71 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Evaluation of the seismic behavior-based FE analysis of steel box connectors in precast column–beam joints T. Cuong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108962
2. Seismic fragility assessment of historic masonry façades: integrating micro-CT material characterization and large-scale vulnerability modeling J. Calderón-Fuentes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2026.110783
3. Impulsive Signals Produced by Earthquakes in Italy and Their Potential Relation with Site Effects and Structural Damage D. Ertuncay et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11060261
4. Structural damages observed in state buildings after Simav/Turkey earthquake occurred on 19 May 2011 Y. Tama https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2709-2012
5. Seismic capacity evaluation of unreinforced masonry residential buildings in Albania H. Bilgin & O. Korini https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3753-2012
6. Seismic Performance and Failure Mechanisms of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subject to the Earthquakes in Türkiye E. Işık et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156473
7. In-plane capacity of existing post-WWII beam-and-clay block floor systems A. Marini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01301-y
8. Behaviour of non-seismic detailed reinforced-concrete beam–column connections K. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.16.00201
9. Numerical Assessment of URM Infilled RC Frames Retrofitted With Near-Surface Mounted Reinforcing Steel Bars R. Soti et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.590302
10. Mechanical properties and durability of biobased fabric-reinforced lime composites intended for strengthening historical masonry structures A. Rakhsh Mahpour et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134916
11. Shear capacity of masonry walls externally strengthened using Flax-TRM composite systems: experimental tests and comparative assessment G. Ferrara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120490
12. Seismic Behavior and Vulnerability of Masonry Dwellings in Eastern Türkiye: A Comprehensive Analysis R. Oyguc https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105490
13. Analysis of the Out-Of-Plane Seismic Behavior of Unreinforced Masonry: A Literature Review T. Ferreira et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2014.885996
14. Seismic performance of multi-story traditional hybrid pavilion-style timber structures: shaking table tests and numerical analysis X. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-026-02643-1
15. Testing Geographical Methodology and Tools for the Study of Territories Damaged by Earthquakes. The Case of L’Aquila and Other Localities Three Years after the April 6th 2009 Event C. Pesaresi et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.41001
16. Seismic retrofitting of existing RC buildings: a rational selection procedure based on Genetic Algorithms R. Falcone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.08.006
17. Risk perception of local stakeholders on natural hazards: implications for theory and practice M. Mărgărint et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3251-2021
18. Tensile behavior of Textile Reinforced Mortars made with Flax fabrics B. Paolillo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.09.385
19. Data-driven analysis of the tectonic history in Greece (1975–2025) and neural network-based modeling of seismic response spectra D. Kontoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42990-025-00176-4
20. Torque Penetrometric Test for the in-situ characterisation of historical mortars: fracture mechanics interpretation and experimental validation D. Marastoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.120
21. Identification of buildings in Panama's Old Quarter (Casco Antiguo) with resonance potential during earthquakes I. Álvarez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109601
22. Experimental and Numerical Study on the Seismic Performance of Base-Suspended Pendulum Isolation Structure L. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152711
23. Experimentelle und analytische Untersuchung des out‐of‐plane‐Verhaltens von unbewehrten Mauerwerkswänden unter Erdbebenbelastung M. Lönhoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/dama.202000008
24. A case study on the updates of Turkish rapid visual screening methods for reinforced-concrete buildings E. IŞIK et al. https://doi.org/10.17678/beuscitech.1024140
25. Tensile behavior of flax textile reinforced lime-mortar: Influence of reinforcement amount and textile impregnation G. Ferrara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103984
26. Active Confinement of Masonry Walls with Stainless Steel Straps: The Effect of Strap Arrangement on the in-Plane Behavior of Strength, Poisson’s Ratio, and Pseudo-Ductility E. Ferretti https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123027
27. Operational Modal Analysis, Model Update and Fragility Curves Estimation, through Truncated Incremental Dynamic Analysis, of a Masonry Belfry I. Capanna et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030120
28. Machine learning-based seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings: a feature selection perspective T. Kumar & M. Siddique https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-025-02241-1
29. Experimental Study on the Structural Performance of Beam-Column Joints in Old Buildings without Designed Shear Reinforcement under Earthquake C. Dang & N. Dinh https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.902.33
30. Source Parameters of the Mw 5.7 Pica Crustal Earthquake in Northern Chile C. Herrera et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220220001
31. Investigation of the Strength of Reinforced Masonry Walls Under the Effect of Earthquake using Geogrid A. Demiröz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-025-01249-9
32. Comprehensive Seismic Risk Zonation and Structural Fragility Assessment of Urban Building Typologies through Fuzzy and Probabilistic Modeling Approaches: Case Study of Muscat J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2752
33. Untersuchungen zum Out‐of‐Plane‐Verhalten von nichttragenden Mauerwerkswänden in deutschen Erdbebengebieten L. Helm et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/dama.202210021
34. Generation of Fragility Curves for Typical RC Health Care Facilities: Emphasis on Hospitals in Turkey H. Bilgin https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000806
35. Field reconnaissance on seismic performance of buildings after the ML 7.2 earthquake of April 3, 2024 in Hualien, Taiwan M. Chuang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113076
