164 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Fragility curves for rainfall-induced shallow landslides on transport networks K. Martinović et al. 10.1139/cgj-2016-0565
2. Spatial model integration for shallow landslide susceptibility and its runout using a GIS-based approach in Yongin, Korea A. Pradhan et al. 10.1080/10106049.2016.1155658
3. Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards M. Papathoma-Köhle 10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
4. Multi-hazard vulnerability of buildings to debris flows H. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105859
5. Landslide consequence analysis: a region-scale indicator-based methodology A. Puissant et al. 10.1007/s10346-013-0429-x
6. Impact Force of a Geomorphic Dam-Break Wave against an Obstacle: Effects of Sediment Inertia C. Di Cristo et al. 10.3390/w13020232
7. Reliability-based formulation of building vulnerability to debris flow impacts H. Luo et al. 10.1139/cgj-2020-0120
8. Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties R. Totschnig & S. Fuchs 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.019
9. A new data assimilation procedure to develop a debris flow run-out model L. Brezzi et al. 10.1007/s10346-015-0625-y
10. Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods R. Melo & J. Zêzere 10.1007/s11069-017-2921-4
11. An integrated approach to the study of catastrophic debris-flows: geological hazard and human influence C. Del Ventisette et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-2907-2012
12. A reliability-based approach for the impact vulnerability assessment of bridge piers subjected to debris flows S. Yan et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105567
13. Quantitative micro-scale flood risk assessment in a section of the Trotuș River, Romania R. Țîncu et al. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.040
14. Detailed investigation and analysis of the dynamic evolutionary process of rainstorm debris flows in mountain settlements: a case study of Xiangbizui Gully J. Cai et al. 10.3389/feart.2023.1257440
15. A hazard preparedness plan for a selected stretch of hill road between Kodaikkanal and Palani E. Sujatha 10.1007/s41870-020-00580-z
16. Quantitative assessment of expected direct economic losses of buildings for debris flows in multiple rainfall intensity scenarios in Yangling Gully, Southwest China M. Chen et al. 10.1007/s11069-023-06315-0
17. The seismic microzonation study of Pescara del Tronto (Central Italy) during and after the Central Italy earthquake sequence. M. Amanti et al. 10.1007/s10518-020-00927-8
18. The John Mitchell Lecture 2023: road asset, socio-economic and fatality risk from debris flow M. Winter 10.1144/qjegh2023-167
19. Development of fragility curves for road embankments exposed to perpendicular debris flows N. Nieto et al. 10.1080/19475705.2021.1935330
20. Debris flow damage incurred to buildings: an in situ back analysis F. Jalayer et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12238
21. Study on Physical Vulnerability Curves of Buildings by Numerical Simulation of Debris Flow H. Kang & Y. Kim 10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.5.155
22. Multi-scale debris flow vulnerability assessment and direct loss estimation of buildings in the Eastern Italian Alps R. Ciurean et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2612-6
23. Cut slope hazard analysis and management based on a double-index precipitation threshold: a case study in the Miaoyuan area (Eastern China) T. Zeng et al. 10.1007/s12665-024-11987-3
24. An interactive web-GIS tool for risk analysis: a case study in the Fella River basin, Italy Z. Aye et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-85-2016
25. GIS-based numerical modelling of debris flow motion across three-dimensional terrain J. Wu et al. 10.1007/s11629-013-2486-y
26. Quantification of model uncertainty in debris flow vulnerability assessment U. Eidsvig et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.006
27. Hazard Assessment of Debris Flow: A Case Study of the Huiyazi Debris Flow Y. Guo et al. 10.3390/w16101349
28. Debris flows risk analysis and direct loss estimation: the case study of Valtellina di Tirano, Italy J. Blahut et al. 10.1007/s11629-013-2806-2
29. Uncertainty characterization, propagation, and evaluation in debris flow run-out hazard assessment P. Zeng et al. 10.1007/s10346-024-02423-5
30. Volcanic hazard impacts to critical infrastructure: A review G. Wilson et al. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.08.030
31. Framework for developing volcanic fragility and vulnerability functions for critical infrastructure G. Wilson et al. 10.1186/s13617-017-0065-6
32. Efficient intensity measures for vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings under flow-type and slow to moderately moving landslides M. Kulariya & S. Saha 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107267
33. The vulnerability of buildings to a large-scale debris flow and outburst flood hazard cascade that occurred on 30 August 2020 in Ganluo, southwest China L. Wei et al. 10.5194/nhess-24-4179-2024
34. Methodological Approaches to the Vulnerability Assessment for the Effect Quantification of Debris Flow Disaster Mitigation Facilities J. Lee et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2016.16.3.359
