185 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Are two earthquakes better than one? How earthquakes in two different regions affect risk judgments and preparation in three locations J. McClure et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.003
2. Perceived risks, emotions, and policy preferences: A longitudinal survey among the local population on gas quakes in the Netherlands G. Perlaviciute et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.012
3. A Socio-Seismology Experiment in Haiti E. Calais et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.542654
4. Community resilience, latent resources and resource scarcity after an earthquake: Is society really three meals away from anarchy? J. Thomas & K. Mora https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1187-3
5. Living a ‘Digital Life’ and ready to cope with crises? Highlighting young adults' conceptions of crisis and emergency preparedness M. Eriksson https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12498
6. Trust and confidence in authorities, responsibility attribution, and natural hazards risk perception Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12234
7. Incentives and Motivators for Improving Building Resilience to Earthquake Disaster T. Egbelakin et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000249
8. Salient Public Beliefs Underlying Disaster Preparedness Behaviors: A Theory-Based Qualitative Study M. Najafi et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X16001448
9. What to do when the earth shakes? DCH or door frames: evaluating generalised risk minimisation guidance S. Ramkumar https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1537351
10. Religious Fatalism and Earthquake Preparedness among Turkish Muslims: Risk Perception as a Moderating Factor H. Türk et al. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.1644820
11. Perceived Stakeholder Information Credibility and Hazard Adjustments: A Case of Induced Seismic Activities in Oklahoma H. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000378
12. Social Representations of Earthquakes: A Study of People Living in Three Highly Seismic Areas H. Joffe et al. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000138
13. Disaster preparedness and cultural factors: a comparative study in Romania and Malta S. Appleby‐Arnold et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12433
14. Is There a Normality Bias in the Spread of COVID-19? M. Toyama & M. Nagamine https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep.70.178
15. Telluric and Climate-Related Risk Awareness, and Risk Mitigation Strategies in the Azores Archipelago: First Steps for Building Societal Resilience A. Ivčević et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158653
16. Information credibility, disaster risk perception and evacuation willingness of rural households in China D. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04106-5
17. Exploring the relationship between housing conditions and risk perception in a disaster context A. Abukhalaf & D. Amaripadath https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310665
18. Expecting the Unexpected: Predicting Physiological and Psychological Wildfire Preparedness from Perceived Risk, Responsibility, and Obstacles I. McNeill et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12037
19. Economic effects of regulating the seismic strengthening of older buildings O. Filippova et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1357318
20. Household earthquake preparedness in Serbia: A study of selected municipalities V. Cvetković et al. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.5445
21. Household preparedness for natural disasters: Impact of disaster experience and implications for future disaster risks in Japan H. Onuma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.004
22. Behavioral Response in the Immediate Aftermath of Shaking: Earthquakes in Christchurch and Wellington, New Zealand, and Hitachi, Japan I. Jon et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111137
23. Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’ I. Stewart & D. Lewis https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003
24. Earthquake awareness and perception of risk among the residents of Istanbul S. Tekeli-Yeşil et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9764-1
25. Behavioural science applied to risk-based decision processes: a case study for earthquake prone buildings in New Zealand R. Ball et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2022.2089980
26. Multi-hazard perceptions at Long Valley Caldera, California, USA J. Peers et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101955
27. When Descriptive Norms Backfire: Attitudes Induce Undesirable Consequences during Disaster Preparation T. Ozaki & K. Nakayachi https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12195
28. Trust in stakeholders and social support: risk perception and preparedness by the Wenchuan earthquake survivors Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2020.1725410
29. An Analysis of Housing Structures’ Earthquake Vulnerability in Two Parts of Dhaka City M. Ahmed & H. Morita https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041106
30. Education and Disaster Vulnerability in Southeast Asia: Evidence and Policy Implications R. Hoffmann & D. Blecha https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041401
31. Multihazard Weather Risk Perception and Preparedness in Eight Countries A. Keul et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0064.1
