the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Recent large inland lake outbursts on the Tibetan Plateau: Processes, causes and mechanisms
Abstract. Lake outburst events have been mainly focused on small glacial lakes in the Himalaya, while the historical events from inland large lakes are few and have received less attention. Inland large lakes on the Tibetan Plateau are expanding rapidly, with recent signs of increasing outburst risk, highlighting the need to elucidate the processes, causes and mechanisms to mitigate future impacts. Here, a long-term satellite lake mapping shows that the number and surface area of lakes on the Tibetan Plateau over the past 50 years peaked in 2023, accompanied by two notable outburst events: Zonag Lake (~150 km2 in 2023) on 15 September 2011 and Selin Co (~2,465 km2 in 2023, the largest lake in Tibet) on 23 September 2023. The cascading outburst of Zonag Lake caused its area to shrink by ~124 km2 (-45 %), while the downstream Yanhu Lake expanded by ~163 km2 (+347 %). The Selin Co outburst resulted in a water volume loss of ~0.3 Gt, the downstream Bange Co experienced a water level rise of ~2.3 m and an area expansion of ~18 %. Despite its large water storage capacity, Selin Co experienced less water loss due to the flat terrain at the breach and the slow flow (~1 m/s at the damaged road), with an average discharge of ~170 m3/s. Even with the low discharge, the Selin Co flood breached the lowland road within ~12 hours. In contrast, the large breach and steep terrain at Zonag Lake facilitated a rapid discharge of a sustained volume of water, with an average discharge of ~2,191 m3/s. Selin Co resulted in only a short period of drainage reorganization, in contrast to the permanent reorganization caused by Zonag Lake. The underlying mechanisms of the increased precipitation as the main trigger for the two outburst events prior to the occurrence are different. For Zonag Lake, thermodynamic effects, i.e. changes in the atmospheric moisture, are the most important, while for Selin Co, dynamical effects, i.e. the vertical motion induced by the changes in atmospheric circulation, dominate the precipitation patterns. Large lake outbursts in the Inner Tibetan Plateau are expected to increase in the near future due to the warmer and wetter climate, and urgent policy planning is needed to mitigate the potential future lake-induced flood damage.
- Preprint
(3964 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(746 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 15 Oct 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2024-127', Adam Emmer, 10 Sep 2024
reply
This study reports three examples of lake outbursts on the Tibetan Plateau. Reported outbursts involved huge amounts of water, threatened infrastructure and are worth reporting considering the implications for future outburst hazards in the region. The text is in general well-written and the manuscript is accompanied by rich figures of high quality and information content. However, it is bit confusing for the readers that the authors describe two outbursts (from Lake Zonag in 2011 and from Lake Selin Co in 2023) in some parts of the study, while the study also contains the information about another one from Lake Donggei Cuona in 2024. To make the study clearer, I suggest the authors to introduce separate study area section (including brief description of three GLOF sites described further in the text) and to describe the studied GLOFs in separate sub-sections of the Results. I also recommend to revise discussion section, put reported outbursts in the context of other outburst in the region and present solid implications of this research for understanding outburst occurrence there. Detailed suggestions / comments / questions are provided below:
L25: the 2011 GLOF has not accompained the 2023 peak – please reword
L29: Gt is not the unit of volume
L38: vertical motion of what?
L44: I suggest not to describe plateau lakes as alpine lakes (plateau environment and alpine environment differ in my understanding)
Fig. 1: you might mention that 1970 – 2018 data come from Zhang et al., 2019
L78: please provide a reference
L80: you actually describe three throughout the text
L82: field surveying is mentioned here but not described in methods and data section – please provide more details or delete it from here
L116: this is first time you mention this lake and outburst (see my general comment)
L152: please provide more details how did you set this value? Based on field measurements?
L158-160: what is the justification of this assumption?
L163: I suggest to distinguish outburst drivers (e.g., climate change) and mechanisms (dam breaching)
L181: please consider moving this section before 2.4
L230: representativeness for what?
Fig. 3: since the study highlights the impact of precipitation increase on lake evolution, I suggest to plot lake areas shown in parts a and c against precipitation data from Fig. 7. For part b, please consider adding arrows and description directly in photos, so it is easier to understand what they illustrate
L258: “water had reached he road” rather than “had accumulated near”?
L259: what signs of heavy precipitation?
L265; the precision of discharge to two decimal places is inappropriate considering uncertainties and assumptions of model inputs (including input hydrograph)
Fig. 4: “The outburst” instead of “outbursting process”?; i and j – km instead of m on x axis?
L286: how reliable is this number considering DEM resolution, accuracy and uncertainties of modelling?
L288-293: the distance between the two lakes (according to Fig. 4) is about 12 km. This gives average flood velocity < 1 km per hour. This is very slow, definitely not rapid as described here.
L292: agree about what?
L299: is this the case in the TP?
L300: how did you get this discharge? It is written in the >Methods that only the outburst of Selin Co was modelled. The 2,191 m3/s average discharge over 28 days gives outburst volume exceeding 5 km^3 (!!). Íf so, this is among the largest (maybe even the largest) outburst floods in the Anthropocene and it should be highlighted
Fig. 7: please add a trendline for part a and consider plotting this against lake area (see my suggestion above)
L312: I was also wondering whether is there possibly any substantial contribution from melting glaciers? Please discuss this
L330: this extreme precipitation prior the outbursts is not shown
Figs. 8-11: these figures are difficult link to outbursts of the two lakes. Maybe one synthesizing figure can be presented in the main manuscript and the rest goes to the supplement?
L411: how does it accelerated permafrost degradation?
L429: the recommendations mentioned in this section are general; to make stronger point, reported events should be put in the context of other GLOFs documented from the TP (in terms of outburst timing, drivers, etc.)
To sum up, I’m convinced this study fits well in the journal and would be of interest for the readers. I recommend revisions of the structure, introduction of a separate study area section and revision of the discussion section (moderate to major revisions).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-127-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
163 | 40 | 9 | 212 | 30 | 4 | 3 |
- HTML: 163
- PDF: 40
- XML: 9
- Total: 212
- Supplement: 30
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1