83 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Assessment of flood loss model transferability considering changes in precaution of flood-affected residents in Germany S. Kienzler et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160713002
2. Investigating resilience barriers of small and medium-sized enterprises to flash floods: a quantile regression of determining factors G. Halkos & A. Skouloudis https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1596782
3. River flood risk in Jakarta under scenarios of future change Y. Budiyono et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-757-2016
4. Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009
5. The determinants affecting the intention of urban residents to prepare for flood risk in China T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2185-2022
6. The 2011 flood event in the Mekong Delta: preparedness, response, damage and recovery of private households and small businesses D. Chinh et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12171
7. Adaptation strategies of flood-damaged businesses in Germany B. Wutzler et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.932061
8. An online survey analysis of coastal flood recovery aided by resident mitigation behavior E. Cass et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07357-2
9. Implementation of property‐level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures: Choices and decisions M. Attems et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1404
10. Analysing the Effects of Flood-Resilience Technologies in Urban Areas Using a Synthetic Model Approach R. Schinke et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5110202
11. The future orientation of Austria’s flood policies: from flood control to anticipatory flood risk management R. Nordbeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1515731
12. Resilient Built Environment: An Overview on Design Strategies for Coastal Adaptation to Sea Level Rise F. Soflaei et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2972426026500017
13. The determinants of households' flood mitigation decisions in France - on the possibility of feedback effects from past investments C. Richert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.014
14. The safe development paradox: An agent-based model for flood risk under climate change in the European Union T. Haer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102009
15. Explaining Changes in Threat Appraisal, Coping Appraisal, and Flood Risk-Reducing Behavior Using Panel Data From a Nation-Wide Survey in Germany P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165231176069
16. Review article: Assessing the costs of natural hazards – state of the art and knowledge gaps V. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
17. Effects of government flood expenditures: the problem of crowding‐out L. Slavikova https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12265
18. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: a contribution to the socio-hydrology debate S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
19. Cost–benefit analysis of flood‐zoning policies: A review of current practice P. Hudson & W. Botzen https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1387
20. Investigating moral hazard and property-level flood resilience measures through panel data from Germany P. Hudson & L. Berghäuser https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103480
21. Property-level adaptation to pluvial flooding: An analysis of individual behaviour and risk communication material L. Dillenardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10148-y
22. Increasing flood risk under climate change: a pan-European assessment of the benefits of four adaptation strategies L. Alfieri et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1641-1
23. Accounting public and individual flood protection measures in damage assessment: A novel approach for quantitative assessment of vulnerability and flood risk associated with local engineering adaptation options B. Rehan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.061
24. Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas H. Cammerer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3063-2013
25. Quantifying Flood Vulnerability Reduction via Private Precaution N. Sairam et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000994
26. Integrating Household Risk Mitigation Behavior in Flood Risk Analysis: An Agent‐Based Model Approach T. Haer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12740
27. The determinants of private flood mitigation measures in Germany — Evidence from a nationwide survey D. Osberghaus https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.010
28. Economic Assessment of Mitigating Damage of Flood Events: Cost–Benefit Analysis of Flood-Proofing Commercial Buildings in Umbria, Italy W. Botzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-017-0065-0
29. Neglecting uncertainties biases house-elevation decisions to manage riverine flood risks M. Zarekarizi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19188-9
30. Appraising investments in Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR): A systematic literature review T. Weerasinghe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100438
31. Long-Term Improvement in Precautions for Flood Risk Mitigation: A Case Study in the Low-Lying Area of Central Vietnam C. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00326-2
32. Flood insurance rate map for non-structural mitigation R. Roslan et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197603002
33. Needed: A systems approach to improve flood risk mitigation through private precautionary measures M. Barendrecht et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100080
34. Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries I. Seifert-Dähnn https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2409-2018
35. The effects of tailor-made flood risk advice for homeowners in Flanders, Belgium P. Davids et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1614251
36. Conceptualising risk communication barriers to household flood preparedness W. Forsyth et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.02.001
37. Stimulating flood damage mitigation through insurance: an assessment of the French CatNat system J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2013.832650
38. Toward an adequate level of detail in flood risk assessments T. Sieg et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12889
39. The Costing of Measures for Natural Hazard Mitigation in Europe L. Bouwer et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000133
40. Individual flood risk adaptation in Germany: exploring the role of different types of flooding L. Dillenardt & A. Thieken https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3257-2025
41. Long-term development and effectiveness of private flood mitigation measures: an analysis for the German part of the river Rhine P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3507-2012
42. Preface: Flood-risk analysis and integrated management P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1005-2016
