98 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Predicting financial losses due to apartment construction accidents utilizing deep learning techniques J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09453-w
2. A State-of-the-Art Review on Metallic Hysteretic Dampers: Design, Materials, Advanced Modeling, and Future Challenges Á. Gómez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16020161
3. Design and Implementation of an Open-Source Web-Based GIS System for Early Earthquake Damage Estimation in Lima, Peru I. Inocente et al. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2025.p1034
4. Exploring representativeness and reliability for late medieval earthquakes in Europe P. Forlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2502-y
5. Development of Model to Predict Natural Disaster-Induced Financial Losses for Construction Projects Using Deep Learning Techniques J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095304
6. Open space suitability analysis for emergency shelter after an earthquake J. Anhorn & B. Khazai https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-789-2015
7. A composite database of casualty-inducing earthquakes in mainland China C. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05811-z
8. Seismic vulnerability of a pre-code, reinforced concrete, apartment-block building S. Parizat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-02054-0
9. Mapping the Intellectual Landscape of Urban Earthquake Resilience: A Scientometric and Qualitative Synthesis toward Sustainable Cities Y. Eminoğlu et al. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1758583
10. Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks F. Parisi & N. Augenti https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.005
11. A multi-disciplinary analysis of the exceptional flood event of July 2021 in central Europe – Part 1: Event description and analysis S. Mohr et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-525-2023
12. A Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone Areas C. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00385-z
13. Global occurrence models for human and economic losses due to earthquakes (1967–2018) considering exposed GDP and population C. Dollet & P. Guéguen https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04950-z
14. A spatio-temporal model for probabilistic seismic hazard zonation of Tehran M. Hashemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.04.005
15. High school students’ perceptions of earthquake disaster: A comparative study of Lebanon and Turkey H. Baytiyeh & A. Öcal https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.004
16. EM-DAT: the Emergency Events Database D. Delforge et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105509
17. Developing and testing the Automated Post-Event Earthquake Loss Estimation and Visualisation (APE-ELEV) technique A. Astoul et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9495-7
18. Stochastic coupled simulation of strong motion and tsunami for the 2011 Tohoku, Japan earthquake K. Goda et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1352-1
19. The Cascadia Region Earthquake Science Center (CRESCENT): Advancing Understanding of Cascadia’s Earthquake Hazards D. Melgar et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220250318
20. A rapid-response earthquake fatality estimation model for mainland China Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102618
21. Observational loss database of typological precast RC buildings damaged after the 2012 Emilia Earthquake L. Praticò et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.227
22. 23 October 2011 Van, Eastern Anatolia, earthquake (M W 7.1) and seismotectonics of Lake Van area M. Utkucu https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-012-9354-z
23. Advancing the measurement of social vulnerability to earthquakes at subnational levels of geography: a contextually valid and robust framework C. Burton & D. Kraemer https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08272-w
24. Case Study of the Application of an Innovative Guide for the Seismic Vulnerability Evaluation of Schools Located in Sangolquí, Interandean Valley in Ecuador K. Ballesteros-Salazar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091471
25. TÜRKİYE AFET YÖNETİMİNDE KRİTİK BİLEŞEN NATECH: DEPREMLERİN TETİKLEDİĞİ ENDÜSTRİYEL KAZALAR B. Türkcan https://doi.org/10.56524/msydergi.1533555
26. Seismotectonic Framework of Afghanistan: an Integrated Review of Geology, Active Tectonics, and Crustal Structure Using Gravity Data A. Mohammadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-025-03904-x
27. A critical discussion on the earthquake risk mitigation of urban cultural heritage assets R. Maio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.010
28. Pre-disaster planning and preparedness for urban seismic Resilience: Evaluating critical influential factors for temporary shelter site selection E. Anjomshoa & G. Heravi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103478
29. To catch a quake E. Cochran https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04790-9
30. Verification of seismic risk models using observed damages from past earthquake events E. Riga et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01017-5
31. A metaheuristic-based approach for optimizing the allocation of emergency water reservoirs for fire following earthquake suppression A. Tanoumand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105925
32. Failure mechanisms and behaviour of adobe masonry buildings: A case study C. Canditone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107343
