52 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Projected Climate-Fire Interactions Drive Forest to Shrubland Transition on an Arizona Sky Island C. O’Connor et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00137
2. U.S.federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests S. Stephens et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1584
3. Applications of simulation-based burn probability modelling: a review M. Parisien et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19069
4. Prescribed fire is unlikely to reduce net PM 2.5 emissions in most locations M. Kreider et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2613722123
5. Assessing Landscape Vulnerability to Wildfire in the USA N. Vaillant et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-016-0040-1
6. Comparing fuel reduction treatments for reducing wildfire size and intensity in a boreal forest landscape of northeastern China Z. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.058
7. Forest management in the Sierra Nevada provides limited carbon storage potential: an expert elicitation S. Lalonde et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2321
8. Fostering Carbon Credits to Finance Wildfire Risk Reduction Forest Management in Mediterranean Landscapes F. Alcasena et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10101104
9. Assessing exposure of human and ecological values to wildfire in Sardinia, Italy M. Salis et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11060
10. Can fuel‐reduction treatments really increase forest carbon storage in the western US by reducing future fire emissions? J. Campbell et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/110057
11. Stand Age Influence on Potential Wildfire Ignition and Spread in the Boreal Forest of Northeastern Canada S. Erni et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-018-0235-3
12. Are the applications of wildland fire behaviour models getting ahead of their evaluation again? M. Alexander & M. Cruz https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.11.001
13. Wildfire Risk Assessment in a Typical Mediterranean Wildland–Urban Interface of Greece I. Mitsopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0432-6
14. Combining wildfire behaviour simulations and network analysis to support wildfire management: A Mediterranean landscape case study B. Aparício et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108726
15. Analyzing spatiotemporal changes in wildfire regime and exposure across a Mediterranean fire-prone area M. Salis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0951-0
16. A comparison of three approaches for simulating fine-scale surface winds in support of wildland fire management. Part I. Model formulation and comparison against measurements J. Forthofer et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12089
17. So you want your research to be relevant? Building the bridge between ecosystem services research and practice L. Olander et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.003
18. Fuel treatment effectiveness at the landscape scale: a systematic review of simulation studies comparing treatment scenarios in North America J. Ott et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00163-2
19. Tamm Review: Are fuel treatments effective at achieving ecological and social objectives? A systematic review E. Kalies & L. Yocom Kent https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.021
20. Landscape‐scale fuel treatment and wildfire impacts on carbon stocks and fire hazard in California spotted owl habitat L. Chiono et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1648
21. Modelling the rate of fire spread and uncertainty associated with the onset and propagation of crown fires in conifer forest stands M. Cruz & M. Alexander https://doi.org/10.1071/WF16218
22. Variation in tree mortality and regeneration affect forest carbon recovery following fuel treatments and wildfire in the Lake Tahoe Basin, California, USA C. Carlson et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-7-7
23. Modelling Fire Behavior to Assess Community Exposure in Europe: Combining Open Data and Geospatial Analysis P. Palaiologou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11030198
24. Advancing effects analysis for integrated, large-scale wildfire risk assessment M. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1731-x
25. The effects of forest restoration on ecosystem carbon in western North America: A systematic review J. James et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.029
26. Interactions of climate, fire, and management in future forests of the Pacific Northwest M. Wimberly & Z. Liu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.043
27. Potential wildfire and carbon stability in frequent‐fire forests in the Sierra Nevada: trade‐offs from a long‐term study D. Foster et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3198
28. Carbon, climate, and natural disturbance: a review of mechanisms, challenges, and tools for understanding forest carbon stability in an uncertain future A. Dye et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-024-00282-0
29. Identifying opportunity hot spots for reducing the risk of wildfire-caused carbon loss in western US conifer forests J. Peeler et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf05a
30. A flexible framework for cost-effective fire management H. Clarke et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102722
31. Assessing Landscape Scale Wildfire Exposure for Highly Valued Resources in a Mediterranean Area F. Alcasena et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0448-6
32. Can we manage a future with more fire? Effectiveness of defensible space treatment depends on housing amount and configuration K. Braziunas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01162-x
33. A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management C. Miller & A. Ager https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11114
34. Tamm review: The effects of prescribed fire on wildfire regimes and impacts: A framework for comparison M. Hunter & M. Robles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118435
35. Patterns of wildfire risk in the United States from systematic operational risk assessments: how risk is characterised by land managers E. Noonan-Wright & C. Seielstad https://doi.org/10.1071/WF21020
36. Zone adaptive fuel mapping for high resolution wildfire spread forecasting P. Sánchez et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06402-1
37. Use of random forests for modeling and mapping forest canopy fuels for fire behavior analysis in Lassen Volcanic National Park, California, USA A. Pierce et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.010
38. Assessing Wildfire Risk in Cultural Heritage Properties Using High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Satellite Imagery and Spatially Explicit Fire Simulations: The Case of Holy Mount Athos, Greece G. Mallinis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7020046
39. Wildfire Exposure Analysis on the National Forests in the Pacific Northwest, USA A. Ager et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01911.x
40. Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: A review M. Thompson & D. Calkin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.015
41. Effect of Climate Change Projections on Forest Fire Behavior and Values-at-Risk in Southwestern Greece K. Kalabokidis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6062214
42. Improving long-term fuel treatment effectiveness in the National Forest System through quantitative prioritization A. G. Barros et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.041
43. Fuel treatment impacts on estimated wildfire carbon loss from forests in Montana, Oregon, California, and Arizona S. Stephens et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES11-00289.1
44. Estimating annual GHG and particulate matter emissions from rural and forest fires based on an integrated modelling approach C. Scarpa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167960
45. A fire modeling approach to assess wildfire exposure of valued resources in central Navarra, Spain F. Alcasena et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-015-0919-6
46. Assessing the effect of a fuel break network to reduce burnt area and wildfire risk transmission T. Oliveira et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15146
47. Landscape-level, participatory wildfire governance reduces fire hazard and potential carbon emission C. Pérez-Izquierdo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127308
48. Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage S. Healey et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1569
49. Application of simulation modeling for wildfire exposure and transmission assessment in Sardinia, Italy M. Salis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102189
50. Wildfire and fuel treatment effects on forest carbon dynamics in the western United States J. Restaino & D. Peterson https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.043
51. Analyzing seasonal patterns of wildfire exposure factors in Sardinia, Italy M. Salis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4175-x
52. Using wildfire as a management strategy to restore resiliency to ponderosa pine forests in the southwestern United States J. Young et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4040