32. Risk perception, policy efficacy, and policy support in earthquake risk management: Empirical insights from South Korea W. Li & T. Paudel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100349
33. A communications intervention to motivate disaster risk reduction A. Sanquini et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-11-2015-0256
34. COVID-19 vaccine intentions in Aotearoa New Zealand: Behaviour, risk perceptions, and collective versus individual motivations L. Vinnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100082
35. Disaster Risk Perception, Sense of Pace, Evacuation Willingness, and Relocation Willingness of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China D. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020602
36. Percepcija rizika od zemljotresa u Republici Srbiji - teorijskoempirijska studija V. Cvetković & M. Filipović https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1902142C
37. Household preparedness for future earthquake disaster risk using an extended theory of planned behavior Z. Zaremohzzabieh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102533
38. When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes J. McClure et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6
39. Role of hazard information in the adoption of seismic hazard adjustments: Information treatment experiment in Beijing H. Lim & D. Fang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103182
40. Exploring the effect of age on the intention of accepting mitigation policy: A case study of residential seismic strengthening policy in an area with high seismic risk H. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101331
41. Assessing the impact and equitability of governance mechanisms for seismic resilience enhancement P. Habibi Moshfegh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106902
42. Preparing for the new normal: Students and earthquake hazard adjustments in Oklahoma H. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.033
43. Integrating psychosocial and WASH school interventions to build disaster resilience E. Pacheco et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102520
44. Disaster Preparedness Education among Community: What is effective? An Integrative Literature Review I. Permana et al. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.8373
45. Earthquake recommendations in Europe: Types and diversity S. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103732
46. Getting Canadians prepared for natural disasters: a multi-method analysis of risk perception, behaviors, and the social environment A. Yong & L. Lemyre https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03669-2
47. The future protection from the climate change-related hazards and the willingness to pay for home insurance in the coastal wetlands of West Sardinia, Italy A. Ivčević et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101956
48. Effects of flood risk warnings on preparedness behavior: Evidence from northern China H. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103971
49. The influence of new information that contradicts common knowledge about earthquake preparedness in Israel: A mixed methods experiment study A. Gesser-Edelsburg et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250127
50. Motivations to prepare after the 2013 Cook Strait Earthquake, N.Z. E. Doyle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.008
51. Salient Beliefs About Earthquake Hazards and Household Preparedness J. Becker et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12014
52. Financial Preparation, Disaster Experience, and Disaster Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence From the Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes in China’s Sichuan Province D. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183345
53. A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
54. Older adults' meanings of preparedness: a New Zealand perspective R. TUOHY & C. STEPHENS https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14001408
55. Earthquake recommendations in Europe: A qualitative coding methodology for the analysis of preparedness and response recommendations from authorities S. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103966
56. The effects of trust in government on earthquake survivors’ risk perception and preparedness in China Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2699-9
57. A comparative frame for a contextualised analysis of local natural risk management R. Bertoldo https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101945
58. Integrating mental health and disaster preparedness in intervention: a randomized controlled trial with earthquake and flood-affected communities in Haiti L. James et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719000163
59. Assessment of Social Vulnerability to Floods in the Floodplain of Northern Italy G. Roder et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0090.1
60. Examining the impact of fatalism belief and optimism orientation on seismic preparedness: Considering their roles in the nexus between risk perception and preparedness X. Liu & L. Sun https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12383
61. Community preparedness for volcanic hazards at Mount Rainier, USA L. Vinnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-021-00110-x
62. Knowledge, perceptions, and behavioral responses to earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand L. Vinnell et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1229247
63. Seismic Risk Perception and Seismic Adjustments in Vaslui City, Romania A. Albulescu et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000453
