35 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Enhancing debris flow run-out hazard assessment through probabilistic post-event back analysis P. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-026-02746-5
2. Modelling outburst floods from moraine-dammed glacial lakes M. Westoby et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.009
3. Relevance of erosion processes when modelling in-channel gravel debris flows for efficient hazard assessment C. Gregoretti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.001
4. The Trend in the Risk of Flash Flood Hazards with Regional Development in the Guanshan River Basin, China N. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061815
5. Modelling of a Debris Flow Event in the Enna Area for Hazard Assessment F. Castelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.026
6. Combining Spatial Models for Shallow Landslides and Debris-Flows Prediction R. Gomes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5052219
7. Influence of rheological characteristics on the fluidization catastrophe of tailings flows D. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-023-7960-6
8. Rheological characterization of debris flows in the western himalayas using XGBoost and laboratory data N. Pandey & N. Satyam https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-025-02311-4
9. Influence of micromorphology and water content on the rheological properties and performance evaluation model of loess mudflow D. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0233362
10. A calculation method for predicting the runout volume of dam-break and non-dam-break debris flows in the Wenchuan earthquake area Q. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.10.023
11. Mean velocity estimation of viscous debris flows H. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-014-0465-z
12. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Rheological Properties of Muddy Flow and Their Measurement Method J. Ryou et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2021.21.6.217
13. Effect of the infiltration of simulated rains on soil organic carbon content and mud rheology M. Minale et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0260301
14. Use of simple analytical solutions in the calibration of shallow water equation debris flow models R. Bonomelli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-665-2025
15. Sensitivity and identifiability of rheological parameters in debris flow modeling G. Zegers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1919-2020
16. Role of Finer Particles in Rheological Characterization of Debris Flows: Insights from Western Himalayas N. Pandey & N. Satyam https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-025-01286-4
17. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8060218
18. A hands-on approach to estimate debris flow velocity for rational mitigation of debris hazard M. Rahman & K. Konagai https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0211
19. Evaluation of Unsaturated Soil Properties for a Debris-Flow Simulation F. Castelli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020064
20. Discussion of “Characteristics of a Debris-Flow Drainage Channel with a Step-Pool Configuration” by Xiaoqing Chen, Jiangang Chen, Wanyu Zhao, Yun Li, and Yong You T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001618
21. Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the application of assessment of granular debris flow hazards with case study Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2511-1
22. Rheological Characteristics and Debris Flow Simulation of Waste Materials . Jeong https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.4.1227
23. Flow behavior and mobility of contaminated waste rock materials in the abandoned Imgi mine in Korea S. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.10.021
24. Review: Rheology concepts applied to geotechnical engineering J. Tsugawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2019-0018
25. The variety of landslide forms in Slovenia and its immediate NW surroundings M. Jemec Auflič et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0848-1
26. Measurement of the effective dynamic viscosity of soil-rock mixture J. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105782
27. Rheology of natural slurries involved in a rapid mudflow with different soil organic carbon content C. Carotenuto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.10.037
28. The 27 May 1937 catastrophic flow failure of gold tailings at Tlalpujahua, Michoacán, Mexico J. Macías et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1069-2015
29. Evaluation of the viscosity of tropical soils for debris flow analysis: a new approach T. de Campos & M. Galindo https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.080
30. Geotechnical and rheological characteristics of waste rock deposits influencing potential debris flow occurrence at the abandoned Imgi Mine, Korea S. Jeong https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3991-1
31. A comparative assessment of two different debris flow propagation approaches – blind simulations on a real debris flow event L. Stancanelli & E. Foti https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-735-2015
32. An experimental method for measuring the rheological behavior of slurry suspensions C. Tranquilino et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/arh-2025-0062
33. The use of FLO2D numerical code in lahar hazard evaluation at Popocatépetl volcano: a 2001 lahar scenario L. Caballero & L. Capra https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-3345-2014
34. Grain-Size Analysis of Debris Flow Alluvial Fans in Panxi Area along Jinsha River, China W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115219
35. Roll-Waves Mathematical Model as a Risk-Assessment Tool: Case Study of Acquabona Catchment G. Fiorot et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001538