Journal cover Journal topic
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 3.102
IF3.102
IF 5-year value: 3.284
IF 5-year
3.284
CiteScore value: 5.1
CiteScore
5.1
SNIP value: 1.37
SNIP1.37
IPP value: 3.21
IPP3.21
SJR value: 1.005
SJR1.005
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 90
Scimago H
index
90
h5-index value: 42
h5-index42
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-110
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-110
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  22 Apr 2020

22 Apr 2020

Review status
A revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal NHESS and is expected to appear here in due course.

Responses to severe weather warnings and affective decision-making

Philippe Weyrich1, Anna Scolobig2, Florian Walther3, and Anthony Patt1 Philippe Weyrich et al.
  • 1Climate Policy Group, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2Environmental Governance and Territorial Development Institute, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
  • 3Wetter-Alarm, GVB Services AG, 3063 Ittigen, Switzerland

Abstract. Informing people of an impending hazard can lead them to adopt behavior to mitigate the harm. In this study we examine whether giving more information, and giving it earlier, leads to a greater behavioral response. Our results, which are contextually dependent, show that providing more information has no effect on behavior, and that longer lead times lead to less behavioral change. These results conflict with those from previous studies. These previous studies differed from ours in terms of the research methods: while past studies examined people's anticipated responses to hypothetical warnings, we conducted a field experiment to observe people's responses to actual warnings of real hazards. Theory from cognitive science suggests that this difference matters. In situations of high stress people may make decisions using a faster decision pathway that is rather emotion-driven, while in less stressful situations they are more likely to base their decisions on information. The difference between actual and hypothetical warnings would capture this mismatch in stress levels, and account for the divergent findings. At the same time, the cognitive theory has been hard to test in the field, because of the ethical challenge of submitting people to actually dangerous conditions. Therefore, our results are not only relevant for the design of warning information, but also provide important empirical support for the theory of different decision-making pathways.

Philippe Weyrich et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Philippe Weyrich et al.

Philippe Weyrich et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 290 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
219 55 16 290 23 15 16
  • HTML: 219
  • PDF: 55
  • XML: 16
  • Total: 290
  • Supplement: 23
  • BibTeX: 15
  • EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 233 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 233 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 17 Sep 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Altmetrics