29 Mar 2021

29 Mar 2021

Review status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal NHESS.

Using high-resolution regional climate models to estimate return levels of daily extreme precipitation over Bavaria

Benjamin Poschlod Benjamin Poschlod
  • Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80333, Germany

Abstract. Extreme daily rainfall is an important trigger for floods in Bavaria. The dimensioning of water management structures as well as building codes are based on observational rainfall return levels. In this study, three high-resolution regional climate models (RCMs) are employed to produce 10-year daily rainfall return levels and their performance is evaluated by comparison to observational return levels. The study area is governed by different types of precipitation (stratiform, orographic, convectional) and a complex terrain, with convective precipitation also contributing to daily rainfall levels. The Canadian Regional Climate Model version 5 (CRCM5) at 12 km spatial resolution and the Weather and Forecasting Research model (WRF) at 5 km resolution both driven by ERA-Interim reanalysis data use parametrization schemes to simulate convection. The WRF at 1.5 km resolution driven by ERA5 reanalysis data explicitly resolves convectional processes. Applying the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution, all three model setups can reproduce the observational return levels with an areal average bias of +6.6 % or less and a spatial Spearman rank correlation of ρ > 0.72. The increase of spatial resolution between the 12 km CRCM5 and the 5 km WRF setup is found to improve the performance in terms of bias (+6.6 % and +3.2 %) and spatial correlation (ρ = 0.72 and ρ = 0.82). However, the finer topographic details of the WRF-ERA5 return levels cannot be evaluated with the observation data because their spatial resolution is too low. Hence, this comparison shows no great further improvement (bias = +1.1 %, ρ = 0.82) of the overall performance compared to the 5 km resolution setup. Uncertainties due to extreme value theory are explored by employing three different approaches for the highest-resolution WRF-ERA5 setup. The GEV distribution with fixed shape parameter (bias = +0.9 %, ρ = 0.79) and the Generalized Pareto (GP: bias = +1.3 %, ρ = 0.81) show almost equivalent results for the 10-year return period, whereas the Metastatistical Extreme Value (MEV) distribution leads to a slight underestimation (bias = -6.2 %, ρ = 0.86). From these results, it follows that high-resolution regional climate models are suitable for generating spatially homogeneous rainfall return level products. In regions with a sparse rain gauge density or low spatial representativeness of the stations due to complex topography, RCMs can support the observational data. Further, RCMs driven by global climate models with emission scenarios can project climate change-induced alterations in rainfall return levels at regional to local scales. This would allow adjustment of structural design and, therefore, adaption to future precipitation conditions.

Benjamin Poschlod

Status: open (until 11 May 2021)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2021-66', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Apr 2021 reply
  • RC2: 'Comment on nhess-2021-66', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Apr 2021 reply

Benjamin Poschlod


Total article views: 280 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
226 52 2 280 19 0 1
  • HTML: 226
  • PDF: 52
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 280
  • Supplement: 19
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Mar 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 256 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 256 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
Latest update: 20 Apr 2021
Short summary
Three regional climate models (RCMs) are used to simulate extreme daily rainfall in Bavaria statistically occurring once every 10 years. Results are validated with observations. The RCMs can reproduce spatial patterns and intensities, where increasing the spatial resolution improves the results. These findings imply that RCMs are appropriate to assess such events. They can be applied to areas with few observations or, driven by emission scenarios, to explore the impact of a changing climate.