Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2022-193
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2022-193
 
27 Jul 2022
27 Jul 2022
Status: this discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

Holistic planning of human, water, and environmental impacts for regional flood management: A case study of aging dam infrastructure

Cyndi Vail Castro1,a and Hanadi Said Rifai1 Cyndi Vail Castro and Hanadi Said Rifai
  • 1Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
  • acurrent Affiliation: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Department of Geography & Geographic Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA

Abstract. Urbanization and climate change have challenged the structural integrity of flood-control dams through increased storage requirements and internal water pressures. Many existing dams are aging and have been classified as deficient or having potential for life-threatening floods in the event of failure, thereby necessitating rapid and innovative mitigation strategies (e.g., optimized timing of releases, emergency warning systems, property buyouts, additional storage, diversion levees, underground tunnels). Such alternatives are often screened primarily through a cost-benefit analysis (CBA), where measures of flood-risk reduction are quantified according to inundation bounds and implementation costs. Secondary impacts associated with dam-induced flooding, such as environmental triggers (e.g., toxic pollutant releases, wastewater dispersion, soil erosion, habitat disruption) or social vulnerabilities (e.g., medical needs, language barriers, reinforced poverty, housing challenges), are often included at the screening stage as a series of narratives and are therefore largely indeterminant when ranking alternative strategies. This tendency to screen mitigation strategies through the lens of flood inundation may prioritize solutions with strong hydrological benefits while minimizing additional impacts associated with widespread flooding. To address this gap, we compare a reservoir mitigation strategy using traditional CBA metrics with composite socio-environmental risks through geospatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and scenario-based hydrologic/hydraulic modelling. We demonstrate a case study of alternative mitigation options associated with the Addicks and Barker Reservoirs in Houston, Texas, USA under Hurricane Harvey rainfall conditions and compare performance outcomes between the traditional CBA approach and the spatial MCDA approach. This study illustrates how preferred flood management strategies may shift when hydrologic outputs are integrated explicitly with socio-environmental factors at the preliminary screening stage. By leveraging the strengths of composite risk indicators and simplified spatial overlay methods, the MCDA framework aids decision-makers in visualizing multi-functional benefits from disparate mitigation options and provides an additional layer of information for optimizing the system.

Cyndi Vail Castro and Hanadi Said Rifai

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Referee comment on nhess-2022-193', Francesco Ballio, 30 Aug 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Hanadi Rifai, 20 Oct 2022
  • RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2022-193', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Sep 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Hanadi Rifai, 20 Oct 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2022-193', Francesco Ballio, 05 Sep 2022
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Hanadi Rifai, 20 Oct 2022

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Referee comment on nhess-2022-193', Francesco Ballio, 30 Aug 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Hanadi Rifai, 20 Oct 2022
  • RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2022-193', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Sep 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Hanadi Rifai, 20 Oct 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2022-193', Francesco Ballio, 05 Sep 2022
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Hanadi Rifai, 20 Oct 2022

Cyndi Vail Castro and Hanadi Said Rifai

Cyndi Vail Castro and Hanadi Said Rifai

Viewed

Total article views: 353 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
256 80 17 353 35 2 2
  • HTML: 256
  • PDF: 80
  • XML: 17
  • Total: 353
  • Supplement: 35
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jul 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Jul 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 337 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 07 Nov 2022
Download
Short summary
Existing dams are aging and no longer meet needed capacities for flood protection. Design of alternatives for retrofit lack rigorous consideration of social and environmental co-benefits. The typical analysis prioritizes flood protection and hydrological benefits. We demonstrate methods for alternative mitigation analysis using the Addicks and Barker Reservoirs in Houston, Texas. The study illustrates how flood management strategies can be integrated explicitly with socio-environmental factors.
Altmetrics