58 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Vulnerability Analysis of the Urban Environments to Different Seismic Scenarios: Residential Buildings and Associated Population Distribution Modelling through Integrating Dasymetric Mapping Method and GIS M. Mesgar & P. Jalilvand 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.100
2. Adjustability of exposed elements by updating their capacity for resistance after a damaging event: application to an earthquake–tsunami cascade scenario C. Negulescu et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-04189-0
3. Testing machine learning models for seismic damage prediction at a regional scale using building-damage dataset compiled after the 2015 Gorkha Nepal earthquake S. Ghimire et al. 10.1177/87552930221106495
4. Optical satellite imagery for quantifying spatio-temporal dimension of physical exposure in disaster risk assessments D. Ehrlich & P. Tenerelli 10.1007/s11069-012-0372-5
5. İstanbul’daki 2000 Yılı Sonrası Binalar İçin Tasarım Depremi Altında Karşılaştırmalı Yapısal Hasar ve Mali Kayıp Tahminleri U. HANCILAR et al. 10.18400/tekderg.326939
6. Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Seismic Risk Mitigation for a Region with Moderate Seismicity: The Case of Tiberias, Israel H. Wei et al. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.581
7. Assessment of the ripple effects and spatial heterogeneity of total losses in the capital of China after a great catastrophic shock Z. Zhang et al. 10.5194/nhess-17-367-2017
8. A Critical Look at the Use of Design Spectrum Shape for Seismic Risk Assessment E. Erduran & C. Lindholm 10.1193/1.4000086
9. Time-Frequency Feature-Based Seismic Response Prediction Neural Network Model for Building Structures P. Zhang et al. 10.3390/app13052956
10. Efficient disaster waste management: identifying suitable temporary sites using an emission-aware approach after the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes A. Demir & A. Dinçer 10.1007/s13762-023-05123-0
11. Impact of Temporal Population Distribution on Earthquake Loss Estimation: A Case Study on Sylhet, Bangladesh S. Ara 10.1007/s13753-014-0033-2
12. A New Agent-Based Methodology for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Areas A. Greco et al. 10.3390/ijgi8060274
13. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Area of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Eastern Uzbekistan, Central Asia A. Ischuk et al. 10.1785/0120160330
14. Comparison of seismic risk assessment based on macroseismic intensity and spectrum approaches using ‘SeisVARA’ P. Haldar et al. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.016
15. A Comparative Study of the Effects of Earthquakes in Different Countries on Target Displacement in Mid-Rise Regular RC Structures E. Işık et al. 10.3390/app122312495
16. The impact of behavior on the risk of injury and death during an earthquake: a simulation-based study S. Shapira et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-3167-5
17. Risk assessment of people trapped in earthquake based on km grid: a case study of the 2014 Ludian earthquake, China B. Wei et al. 10.1080/19475705.2017.1318795
18. Extracting building stock information from optical satellite imagery for mapping earthquake exposure and its vulnerability D. Ehrlich et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0482-0
19. A framework for estimating immediate interdependent functionality reduction of a steel hospital following a seismic event E. Hassan & H. Mahmoud 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.009
20. Seismic damage assessment using RADIUS and GIS: A case study of Sylhet City, Bangladesh R. Mazumder & A. Salman 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.023
21. Earthquake hazard potential of Indo-Gangetic Foredeep: its seismotectonism, hazard, and damage modeling for the cities of Patna, Lucknow, and Varanasi S. Nath et al. 10.1007/s10950-019-09832-3
22. Risk assessment of people trapped in earthquake disasters based on a single building: a case study in Xichang city, Sichuan Province, China B. Wei et al. 10.1080/19475705.2021.2017358
23. Karma Deprem Yalıtım Sistemlerinin Deneysel Performans Değerlendirmesi C. YENİDOGAN 10.21205/deufmd.2021236906
24. Determination of Urban Earthquake Risk for Kırşehir, Turkey E. Isik et al. 10.15446/esrj.v23n3.60255
25. A Technological System for Post-Earthquake Damage Scenarios Based on the Monitoring by Means of an Urban Seismic Network A. Costanzo et al. 10.3390/s21237887
26. Quantitative assessment of the environmental risks of geothermal energy: A review S. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111287
27. Population density modelling in support of disaster risk assessment P. Tenerelli et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.015
