Articles | Volume 10, issue 12
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 2515–2526, 2010

Special issue: Models, theory, and empirical studies in wildfire hazard

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 2515–2526, 2010

  07 Dec 2010

07 Dec 2010

Measuring the effect of fuel treatments on forest carbon using landscape risk analysis

A. A. Ager1, M. A. Finney2, A. McMahan3, and J. Cathcart4 A. A. Ager et al.
  • 1USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center, 3160 NE 3rd Street, Prineville, OR, 97754, USA
  • 2USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 Hwy. 10 West, Missoula, MT, 59808, USA
  • 3USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, 2150A Centre Avenue, Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA
  • 4Oregon Department of Forestry, 2600 State Street, Salem, OR 97310, USA

Abstract. Wildfire simulation modelling was used to examine whether fuel reduction treatments can potentially reduce future wildfire emissions and provide carbon benefits. In contrast to previous reports, the current study modelled landscape scale effects of fuel treatments on fire spread and intensity, and used a probabilistic framework to quantify wildfire effects on carbon pools to account for stochastic wildfire occurrence. The study area was a 68 474 ha watershed located on the Fremont-Winema National Forest in southeastern Oregon, USA. Fuel reduction treatments were simulated on 10% of the watershed (19% of federal forestland). We simulated 30 000 wildfires with random ignition locations under both treated and untreated landscapes to estimate the change in burn probability by flame length class resulting from the treatments. Carbon loss functions were then calculated with the Forest Vegetation Simulator for each stand in the study area to quantify change in carbon as a function of flame length. We then calculated the expected change in carbon from a random ignition and wildfire as the sum of the product of the carbon loss and the burn probabilities by flame length class. The expected carbon difference between the non-treatment and treatment scenarios was then calculated to quantify the effect of fuel treatments. Overall, the results show that the carbon loss from implementing fuel reduction treatments exceeded the expected carbon benefit associated with lowered burn probabilities and reduced fire severity on the treated landscape. Thus, fuel management activities resulted in an expected net loss of carbon immediately after treatment. However, the findings represent a point in time estimate (wildfire immediately after treatments), and a temporal analysis with a probabilistic framework used here is needed to model carbon dynamics over the life cycle of the fuel treatments. Of particular importance is the long-term balance between emissions from the decay of dead trees killed by fire and carbon sequestration by forest regeneration following wildfire.