Articles | Volume 6, issue 1
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 33–39, 2006

Special issue: Documentation and monitoring of landslides and debris flows...

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 33–39, 2006

  02 Jan 2006

02 Jan 2006

Site investigation and modelling at "La Maina" landslide (Carnian Alps, Italy)

G. Marcato1, M. Mantovani1, A. Pasuto2, S. Silvano1, F. Tagliavini2, L. Zabuski3, and A. Zannoni1 G. Marcato et al.
  • 1CNR-IRPI – National Research Council of Italy, Research Institute for Hydrological and Geological Hazard Prevention, Stati Uniti 4, 35127 Padova, Italy
  • 2GRJL – Geo Risk Joint Lab, Palazzo delle Fiere, 32013 Longarone (BL), Italy
  • 3IHEPAS – Institute of Hydro Engineering of the Polish Academy of Science,7, Koscierska Str., 80-953 Gdansk, Poland

Abstract. The Sauris reservoir is a hydroelectric basin closed downstream by a 136 m high, double arc concrete dam. The dam is firmly anchored to a consistent rock (Dolomia dello Schlern), but the Lower Triassic clayey formations, cropping out especially in the lower part of the slopes, have made the whole catchment basin increasingly prone to landslides. In recent years, the "La Maina landslide" has opened up several joints over a surface of about 100 000 m2, displacing about 1 500 000 m3 of material. Particular attention is now being given to the evolution of the instability area, as the reservoir is located at the foot of the landslide. Under the commission of the Regional Authority for Civil Protection a numerical modelling simulation in a pseudo-time condition of the slope was developed, in order to understand the risk for transport infrastructures, for some houses and for the reservoir and to take urgent mesaures to stabilize the slope. A monitoring system consisting of four inclinometers, three wire extensometers and ten GPS bench-mark pillars was immediately set up to check on surface and deep displacements. The data collected and the geological and geomorphological evidences was used to carry out a numerical simulation. The reliability of the results was checked by comparing the model with the morphological evidence of the movement. The mitigation measures were designed and realised following the indications provided by the model.