35. Impact of irrigation on vulnerability of winter wheat under extreme climate change scenario: a case study of North China Plain Y. Gao et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1291866
36. Quantitative risk assessment of landslides over the China-Pakistan economic corridor M. Chang et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102441
37. Debris flow in indian himalaya: A threat to emerging infrastructure N. Chauhan et al. 10.1007/s10064-024-03923-3
38. Analysis of Landslide Vulnerabilities in Small and Medium-Sized Cities of ColombiaⅠ: With Focus on Physical Vulnerability J. Lee et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.6.87
39. Hazard and population vulnerability analysis: a step towards landslide risk assessment F. Murillo-García et al. 10.1007/s11629-016-4179-9
40. Physical vulnerability curve construction and quantitative risk assessment of a typhoon-triggered debris flow via numerical simulation: A case study of Zhejiang Province, SE China T. Wang et al. 10.1007/s10346-024-02218-8
41. An example of a hazard and risk assessment for debris flows—A case study of Niwan Gully, Wudu, China C. Ouyang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105351
42. Multi-temporal LiDAR-DTMs as a tool for modelling a complex landslide: a case study in the Rotolon catchment (eastern Italian Alps) G. Bossi et al. 10.5194/nhess-15-715-2015
43. Basinwide disaster loss assessments under extreme climate scenarios: a case study of the Kaoping River basin H. Li et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2729-7
44. Empirical prediction of coseismic landslide dam formation X. Fan et al. 10.1002/esp.3585
45. Loss estimation for landslides in mountain areas – An integrated toolbox for vulnerability assessment and damage documentation M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.003
46. Numerical-model-derived intensity–duration thresholds for early warning of rainfall-induced debris flows in a Himalayan catchment S. Dixit et al. 10.5194/nhess-24-465-2024
47. A mathematical approach for assessing landslide vulnerability H. Martinez-Carvajal et al. 10.15446/esrj.v22n4.68553
48. Mapping debris flow susceptibility using analytical network process in Kodaikkanal Hills, Tamil Nadu (India) E. Sujatha & V. Sridhar 10.1007/s12040-017-0899-7
49. Back-Analysis of the Abbadia San Salvatore (Mt. Amiata, Italy) Debris Flow of 27–28 July 2019: An Integrated Multidisciplinary Approach to a Challenging Case Study M. Amaddii et al. 10.3390/geosciences12100385
50. The importance of indicator weights for vulnerability indices and implications for decision making in disaster management M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101103
51. Evaluation of debris-flow building damage forecasts K. Barnhart et al. 10.5194/nhess-24-1459-2024
52. Risk Assessment of 2011 Debris Flow Hazard Area in Yongin City G. Choi et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.2.165
53. Development and Application of Urban Landslide Vulnerability Assessment Methodology Reflecting Social and Economic Variables Y. Park et al. 10.1155/2016/4572498
54. Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk J. Corominas et al. 10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
55. Reliability analysis of an RC member impacted by a rockfall using a nonlinear SDOF model D. Bertrand et al. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.051
56. Enhancing local action planning through quantitative flood risk analysis: a case study in Spain J. Castillo-Rodríguez et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-1699-2016
57. Run-out Modeling of Debris Flows in Mt. Umyeon using FLO-2D S. Kim et al. 10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.3.965
58. Physical Vulnerability Function of Buildings Impacted by Debris Flow H. Kang & Y. Kim 10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.5.133
59. Development of structural debris flow fragility curves (debris flow buildings resistance) using momentum flux rate as a hazard parameter J. Prieto et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.014
60. Development of Debris flow Vulnerability Curve for Data-driven Method C. Song et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341505025
61. Numerical model of debris flow susceptibility using slope stability failure machine learning prediction with metaheuristic techniques trained with different algorithms K. Onyelowe et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-70634-w
62. Vulnerability assessment for buildings exposed to torrential hazards at Sichuan-Tibet transportation corridor Y. Lei et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106803
63. 2014 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Landslide runout analysis — current practice and challenges S. McDougall 10.1139/cgj-2016-0104
64. Assessment of Building Vulnerability with Varying Distances from Outlet Considering Impact Force of Debris Flow and Building Resistance M. Kim & J. Kwak 10.3390/w12072021
65. Assessing vulnerability of buildings to hydro-meteorological hazards using an expert based approach – An application in Nehoiu Valley, Romania A. Godfrey et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.001