64. Rethinking the share of responsibilities in disaster preparedness to encourage individual preparedness for flash floods in urban areas C. Monteil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102663
65. Participation in housing renewal in Istanbul in the face of seismic risk: a mixed methods research E. Bilbil et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2026.2689343
66. Calculative and relational trust in the management of coastal floods and earthquakes: a comparative study (Confianza calculativa y relacional en la gestión de inundaciones costeras y terremotos: un estudio comparativo) R. Bertoldo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2020.1734398
67. Trusting Government to Mitigate a New Hazard: The Case of Oklahoma Earthquakes H. Murphy et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12141
68. Shaping Children’s Knowledge and Response to Bushfire Through Use of an Immersive Virtual Learning Environment S. Molan et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211054569
69. Difficulties in explaining complex issues with maps: evaluating seismic hazard communication – the Swiss case M. Marti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2677-2019
70. How to increase earthquake and home fire preparedness: the fix-it intervention H. Joffe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2528-1
71. Older adults' disaster lifecycle experience of the 2011 and 2013 Queensland floods L. Brockie & E. Miller https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.001
72. Effects of risk framing on earthquake risk perception: Life-time frequencies enhance recognition of the risk L. Henrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.003
73. Children’s knowledge of bushfire emergency response B. Towers https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13153
74. A model of household preparedness for earthquakes: how individuals make meaning of earthquake information and how this influences preparedness J. Becker et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0238-x
75. A critical review of cognitive and environmental factors of disaster preparedness: research issues and implications from the usage of “awareness (ishiki)” in Japan H. Daimon et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05909-y
76. Disaster risk reduction: Psychological perspectives on preparedness D. Paton https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12237
77. Community Disaster Resilience and Risk Perception in Earthquake-Stricken Areas of China Z. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2021.342
78. The relationship between political ideology and current earthquake and tsunami preparedness P. Repetto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102444
79. Earthquake Threat! Understanding the Intention to Prepare for the Big One Z. Asgarizadeh Lamjiry & R. Gifford https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13775
80. Exploring the changes in risk perceptions and adaptation behaviors based on various socioeconomic characteristics before and after earthquake disasters – a case study in Taiwan T. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2433-2020
81. Analysis and modeling of key factors in implementing pre-flood protection measures in local communities in Iran E. Askari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100838
82. Using GIS to measure the impact of the Canterbury earthquakes on house prices in Christchurch, NZ S. Bond & S. Dermisi https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2015-0027
83. A psychosocial perspective on community resilience and preparedness in the context of earthquakes in Turkey C. Doğulu et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP501-2019-110
84. Tsunami preparedness within Sri Lanka's education system J. Cels et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103473
85. Advancing disaster risk communications I. Stewart https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104677
86. Economic impediments to successful seismic retrofitting decisions D. K. Ahadzie et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-01-2014-0002
87. An overview of communication activities for risk mitigation in Italy A. Digrisolo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2025.12.097
88. Local risk awareness and precautionary behaviour in a multi-hazard region of North Morocco A. Ivčević et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101724
89. Agent-based simulation of the effectiveness of policies for the adoption of seismic retrofits A. Ahmadi & R. Costa https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930251377731
90. Assessment of Public Flood Risk Perception and Influencing Factors: An Example of Jiaozuo City, China D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159475
91. Risk, Transformation and Adaptation: Ideas for Reframing Approaches to Disaster Risk Reduction D. Paton & P. Buergelt https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142594
92. Kriz Dönemlerinde Risk Algısının Tüketici Davranışlarına Etkisi: Deprem Örneği N. ESER & A. YAVUZALP MARANGOZ https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1325326
93. Beyond social capital: The norms, belief systems, and agency embedded in social networks shape resilience to climatic and geophysical hazards B. MacGillivray https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.014
94. Qualitative research can improve understandings about disaster preparedness for independent older adults in the community R. Tuohy et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-01-2013-0006
