71 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Predicting the Initiation Area of a Debris Flow Using Geomorphological Characteristics and a Physically-Based Model C. Song et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2021.21.2.137
2. Debris Flow Assessment in the Gaizi-Bulunkou Section of Karakoram Highway N. Jiang et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.660579
3. The MultiRISK platform: The technical concept and application of a regional-scale multihazard exposure analysis tool M. Kappes et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.01.024
4. Geohazard vulnerability assessment in Qiaojia seismic zones, SW China Z. Gao et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101928
5. La simulation comme outil d’anticipation des crues rapides dans les petits bassins versants en Seine-Maritime J. Douvinet et al. 10.3166/RIG.25.99-122
6. A Novel Multi-Risk Assessment Web-Tool for Evaluating Future Impacts of Global Change in Mountainous Areas G. Grandjean et al. 10.3390/cli6040092
7. Cartographie régionale de la susceptibilité aux laves torrentielles dans les Alpes du Sud M. Bertrand et al. 10.4000/rga.3530
8. A landscape scale model to predict post-fire debris flow impact zones T. Keeble et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109175
9. Assessment of landslide age, landslide persistence and human impact using airborne laser scanning digital terrain models R. Bell et al. 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2012.00454.x
10. Coupled model for simulation of landslides and debris flows at local scale D. Park et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2150-2
11. Estimating the Future Function of the Nipsa Reservoir due to Climate Change and Debris Sediment Factors F. Maris et al. 10.3390/cli7060076
12. Flash Flood Hazard Assessment in Small Agricultural Basins Coupling GIS-Data and Cellular Automata Modelling J. Douvinet 10.4018/ijaeis.2014010104
13. Robustness evaluation of the probability-based HTCA model for simulating debris-flow run-out extent: Case study of the 2010 Hongchun event, China Y. Ma et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106918
14. Simulation of event-based landslides and debris flows at watershed level S. Chiang et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.09.016
15. ASCHFLOW - A dynamic landslide run-out model for medium scale hazard analysis B. Quan Luna et al. 10.1186/s40677-016-0064-7
16. Regional Scale Mapping of Debris-Flow Susceptibility in the Southern French Alps M. Bertrand et al. 10.4000/rga.3543
17. Landslide consequence analysis: a region-scale indicator-based methodology A. Puissant et al. 10.1007/s10346-013-0429-x
18. A statistical framework for tree‐ring reconstruction of high‐magnitude mass movements: case study of snow avalanches in eastern canada D. Germain 10.1111/geoa.12138
19. Debris Flow Susceptibility Assessment in the Wudongde Dam Area, China Based on Rock Engineering System and Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm Y. Li et al. 10.3390/w9090669
20. Estimating the topographic predictability of debris flows N. Meyer et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.10.030
21. Application of Machine Learning to Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping along the China–Pakistan Karakoram Highway F. Qing et al. 10.3390/rs12182933
22. Material sources supplying debris flows in Jiangjia Gully T. Xiafei et al. 10.1007/s12665-020-09020-4
23. Risk Assessment of Debris Flow at Regional Scale considering Catchment Area in Chuncheon, Korea G. Choi et al. 10.1007/s12205-021-0136-4
24. Parameter Analysis of Flow-R Model for Physical Vulnerability Assessment of Debris Flow Disaster in Regional Scale H. Kang & Y. Kim 10.9798/KOSHAM.2017.17.4.233
25. Mapping debris flow susceptibility based on watershed unit and grid cell unit: a comparison study S. Qin et al. 10.1080/19475705.2019.1604572
26. Susceptibility assessment of debris flow from Baoxing River basin in Lushan earthquake zone, China L. Liu et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/861/5/052010
27. Analysis and quantification of potential consequences in multirisk coastal context at different spatial scales (Normandy, France) K. Graff et al. 10.1007/s11069-019-03763-5
28. Temporal Characteristics of Debris Flow Surges J. Zhang et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.660655
29. Flow-R, a model for susceptibility mapping of debris flows and other gravitational hazards at a regional scale P. Horton et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-869-2013
30. Regional vulnerability assessment for debris flows in China—a CWS approach M. Ding et al. 10.1007/s10346-015-0578-1
31. Integrating expert opinion with modelling for quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment in the Eastern Italian Alps L. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.041
32. Debris flow susceptibility assessment of Leh Valley, Ladakh, based on concepts of connectivity, propagation and evidence-based probability C. Sharma et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05619-x
33. GIS-based numerical modelling of debris flow motion across three-dimensional terrain J. Wu et al. 10.1007/s11629-013-2486-y
34. Dynamic hazard assessment of debris flow based on TRIGRS and flow-R coupled models Y. Nie et al. 10.1007/s00477-021-02093-y
35. Regional debris flow susceptibility analysis in mountainous peri-urban areas through morphometric and land cover indicators M. Rogelis & M. Werner 10.5194/nhess-14-3043-2014
36. Exploring the impact of introducing a physical model into statistical methods on the evaluation of regional scale debris flow susceptibility J. Sun et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-04498-4
37. Physically-based modelling of granular flows with Open Source GIS M. Mergili et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-187-2012