33. Die globale Gesundheitsbelastung durch Bauwerksversagen D. Proske https://doi.org/10.1002/bate.201900015
34. Historical Earthquakes and Their Socioeconomic Consequences in China: 1950–2017 X. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122728
35. Occurrence of Local Tsunamis Along the Eastern Coast of the Korean Peninsula Based on Numerical Modeling of Historical Earthquakes T. Ha et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.836168
36. Factors influencing university students' accommodation choices: risk perception, safety, and vulnerability M. Magni et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09675-x
37. Disaster resilience quantification of communities: A risk-based approach S. Marasco et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102778
38. Simplified seismic loss assessment using limit state loss-intensity models A. Orumiyehei & T. Sullivan https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1579
39. Assessing the Risk of Natural Disaster-Induced Losses to Tunnel-Construction Projects Using Empirical Financial-Loss Data from South Korea S. Yum et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198026
40. Trends in flood losses in Europe over the past 150 years D. Paprotny et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04253-1
41. A universal approach for evaluating earthquake safety level based on societal fatality risk H. Tsang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00727-9
42. A Composite Catalog of Damaging Earthquakes for Mainland China Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210090
43. Investigation of seismic damage to existing buildings by using remotely observed images R. Nascimbene https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108282
44. Large scale loss assessment using stick-it model: A comparison with actual cost data M. Gaetani d’Aragona et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107363
45. Sustainability of Civil Structures through the Application of Smart Materials: A Review A. Tabrizikahou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174824
46. Post-earthquake water demand modeling of water distribution systems considering population redistribution H. Miao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104868
47. Strength reduction factors for wind and earthquake effects P. Martinez-Vazquez https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.16.00086
48. Future scenarios for earthquake and flood risk in Eastern Europe and Central Asia R. Murnane et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000481
49. Investigation of superstorm Sandy 2012 in a multi-disciplinary approach M. Kunz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2579-2013
50. Development of Damage Prediction Formula for Natural Disasters Considering Economic Indicators Y. Song & M. Park https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030868
51. Review Article: A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators M. de Ruiter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
52. Losses Associated with Secondary Effects in Earthquakes J. Daniell et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00030
53. Developing Drought Damage Prediction Equation Considering Economic Indicators and Basic Indicators of Asian Countries Y. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2019.19.7.451
54. Databases in geohazard science: An introduction M. Klose et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.029
55. Development of a global seismic risk model V. Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899953
56. Development and implementation of a GIS-based tool for spatial modeling of seismic vulnerability of Tehran M. Hashemi & A. Alesheikh https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3659-2012
57. Coseismic slip in the 2010 Yushu earthquake (China), constrained by wide-swath and strip-map InSAR Y. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-35-2013
58. The 2011 MW 6.8 Burma earthquake: fault constraints provided by multiple SAR techniques W. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt254
59. A database of damaging small-to-medium magnitude earthquakes C. Nievas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09897-0
60. Natural Disasters—Origins, Impacts, Management M. Chaudhary & A. Piracha https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1040084
61. Loss and damage assessment in critical infrastructures due to extreme events A. Urlainis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105587
62. Fluid dynamics, structural, micro-structural, and kinematic analyses on the Kuh-e-Namak (Dashti) salt diapiric rectangular cuboid channel flow, Iran K. Sarkarinejad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2023.106625
63. Time-dependent analysis of aftershock events and structural impacts on intraplate crustal seismicity of the Van earthquake (Mw 7.1, 23 October 2011), E-Anatolia M. Toker https://doi.org/10.2478/s13533-012-0141-8
64. HANZE: a pan-European database of exposure to natural hazards and damaging historical floods since 1870 D. Paprotny et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-565-2018
65. Strategic framework for natural disaster risk mitigation using deep learning and cost-benefit analysis J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2131-2022
66. Economic and Human Loss Empirical Models for Earthquakes in the Mediterranean Region, with Particular Focus on Algeria A. Guettiche et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-017-0153-6