95. How does multi‐hazard communication influence risk perception, attitudes, and behaviour: an experimental survey L. Vinnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.70049
96. Preparedness actions towards seismic risk mitigation for the general public in Martinique, French Lesser Antilles: a mid-term appraisal J. Audru et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2031-2013
97. Earthquake probability in the National Seismic Hazard Maps for Japan and people’s risk perceptions: the search for more effective expression S. Saito et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01627-0
98. Supernatural and natural seismic framing in a Tibetan Buddhist community L. Sun & J. Guo https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07277-1
99. Examination of factors of household-based preparedness behavior against earthquakes R. Tanaka & H. Takehashi https://doi.org/10.4189/shes.17.139
100. Examining the relationship between media representations of typhoon-related issues and public risk perception K. Yamada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102837
101. Unpacking immediate public behavioral responses to earthquakes: A study focusing on the role of fatalism and fear L. Sun & X. Liu https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231189701
102. Prediction of humans’ behaviors during a disaster: The Behavioral Pattern during Disaster Indicator (BPDI) Y. Xenidis & G. Kaltsidi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105773
103. Applying the Protective Action Decision Model to Explain Cyclone Shutter Installation Behavior M. Scovell et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000417
104. The development of the model of influence of sociodemographic characteristics and disaster experience toward household preparedness for facing landslide in Bogor regency P. Saputra et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/708/1/012049
105. Perceptions of earthquake emergency response and rescue in China: a comparison between experts and local practitioners Y. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03663-8
106. Sea-level rise and human migration M. Hauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-019-0002-9
107. Learn from the Past, Prepare for the Future: Impacts of Education and Experience on Disaster Preparedness in the Philippines and Thailand R. Hoffmann & R. Muttarak https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.016
108. The relationship between risk experience and risk response: a study of farmers and climate change A. Hamilton-Webb et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1153506
109. Perceived Arrival Time of Disaster Relief Supplies Matters for Household Preparedness for Natural Disasters S. Maruta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-020-00061-4
110. Societal Influences on Earthquake Information Meaning-Making and Household Preparedness1 J. Becker et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701403200204
111. Residents’ Disaster Preparedness after the Meinong Taiwan Earthquake: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory J. Tang & J. Feng https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071434
112. Seismic experience and structural preparedness of residential houses in Aotearoa New Zealand C. Miranda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102590
113. Perceptions of risk characteristics of earthquakes compared to other hazards and their impact on risk tolerance L. Henrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12284
114. Beyond average preparedness: a quantile analysis of earthquake mitigation behaviors among homeowners F. Nkouaga https://doi.org/10.3389/frevc.2025.1658608
115. A tale of two cities: Judgments about earthquake and aftershock probabilities across time windows J. McClure et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.11.010
116. Evaluating the ShakeOut drill in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Effects on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour L. Vinnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101721
117. Reactions to earthquake hazard: Strengthening commercial buildings and voluntary earthquake safety checks on houses in Wellington, New Zealand C. McRae et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.007
118. Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk J. Lawrence et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1288-z
119. Communicating Earthquake Preparedness: The Influence of Induced Mood, Perceived Risk, and Gain or Loss Frames on Homeowners’ Attitudes Toward General Precautionary Measures for Earthquakes M. Marti et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12875
120. Cognition and Implementation of Disaster Preparedness among Japanese Dialysis Facilities H. Sugisawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6691350
121. Community Perspectives on Social Equity in Disaster Planning: A Qualitative Inquiry S. Badiezadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9090365
122. An integrated approach to mental health and disaster preparedness: a cluster comparison with earthquake affected communities in Nepal C. Welton-Mitchell et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1863-z
123. Does non‐destructive earthquake experience affect risk perception and motivate preparedness? L. Sun & L. Xue https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12286
124. An Analysis of Rural Households’ Earthquake-Resistant Construction Behavior: Evidence from Pingliang and Yuxi, China M. Wu & G. Wu https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239079
125. Perceptions of seismic and volcanic risk and preparedness at São Miguel Island (Azores, Portugal) I. Rego et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.008
