117 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Are two earthquakes better than one? How earthquakes in two different regions affect risk judgments and preparation in three locations J. McClure et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.003
2. Perceived risks, emotions, and policy preferences: A longitudinal survey among the local population on gas quakes in the Netherlands G. Perlaviciute et al. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.012
3. Economic impediments to successful seismic retrofitting decisions D. K. Ahadzie et al. 10.1108/SS-01-2014-0002
4. Local risk awareness and precautionary behaviour in a multi-hazard region of North Morocco A. Ivčević et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101724
5. A Socio-Seismology Experiment in Haiti E. Calais et al. 10.3389/feart.2020.542654
6. Community resilience, latent resources and resource scarcity after an earthquake: Is society really three meals away from anarchy? J. Thomas & K. Mora 10.1007/s11069-014-1187-3
7. Risk, Transformation and Adaptation: Ideas for Reframing Approaches to Disaster Risk Reduction D. Paton & P. Buergelt 10.3390/ijerph16142594
8. Beyond social capital: The norms, belief systems, and agency embedded in social networks shape resilience to climatic and geophysical hazards B. MacGillivray 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.014
9. Qualitative research can improve understandings about disaster preparedness for independent older adults in the community R. Tuohy et al. 10.1108/DPM-01-2013-0006
10. Incentives and Motivators for Improving Building Resilience to Earthquake Disaster T. Egbelakin et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000249
11. Salient Public Beliefs Underlying Disaster Preparedness Behaviors: A Theory-Based Qualitative Study M. Najafi et al. 10.1017/S1049023X16001448
12. Perceived Stakeholder Information Credibility and Hazard Adjustments: A Case of Induced Seismic Activities in Oklahoma H. Wu et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000378
13. Social Representations of Earthquakes: A Study of People Living in Three Highly Seismic Areas H. Joffe et al. 10.1193/1.4000138
14. Disaster preparedness and cultural factors: a comparative study in Romania and Malta S. Appleby‐Arnold et al. 10.1111/disa.12433
15. Preparedness actions towards seismic risk mitigation for the general public in Martinique, French Lesser Antilles: a mid-term appraisal J. Audru et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-2031-2013
16. Information credibility, disaster risk perception and evacuation willingness of rural households in China D. Xu et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-04106-5
17. Examination of factors of household-based preparedness behavior against earthquakes R. Tanaka & H. Takehashi 10.4189/shes.17.139
18. Expecting the Unexpected: Predicting Physiological and Psychological Wildfire Preparedness from Perceived Risk, Responsibility, and Obstacles I. McNeill et al. 10.1111/risa.12037
19. Economic effects of regulating the seismic strengthening of older buildings O. Filippova et al. 10.1080/09613218.2017.1357318
20. Household earthquake preparedness in Serbia: A study of selected municipalities V. Cvetković et al. 10.3986/AGS.5445
21. Applying the Protective Action Decision Model to Explain Cyclone Shutter Installation Behavior M. Scovell et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000417
22. The development of the model of influence of sociodemographic characteristics and disaster experience toward household preparedness for facing landslide in Bogor regency P. Saputra et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/708/1/012049
23. Household preparedness for natural disasters: Impact of disaster experience and implications for future disaster risks in Japan H. Onuma et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.004
24. Perceptions of earthquake emergency response and rescue in China: a comparison between experts and local practitioners Y. Deng et al. 10.1007/s11069-019-03663-8
25. Sea-level rise and human migration M. Hauer et al. 10.1038/s43017-019-0002-9
26. Learn from the Past, Prepare for the Future: Impacts of Education and Experience on Disaster Preparedness in the Philippines and Thailand R. Hoffmann & R. Muttarak 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.016
27. Behavioral Response in the Immediate Aftermath of Shaking: Earthquakes in Christchurch and Wellington, New Zealand, and Hitachi, Japan I. Jon et al. 10.3390/ijerph13111137
28. The relationship between risk experience and risk response: a study of farmers and climate change A. Hamilton-Webb et al. 10.1080/13669877.2016.1153506
29. Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’ I. Stewart & D. Lewis 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003
