Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-3-1789-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-3-1789-2015
06 Mar 2015
 | 06 Mar 2015
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Landslide susceptibility mapping in Mawat area, Kurdistan Region, NE Iraq: a comparison of different statistical models

A. A. Othman, R. Gloaguen, L. Andreani, and M. Rahnama

Abstract. During the last decades, expansion of settlements into areas prone to landslides in Iraq has increased the importance of accurate hazard assessment. Susceptibility mapping provides information about hazardous locations and thus helps to potentially prevent infrastructure damage due to mass wasting. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare frequency ratio (FR), weight of evidence (WOE), logistic regression (LR) and probit regression (PR) approaches in combination with new geomorphological indices to determine the landslide susceptibility index (LSI). We tested these four methods in Mawat area, Kurdistan Region, NE Iraq, where landslides occur frequently. For this purpose, we evaluated 16 geomorphological, geological and environmental predicting factors mainly derived from the advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER) satellite. The available reference inventory includes 351 landslides representing a cumulative surface of 3.127 km2. This reference inventory was mapped from QuickBird data by manual delineation and partly verified by field survey. The areas under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and relative landslide density (R index) show that all models perform similarly and that focus should be put on the careful selection of proxies. The results indicate that the lithology and the slope aspects play major roles for landslide occurrences. Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that using hypsometric integral as a prediction factor instead of slope curvature gives better results and increases the accuracy of the LSI.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
A. A. Othman, R. Gloaguen, L. Andreani, and M. Rahnama

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
A. A. Othman, R. Gloaguen, L. Andreani, and M. Rahnama
A. A. Othman, R. Gloaguen, L. Andreani, and M. Rahnama

Viewed

Total article views: 2,691 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,325 1,249 117 2,691 108 105
  • HTML: 1,325
  • PDF: 1,249
  • XML: 117
  • Total: 2,691
  • BibTeX: 108
  • EndNote: 105
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2015)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 18 Nov 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Altmetrics