28. An evolutionary multi-objective optimization approach to disaster waste management: A case study of Istanbul, Turkey K. Onan et al. 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.039
29. IRMA platform for the calculation of damages and risks of Italian residential buildings B. Borzi et al. 10.1007/s10518-020-00924-x
30. New macroseismic intensity predictive models for Turkey E. Bayrak et al. 10.1007/s11600-019-00357-4
31. Epistemic uncertainty of probabilistic building exposure compositions in scenario-based earthquake loss models J. Gómez Zapata et al. 10.1007/s10518-021-01312-9
32. Incomplete information imputation in limited data environments with application to disaster response K. Yagci Sokat et al. 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.016
33. Rapid earthquake response: The state-of-the art and recommendations with a focus on European systems S. Guérin-Marthe et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101958
34. Fine–Scale Spatiotemporal Distribution Assessment of Indoor Population Based on Single Buildings: A Case in Dongcheng Subdistrict, Xichang, China B. Wei et al. 10.3390/su15097423
35. Deriving fragility functions from bilinearized capacity curves for earthquake scenario modelling using the conditional spectrum C. Michel et al. 10.1007/s10518-018-0371-3
36. Armagedom — A Tool for Seismic Risk Assessment Illustrated with Applications O. Sedan et al. 10.1080/13632469.2012.726604
37. Resilience-Based Design of Infrastructure: Review of Models, Methodologies, and Computational Tools M. Shadabfar et al. 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001184
38. Seismic risk assessment of a large metropolitan area by means of simulated earthquakes E. Fischer et al. 10.1007/s11069-023-05995-y
39. Unravelling Karachi’s Seismic Potential: Estimating Maximum Ground Shaking in Various Zones M. Ahmed & S. Lodi 10.1142/S1793431123500252
40. A Spatiotemporal Risk Scenario for a Predictive Earthquake in Western Himalaya S. Rajput et al. 10.1080/13632469.2022.2033352
41. Review of literature on decision support systems for natural hazard risk reduction: Current status and future research directions J. Newman et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.042
42. Earthquake risk assessment for the building inventory of Muscat, Sultanate of Oman U. Hancilar et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-3357-1
43. VIGIRISKS platform, a web-tool for single and multi-hazard risk assessment C. Negulescu et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05567-6
44. First-Order Seismic Loss Assessment at Urban Scale: A Case Study of Skopje, North Macedonia V. Mircevska et al. 10.1080/13632469.2019.1662342
45. A systematic approach to identify, characterize, and prioritize the data needs for quantitative sustainable disaster debris management H. Jalloul et al. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106174
46. Comparative earthquake loss estimations for high-code buildings in Istanbul U. Hancilar et al. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105956
47. Pan-European seismic risk assessment: a proof of concept using the Earthquake Loss Estimation Routine (ELER) C. Corbane et al. 10.1007/s10518-016-9993-5
48. Topological network and GIS approach to modeling earthquake risk of infrastructure systems: A case study in Japan C. Lam et al. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102392
49. An Integrated Computational Approach for Seismic Risk Assessment of Individual Buildings J. Estêvão 10.3390/app9235088
50. Insights from Hazus loss estimations in Israel for Dead Sea Transform earthquakes T. Levi et al. 10.1007/s11069-014-1325-y
51. LOG-IDEAH: LOGic trees for identification of damage due to earthquakes for architectural heritage V. Novelli & D. D’Ayala 10.1007/s10518-014-9622-0
52. Urban RAT: New Tool for Virtual and Site-Specific Mobile Rapid Data Collection for Seismic Risk Assessment S. Ploeger et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000472
53. Development of integrated earthquake simulation system for Istanbul A. Sahin et al. 10.1186/s40623-016-0497-y
54. Volume loss fatality model for as-built and retrofitted clay brick unreinforced masonry buildings damaged in the 2010/11 Canterbury earthquakes S. Abeling & J. Ingham 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.02.014
55. Fragility functions for code complying RC frames via best correlated IM–EDP pairs U. Hancilar & E. Çaktı 10.1007/s10518-015-9775-5
56. Damage Catalogue Software and the Role of Architecture & Architects: A Comprehensive Review M. DALLI & A. SOYLUK 10.30785/mbud.1317394
57. Farklı Deprem Senaryolarına Göre Kırşehir İli Kayıp Tahmin Analizleri E. IŞIK et al. 10.21324/dacd.432592
58. Seismic vulnerability of the Himalayan half-dressed rubble stone masonry structures, experimental and analytical studies N. Ahmad et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-3441-2012