70 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. An emergency response plan for cascading post-earthquake fires in fuel storage facilities B. Baser & B. Behnam 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104155
2. Seismic risk in the chemical process industry: A semi-quantitative methodology for critical equipment identification F. Novelli et al. 10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105252
3. Seismic performance assessment of an existing anchored and a self-anchored liquid storage tank in high seismic regions B. Erkmen 10.1007/s10518-024-01932-x
4. RAPID-N: Rapid natech risk assessment and mapping framework S. Girgin & E. Krausmann 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.10.004
5. Historical analysis of U.S. onshore hazardous liquid pipeline accidents triggered by natural hazards S. Girgin & E. Krausmann 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.02.008
6. Analysis of Complexities in Natech Disaster Risk Reduction and Management: A Case Study of Cilegon, Indonesia F. Lestari et al. 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1298
7. Probabilistic risk analysis of process plants under seismic loading based on Monte Carlo simulations S. Alessandri et al. 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.12.013
8. Fragility and Recovery Models for Energy, Water, and Wastewater Systems for Seismic Regional Risk and Resilience Assessment: State-of-the-Art Review and Database M. Alam et al. 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1661
9. Observational Seismic Fragility Curves for Steel Cylindrical Tanks M. D'Amico & N. Buratti 10.1115/1.4040137
10. A study of accident investigation methodologies applied to the Natech events during the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake A. Chakraborty et al. 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.01.003
11. Dealing with cascading multi-hazard risks in national risk assessment: The case of Natech accidents S. Girgin et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101072
12. Systematic literature review and qualitative meta-analysis of Natech research in the past four decades M. Suarez-Paba et al. 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.033
13. Seismic performance assessment of non-code-conforming and code-conforming supporting structures of elevated tanks using conventional and risk-based decision models S. Caprinozzi & M. Dolšek 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111469
14. Failure Sensitivity Analysis of Tall Moment-Resisting Structures Under Natural Fires B. Behnam 10.1007/s40999-017-0248-x
15. Young adults’ fear of disasters: A case study of residents from Turkey, Serbia and Macedonia V. Cvetković et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101095
16. Find-Natech: A GIS-based spatial management system for Natech events X. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103028
17. Natech risk assessment for crude oil storage tanks using fish bone diagram C. Mandal & M. Agarwal 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.148
18. Seismic fragility assessment of building-type structures in oil refineries A. Kazantzi et al. 10.1007/s10518-022-01476-y
19. A Hybrid Approach Integrating Entropy-AHP and GIS for Suitability Assessment of Urban Emergency Facilities P. Nyimbili & T. Erden 10.3390/ijgi9070419
20. Advances in Natech research: An overview A. Cruz & M. Suarez-Paba 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100013
21. Seismic fragility assessment of high-rise stacks in oil refineries N. Karaferis et al. 10.1007/s10518-022-01472-2
22. Risk assessment of chemical release accident triggered by landslide using Bayesian network N. Moriguchi et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164321
23. Ranking of sectors in organized industrial zones according to Natech risk criteria: An application for Gaziantep province in Türkiye E. Guven et al. 10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105377
24. A qualitative investigation of the effect of natural hazards on industrial plants (with emphasis on oil and gas industries) and 's position in this field s. koohestani et al. 10.61186/jsaeh.10.4.183
25. The Effect of Safety Barrier Degradation on the Severity of Primary Natech Scenarios A. Misuri et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109272
26. Experimental and numerical study on earthquake-fire coupling failure mechanism of steel cylindrical tanks J. Men et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110016
27. Health care students’ willingness to work during disasters in Turkey E. Inal & E. Kaya 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101002
28. A paradigm shift in the assessment of Natech scenarios in chemical and process facilities A. Misuri & V. Cozzani 10.1016/j.psep.2021.06.018
29. Resilience assessment of chemical industrial areas during Natech-related cascading multi-hazards T. Zeng et al. 10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104967
30. Vulnerability Assessment of Industrial Sites to Interface Fires and Wildfires F. Ricci et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109895
31. Remote sensing contributing to assess earthquake risk: from a literature review towards a roadmap C. Geiß & H. Taubenböck 10.1007/s11069-012-0322-2
32. Emergency response in cascading scenarios triggered by natural events F. Ricci et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109820
33. Reduction of seismic sloshing in floating roof liquid storage tanks by using a Suspended Annular Baffle (SAB) M. Hosseini et al. 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.02.008
34. Investigation of industrial structure performances in the Hatay and Gaziantep provinces during the Türkiye earthquakes on February 6, 2023 S. Öztürk et al. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108569
