Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 3.102
IF3.102
IF 5-year value: 3.284
IF 5-year
3.284
CiteScore value: 5.1
CiteScore
5.1
SNIP value: 1.37
SNIP1.37
IPP value: 3.21
IPP3.21
SJR value: 1.005
SJR1.005
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 90
Scimago H
index
90
h5-index value: 42
h5-index42
Volume 10, issue 9
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 1927–1940, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1927-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 1927–1940, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1927-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  16 Sep 2010

16 Sep 2010

Benefitting from differences in knowledge, practice and belief: Māori oral traditions and natural hazards science

D. N. King1 and J. R. Goff2 D. N. King and J. R. Goff
  • 1Māori Environmental Research Centre (Te Kuwaha o Taihoro Nukurangi) – National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 109695, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 2Australian Tsunami Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, NSW, Australia

Abstract. This paper builds upon earlier work that argued the information and experience contained within the knowledge-practice-belief complex of Mātauranga Māori [Māori knowledge] is a valuable and neglected area of information and understanding about past catastrophic events in Aotearoa/New Zealand (A/NZ). Here we map Māori oral traditions (pūrākau) that relate experience with extreme environmental disturbance (in particular, tsunamis) around the A/NZ coast, compare the findings with geo-archaeological evidence, and discuss the scientific benefits to be gained by considering pūrākau as legitimate perspectives on history. Not surprisingly, there are both differences and complementarities between traditional Māori narratives and the available geo-archaeological evidence on extreme coastal disturbances. The findings presented here raise new and important questions about accepted geographies of tsunami risk, the causes and sources of their generation, as well as reasons for the relative paucity and abundance of information in some regions. Ways in which Mātauranga Taiao [Māori environmental knowledge] and contemporary science can be combined to produce new narratives about extreme environmental disturbance along the A/NZ coastline will require not only acceptance of other ways of knowing but also open engagement with Māori that respects their rights to tell their own histories. These efforts are encouraged to revitalise and ground-truth the interpretation of traditional stories, corroborate and/or question previous scientific deductions, and improve our collective understanding of the recurring impact of tectonic, geologic and meteorological-based events across A/NZ.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Altmetrics