a drainage channel with an energy dissipation structure J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.004