66. Physical vulnerability to dynamic flooding: Vulnerability curves and vulnerability indices M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127501
67. Physical vulnerability evaluation of buildings exposed to Balia Nala landslide using indicator-based approach and GIS: a case study of Nainital town, Uttarakhand, India H. Tiwari et al. 10.1007/s12517-022-09742-8
68. Integrating expert opinion with modelling for quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment in the Eastern Italian Alps L. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.041
69. Database of geo-hydrological disasters for civil protection purposes J. Blahut et al. 10.1007/s11069-011-9893-6
70. Indicator-based approach for assigning physical vulnerability of the houses to landslide hazard in the Himalayan region of India S. Bera et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101891
71. Modeling the stability of terraced slopes: an approach from Valtellina (Northern Italy) C. Camera et al. 10.1007/s12665-015-4089-0
72. Experimental analyses of impact forces on buildings exposed to fluvial hazards M. Sturm et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.070
73. ASCHFLOW - A dynamic landslide run-out model for medium scale hazard analysis B. Quan Luna et al. 10.1186/s40677-016-0064-7
74. The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events H. Kang & Y. Kim 10.1007/s11069-015-2032-z
75. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
76. Rheological Characteristics and Debris Flow Simulation of Waste Materials . Jeong 10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.4.1227
77. The Vulnerability of People to Landslides: A Case Study on the Relationship between the Casualties and Volume of Landslides in China Q. Lin et al. 10.3390/ijerph14020212
78. Finite Element Method Simulations to Study Factors Affecting Buried Pipeline Subjected to Debris Flow W. Ying et al. 10.1115/1.4042055
79. Risk evolution: how can changes in the built environment influence the potential loss of natural hazards? B. Schwendtner et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-2195-2013
80. Building vulnerability to hydro-geomorphic hazards: Estimating damage probability from qualitative vulnerability assessment using logistic regression S. Ettinger et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.017
81. Semi-quantitative landslide risk assessment of district Muzaffarabad, northwestern Himalayas, Pakistan M. Riaz et al. 10.1007/s00477-023-02462-9
82. Spatial scan statistics in vulnerability assessment: an application to mountain hazards S. Fuchs et al. 10.1007/s11069-011-0081-5
83. Quantitative human risk analysis of 2015 Shenzhen dump failure considering influence of urbanization S. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s11629-020-6260-7
84. A risk-based methodology for establishing landslide exclusion zones in operating open pit mines J. Whittall et al. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.10.012
85. Two‐dimensional Dynamics Simulation of Two‐phase Debris Flow W. LIU et al. 10.1111/1755-6724.13416
86. Debris Flow Damage Assessment by Considering Debris Flow Direction and Direction Angle of Structure in South Korea D. Nam et al. 10.3390/w11020328
87. Vulnerability curves for masonry buildings affected by hyperconcentrated flows as natural disaster risk management tools for the quantification of material damage A. Jara et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/958/1/012021
88. Failure modes of reinforced concrete columns of buildings under debris flow impact C. Zeng et al. 10.1007/s10346-014-0490-0
89. Exploring the velocity distribution of debris flows: An iteration algorithm based approach for complex cross-sections Z. Han et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.043
90. The quantitative estimation of the vulnerability of brick and concrete wall impacted by an experimental boulder J. Zhang et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-299-2016
91. Multi-Hazard Assessment of Masonry Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review P. Zhang et al. 10.3390/buildings14123711
92. A spatial model for the assessment of debris flow susceptibility along the Kodaikkanal-Palani traffic corridor E. Sujatha 10.1007/s11707-019-0775-7
93. Hydrodynamic and topography based cellular automaton model for simulating debris flow run-out extent and entrainment behavior Z. Han et al. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116872
94. Physical process-based runout modeling and hazard assessment of catastrophic debris flow using SPH incorporated with ArcGIS: A case study of the Hongchun gully H. Cheng et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106052
95. Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide H. Cheng et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05239-5
96. Revisiting landslide risk terms: IAEG commission C-37 working group on landslide risk nomenclature J. Corominas et al. 10.1007/s10064-023-03474-z
97. Estimating the mud depth of debris flow in a natural river channel: a theoretical approach and its engineering application Y. Li et al. 10.1007/s12665-016-5480-1
