Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-211
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-211
25 Nov 2024
 | 25 Nov 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal NHESS.

Is higher resolution always better? Open-access DEM comparison for Slope Units delineation and regional landslide prediction

Mahnoor Ahmed, Giacomo Titti, Sebastiano Trevisani, Lisa Borgatti, and Mirko Francioni

Abstract. Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) play a key role in slope instability studies, ranging from landslide detection and recognition to landslide prediction. DEMs assist these investigations by reproducing landscape morphological features and deriving relevant predisposing factors, such as slope gradient, roughness, aspect, and curvature. Additionally, DEMs are useful for delineating map units with homogeneous morphological characteristics, such as Slope Units (SUs).

In many cases, the selection of a DEM depends on factors like accessibility and resolution, without considering its actual accuracy. In this study, we compared freely available global DEMs (ALOS, COP, FABDEM) and a national DEM (TINITALY) with a reference DEM (local airborne LiDAR) to identify the most suitable DEM for representing fine-scale morphology and delineating SUs in the Marche Region, Italy, for landslide susceptibility mapping. Furthermore, we proposed a novel approach for selecting the optimal SUs partition.

The DEM comparison was based on several criteria, including elevation, residual DEMs, roughness indices, slope variations, and the ability to delineate SUs. TINITALY, resampled at a 30x30 m pixel size, was found to be the most suitable DEM for representing fine-scale terrain morphology. It was then used to generate the optimal SUs partition among 18 combinations. These combinations were evaluated using both existing and newly integrated metrics alongside mapped landslide inventories to optimize terrain delineation and produce landslide susceptibility maps.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Mahnoor Ahmed, Giacomo Titti, Sebastiano Trevisani, Lisa Borgatti, and Mirko Francioni

Status: open (until 06 Jan 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Mahnoor Ahmed, Giacomo Titti, Sebastiano Trevisani, Lisa Borgatti, and Mirko Francioni

Data sets

Slope Units delineation for Marche region in Italy Mahnoor Ahmed and Giacomo Titti https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13769103

Mahnoor Ahmed, Giacomo Titti, Sebastiano Trevisani, Lisa Borgatti, and Mirko Francioni

Viewed

Total article views: 132 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
103 24 5 132 1 3
  • HTML: 103
  • PDF: 24
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 132
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Nov 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 131 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 131 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 11 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Elevation models are compared with a true dataset for terrain characteristics which selects a better ranking model to test with different parameters for partitioning the terrain. The partitioning of the terrain is measured by how well a partitioned unit can support the mapped landslide area and number of landslides. The effect of this relationship is reflected with different metrics in the susceptibility maps.
Altmetrics