What does nature have to do with it? Reconsidering distinctions in international disaster response frameworks in the Danube basin
Shanna N. McClain1,Silvia Secchi2,Carl Bruch3,and Jonathan W. F. Remo1,4Shanna N. McClain et al.Shanna N. McClain1,Silvia Secchi2,Carl Bruch3,and Jonathan W. F. Remo1,4
Received: 28 Sep 2016 – Discussion started: 14 Oct 2016 – Revised: 28 Oct 2017 – Accepted: 02 Nov 2017 – Published: 05 Dec 2017
Abstract. This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to natural and man-made disasters occurring in the Danube basin and the Tisza sub-basin, two transnational basins. Monitoring and response to these types of incidents have historically been managed separately. We discuss whether the policy distinctions in response to natural and man-made disasters remain functional given recent international trends toward holistic response to both kinds of disasters. We suggest that these distinctions are counterproductive, outdated, and ultimately flawed, illustrate some of the specific gaps in the Danube and the Tisza, and conclude by proposing an integrated framework for disaster response in the Danube basin and Tisza sub-basin.
This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to natural and man-made disasters occurring in the Danube basin and the Tisza sub-basin, two transnational basins. Monitoring and response to these types of incidents have historically been managed separately. We suggest that these distinctions are counterproductive, outdated, and ultimately flawed, illustrate some of the specific gaps in the Danube and the Tisza, and propose an integrated framework.
This article examines the international policy and institutional frameworks for response to...