126. Differences in disaster preparedness between urban and rural communities in China L. Chai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102020
127. Americans’ Views of Voluntary Protective Actions Against Zika Infection: Conceptual and Measurement Issues B. Johnson https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13378
128. Tropical cyclone perceptions, impacts and adaptation in the Southwest Pacific: an urban perspective from Fiji, Vanuatu and Tonga A. Magee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1091-2016
129. Brief communication: Key papers of 20 years in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences A. Gain et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-985-2022
130. A Qualitative Social-Psychological Analysis of Earthquake Preparedness and Non-Preparedness Among the Survivors of the 2011 Van Earthquake M. Karasu & B. Balakan https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2026-1562056
131. Seismic catastrophes in historical times in Arabia – Destruction of the city of Qalhat (Oman) in the 16th century M. Kázmér et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2023.05.016
132. Do Social Norms Affect Support for Earthquake-Strengthening Legislation? Comparing the Effects of Descriptive and Injunctive Norms L. Vinnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517752435
133. The Effects of Earthquake Experience on Intentions to Respond to Earthquake Early Warnings J. Becker et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.857004
134. Embodied uncertainty: living with complexity and natural hazards V. Sword-Daniels et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1200659
135. Community social capital and individual disaster preparedness in immigrants and Canadian-born individuals: an ecological perspective A. Yong et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1628090
136. The role of mGovernment applications in building trust during public crises: Evidence from the COVID-19 epidemic J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32476
137. Psychometric Properties of Turkish Adaptation of the Environmental Risk Coping Scale E. Sarı et al. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1432270
138. Exploring communication practices that promote community participation and collective action for reducing disaster risks in New Zealand M. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12690
139. Enhancing seismic risk mitigation decisions: a motivational approach T. Egbelakin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.629664
140. The Role of Teachers in Fostering Resilience After a Disaster in Indonesia E. Parrott et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09709-y
141. A decade of shaking in the Garden City: the dynamics of preparedness, perceptions, and beliefs in Canterbury, New Zealand, and implications for earthquake information J. Becker et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1410333
142. ‘Living on the edge’: using cognitive filters to appraise experience of environmental risk A. Hamilton-Webb et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1378249
143. A serendipitous, quasi-natural experiment: earthquake risk perceptions and hazard adjustments among college students A. Greer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3337-5
144. Seismic preparedness of families with children: Measures and dynamics M. Pacheco et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12694
145. Factors influencing homeowners' seismic risk mitigation behavior: A case study in Zeytinburnu district of Istanbul A. Taylan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.08.006
146. Homeowner mitigation decision‐making: Exploring the theory of planned behaviour approach R. Slotter et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12667
147. Public Support for Disaster Risk Reduction: Evidence from The Bahamas Before and After Hurricane Dorian B. Levitt & R. Olson https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14040248
148. Assessment of social aspects of seismic hazard T. Danilova et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/929/1/012030
149. Source of fatalistic seismic belief: The role of previous earthquake experience and general fatalism L. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103377
150. STAKEHOLDERS' PRACTICES: A CHALLENGE TO EARTHQUAKE RISK MITIGATION DECISIONS T. EGBELAKIN et al. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2015.1101029
151. What defines the success of maps and additional information on a multi-hazard platform? I. Dallo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101761
152. Natural hazards knowledge and risk perception of Wujie indigenous community in Taiwan G. Roder et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2100-4
153. Why do people prepare for natural hazards? Developing and testing a Theory of Planned Behaviour approach L. Vinnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2021.100011
154. Storm surge risk perception and resilience: A pilot study in the German North Sea coast P. González-Riancho et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.004
155. Overview of the co-ordinated risk-based approach to science and management response and recovery for the 2012 eruptions of Tongariro volcano, New Zealand G. Jolly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.08.028
156. The lived experience of preparing for earthquakes in households: a phenomenological psychological study Y. Nakagawa https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2948-6