30. Earthquake awareness and perception of risk among the residents of Istanbul S. Tekeli-Yeşil et al. 10.1007/s11069-011-9764-1
31. Multi-hazard perceptions at Long Valley Caldera, California, USA J. Peers et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101955
32. Perceived Arrival Time of Disaster Relief Supplies Matters for Household Preparedness for Natural Disasters S. Maruta et al. 10.1007/s41885-020-00061-4
33. Entendiendo el Comportamiento Cívico Post-Terremoto (Determinants of civic behavior After-Earthquake) H. Ormeño 10.2139/ssrn.1993250
34. When Descriptive Norms Backfire: Attitudes Induce Undesirable Consequences during Disaster Preparation T. Ozaki & K. Nakayachi 10.1111/asap.12195
35. Trust in stakeholders and social support: risk perception and preparedness by the Wenchuan earthquake survivors Z. Han et al. 10.1080/17477891.2020.1725410
36. Residents’ Disaster Preparedness after the Meinong Taiwan Earthquake: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory J. Tang & J. Feng 10.3390/ijerph15071434
37. Perceptions of risk characteristics of earthquakes compared to other hazards and their impact on risk tolerance L. Henrich et al. 10.1111/disa.12284
38. An Analysis of Housing Structures’ Earthquake Vulnerability in Two Parts of Dhaka City 10.3390/su10041106
39. A tale of two cities: Judgments about earthquake and aftershock probabilities across time windows J. McClure et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.11.010
40. Evaluating the ShakeOut drill in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Effects on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour L. Vinnell et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101721
41. Reactions to earthquake hazard: Strengthening commercial buildings and voluntary earthquake safety checks on houses in Wellington, New Zealand C. McRae et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.007
42. Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk J. Lawrence et al. 10.1007/s11069-014-1288-z
43. Communicating Earthquake Preparedness: The Influence of Induced Mood, Perceived Risk, and Gain or Loss Frames on Homeowners’ Attitudes Toward General Precautionary Measures for Earthquakes M. Marti et al. 10.1111/risa.12875
44. Education and Disaster Vulnerability in Southeast Asia: Evidence and Policy Implications R. Hoffmann & D. Blecha 10.3390/su12041401
45. Cognition and Implementation of Disaster Preparedness among Japanese Dialysis Facilities H. Sugisawa et al. 10.1155/2021/6691350
46. Multihazard Weather Risk Perception and Preparedness in Eight Countries A. Keul et al. 10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0064.1
47. An integrated approach to mental health and disaster preparedness: a cluster comparison with earthquake affected communities in Nepal C. Welton-Mitchell et al. 10.1186/s12888-018-1863-z
48. A communications intervention to motivate disaster risk reduction A. Sanquini et al. 10.1108/DPM-11-2015-0256
49. Does non‐destructive earthquake experience affect risk perception and motivate preparedness? L. Sun & L. Xue 10.1111/1468-5973.12286
50. An Analysis of Rural Households’ Earthquake-Resistant Construction Behavior: Evidence from Pingliang and Yuxi, China M. Wu & G. Wu 10.3390/ijerph17239079
51. Perceptions of seismic and volcanic risk and preparedness at São Miguel Island (Azores, Portugal) I. Rego et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.008
52. Disaster Risk Perception, Sense of Pace, Evacuation Willingness, and Relocation Willingness of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China D. Xu et al. 10.3390/ijerph17020602
53. Differences in disaster preparedness between urban and rural communities in China L. Chai et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102020
54. Percepcija rizika od zemljotresa u Republici Srbiji - teorijskoempirijska studija V. Cvetković & M. Filipović 10.5937/vojdelo1902142C
55. When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes J. McClure et al. 10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6
56. Americans’ Views of Voluntary Protective Actions Against Zika Infection: Conceptual and Measurement Issues B. Johnson 10.1111/risa.13378
57. Tropical cyclone perceptions, impacts and adaptation in the Southwest Pacific: an urban perspective from Fiji, Vanuatu and Tonga A. Magee et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-1091-2016
58. Exploring the effect of age on the intention of accepting mitigation policy: A case study of residential seismic strengthening policy in an area with high seismic risk H. Cheng et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101331
59. Preparing for the new normal: Students and earthquake hazard adjustments in Oklahoma H. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.033
