the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Enhancement of state response capability and famine mitigation: A comparative analysis of two drought events in northern China during the Ming dynasty
Abstract. Studying social impacts and responses to historical extreme climate events can offer valuable insights into coping with major disaster events and adapting to climate change better. This paper developed a model of the processes and responses to extreme drought-induced famines in ancient China. Based on this, the study explored the differences in famine causation and response effectiveness between Chenghua Drought (1483–1486 CE) and Wanli Drought (1585–1588 CE). The findings are as follows: (1) By the time of Wanli Drought, the increase in land reclamation and introduction of American crops had enhanced societal defence, preventing many drought-affected counties from experiencing famine. Even in cases where famines did occur, their severity was lower than during the Chenghua Drought. (2) State emergency measures, including exemption and relief, proved effective in mitigating famines. The stronger finance and economy during the Wanli Drought enabled more robust relief efforts, resulting in lower famine severity. (3) Famine response capabilities varied regionally. Shandong, Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei demonstrated strong defensive capabilities and effective state emergency responses, while Shanxi had weaker defensive abilities, making it more vulnerable to famine. The defensive capabilities in Henan, Shaanxi, Gansu, and Ningxia showed significant improvement.
- Preprint
(1302 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 22 Oct 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2024-159', Samar Momin, 25 Sep 2024
reply
This review is concerned with the article titled "Enhancement of state response capability and famine mitigation: A comparative analysis of two drought events in northern China during the Ming dynasty", it is divided into three categories, namely, general comments, specific comments and technical comments.
General Comments:
The article titled "Enhancement of state response capability and famine mitigation: A comparative analysis of two drought events in northern China during the Ming dynasty" clearly reflects the contents of the paper, and the abstract provides a concise, complete, and unambiguous summary of the work done and the results obtained. Both these sections are pertinent and easy to understand. The manuscript is well-written and well-structured, delivering the idea, methodology, and results clearly and concisely. The figures are descriptive and of high quality, and the tables are informative. It is well-referenced with proper credit attributed to previous and/or related works, and the authors clearly indicate each of their contributions. The manuscript contributes interesting insights and a methodology to comparatively analyze the responses to two major drought events in China. Studying such past events is extremely important for comprehensive disaster risk management strategies for resilience at the county and national. Thus, this manuscript has good scientific significance, scientific quality, and presentation quality.
Specific Comments:
- Historical Vs modern climate change adaption:
- It would be useful to have a section with a simple comparison or explanation between these historical responses and modern-day disaster management strategies adopted in China. This would make the research more relevant to current discussions on climate change adaptation.
- Formulations:
- Could the authors provide a clear explanation (in the text) about how the formulations were derived?
-
Graphical summaries:
- The spatial distribution maps and graphs are useful. However, the authors could add additional visual representations of the comparisons between the two droughts (e.g., timeline diagrams) could further clarify the narrative.
Technical Comments:
In general spaces between text and in-text citation are missing throughout the manuscript.
For example: production(Deng, 2011).
It should be: production (Deng, 2011).
- Grammatical/sentence structure:
- Requires correction: "Give that famine often stems from poor harvests..."
- Corrected: "Given that famine often stems from poor harvests..."
- Requires correction: "...as a time when ancient famine response policies were highly well-develop in China."
- Corrected: "...as a time when ancient famine response policies were highly well-developed in China."
- Needs clarification: Line 135, Ancient China gradually developed a comprehensive famine response system that deal with each step of processes to extreme drought-induced famines (Figure 2).
- Needs clarification: Line 147, In ancient China, there were various emergency measures to mitigate famine, among which exemption and relied being the most common(Hao et al., 2021).
- Throughout the manuscript counties classifications Type A, Type B and Type C are written as "Type a" or "type a", I believe that since it is a classification, the Latin letter needs to be capitalized for example use Type "A" or type "A" consistently.
- Table 6: What is AD1 and AF1?
- Clarification: What is the unit (mu) here? "6.51 mu per person"
- Please look into the standardization of citation formatting in the references section.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-159-RC1 - Historical Vs modern climate change adaption:
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
93 | 12 | 68 | 173 | 5 | 4 |
- HTML: 93
- PDF: 12
- XML: 68
- Total: 173
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1