36. Numerical homogenization‐based seismic assessment of an English‐bond masonry prototype: Structural level application L. Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3267
37. Predicting the seismic performance of typical R/C healthcare facilities: emphasis on hospitals H. Bilgin & I. Frangu https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-017-0164-y
38. Shear Strength of Unreinforced Masonry Walls Retrofitted with CFRP S. Elmalyh et al. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050246
39. Assessment of Post-Earthquake Damage: St. Salvatore Church in Acquapagana, Central Italy G. Sferrazza Papa & B. Silva https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8030045
40. A passive nonlinear tuned mass damper with state-dependent switching damping (NTMD-SD): Prototype realization, optimal closed-form design, and seismic performance S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.123417
41. Comparison of near and far-fault ground motion effects on low and mid-rise masonry buildings H. Bilgin & M. Hysenlliu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101248
42. Evaluation of mechanical behaviour of vegetal FRCM composites through the DIC technique: Effects of textile pre-impregnation and short flax fibres O. Agossou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138416
43. Displacement-Based Design of an Energy Dissipating System for Seismic Upgrading of Existing Masonry Structures A. Benedetti et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.897274
44. Seismic assessment and loss estimation of existing school buildings in Italy G. O'Reilly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.056
45. Horizontal PGA Estimates for Varying Deep Geological Conditions—A Case Study of Banja Luka B. Bulajić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126712
46. From field to framework: integrating UN-Habitat guidelines for accelerated visual damage assessment and seismic vulnerability analysis after Myanmar’s 2025 Mw 7.7 earthquake M. Kassem et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2026.2674345
47. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake G. Brandonisio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021
48. Disaster recovery: narrating the resilience process in the reconstruction of L’Aquila (Italy) G. Forino https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2014.973056
49. Untersuchungen zum Out‐of‐Plane‐Verhalten von nichttragenden Mauerwerkswänden in deutschen Erdbebengebieten L. Helm et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/bate.202100060
50. Back calculation and model calibration for earthquake damaged bridges - a general procedure and its application to a highway viaduct P. Sebastiani et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1075050
51. Behavior of concrete masonry infills bounded by masonry frames subjected to in-plane lateral loading – Experimental study S. Roosta & Y. Liu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113153
52. Seismic Structural Assessment of the Christchurch Catholic Basilica, New Zealand L. Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.06.004
53. Perception and Communication of Seismic Risk: The 6 April 2009 L'Aquila Earthquake Case Study F. Marincioni et al. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3672928
54. Improving in-plane seismic response of unreinforced masonry walls using steel strips A. Darbhanzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220920995
55. Vulnerability models of brick and wood structures considering empirical seismic damage observations S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.023
56. Diagonal shear behaviour of unreinforced masonry wallettes strengthened using twisted steel bars N. Ismail et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.063
57. Seismic behavior of self-centering steel connections with friction T-stubs Y. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106263
58. Strong ground motion and structural damage in the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: A comparative case study of numerical predictions and field observations S. Kartal et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70790
59. Seismic fragility functions for code compliant and non-compliant RC SMRF structures in Pakistan N. Ahmad et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0377-x
60. Conceptual design formulation and comparative assessment of a seismic retrofit procedure for existing RC structures based on combining member- and structure-level techniques C. Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.062
61. Out-of-plane loaded masonry walls retrofitted with oriented strand boards: Numerical analysis and influencing parameters J. Dauda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112683
62. Seismic performance validation for RC building structures damaged by Durres earthquake, Mw6.4, 26 November 2019, Albania M. Vitanova et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01453-5
63. Evaluation of Services Provided During Three Major Earthquakes in Türkiye: A Phenomenological Study G. Usta & S. Şahinöz https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.70078
64. Effects of the long-term degradation of fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) systems on the seismic retrofitting of historical masonry structures R. Labernarda & F. Mazza https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2026.110129
65. Characterisation of the masonry building stock in Portugal for earthquake risk assessment H. Lovon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111857
66. Experimental and numerical studies of improving cyclic behavior of infilled reinforced concrete frame by prefabricated wall panels with sliding joints C. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107524
67. Traditional T-F Masonries in the City Centre of L’Aquila – The Baraccato Aquilano A. Aloisio et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1624874
68. Seismic Performance of Prefabricated Constructional Columns Using Recycled Lump Concrete L. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15040625
69. Diagonal shear behaviour of limestone masonry walls strengthened with jute-TRM composite systems A. Hyseni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140572
70. Vertical to Horizontal UHS Ratios for Low to Medium Seismicity Regions with Deep Soil atop Deep Geological Sediments—An Example of the City of Osijek, Croatia B. Bulajić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156782
71. Finite element analysis and hysteretic model of self-centering steel connection with dual energy dissipation mechanism Y. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117238