67. Deprem ve konut fiyatları ilişkisi: konutlarda depreme dayanıklılık ekseninde İstanbul ve İzmir analizleri B. TÜRKCAN et al. https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.1338125
68. Multi-hazard and multi-risk decision-support tools as a part of participatory risk governance: Feedback from civil protection stakeholders N. Komendantova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.006
69. 6 Şubat Depremleri’nin Sanayiye Etkileri ve Depremler Sonrası Bölgesel Gelişme Stratejisi B. Türkcan https://doi.org/10.61127/idusos.1779238
70. AI-Driven Post-Earthquake Rapid Structural Damage Assessment: A Scoping Review of Component-Level and Holistic Approaches S. Aydin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-026-10556-0
71. Critical surfaces for adobe masonry: Micromechanical approach A. Caporale et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.087
72. Evaluating the effects of reconstruction of the damaged villages in the 2002 earthquake in Avaj, Iran J. Einali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101373
73. Catastrophes of the 21st Century R. Pielke https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3660542
74. Damage in Critical Infrastructures Due to Natural and Man-made Extreme Events – A Critical Review A. Urlainis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.580
75. The 2013Mw6.2 Khaki‐Shonbe (Iran) Earthquake: Insights into seismic and aseismic shortening of the Zagros sedimentary cover J. Elliott et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015EA000098
76. Earthquake Disaster Fatality Data: Temporally Stable Power Law Behavior and Effects of Underreporting N. Joshi et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230342
77. Are colleges in Lebanon preparing students for future earthquake disasters? H. Baytiyeh & M. Naja https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.10.007
78. Seismic Exposure Modelling of the Romanian Residential Building Stock for (Re)Insurance Applications B. Gheorghe & R. Vacareanu https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16040728
79. Generalising Rescue Operations in Disaster Scenarios Using Drones: A Lifelong Reinforcement Learning Approach J. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9060409
80. Empirical Predictive Modeling Approach to Quantifying Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1823807
81. Estimation of Human Casualties Due to Earthquakes: Overview and Application of Literature Models with Emphasis on Occupancy Rate V. Manfredi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040082
82. Soil-structure interaction effects on out-of-plane seismic response and damage of masonry buildings with shallow foundations F. Silvestri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108403
83. Site Effect Potential in Fond Parisien, in the East of Port-au-Prince, Haiti S. Ulysse et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11040175
84. Seismic risk maps for the seismic risk management and reduction M. Zanini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.039
85. Cascadia Subduction Zone Science: Call for the Next Generation Community Seismic Velocity Model V. Sahakian et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220250448
86. Selection of shelters after earthquake using probabilistic seismic aftershock hazard analysis and remote sensing S. Ommi & M. Janalipour https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05303-0
87. Earthquake Risk Severity and Urgent Need for Disaster Management in Afghanistan N. Akhundzadah https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards6010009
88. A new index-based model for site selection of emergency shelters after an earthquake for Iran K. Amini Hosseini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103110
89. Stochastic event-based probabilistic earthquake risk assessment framework for Uganda: towards informing the National Policy for Disaster preparedness and management M. Oleng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02103-2
90. Numerical study of headed bars in exterior RC beam column joint wrapped with GFRP under cyclic loading B. Sebastin et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7076-rmat-2025-1072
91. Space-Based Earth Observations for Disaster Risk Management G. Le Cozannet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09586-5
92. Climate Calamity in Rio Grande Do Sul: A Comparative Analysis with Previous Disasters N. Machado Pinto et al. https://doi.org/10.37497/eagleSustainable.v16i.628
93. Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards J. Gill & B. Malamud https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000445
94. Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Fatalities in Mainland China Based on Physical Simulation and Empirical Statistics—A Case Study of the 2021 Yangbi Earthquake Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116820
95. The main developments of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering since the early 1700s and the new challenges for a sustainable society C. Oliveira https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01440-w
96. Developing an adaptive global exposure model to support the generation of country disaster risk profiles R. Gunasekera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.012
97. Extreme earthquake loss assessment using spliced marginal distributions and SJC Copula based joint modeling Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2026.2659160
98. Earthquake population loss estimation using spatial modelling and survey data: The Bam earthquake, 2003, Iran R. Hassanzadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.023