Reevaluating Flood Protection: Disaster Risk Reduction for Urbanized Alluvial Fans

Grodek, Tamir; Benito, Gerardo

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-171

Preprints

https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-171

Preprints

08 Oct 2024

| 08 Oct 2024

Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal NHESS.

Reevaluating Flood Protection: Disaster Risk Reduction for Urbanized Alluvial Fans

Tamir Grodek and Gerardo Benito

Abstract. The deterioration of check dams and other flood prevention measures, combined with storms breaking historical records, has created an immediate risk of floods and debris flows breaching urbanized alluvial fans. In this study, we reevaluate these flood and sediment prevention measures and propose a different flood prevention paradigm.

Flood defense measures like check dams, terraces, and afforestation in steep mountain basins aim to retain sediments and prevent them from reaching the alluvial fan, ensuring the functionality of bypass canals and levees. However, this approach provides a false sense of security; natural and man-made weathering and erosion processes continue, causing sediments to accumulate in the control measures, gradually reducing their effectiveness and strength. Over decades, high-intensity rainstorms can trigger slope instability and flooding, leading to the collapse of these measures that carries the accumulated sediments into urban areas in the form of destructive debris flows. As the risk gradually increases over time, the long-term effectiveness of these measures is questionable.

Findings from disastrous events worldwide, together with 60 years of flood monitoring in the city of Eilat, highlight the potential for incorporating flood management within urbanized alluvial fans. It has been shown that, for long-term safety, the steep mountain basin should remain natural to allow the continuous evacuation of sediments. On the alluvial fan, the strategic placement of recreation areas, radial roads, and parks can effectively create space for incoming water and sediment. Our approach to disaster risk reduction proposes a shift in urban planning priorities to incorporate flood management by allocating 20–30 % of the alluvial fan—including the fan head and several wide radial road corridors down to the fan toe—for stream migration and sediment deposition. This concept was effectively tested using a physical analogue model in the laboratory.

Received: 07 Sep 2024 – Discussion started: 08 Oct 2024

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Download & links

Tamir Grodek and Gerardo Benito

Status: final response (author comments only)

RC1:
'Comment on nhess-2024-171', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Nov 2024
This study aims to evaluate flood protection measures on an alluvial fan through a review of relevant case studies and the development of a physical model. The topic is compelling, and the manuscript is generally well written. However, the methodology section requires further clarification to fully connect the case studies with the physical model-based work. Specific comments for improvement are provided below:
The methodology section needs further elaboration. While the authors conducted a literature review on selected case studies, the selection process is not clearly described. Additionally, the methodology used for conducting the literature review requires clarification.

The case studies chosen for this study are interesting, but the authors should better justify their selection criteria. For instance, were geographical factors considered in the selection process?

The methodology of this study includes four steps. The methodology comprises four steps; however, the connections between these steps are not entirely clear. For example, in Step 1, the authors evaluate the reliability of flood protection measures on urbanized alluvial fans based on four case studies. In Step 2, they identify the spatial distribution of landforms and surface processes, including debris flow, in-channel flow, and unconfined flow, in an archetypal alluvial fan at Turkey Flat. The authors should clarify how Step 1 relates to Step 2. It seems that the secondary case studies are meant to contextualize the physical model-based analysis of Turkey Flat. This should reflect in the manuscript.

Step 3, which involves investigating the hydro-sedimentary functioning of natural alluvial fan areas to identify nature-based solutions for safer urbanization, should be explained in greater detail in the methodology section.

A schematic diagram in the methodology section could greatly enhance readers' understanding of the study's process and workflow.

The laboratory experiment is a key component of this study. The physical model described in Section 5.3 and Appendix B would be better integrated into the methodology section to provide a clearer understanding of the model's role.

Using a physical model, the authors replicate the Turkey Flat alluvial fan. Was any effort made to validate the simulation results against real-world observations? If not, the authors should discuss potential sources of uncertainty in their results.

The abstract should include an overview of the methodology employed in this study.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-171-RC1
RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2024-171', Mirela-Adriana Anghelache, 16 Dec 2024

The material is well articulated and it presents, through a review of different case studies of extreme floods on several urban alluvial fans, a new paradigm of flood prevention.
In the abstract the phrase from row 9 ”In this study, we reevaluate these flood and sediment prevention measures and propose a different flood prevention paradigm” has to put somewhere in the last paragraph of the Abstract.
Row 10 : these floods instead of these flood
In the chapter Materials and methods there are presenting 4 steps of involved methodology and they are described shortly, except step 3: investigating the hydro-sedimentary functioning of natural alluvial fan areas to identify nature-based solutions for safer urbanization. There are necessary few sentences about it, too.
Row 207 : 1.5 mm³ instead 1.5 Mm³
Row 362: change the font size of (Fig. 9ii)
Row 409: ‘physical analogue model' corect the quotation marks.

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-171-RC2

Tamir Grodek and Gerardo Benito

Viewed

Total article views: 276 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML	PDF	XML	Total	BibTeX	EndNote
177	62	37	276	6	9

HTML: 177
PDF: 62
XML: 37
Total: 276
BibTeX: 6
EndNote: 9

Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Oct 2024)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Oct 2024	101	29	6	136
Nov 2024	51	22	6	79
Dec 2024	25	11	25	61

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Oct 2024)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Oct 2024	101	29	6	136
Nov 2024	51	22	6	79
Dec 2024	25	11	25	61

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 267 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 267 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.

Country	#	Views	%

Latest update: 16 Dec 2024

Short summary

Check dams, terraces, and trees on steep basins serve to retain sediments, thereby protecting urbanized alluvial fan canals and levees from flooding. However, their effectiveness gradually decreases over time due to sedimentation and aging, which may lead to catastrophic breaching floods. To enhance urban resilience, we propose preserving natural mountain basins and allocating 20–30 % of the alluvial fan for channel migration and sediment deposition corridors.


Total:	0
HTML:	0
PDF:	0
XML:	0