the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Earthquake hazard characterization by using entropy: application to northern Chilean earthquakes
Denisse Pasten
Eugenio E. Vogel
Gonzalo Saravia
Abstract. The mechanical description of the seismic cycle has an energetic analogy in terms of statistical physics and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. In this context, an earthquake can be considered as a phase transition, where continuous reorganization of stresses and forces reflects an evolution from equilibrium to non-equilibrium states and we can use this analogy to characterize the earthquake hazard of a region. In this study, we used 8 years (2007–2014) of high-quality Integrated Plate Boundary Observatory Chile (IPOC) seismic data for >100,000 earthquakes in northern Chile to test the theory that Shannon entropy, H, is an indicator of the equilibrium state of a seismically active region. We confirmed increasing H reflects the irreversible transition of a system and is linked to the occurrence of large earthquakes. Using variation in H, we could detect major earthquakes and their foreshocks and aftershocks, including 2007 MW 7.8 Tocopilla earthquake, 2014 MW 8.1 Iquique earthquake, and the 2010 and 2011 Calama earthquakes (MW 6.6 and 6.8, respectively). Moreover, we identified possible periodic seismic behaviour between 80 and 160 km depth.
Antonio Posadas et al.
Status: open (until 11 Apr 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2023-28', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Mar 2023
reply
The authors present an innovative relationship between the earthquake hazard and the Second Law of Thermodynamics by using the Shannon entropy, H, as a indicator of the changes in the seismic activity of a region.
I recommend to accept it after the author incorporate the minor revisions (see attached document)
-
RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2023-28', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Mar 2023
reply
In the paper “Earthquake hazard characterization by using entropy: application to northern Chilean earthquakes” the authors discuss a statistical physics approach for the characterization of seismicity evolution and dynamics in Northern Chile. To this end, the authors use the relationship between the Gutenberg-Richter scaling relation and the Shannon entropy to demonstrate variations in entropy associated with the occurrence of strong earthquakes in this region. The manuscript is generally well-written and organized, the methodology is sound, and the results present some interest for the scientific community. Therefore, I recommend its publication after some minor revisions listed below.
1) In Equation 6 and so on, the upper limit of the integral, representing the interval of earthquake magnitudes, is infinity. However, there is a maximum magnitude up to which earthquakes occur. I would suggest substituting the infinity symbol with Mmax.
2) In Page 4, the annotation given first to the parameter n is “the number of earthquakes with magnitude M”, whereas later on “the cumulative number of earthquakes with a magnitude equal to or larger than M”. The annotation given to particular parameters should be consistent throughout the text.
3) Equation 17 has also been derived by De Santis et al. (2011). Provide the appropriate references and/or discussion.
4) The authors use the MAXC method to estimate the magnitude of completeness (Mc) of their catalog. Woessner and Wiemer (BSSA, 2005) suggested that Mc calculated with this method should be corrected to +0.2 units of magnitude to give more robust estimation of the b-value. Did the authors consider this correction?
5) As the authors discuss in Figure 9, the threshold magnitude (Mc in my previous comment) varies with depth. However, in their analysis of the entire catalog, they use a common threshold magnitude for all depth ranges. In addition, it is possible that Mc also varies with time, and it should be estimated in the temporal windows. The proper estimation of Mc (or M0) is crucial for the determination of the b-value (see Eq. 18).
6) In Figure 1 show the position of the second largest region on the globe.
7) The authors mention the Gutenberg-Richter scaling relation in Fig.4, as well as in other figures (Fig.9). However, in these figures only the cumulative and discrete frequency-magnitude distribution is shown. Show also the Gutenberg-Richter relation and the associated a and b parameters.
8) What do the colors indicate in Fig.6?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-28-RC2
Antonio Posadas et al.
Antonio Posadas et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
205 | 41 | 8 | 254 | 1 | 2 |
- HTML: 205
- PDF: 41
- XML: 8
- Total: 254
- BibTeX: 1
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1