Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-3-429-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-3-429-2015
16 Jan 2015
 | 16 Jan 2015
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal NHESS. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

The development of mountain risk governance: challenges for application

S. Link and J. Stötter

Abstract. The complexity the management of mountain risks in the Alps has considerably increased since its institutionalisation in the late nineteenth century. In the history of approaches to dealing with mountain risks four successive paradigms can be distinguished on the basis of key indicators such as guiding principles, characteristic elements and typical instruments: "hazard protection", "hazard management", "risk management", and "risk governance". In this contribution, special attention is paid to the development of hazard zone planning and the growing importance of communication and participation over the course of this transformation. At present, the risk management paradigm has reached maturity. In the Alps, risk governance frameworks are not yet applied to risks from natural hazards. Based on a historical analysis, the suitability and applicability of general risk governance frameworks in the context of mountain risks are discussed. Necessary adaptations (e.g., in administration, educational, and legal structures) are proposed for the upcoming transformation towards mountain risk governance.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
S. Link and J. Stötter
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
S. Link and J. Stötter
S. Link and J. Stötter

Viewed

Total article views: 1,592 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,074 434 84 1,592 94 97
  • HTML: 1,074
  • PDF: 434
  • XML: 84
  • Total: 1,592
  • BibTeX: 94
  • EndNote: 97
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jan 2015)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
The complexity the management of mountain risks in the Alps has considerably increased since the late nineteenth century. In history, four successive paradigms to dealing with mountain risks can be distinguished: “hazard protection”, “hazard management”, “risk management”, and “risk governance”. Based on a historical analysis, the suitability and applicability of general risk governance frameworks in the specific context of mountain risks are discussed and necessary adaptations are proposed.
Altmetrics