38. A multivariate statistical method for susceptibility analysis of debris flow in southwestern China F. Ji et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-1321-2020
39. Debris Flow Susceptibility Evaluation in Meizoseismal Region: A Case Study in Jiuzhaigou, China Y. Li et al. 10.1007/s12583-022-1803-1
40. Susceptibility assessment of soil-water hazard chain on a small catchment in gully region of Loess Plateau: Implications for artificially-induced mountaintop removal filling valley and geoheritage H. Shu & F. Zhang 10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108949
41. Debris-Flow and Debris-Flood Susceptibility Mapping for Geohazard Risk Prioritization M. Sturzenegger et al. 10.2113/EEG-D-20-00006
42. Sample size matters: investigating the effect of sample size on a logistic regression susceptibility model for debris flows T. Heckmann et al. 10.5194/nhess-14-259-2014
43. Characterization of elements at risk in the multirisk coastal context and at different spatial scales: Multi-database integration (normandy, France). K. Graff et al. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102076
44. Assessment of exposed elements in a changing built environment by using an integrated model of debris flow initiation and runout (Kalimpong region, Himalaya) S. Bera et al. 10.1007/s10064-021-02352-w
45. Identification and characterization of rainfall events responsible for triggering of debris flows and shallow landslides C. Iadanza et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.018
46. Parameterization of a numerical 2-D debris flow model with entrainment: a case study of the Faucon catchment, Southern French Alps H. Hussin et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-3075-2012
47. Modelling post‐earthquake cascading hazards: Changing patterns of landslide runout following the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal M. Kincey et al. 10.1002/esp.5501
48. Debris flow susceptibility assessment based on an empirical approach in the central region of South Korea S. Kang & S. Lee 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.01.025
49. Regional rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence using a centenary database T. Vaz et al. 10.5194/nhess-18-1037-2018
50. Groundwater Overexploitation Causing Land Subsidence: Hazard Risk Assessment Using Field Observation and Spatial Modelling B. Huang et al. 10.1007/s11269-012-0141-y
51. Landslide initiation and runout susceptibility modeling in the context of hill cutting and rapid urbanization: a combined approach of weights of evidence and spatial multi-criteria M. Rahman et al. 10.1007/s11629-016-4220-z
52. Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods R. Melo & J. Zêzere 10.1007/s11069-017-2921-4
53. Combining stratigraphic forward modeling and susceptibility mapping to investigate the origin and evolution of submarine canyons L. Wan et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.108047
54. Quantitative Assessment of Regional Debris-Flow Risk: A Case Study in Southwest China G. Liu et al. 10.3390/su10072223
55. Morphometry and Debris-Flow Susceptibility Map in Mountain Drainage Basins of the Vallo di Diano, Southern Italy S. Giano et al. 10.3390/rs13163254
56. Hydrodynamic and topography based cellular automaton model for simulating debris flow run-out extent and entrainment behavior Z. Han et al. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116872
57. Assessing Susceptibility of Debris Flow in Southwest China Using Gradient Boosting Machine B. Di et al. 10.1038/s41598-019-48986-5
58. Establishing a GIS-based evaluation method considering spatial heterogeneity for debris flow susceptibility mapping at the regional scale S. Qin et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05487-5
59. Assessment of rainfall-generated shallow landslide/debris-flow susceptibility and runout using a GIS-based approach: application to western Southern Alps of New Zealand T. Kritikos & T. Davies 10.1007/s10346-014-0533-6
60. Identification of landslide hazard and risk ‘hotspots’ in Europe C. Jaedicke et al. 10.1007/s10064-013-0541-0
61. Debris-Flow Susceptibility Assessment in China: A Comparison between Traditional Statistical and Machine Learning Methods H. Huang et al. 10.3390/rs14184475
62. Semi-quantitative method to identify the vulnerable areas in terms of building aggregation for probable landslide runout at the regional scale: a case study from Soacha Province, Colombia A. Pradhan et al. 10.1007/s10064-019-01533-y
63. A flash flood hazard assessment in dry valleys (northern France) by cellular automata modelling J. Douvinet et al. 10.1007/s11069-014-1470-3
64. Regional-scale landslide risk assessment on Mt. Umyeon using risk index estimation B. Nguyen & Y. Kim 10.1007/s10346-021-01622-8
65. Debris flow susceptibility mapping in alpine canyon region: a case study of Nujiang Prefecture Y. Li et al. 10.1007/s10064-024-03657-2
66. Modeling the flow behavior of a simulated municipal solid waste Z. Dai et al. 10.1007/s10064-015-0735-8
67. Debris flows modeling using geo-environmental factors: developing hybridized deep-learning algorithms Y. Li et al. 10.1080/10106049.2021.1912194
68. Comparison of Conventional Deterministic and Entropy-Based Methods for Predicting Sediment Concentration in Debris Flow Z. Zhu et al. 10.3390/w11030439
69. Stochastic generation of multi-site daily precipitation for applications in risk management K. Breinl et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.015
70. On the criteria to create a susceptibility map to debris flow at a regional scale using Flow-R R. Pastorello et al. 10.1007/s11629-016-4077-1
71. Correlation between the rainfall, sediment recharge, and triggering of torrential flows in the Rebaixader catchment (Pyrenees, Spain) R. Pastorello et al. 10.1007/s10346-018-1000-6