98. From spatio-temporal landslide susceptibility to landslide risk forecast T. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101765
99. Application of statistical techniques to proportional loss data: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of physical vulnerability to hazardous hydro-meteorological events C. Chow et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.084
100. Damage analysis of masonry structures subjected to rockfalls O. Mavrouli et al. 10.1007/s10346-016-0765-8
101. Landslide risk on photovoltaic power stations under climate change C. Park et al. 10.1080/19475705.2023.2286904
102. Recent advances in vulnerability assessment for the built environment exposed to torrential hazards: Challenges and the way forward S. Fuchs et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.067
103. Assessment of Physical Vulnerability and Uncertainties for Debris Flow Hazard: A Review concerning Climate Change M. Khan et al. 10.3390/land11122240
104. How does a cluster of buildings affect landslide mobility: a case study of the Shenzhen landslide H. Luo et al. 10.1007/s10346-019-01239-y
105. Assessing climate change vulnerability of coastal roads L. Rocchi et al. 10.1007/s11027-024-10140-6
106. Enriching Great Britain's National Landslide Database by searching newspaper archives F. Taylor et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.019
107. Relating the compensational stacking of debris-flow fans to characteristics of their underlying stratigraphy: Implications for geologic hazard assessment and mitigation C. Pederson et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.030
108. Mechanisms of rainfall-induced landslides and interception dynamic response: a case study of the Ni changgou landslide in Shimian, China Y. Li et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-51419-7
109. Experimental Study on the Performance of Polyurethane-Steel Sandwich Structure under Debris Flow P. Li et al. 10.3390/app7101018
110. Debris flow-induced topographic changes: effects of recurrent debris flow initiation C. Chen & Q. Wang 10.1007/s10661-017-6169-y
111. Assessment of dynamic impact force of debris flow in mountain torrent based on characteristics of debris flow M. Kim et al. 10.1007/s12665-018-7707-9
112. The March 2015 catastrophic flood event and its impacts in the city of Copiapó (southern Atacama Desert). An integrated analysis to mitigate future mudflow derived damages T. Izquierdo et al. 10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102975
113. Physical vulnerability models for assessing building damage by debris flows S. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.017
114. Failure mechanism and landslide fragility of reinforced concrete buildings considering uncertain flow properties M. Kulariya & S. Saha 10.1080/17499518.2024.2337377
115. Quantitative assessment of physical fragility of buildings to the debris flow on 20 August 2019 in the Cutou gully, Wenchuan, southwestern China M. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106319
116. Regional prioritisation of flood risk in mountainous areas M. Rogelis et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-833-2016
117. Field Measurements and Numerical Simulation of Debris Flows from Dolomite Slopes Destabilized during the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake, Pakistan Z. Kazmi et al. 10.1080/13632469.2013.873372
118. Numerical simulation for run-out extent of debris flows using an improved cellular automaton model Z. Han et al. 10.1007/s10064-016-0902-6
119. Lahars and debris flows: Characteristics and impacts J. Thouret et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.103003
120. Development of Physical Vulnerability Curve based on Debris Flow Events C. Song et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2023.23.4.185
121. Empirical atmospheric thresholds for debris flows and flash floods in the southern French Alps T. Turkington et al. 10.5194/nhess-14-1517-2014
122. Pure risk premium rating of debris flows based on a dynamic run-out model: a case study in Anzhou, China Z. Deng et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-04459-x
123. Parameterization of a numerical 2-D debris flow model with entrainment: a case study of the Faucon catchment, Southern French Alps H. Hussin et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-3075-2012
124. Physics of building vulnerability to debris flows, floods and earth flows H. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105611
125. Sensitivity and identifiability of rheological parameters in debris flow modeling G. Zegers et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-1919-2020
126. Building Damage Functions Using Limited Available Data for Volcanic Ash Loss Estimation S. Yu et al. 10.5467/JKESS.2013.34.6.524
127. Physical vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings under debris avalanche impact based on GF-discrepancy and DEM-FEM J. Pu et al. 10.1007/s11069-023-06294-2
128. FEM Numerical Formulation for Debris Flow H. Shin 10.7843/kgs.2014.30.10.55
129. Territorial Accessibility and Decision-Making Structure Related to Debris Flow Impacts on Roads in the French Alps M. Utasse et al. 10.1007/s13753-016-0088-3
130. Machine-Learning-Based Prediction Modeling for Debris Flow Occurrence: A Meta-Analysis L. Yang et al. 10.3390/w16070923
