78 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Determining social-psychological drivers of Texas Gulf Coast homeowners’ intention to implement private green infrastructure practices T. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102090
2. Study on the factors and pathways influencing the public’s environmental risk response behavior from the perspective of perceived risk – A case study of JS industrial zone in Shanghai, China K. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2075314
3. Semeru volcano, Indonesia: measuring hazard, exposure and response of densely populated neighbourhoods facing persistent volcanic threats J. Thouret et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05910-5
4. Public perception of flood hazard and flood risk in Iceland: a case study in a watershed prone to ice-jam floods E. Pagneux et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9665-8
5. Bam 2003 earthquake disaster: On the earthquake risk perception, resilience and earthquake culture – Cultural beliefs and cultural landscape of Qanats, gardens of Khorma trees and Argh-e Bam F. Parsizadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.011
6. Variations in community exposure to lahar hazards from multiple volcanoes in Washington State (USA) A. Diefenbach et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-015-0024-z
7. Household self‐blame for disasters: responsibilisation and (un)accountability in decentralised participatory risk governance G. Sou https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12319
8. The sublime attraction of active volcanoes: An exploration of tourists’ experiences during a long-distance hiking route in Iceland Þ. Heimisdóttir et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797619832306
9. La discrétion du volcan Katla E. Bernard https://doi.org/10.4000/ateliers.16994
10. Communication-related vulnerability at the last mile: a mechanism-based framework A. Hamidi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106328
11. The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards G. Wachinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
12. Hazard communication by volcanologists: Part 1 - Framing the case for contextualisation and related quality standards in volcanic hazard assessments R. Bretton et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-018-0077-x
13. The Eldfell eruption, Iceland, 1973: using “Small Stories” to investigate the human evacuation from Heimaey R. Meara et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-026-00159-6
14. Comparison of the themes of critical factors affecting livelihood recovery following major disasters: a comparative study between China and New Zealand G. Pu https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07398-3
15. Mapping the Impacts of Iceland's Katla Subglacial Volcano on the Mýrdalsjökull Glacier C. McNeill-Jewer et al. https://doi.org/10.3138/cart.50.3.3197F
16. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: a contribution to the socio-hydrology debate S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
17. Prepared and flexible: Local adaptation strategies for avalanche risk G. Hovelsrud et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1460899
18. Determinants of Preventive Behaviors for COVID-19 in Japan M. Kosugi https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199979
19. Vulnerability of human settlements to flood risk in the core area of Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria R. Salami et al. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v9i1.371
20. Living at the edge of an active volcano: Risk from lava flows on Mt. Etna C. Del Negro et al. https://doi.org/10.1130/B35290.1
21. Disaster Risk Perception of University Students S. Mızrak & R. Aslan https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12202
22. A vulnerability-based risk assessment of the threatened area surrounding Popocatépetl Volcano to support decision-making during a volcanic crisis E. Ramos Jiménez https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2019.58.1.2064
23. ‘It's like going to the moon…’ exploring risk and stakeholder views of Iceland's Krafla Magma Testbed (KMT) A. Gormally-Sutton & H. Napier https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104728
24. The 2021 La Palma eruption: social dilemmas resulting from life close to an active volcano V. Troll et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gto.12472
25. Afet Yönetiminde Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rolünün Afet Risk Algısına Etkisinin Belirlenmesi F. Gündüz Zeybekoğlu https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1671581
26. Coping with storm surges on the Icelandic south coast: A case study of the Stokkseyri village G. Geirsdóttir et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.09.013
27. Community resilience through the lens of social support: Recovering from the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption in Iceland I. Ómarsdóttir et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103272
28. Religious Fatalism and Earthquake Preparedness among Turkish Muslims: Risk Perception as a Moderating Factor H. Türk et al. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.1644820
29. Withstanding winter vulnerabilities: A way of life in a northern seaside community B. Heimtun & J. Jacobsen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.038
30. Lulling Effect of Public Flood Protection: Case of Benhe Community in Kaohsiung during Typhoon Fanapi Y. Kuo et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000189
31. Media Disaster Reporting Effects on Public Risk Perception and Response to Escalating Tornado Warnings: A Natural Experiment M. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13205
32. Community Perception and Communication of Volcanic Risk from the Cotopaxi Volcano in Latacunga, Ecuador J. Gomez-Zapata et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041714
33. Communication-related vulnerability to disasters: A heuristic framework S. Hansson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101931
34. Responding to volcanic eruptions in Iceland: from the small to the catastrophic D. Bird & G. Gísladóttir https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0205-6
35. Dry Heat Among the Red Rocks: Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Responses to Extreme Heat Among Outdoor Recreationists in Southeastern Utah K. Goldstein & P. Howe https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737620500049
36. Percepção dos riscos naturais e tecnológicos, confiança institucional e preparação para situações de emergência: O caso de Portugal continental A. Tavares et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.1380
37. Identifying critical factors affecting the livelihood recovery following disasters: A comparative analysis of China and New Zealand G. Pu & A. Chang-Richards https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104958
38. Research on the impact of village organization degree on farmers' flood adaptation Behavior: Evidence from southwest China F. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104006
39. Mainstreaming risk reduction into self-build housing: the negligible role of perceptions G. Sou https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1318746
