the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The influence of aftershocks on seismic hazard analysis: A case study from Xichang and the surrounding areas
Qing Wu
Guijuan Lai
Jian Wu
Jinmeng Bi
Abstract. In some instances, a strong aftershock can cause more damage than the mainshock. Ignoring the influence of aftershocks may underestimate the seismic hazard of some areas. Taking Xichang and its surrounding areas as an example, and based on the Seismic Ground Motion Parameter Zoning Map of China (GB18306-2015), this study used the Monte Carlo method to simulate the synthetic mainshock sequences. Additionally, the Omi-Reasenberg-Jones (Omi-R-J) aftershock activity model is used to simulate the aftershock sequences that follow mainshocks above a certain magnitude threshold. Then, the mainshock and the aftershocks are combined to calculate the regional seismic hazard using ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). Finally, the influence of aftershocks on seismic hazard analysis is examined and considered. The results show that in areas with moderate to strong seismic backgrounds, the influence of aftershocks on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis can exceed 50 %. These results suggest that the impact of aftershocks should be properly considered for future probabilistic seismic hazard analyses, especially in areas with moderate to strong seismic activity backgrounds and in areas prone to secondary disasters such as landslides and mudslides.
Qing Wu et al.
Status: open (until 17 Aug 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2023-30', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Jul 2023
reply
There are three major points that should be clarified before further evaluation of this submission.Â
Â
- Line 200. How are·the probabilities of seismic hazard obtained? I checked Wu et al. 2020, but did not think that the details had been given in it.Â
- How are the aftershocks simulated?Â
- How is the ETAS model, given in Section 2.2, used in the evaluation?
Other:
1. Line 150. Is EM algorithm necessary? How are p, c, k estimated?
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-30-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Qing Wu, 25 Jul 2023
reply
Thank you very much for your comment. Due to the many details in the reply, please refer to the following supplement. Looking forward to more discussions. Thanks again.
Qing Wu et al.
Qing Wu et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
142 | 26 | 6 | 174 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 142
- PDF: 26
- XML: 6
- Total: 174
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1