the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Supershear crack propagation in snow slab avalanche release: new insights from numerical simulations and field measurements
Abstract. The release process of dry-snow slab avalanches begins with a localized failure within a porous, weak snow layer that lies beneath a cohesive slab. Subsequently, rapid crack propagation may occur within the weak layer, eventually leading to a tensile fracture across the slab, resulting, if the slope is steep enough, to its detachment and sliding. The dynamics of crack propagation is believed to influence the size of the release area. However, the relationship between crack propagation dynamics and avalanche size remains incompletely understood. Notably, crack propagation speeds estimated from avalanche video analysis are almost one order of magnitude larger than speeds typically measured in field experiments. To shed more light on this discrepancy and avalanche release processes, we used discrete (DEM: discrete element method) and continuum (MPM: material point method) numerical methods to simulate the so-called propagation saw test (PST). On low angle terrain, our models showed that the weak layer failed mainly due to a compressive stress peak at the crack tip induced by weak layer collapse and the resulting slab bending. On steep slopes, we observed the emergence of a supershear crack propagation regime: the crack speed becomes higher than the slab shear wave speed. This transition occurs if the crack propagates over a distance larger than the super-critical crack length (approximately 5 m). Above the super-critical crack length, the fracture is mainly driven by the slope-parallel gravitational pull of the slab (tension) and, thus, shear stresses in the weak layer. These findings represent an essential additional piece in the dry-snow slab avalanche formation puzzle.
- Preprint
(1074 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2024-70', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Jul 2024
The authors used two numerical models to investigate the crack propagation speed in snow slab avalanches. They were able to explain the observed difference in crack propagation speed between field experiments and avalanches. Both models consistently showed the existence of two propagation regimes: an initial collapse-driven slower propagation is followed by a supershear crack propagation driven by shear stresses once the crack size is large enough. The combination of numerical results and experimental data confirms the model-based conclusions of previous publications.
I found the article to be well-written, clear and concise. The numerical models' findings are consistent with the experimental data, and the presented results support the conclusions.
I have only a few comments listed below.Line 99: This sentence is a repetition of the sentence on line 95
Line 151: I think you mean Figure 2c only at this place
Figure 2: Why do you use different bin sizes, resulting in different column thickness for each dataset? Is there a specific reason or meaning?
Figure 4: The symbols used for the crack propagation speed (v/cs) in the subplot are not consistent with the other figures. I would suggest adding an explanation in the caption since it is difficult to understand what the plots represent. Moreover, I couldn’t find what Φ* represents. I assume that it is the threshold slope angle, but it should be specified.
Line 212-213: It is not clear to me what mechanism the authors are describing. Can you explain in more detail? There is no evidence in the presented data of this observation. Can you provide some reference?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-70-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2024-70', Markus Hoffmann, 21 Oct 2024
The prediction of avalanche dangers relies on a solid understanding of the mechanical properties of snow slabs as well as the different structural failure processes. The paper is focussed on dry-snow avalanches and the failure mechanism of crack propagation in weak layers adding an essential piece in the understanding of these failure processes based on field measurements and numerical methods. The paper is structured as follows:
- Introduction on the dynamics of crack propagation and the crack propagation dynamics from modelling and field observations
- Data and methods from snow crack propagation based on saw tests, discrete element method calculations, material point methods, video sequence processing, and the elastic wave speed in snow
- Results on crack propagation regimes, and the crack propagation dynamics and stresses
- The discussion of results with a conceptional diagram
- Conclusions of the findings
The research results are summarized as follows:
- The paper identifies two distinct crack propagation methods namely sub-Raleigh and supershear
- The numerical methods discrete element method DEM and material point method MPM on these mechanisms provided consistent results
- The results show that on flat terrain the weak layer behaviour is critical for self -sustained crack propagation
- For slope angles greater than the snow friction angle the supershear crack propagation is dominant with the fraction being mainly driven by shear
- The link between the dynamics of crack propagation and size of the avalanche release zone remains to be established
General remarks of the reviewer regarding the form of the paper and the figures:
- The paper is well written and the figures are clear
- The results from DEM and MPM align well
- The conceptual diagram is great for understanding the dominant findings on flat terrain and steep slopes
Remarks of the reviewer regarding the methods, models, and findings:
- Further investigation into the critical conditions in the transition between flat and steep terrain would be interesting as to how this affects the size of the release zone for a given topography
- Furthermore, it would be interesting to provide more insights into the snow friction angle and possible changes under different conditions over time
- As the field tests are based on saw tests of snow columns it would be also interesting to investigate the spatial and temporal changes as this may provide further insights on the crack propagation and release areas as well as the sensitivity of the findings
In summary, the paper is well written and the findings within the scope and used methods appear to be sound. If possible, the highlighted remarks should be elaborated in the context of the reported findings prior to publication as a starting point for further understanding and research.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-70-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
415 | 115 | 32 | 562 | 22 | 28 |
- HTML: 415
- PDF: 115
- XML: 32
- Total: 562
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 28
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1