60. Do Social Norms Affect Support for Earthquake-Strengthening Legislation? Comparing the Effects of Descriptive and Injunctive Norms L. Vinnell et al. 10.1177/0013916517752435
61. Embodied uncertainty: living with complexity and natural hazards V. Sword-Daniels et al. 10.1080/13669877.2016.1200659
62. Community social capital and individual disaster preparedness in immigrants and Canadian-born individuals: an ecological perspective A. Yong et al. 10.1080/13669877.2019.1628090
63. Getting Canadians prepared for natural disasters: a multi-method analysis of risk perception, behaviors, and the social environment A. Yong & L. Lemyre 10.1007/s11069-019-03669-2
64. The future protection from the climate change-related hazards and the willingness to pay for home insurance in the coastal wetlands of West Sardinia, Italy A. Ivčević et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101956
65. The influence of new information that contradicts common knowledge about earthquake preparedness in Israel: A mixed methods experiment study A. Gesser-Edelsburg et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0250127
66. Motivations to prepare after the 2013 Cook Strait Earthquake, N.Z. E. Doyle et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.008
67. Enhancing seismic risk mitigation decisions: a motivational approach T. Egbelakin et al. 10.1080/01446193.2011.629664
68. Salient Beliefs About Earthquake Hazards and Household Preparedness J. Becker et al. 10.1111/risa.12014
69. ‘Living on the edge’: using cognitive filters to appraise experience of environmental risk A. Hamilton-Webb et al. 10.1080/13669877.2017.1378249
70. Financial Preparation, Disaster Experience, and Disaster Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence From the Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes in China’s Sichuan Province D. Xu et al. 10.3390/ijerph16183345
71. A serendipitous, quasi-natural experiment: earthquake risk perceptions and hazard adjustments among college students A. Greer et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-3337-5
72. Seismic preparedness of families with children: Measures and dynamics M. Pacheco et al. 10.1002/ijop.12694
73. A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior P. Bubeck et al. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
74. Older adults' meanings of preparedness: a New Zealand perspective R. TUOHY & C. STEPHENS 10.1017/S0144686X14001408
75. Factors influencing homeowners' seismic risk mitigation behavior: A case study in Zeytinburnu district of Istanbul A. Taylan 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.08.006
76. Homeowner mitigation decision‐making: Exploring the theory of planned behaviour approach R. Slotter et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12667
77. The effects of trust in government on earthquake survivors’ risk perception and preparedness in China Z. Han et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2699-9
78. STAKEHOLDERS' PRACTICES: A CHALLENGE TO EARTHQUAKE RISK MITIGATION DECISIONS T. EGBELAKIN et al. 10.3846/1648715X.2015.1101029
79. What defines the success of maps and additional information on a multi-hazard platform? I. Dallo et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101761
80. A comparative frame for a contextualised analysis of local natural risk management R. Bertoldo 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101945
81. Natural hazards knowledge and risk perception of Wujie indigenous community in Taiwan G. Roder et al. 10.1007/s11069-015-2100-4
82. Integrating mental health and disaster preparedness in intervention: a randomized controlled trial with earthquake and flood-affected communities in Haiti L. James et al. 10.1017/S0033291719000163
83. Assessment of Social Vulnerability to Floods in the Floodplain of Northern Italy G. Roder et al. 10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0090.1
84. Storm surge risk perception and resilience: A pilot study in the German North Sea coast P. González-Riancho et al. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.004
85. Overview of the co-ordinated risk-based approach to science and management response and recovery for the 2012 eruptions of Tongariro volcano, New Zealand G. Jolly et al. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.08.028
86. The lived experience of preparing for earthquakes in households: a phenomenological psychological study Y. Nakagawa 10.1007/s11069-017-2948-6
87. Rural households’ perceptions and behavior expectations in response to seismic hazard in Sichuan, China C. Hua et al. 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104622
88. Between oblivion and drastic evidence: How local communities cope with seismic risk by forgetting and remembering S. Brondi et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102132
