Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 3.102
IF3.102
IF 5-year value: 3.284
IF 5-year
3.284
CiteScore value: 5.1
CiteScore
5.1
SNIP value: 1.37
SNIP1.37
IPP value: 3.21
IPP3.21
SJR value: 1.005
SJR1.005
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 90
Scimago H
index
90
h5-index value: 42
h5-index42
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-95
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-95
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  07 May 2020

07 May 2020

Review status
A revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal NHESS and is expected to appear here in due course.

A Novel Approach to Assessing Nuisance Risk from Seismicity Induced by UK Shale Gas Development, with Implications for Future Policy Design

Gemma Cremen1 and Maximilian J. Werner2 Gemma Cremen and Maximilian J. Werner
  • 1Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London, UK
  • 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Abstract. We propose a novel framework for assessing the risk associated with seismicity induced from hydraulic fracturing, which has been a notable source of recent public concern. The framework combines statistical forecast models for injection-induced seismicity, ground motion prediction equations, and exposure models for affected areas, to quantitatively link the volume of fluid injected during operations with the potential for nuisance felt ground motions. Such (relatively small) motions are expected to be more aligned with the public tolerance threshold for induced seismicity than larger ground shaking that could cause structural damage. This proactive type of framework, which facilitates control of the injection volume ahead of time for risk mitigation, has significant advantages over reactive-type magnitude and ground motion-based systems typically used for induced seismicity management. The framework is applied to the region surrounding the Preston New Road shale gas site in North West England. A notable finding is that the calculations are particularly sensitive to assumptions of the seismicity forecast model used, i.e. whether it limits the cumulative seismic moment released for a given volume or assumes seismicity is consistent with the Gutenberg–Richter distribution for tectonic events. Finally, we discuss how the framework can be used to inform relevant policy.

Gemma Cremen and Maximilian J. Werner

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Gemma Cremen and Maximilian J. Werner

Gemma Cremen and Maximilian J. Werner

Viewed

Total article views: 470 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
333 120 17 470 16 18
  • HTML: 333
  • PDF: 120
  • XML: 17
  • Total: 470
  • BibTeX: 16
  • EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 May 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 May 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 381 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 381 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 23 Sep 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Altmetrics