43. Economic assessment of precautionary measures against floods: insights from a non-contextual approach C. Richert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2525-2019
44. A Review of Cost Estimates for Flood Adaptation J. Aerts https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111646
45. Drivers of Farm Households’ Perceived Risk Sources and Factors Affecting Uptake of Mitigation Strategies in Punjab Pakistan: Implications for Sustainable Agriculture M. Iqbal et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239895
46. An Overview of Flood Concepts, Challenges, and Future Directions A. Mishra et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002164
47. Evaluating the effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures by the application of propensity score matching P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1731-2014
48. Capturing flood-risk dynamics with a coupled agent-based and hydraulic modelling framework T. Michaelis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1750617
49. Effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures: Empirical evidence from French flood disasters J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.007
50. Adapting to flood risk under climate change R. Wilby & R. Keenan https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312438908
51. Urban pluvial flood adaptation: Results of a household survey across four German municipalities L. Dillenardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12748
52. Measuring impacts of extreme weather events using the life satisfaction approach C. von Möllendorff & J. Hirschfeld https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.013
53. Risk reduction in compulsory disaster insurance: Experimental evidence on moral hazard and financial incentives J. Mol et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.101500
54. A Comparison of Factors Driving Flood Losses in Households Affected by Different Flood Types G. Mohor et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025943
55. Analyses of community willingness-to-pay and the influencing factors towards restoration of River Malaba floodplains A. Mubialiwo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100160
56. The impact of flood action groups on the uptake of flood management measures R. Dittrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1752-8
57. Potential of semi-structural and non-structural adaptation strategies to reduce future flood risk: case study for the Meuse J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3455-2012
58. A micro-scale cost-benefit analysis of building-level flood risk adaptation measures in Los Angeles L. de Ruig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2019.100147
59. Do flood risk perceptions provide useful insights for flood risk management? Findings from central Vietnam P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01151.x
60. Coping with Pluvial Floods by Private Households V. Rözer et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8070304
61. Factors Affecting Farmers’ Adoption of Flood Adaptation Strategies Using Structural Equation Modeling M. Faruk & K. Maharjan https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193080
62. A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9629-5
63. Probabilistic, Multivariable Flood Loss Modeling on the Mesoscale with BT‐FLEMO H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12650
64. Willingness of households to reduce flood risk in southern France V. Champonnois & K. Erdlenbruch https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12696
65. The flood of June 2013 in Germany: how much do we know about its impacts? A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1519-2016
66. Climate-resilient systems prioritisation index: a spatial framework for multi-hazard mitigation via nature-based solutions K. Tzavella et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2026.2666223
67. Incentivising flood risk adaptation through risk based insurance premiums: Trade-offs between affordability and risk reduction P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.015
68. Flood management in the built environment: the micro-scale contribution to a distributed strategy F. Vanelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1402/1/012012
69. Adoption of Individual Flood Damage Mitigation Measures in New York City: An Extension of Protection Motivation Theory W. Botzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13318
70. The Role of Information and Dissemination Activities in Enhancing People’s Willingness to Implement Natural Water Retention Measures F. Pagliacci et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213437
71. Insurance, Public Assistance, and Household Flood Risk Reduction: A Comparative Study of Austria, England, and Romania S. Hanger et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12881
72. Hard or soft flood adaptation? Advantages of a hybrid strategy for Shanghai S. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102037
73. Factors affecting flood insurance purchase in residential properties in Johor, Malaysia U. Aliagha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-3297-2014
74. Factors for Self-Protective Behavior against Extreme Weather Events in the Philippines J. Werg et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156010
75. Assessing social capacity and vulnerability of private households to natural hazards – integrating psychological and governance factors J. Werg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1613-2013
76. Does government intervention moderate the flood risk, flood risk perceptions, and moral hazard of Malaysian household risk financing decisions? S. Tan & Z. Ghazali https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2698289
77. High-resolution approach to quantify the impact of building-level flood risk mitigation and adaptation measures on flood losses at the community-level O. Nofal & J. van de Lindt https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101903
78. Private Hochwasservorsorge und Elementarschadenversicherung D. Osberghaus & A. Philippi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-016-0341-2
79. The Value of Empirical Data for Estimating the Parameters of a Sociohydrological Flood Risk Model M. Barendrecht et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024128
80. The Affordability of Flood Risk Property‐Level Adaptation Measures P. Hudson https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13465
81. The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications C. Kuhlicke et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1418
82. Flood risk management in Austria: Analysing the shift in responsibility-sharing between public and private actors from a public stakeholder's perspective M. Rauter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105017
83. Participatory adaptation to climate extremes: an assessment of households’ willingness to contribute labor for flood risk mitigation in Pakistan A. Abbas et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2016.002