29 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Modelling outburst floods from moraine-dammed glacial lakes M. Westoby et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009
2. Relevance of erosion processes when modelling in-channel gravel debris flows for efficient hazard assessment C. Gregoretti et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.001
3. The Trend in the Risk of Flash Flood Hazards with Regional Development in the Guanshan River Basin, China N. Chen et al. 10.3390/w12061815
4. Modelling of a Debris Flow Event in the Enna Area for Hazard Assessment F. Castelli et al. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.026
5. Combining Spatial Models for Shallow Landslides and Debris-Flows Prediction R. Gomes et al. 10.3390/rs5052219
6. Influence of rheological characteristics on the fluidization catastrophe of tailings flows D. Wang et al. 10.1007/s11629-023-7960-6
7. Rheological characterization of debris flows in the western himalayas using XGBoost and laboratory data N. Pandey & N. Satyam 10.1007/s40808-025-02311-4
8. Influence of micromorphology and water content on the rheological properties and performance evaluation model of loess mudflow D. Wang et al. 10.1063/5.0233362
9. A calculation method for predicting the runout volume of dam-break and non-dam-break debris flows in the Wenchuan earthquake area Q. Fang et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.10.023
10. Mean velocity estimation of viscous debris flows H. Yang et al. 10.1007/s12583-014-0465-z
11. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Rheological Properties of Muddy Flow and Their Measurement Method J. Ryou et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2021.21.6.217
12. Sensitivity and identifiability of rheological parameters in debris flow modeling G. Zegers et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-1919-2020
13. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. 10.3390/geosciences8060218
14. A hands-on approach to estimate debris flow velocity for rational mitigation of debris hazard M. Rahman & K. Konagai 10.1139/cgj-2017-0211
15. Evaluation of Unsaturated Soil Properties for a Debris-Flow Simulation F. Castelli et al. 10.3390/geosciences11020064
16. Discussion of “Characteristics of a Debris-Flow Drainage Channel with a Step-Pool Configuration” by Xiaoqing Chen, Jiangang Chen, Wanyu Zhao, Yun Li, and Yong You T. Wang et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001618
17. Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the application of assessment of granular debris flow hazards with case study Y. Wu et al. 10.1007/s11629-013-2511-1
18. Rheological Characteristics and Debris Flow Simulation of Waste Materials . Jeong 10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.4.1227
19. Flow behavior and mobility of contaminated waste rock materials in the abandoned Imgi mine in Korea S. Jeong et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.10.021
20. Review: Rheology concepts applied to geotechnical engineering J. Tsugawa et al. 10.1515/arh-2019-0018
21. The variety of landslide forms in Slovenia and its immediate NW surroundings M. Jemec Auflič et al. 10.1007/s10346-017-0848-1
22. Rheology of natural slurries involved in a rapid mudflow with different soil organic carbon content C. Carotenuto et al. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.10.037
23. The 27 May 1937 catastrophic flow failure of gold tailings at Tlalpujahua, Michoacán, Mexico J. Macías et al. 10.5194/nhess-15-1069-2015
24. Evaluation of the viscosity of tropical soils for debris flow analysis: a new approach T. de Campos & M. Galindo 10.1680/jgeot.15.P.080
25. Geotechnical and rheological characteristics of waste rock deposits influencing potential debris flow occurrence at the abandoned Imgi Mine, Korea S. Jeong 10.1007/s12665-014-3991-1
26. A comparative assessment of two different debris flow propagation approaches – blind simulations on a real debris flow event L. Stancanelli & E. Foti 10.5194/nhess-15-735-2015
27. The use of FLO2D numerical code in lahar hazard evaluation at Popocatépetl volcano: a 2001 lahar scenario L. Caballero & L. Capra 10.5194/nhess-14-3345-2014
28. Grain-Size Analysis of Debris Flow Alluvial Fans in Panxi Area along Jinsha River, China W. Zhang et al. 10.3390/su71115219
29. Roll-Waves Mathematical Model as a Risk-Assessment Tool: Case Study of Acquabona Catchment G. Fiorot et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001538