40. Volcanic risk perception in northern Chiapas, Mexico F. Rodríguez-VanGort & D. Novelo-Casanova https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1549-x
41. Washington households' expected responses to lahar threat from Mt. Rainier H. Wei & M. Lindell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.014
42. Local knowledge of emerging hazards: Instability above an Icelandic glacier S. Matti & H. Ögmundardóttir https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102187
43. Virtual tools for volcanic crisis management, and evacuation decision support: applications to El Chichón volcano (Chiapas, México) J. Marrero et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0672-4
44. Fearing the knock on the door: critical security studies insights into limited cooperation with disaster management regimes R. Christie et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-015-0037-7
45. The Impact of Perceived Flood Exposure on Flood‐Risk Perception: The Role of Distance E. O'Neill et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12597
46. Gender, Intra-Household Dynamics, and Household Hurricane Preparedness: An Exploratory Study Employing a Dyadic Interview Approach L. Hung https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0158-9
47. The Influence of Hazard Maps and Trust of Flood Controls on Coastal Flood Spatial Awareness and Risk Perception D. Houston et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517748711
48. Exploring Household Preparedness for Volcanic Eruptions of Kīlauea and Mauna Loa, Hawai‘i H. Wei https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000573
49. How do Disaster Types and Research and Development Play a Different Role in Risk Perception of Citizens? S. Yum https://doi.org/10.1177/15697371251336116
50. Afet Yönetimi Sürecinde Risk Algısı Çalışmalarının Katkısı S. MIZRAK https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.992959
51. Living through a volcanic eruption: Understanding the experience of survivors as a phenomenological existential phenomenon S. Warsini et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12212
52. Glacier and Snow Cover Dynamics and Their Affecting Factors on the Pamir Plateau Section of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Y. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040880
53. The development of perception scale of gender role in disaster management and the examination with related factors E. Onal et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-08-2021-0251
54. Livelihood recovery for sustainable development: A study of the Lushan earthquake G. Pu & A. Chang-Richards https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103317
55. Perceived Arrival Time of Disaster Relief Supplies Matters for Household Preparedness for Natural Disasters S. Maruta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-020-00061-4
56. Risk awareness characterisation in multi-hazard, high-tourist-interest sites: the case of Stromboli volcano during the 2019 eruptive crisis (Aeolian islands UNESCO site, Italy) A. Turchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08001-3
57. Community preparedness for emergency: a cross-sectional survey of residents in Heilongjiang of China W. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008479
58. The perception of risk in the flood-prone area: a case study from the Czech municipality M. Bera & P. Daněk https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-01-2017-0004
59. Living with Risks: Changes in Risk Perception in the Campi Flegrei Volcanic Area (South Italy) A. Galderisi & G. Limongi https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229707
60. Discovering the 1858 Lava Flow Field at Somma-Vesuvius (Italy) Through geoitinerary, Virtual Tour and 3D Reconstruction of Volcanic Landforms T. Lemaire et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01247-6
61. The psychology of beach users: importance of confirmation bias, action, and intention to improving rip current safety A. Ménard et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3424-7
62. Determination of health workers' perceptions of the disaster management process and gender inequality: the case of a state hospital in Turkey B. Çoban & E. İnal Önal https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-08-2022-0044
63. The holistic bricolage research approach and disaster-risk reduction A. Lotteri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104031
64. Residents' attitudes and behaviour before and after the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruptions—a case study from southern Iceland D. Bird & G. Gísladóttir https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-012-0595-z
65. Balancing Safety and Mobility: Experience with Iceland’s SMS Avalanche Warning System M. Kokorsch https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-026-00722-0
66. Perception and Communication of Seismic Risk: The 6 April 2009 L'Aquila Earthquake Case Study F. Marincioni et al. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3672928
67. Household preparedness for natural disasters: Impact of disaster experience and implications for future disaster risks in Japan H. Onuma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.004
68. Surveying volcanic crises exercises: From open-question questionnaires to a prototype checklist S. Massaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2023.107850
69. Volcanic Risk Perception and Coping Strategies from Mounts Cameroon and Nyiragongo Eruptions, Central Africa: A Comparative Analysis M. Wantim et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2024.126011
70. Differing community responses to similar public health threats: A cross-disciplinary systematic literature review G. Greene et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.031
71. A multi-scale risk assessment for tephra fallout and airborne concentration from multiple Icelandic volcanoes – Part 2: Vulnerability and impact C. Scaini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2289-2014
72. Development of the Disaster Risk Perception Scale: Evaluation of Its Impact on Disaster Preparedness I. Kiymis & A. Kaya https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.38
73. An Ecological Risk Management and Capacity Building Model P. Buergelt & D. Paton https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-014-9676-2
74. Public perceptions of a rip current hazard education program: “Break the Grip of the Rip!” C. Houser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1003-2017
75. Different communities, different perspectives: issues affecting residents’ response to a volcanic eruption in southern Iceland D. Bird et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0464-1
76. Cultural landscapes at risk: Exploring the meaning of place in a sacred valley of Nepal J. Sherry et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.007
77. Education: Can a bottom-up strategy help for earthquake disaster prevention? G. Musacchio et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9779-1
78. Examining the impact of fatalism belief and optimism orientation on seismic preparedness: Considering their roles in the nexus between risk perception and preparedness X. Liu & L. Sun https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12383