Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-164
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2019-164
27 May 2019
 | 27 May 2019
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal NHESS. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Sandbag Replacement Systems – Stability, Functionality and Handling

Lena Lankenau, Christopher Massolle, Bäbel Koppe, and Veronique Krull

Abstract. The classic aid in operative flood defence is the sandbag. Over the past few decades, though, so-called sandbag replacement systems (SBRS) have also been available for flood fighting. Although the use of sandbags is time-consuming as well as highly intensive in terms of materials and personnel, so far SBRS are rarely used in Germany. However, owing to their functionality and their labour and time-saving characteristics, they can make an essential contribution to flood protection – and this all the more so in view of the expected consequences of climate change. In order to foster confidence in such systems, the Institute of Hydraulic Engineering at the Hochschule Bremen – City University of Applied Sciences (IWA) carried out a series of systematic tests of SBRS that focused on the functionality, stability and handling of the systems. The experience gained shows that SBRS have the potential to make flood defence more efficient than the use of sandbags alone. Since SBRS are technical systems whose functional capability must be proven before they can be used, it is recommended to introduce an official test and certification procedure.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Lena Lankenau, Christopher Massolle, Bäbel Koppe, and Veronique Krull
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Lena Lankenau, Christopher Massolle, Bäbel Koppe, and Veronique Krull
Lena Lankenau, Christopher Massolle, Bäbel Koppe, and Veronique Krull

Viewed

Total article views: 1,145 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
650 410 85 1,145 35 50
  • HTML: 650
  • PDF: 410
  • XML: 85
  • Total: 1,145
  • BibTeX: 35
  • EndNote: 50
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 May 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 May 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,041 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,038 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Owing to their material, personnel and time-saving characteristics, sandbag replacement systems (SBRS) can make an essential contribution to flood protection. In order to foster confidence in the systems, systematic test set-ups were carried out with the focus on functionality, stability and handling of SBRS. Experience from the tests shows that SBRS have the potential to make flood protection more efficient than the use of sandbags alone.
Altmetrics