157. Broken production system, strong community: disaster management experiences of livestock farmers after the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes R. Aslan et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-02-2026-0074
158. Rural households’ perceptions and behavior expectations in response to seismic hazard in Sichuan, China C. Hua et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104622
159. Between oblivion and drastic evidence: How local communities cope with seismic risk by forgetting and remembering S. Brondi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102132
160. Living with Disasters: Perspectives on the (Re-)Production of Knowledge H. Swee & Z. Hrdličková https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2017.120101
161. Trust in Government, Social Determinants, and Resource Distribution after a Catastrophic Typhoon H. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000434
162. Digital engagement methods for earthquake and fire preparedness: a review E. Verrucci et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2378-x
163. Do framing messages increase support for earthquake legislation? L. Vinnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-06-2016-0127
164. Navigating Theories of Actions on Disaster Prevention: A Systematic Review on Disaster Research in Japan H. Daimon et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1630
165. Unraveling the risk perception paradox: How benefits, self-efficacy, and social networks drive farmers’ landslide mitigation efforts in Gansu, China J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-024-8978-0
166. Earthquake risk communication as dialogue – insights from a workshop in Istanbul's urban renewal neighbourhoods J. Ickert & I. Stewart https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1157-2016
167. The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness J. Becker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
168. Anecdotal Evidence Is An Insufficient Basis for Designing Earthquake Preparedness Campaigns M. Marti et al. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200010
169. Tsunami awareness and preparedness in Aotearoa New Zealand: The evolution of community understanding A. Dhellemmes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102576
170. Health behaviour theory, adaptive capacity and the dynamics of disease risk R. Few https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2012.728128
171. Exploring the Relationship between Hazard Adjustments and Risk Managers in Organizations A. Sadiq & J. Graham https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12114
172. Preferences for earthquake insurance in rural China: factors influencing individuals’ willingness to pay L. Tian & P. Yao https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1829-0
173. Towards a “behavioural design” approach for seismic risk reduction strategies of buildings and their environment G. Bernardini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.010
174. Revisiting the Person-relative-to-Event (PrE) model of coping with threat: a study in the Azores (Portugal) S. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-024-00294-5
175. Understanding the culture of natural disaster preparedness: exploring the effect of experience and sociodemographic predictors J. Castañeda et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04060-2
176. Unveiling the Influence of Subjective Norms on Flood Preparedness Among Household Renters: The Moderating Effect of Trust in Public Protection M. Ridzuan et al. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.2.12
177. CHALLENGES TO SEISMIC REHABILITATION DECISION PROCESS IN NEW ZEALAND: A FOCUS OF DECISION ENVIRONMENT F. YING et al. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2016.1190419
178. Media Exposure, Disaster Experience, and Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence from Rural China D. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093246
179. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on public engagement approaches to disaster preparedness for foreign residents: case of Tokyo Metropolitan Area, Japan B. Adu Gyamfi & R. Shaw https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2021-0095
180. Earthquake attribution, risk perception, and self-efficacy: Tibetan Buddhism believers’ preparedness motivation L. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2024.2325031
181. Examining associations between citizens' beliefs and attitudes about uncertainty and their earthquake risk judgments, preparedness intentions, and mitigation policy support in Japan and the United States B. Johnson & K. Nakayachi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.019
182. A Hybrid Decision Support Framework Integrating Combined Probabilistic Spatial Modeling with Large Language Models for Post-Earthquake Search and Rescue C. Piña-García https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073414
183. The antecedents of risk perception in the context of natural hazards: A multi-level meta-analysis A. Theodorou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106281
184. Residents’ perceptions of risk towards residential property in Canterbury NZ subsequent to the earthquakes S. Bond https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2013-0008
185. Individual perceptions on rainfall variations versus precipitation trends from satellite data: An interdisciplinary approach in two socio-economically and topographically contrasted districts in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire A. Attoumane et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103285