89. Seismic Risk Perception and Seismic Adjustments in Vaslui City, Romania A. Albulescu et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000453
90. Living with Disasters: Perspectives on the (Re-)Production of Knowledge H. Swee & Z. Hrdličková 10.3167/nc.2017.120101
91. Trust in Government, Social Determinants, and Resource Distribution after a Catastrophic Typhoon H. Lee et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000434
92. Digital engagement methods for earthquake and fire preparedness: a review E. Verrucci et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2378-x
93. Do framing messages increase support for earthquake legislation? L. Vinnell et al. 10.1108/DPM-06-2016-0127
94. Calculative and relational trust in the management of coastal floods and earthquakes: a comparative study (Confianza calculativa y relacional en la gestión de inundaciones costeras y terremotos: un estudio comparativo) R. Bertoldo et al. 10.1080/21711976.2020.1734398
95. Trusting Government to Mitigate a New Hazard: The Case of Oklahoma Earthquakes H. Murphy et al. 10.1002/rhc3.12141
96. Earthquake risk communication as dialogue – insights from a workshop in Istanbul's urban renewal neighbourhoods J. Ickert & I. Stewart 10.5194/nhess-16-1157-2016
97. The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness J. Becker et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
98. Anecdotal Evidence Is An Insufficient Basis for Designing Earthquake Preparedness Campaigns M. Marti et al. 10.1785/0220200010
99. Health behaviour theory, adaptive capacity and the dynamics of disease risk R. Few 10.1080/17565529.2012.728128
100. Exploring the Relationship between Hazard Adjustments and Risk Managers in Organizations A. Sadiq & J. Graham 10.1111/1468-5973.12114
101. Difficulties in explaining complex issues with maps: evaluating seismic hazard communication – the Swiss case M. Marti et al. 10.5194/nhess-19-2677-2019
102. How to increase earthquake and home fire preparedness: the fix-it intervention H. Joffe et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2528-1
103. Older adults' disaster lifecycle experience of the 2011 and 2013 Queensland floods L. Brockie & E. Miller 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.001
104. Preferences for earthquake insurance in rural China: factors influencing individuals’ willingness to pay L. Tian & P. Yao 10.1007/s11069-015-1829-0
105. Towards a “behavioural design” approach for seismic risk reduction strategies of buildings and their environment G. Bernardini et al. 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.010
106. Effects of risk framing on earthquake risk perception: Life-time frequencies enhance recognition of the risk L. Henrich et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.003
107. Learning from Extreme Catastrophes S. Kamiya & N. Yanase 10.2139/ssrn.3031124
108. Understanding the culture of natural disaster preparedness: exploring the effect of experience and sociodemographic predictors J. Castañeda et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-04060-2
109. A model of household preparedness for earthquakes: how individuals make meaning of earthquake information and how this influences preparedness J. Becker et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0238-x
110. CHALLENGES TO SEISMIC REHABILITATION DECISION PROCESS IN NEW ZEALAND: A FOCUS OF DECISION ENVIRONMENT F. YING et al. 10.3846/1648715X.2016.1190419
111. Media Exposure, Disaster Experience, and Risk Perception of Rural Households in Earthquake-Stricken Areas: Evidence from Rural China D. Xu et al. 10.3390/ijerph17093246
112. Examining associations between citizens' beliefs and attitudes about uncertainty and their earthquake risk judgments, preparedness intentions, and mitigation policy support in Japan and the United States B. Johnson & K. Nakayachi 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.019
113. Disaster risk reduction: Psychological perspectives on preparedness D. Paton 10.1111/ajpy.12237
114. Residents’ perceptions of risk towards residential property in Canterbury NZ subsequent to the earthquakes S. Bond 10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2013-0008
115. Exploring the changes in risk perceptions and adaptation behaviors based on various socioeconomic characteristics before and after earthquake disasters – a case study in Taiwan T. Chen et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-2433-2020
116. Using GIS to measure the impact of the Canterbury earthquakes on house prices in Christchurch, NZ S. Bond & S. Dermisi 10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2015-0027
117. A psychosocial perspective on community resilience and preparedness in the context of earthquakes in Turkey C. Doğulu et al. 10.1144/SP501-2019-110