131. An expert judgement approach to determining the physical vulnerability of roads to debris flow M. Winter et al. 10.1007/s10064-014-0570-3
132. Velocity and runout determination of a debris flow based on energy conservation: the Dongwopu debris flow in Tianjin, China W. Zhang et al. 10.1144/qjegh2014-036
133. A Study of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Trend Prediction Using a Rule-Based Discrete Grid Model Y. Duan et al. 10.3390/rs16244740
134. Comparative Analysis of Debris Flow Numerical Simulation Based on the Difference between the Resolution of Topographic Information and Grid Size N. Kim & B. Jun 10.9798/KOSHAM.2023.23.2.41
135. Effect of Boulder Size on Debris Flow Impact Pressure Using a CFD-DEM Numerical Model R. Chehade et al. 10.3390/geosciences12050188
136. Improved assessment of rainfall-induced railway infrastructure risk in China using empirical data W. Zhu et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05605-3
137. Risk assessment of debris flow in Yushu seismic area in China: a perspective for the reconstruction H. Lan et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-2957-2013
138. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. 10.3390/geosciences8060218
139. Physically based dynamic run-out modelling for quantitative debris flow risk assessment: a case study in Tresenda, northern Italy B. Quan Luna et al. 10.1007/s12665-013-2986-7
140. Development of structural type-based physical vulnerability curves to debris flow using numerical analysis and regression model J. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104431
141. Progressive failure of buildings under landslide impact H. Luo et al. 10.1007/s10346-019-01164-0
142. Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs H. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329
143. Probabilistic Analysis of Floods from Tailings Dam Failures: A Method to Analyze the Impact of Rheological Parameters on the HEC-RAS Bingham and Herschel-Bulkley Models M. Melo & J. Eleutério 10.3390/w15162866
144. Risk Assessment of Debris Flow at Regional Scale considering Catchment Area in Chuncheon, Korea G. Choi et al. 10.1007/s12205-021-0136-4
145. Short communication: A model to predict flood loss in mountain areas S. Fuchs et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.026
146. Regional risk assessment of debris flows in China—An HRU-based approach Q. Zou et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.027
147. Human Vulnerability to Landslides W. Pollock & J. Wartman 10.1029/2020GH000287
148. Quantifying Sediment Deposition Volume in Vegetated Areas with UAV Data S. Emtehani et al. 10.3390/rs13122391
149. Physical vulnerability assessment of damaged buildings to the Shenzhen catastrophic CSW landslide S. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s10346-023-02200-w
150. Characteristics of damage to buildings by debris flows on 7 August 2010 in Zhouqu, Western China K. Hu et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-2209-2012
151. Evaluation of Debris Flows for Flood Plain Estimation in a Small Ungauged Tropical Watershed for Hurricane Otto S. Fallas Salazar & A. Rojas González 10.3390/hydrology8030122
152. Towards dynamics in flood risk assessment B. Mazzorana et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-3571-2012
153. Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the application of assessment of granular debris flow hazards with case study Y. Wu et al. 10.1007/s11629-013-2511-1
154. Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0105-9
155. Analytic Back Calculation of Debris Flow Damage Incurred to a Masonry Building: The Case of Scaletta Zanclea 2009 Event H. Soleimankhani et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20160704007
156. Quantification of debris flow vulnerability of typical bridge substructure based on impact force simulation Y. Liang & F. Xiong 10.1080/19475705.2019.1641564
157. A multi-step hazard assessment for debris-flow prone areas influenced by hydroclimatic events V. Cabral et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106961
158. Inundation, flow dynamics, and damage in the 9 January 2018 Montecito debris-flow event, California, USA: Opportunities and challenges for post-wildfire risk assessment J. Kean et al. 10.1130/GES02048.1
159. Assessment of Building Physical Vulnerability in Earthquake-Debris Flow Disaster Chain H. Zheng et al. 10.1007/s13753-023-00509-7
160. Vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings exposed to landslides O. Mavrouli et al. 10.1007/s10064-014-0573-0
161. Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study W. Lo et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0124-6
162. A physical approach on flood risk vulnerability of buildings B. Mazzorana et al. 10.5194/hess-18-3817-2014
163. Catchment-scale flood hazard mapping and flood vulnerability analysis of residential buildings: The case of Khando River in eastern Nepal S. Thapa et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100704
164. Climate change-induced landslide vulnerability: Empirical evidence from Shimla district, Himachal Pradesh, India A. Sharma et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104657