35. Management of risks in natural disasters: A systematic review of the literature on NATECH events K. Nascimento & M. Alencar 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.10.003
36. Seismic intensity measures for above‐ground liquid storage tanks K. Bakalis et al. 10.1002/eqe.3043
37. Assessment of safety barrier performance in the mitigation of domino scenarios caused by Natech events A. Misuri et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107278
38. Seismic vulnerability of natural gas pipelines G. Lanzano et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.019
39. An innovative quantitative analysis methodology for Natech events triggered by earthquakes in chemical tank farms K. Huang et al. 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104744
40. Multi-Hazard Coupling Effects in Chemical Process Industry—Part I: Preliminaries and Mechanism J. Men et al. 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3182994
41. Characterization of the expected seismic damage for a critical infrastructure: the case of the oil pipeline in Friuli Venezia Giulia (NE Italy) A. Tamaro et al. 10.1007/s10518-017-0252-1
42. Assessing College Writing: Do Students Connect with the Text? T. Nalabandian et al. 10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.1.nal
43. Thinking the unthinkable: A perspective on Natech risks and Black Swans E. Krausmann & A. Necci 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105255
44. Loss and damage assessment in critical infrastructures due to extreme events A. Urlainis et al. 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105587
45. Natech Accidents Triggered by Heat Waves F. Ricci et al. 10.3390/safety9020033
46. Seismic Behavior of Liquid Storage Tanks Using Complex and Simple Analytical Models N. Chaulagain et al. 10.5000/EESK.2018.22.7.401
47. The classification of physical effects from natural hazards for Natech risk assessment based on a Japanese database M. Kumasaki et al. 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.017
48. Assessment of safety barrier performance in Natech scenarios A. Misuri et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106597
49. Değirmendere’nin CBS Tabanlı Deprem Risk ve Erişebilirlik Analizi İ. GÜVEN & D. GERÇEK 10.32569/resilience.364276
50. A comparative impact chain analysis of 1999 Kocaeli and 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes C. Goksu et al. 10.47818/DRArch.2023.v4si109
51. Surrogate Modeling for the Seismic Performance Assessment of Liquid Storage Tanks K. Bakalis et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001667
52. Seismic performance evaluation of a vertical pipe connected with rigid groove joints using a system and a component S. Kim et al. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.046
53. Power plants: The need for effective bio-monitoring of the contribution of bio(wood) fuelled stations to atmospheric contamination L. Lucadamo et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2019.09.012
54. Organize Sanayi Bölgeleri’nin Natech Riskine Göre Değerlendirilmesi: Kocaeli İli İçin Bir Örnek E. Güven et al. 10.32569/resilience.1379980
55. Fragility Analysis of Atmospheric Storage Tanks by Observational and Analytical Data F. Bezir et al. 10.1007/s13296-021-00567-x
56. Uplift mechanics of unanchored liquid storage tanks subjected to lateral earthquake loading K. Bakalis & S. Karamanos 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107145
57. Natech accidents triggered by cold waves F. Ricci et al. 10.1016/j.psep.2023.03.022
58. On the interaction between span length and opening ratio of RC frames under natural fires B. Behnam 10.1680/jstbu.17.00044
59. Three cases in Japan occurred by natural hazards and lessons for Natech disaster management M. Kumasaki & M. King 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101855
60. Time-dependent earthquake-fire coupling fragility analysis under limited prior knowledge: A perspective from type-2 fuzzy probability J. Men et al. 10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.011
61. A hybrid deep belief network-based label distribution learning system for seismic damage estimation of liquid storage tanks J. Men et al. 10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.079
62. Evaluation of natech criteria in organized industrial zones: An application for Kırıkkale province E. Guven et al. 10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105379
63. Natural hazard impacts on industry and critical infrastructure: Natech risk drivers and risk management performance indicators E. Krausmann et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101163
64. Dynamic analysis for fire-induced domino effects in chemical process industries K. Huang et al. 10.1016/j.psep.2021.01.042
65. Experimental study on the seismic response of liquid storage tanks with Sliding Concave Bearings M. Compagnoni et al. 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.05.009
66. On the nonlinear dynamic analysis of annular baffled steel containers isolated by bearings S. Farahmandpey et al. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105012
67. People’s Response to Potential Natural Hazard-Triggered Technological Threats after a Sudden-Onset Earthquake in Indonesia F. Lestari et al. 10.3390/ijerph18073369
68. Seismic risk assessment of liquid storage tanks via a nonlinear surrogate model K. Bakalis et al. 10.1002/eqe.2939
69. Disaster impact assessment of the underground hazardous materials pipeline M. Teng & S. Ke 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104486
70. Impact of the 11 March 2011, Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami on the chemical industry E. Krausmann & A. Cruz 10.1007/s11069-013-0607-0