Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-147
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-147
19 Aug 2024
 | 19 Aug 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal NHESS.

Development of operational decision support tools for mechanized ski guiding using avalanche terrain modelling, GPS tracking, and machine learning

John Sykes, Pascal Haegeli, Roger Atkins, Patrick Mair, and Yves Bühler

Abstract. Snow avalanches are the primary mountain hazard for mechanized skiing operations. Helicopter and snowcat ski guides are tasked with finding safe terrain to provide guests with enjoyable skiing in a fast-paced and highly dynamic and complex decision environment. Based on years of experience, ski guides have established systematic decision-making practices that streamline the process and limit the potential negative influences of time pressure and emotional investment. While this expertise is shared within guiding teams through mentorship, the current lack of a quantitative description of the process prevents the development of decision aids that could strengthen the process. To address this knowledge gap, we collaborated with guides at Canadian Mountain Holidays (CMH) Galena Lodge to catalogue and analyze their decision-making process for the daily run list, where they code runs as green (open for guiding), red (closed), or black (not considered) before heading into the field. To capture the real-world decision-making process, we first built the structure of the decision-making process with input from guides, and then used a wide range of available relevant data indicative of run characteristics, current conditions, and prior run list decisions to create the features of the models. We employed three different modelling approaches to capture the run list decision-making process: Bayesian Network, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. The overall accuracies of the models are 84.6 %, 91.9 %, and 93.3 % respectively, compared to a testing dataset of roughly 20,000 observed run codes. The insights of our analysis provide a baseline for the development of effective decision support tools for backcountry avalanche risk management that can offer independent perspectives on operational terrain choices based on historic patterns or as a training tool for newer guides.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
John Sykes, Pascal Haegeli, Roger Atkins, Patrick Mair, and Yves Bühler

Status: open (until 30 Sep 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
John Sykes, Pascal Haegeli, Roger Atkins, Patrick Mair, and Yves Bühler

Model code and software

Development of operational decision support tools for mechanized ski guiding using avalanche terrain modelling, GPS tracking, and machine learning - Code and Data John Sykes, Pascal Haegeli, and Patrick Mair https://osf.io/pqzd8/

John Sykes, Pascal Haegeli, Roger Atkins, Patrick Mair, and Yves Bühler

Viewed

Total article views: 128 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
93 30 5 128 2 2
  • HTML: 93
  • PDF: 30
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 128
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Aug 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Aug 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 110 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 110 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Aug 2024
Download
Short summary
We develop decision support tools to assist professional ski guides in determining safe terrain each day based on current conditions. To understand the decision-making process we collaborate with professional guides and build three unique models to predict their decisions. The models accurately capture the real world decision-making outcomes in 85–93 % of cases. Our conclusions focus on strengths and weaknesses of each model and discuss ramifications for practical applications in ski guiding.
Altmetrics