<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NHESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NHESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1684-9981</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/nhess-26-4291-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Analysis of urban-scale typhoon precipitation characteristics and spatiotemporal patterns: a case study of Ningbo, China</article-title><alt-title>Analysis of urban-scale typhoon precipitation characteristics and spatiotemporal patterns</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Caiming</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Hong-Li</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Yi</given-names></name>
          <email>luy@typhoon.org.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Fumin</given-names></name>
          <email>fmren@163.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), School of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Meteorological Science and Technology (LaSW), and Center for Meteorological Impact and Risk Research, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Shanghai Typhoon Institute, China Meteorological Administration, Shanghai, 200030, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Asia-Pacific Typhoon Collaborative Research Center, Shanghai, 200030, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yi Lu (luy@typhoon.org.cn) and Fumin Ren (fmren@163.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>4291</fpage><lpage>4308</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Caiming Wu et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026.html">This article is available from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e130">Conventional urban-scale precipitation characterization often overlooks the uniqueness of typhoon rainfall specifically in intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) relationships and rainfall patterns. This study used meteorological station observations and assimilated gridded datasets from Ningbo, China, to derive county-level IDF curves and to extract typical spatiotemporal patterns using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering for typhoon rainfall. The main findings are as follows. The impacts of typhoon-related rainfall in Ningbo are dominated by long-duration extreme rainfall, most notably 24 h rainfall. Current published IDF curves underestimate the extremes for such events. Furthermore, comparison of the results for two periods (1980–2014 and 1980–2024) revealed spatially inhomogeneous enhancement of typhoon impacts, with notable increase in the northern region. The extracted temporal rainfall patterns were found dominated by the central-peaked pattern (with rainfall concentrated in the middle phase) and the late-peaked pattern, differing substantially from the Chicago hyetograph. The latter exhibits limitation in characterizing the structure of long-duration typhoon rainfall because it tends to overestimate peak rainfall intensity. Spatially, rainfall patterns were categorized into dispersed-dominated and concentrated types. The study also identified the key influencing factors through statistical analysis across typhoon rainfall patterns. These offers a scientific reference for urban resilience in typhoon-prone coastal regions with systemic vulnerability to extreme typhoon rainfall.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e149">Typhoons (i.e., tropical cyclones, TC), through secondary flooding triggered by torrential rainfall, remain one of the world's most destructive natural hazards. For example, in association with Hurricane Helene (2024) and Typhoon Kalmaegi (2025), heavy casualties were recorded both in North Carolina (USA) and in the second-largest city of the Philippines, respectively, owing to severe flooding triggered by the extreme rainfall. In coastal China, typhoons are the weather system primarily responsible for extreme precipitation events (Zhang et al., 2018) that often result in flooding (Su et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2025). For example, record rainfall associated with Typhoon Fitow in 2013 resulted in flooding of 70 % of Yuyao, a county-level city in Ningbo, Zhejiang Province (China), with the core urban area experiencing 90 % inundation. The water level at the Yao River's Yuyao station peaked at 3.46 m, surpassing previous records (Chan et al., 2022). Typhoon Lekima (2019) remained over mainland China for more than 44 h, causing varying degrees of urban and rural waterlogging and river flooding across multiple provinces (Xu et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2022), and a county-level city in Zhejiang Province was nearly entirely inundated (Zhou et al., 2022). In 2021, Typhoon In-Fa moved slowly and exerted prolonged influence on parts of China, with continuous rainfall persisting for 7 d, resulting in exceptionally high cumulative precipitation. The water level at Yuyao station reached a new record height of 3.53 m. Despite notable upgrades and effective operation of flood defence systems (Chan et al., 2022), drainage and flood control infrastructure still faced immense pressure under the scenarios outlined above. Studies over recent years also indicate that the occurrence of typhoon-induced heavy rainfall is increasing (Kossin, 2018; Li and Chakraborty, 2020; Emanuel, 2017; Liu and Wang, 2020), and the risk of secondary flooding is projected to rise correspondingly.</p>
      <p id="d2e152">For purposes such as designing flood control and drainage infrastructure, quantitatively assessing rainstorm disaster risk, and addressing the impact of climate change, it is a fundamental task is to understand and scientifically characterize regional rainfall features (Lanciotti et al., 2022). Through quantification of extreme rainfall intensity over specific durations and recurrence periods, and analysis of the spatiotemporal structure of heavy rainfall, the statistical characteristics of extreme precipitation can be transformed into physical inputs that drive flooding response simulations and dynamic risk management.</p>
      <p id="d2e155">Intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves are an internationally recognized core tool for urban drainage design, flood risk analysis, and water resource engineering planning. In the United States, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Office of Hydrology developed a national, standardized system providing site-specific IDF data across varying durations (5 min to 60 d) and return periods (1–1000 years) using statistical and regional analysis methods (Hosking, 1990; Lin et al., 2006). Through the point-to-surface conversion method, single-point IDF curves can be scaled to the catchment level (Sivapalan and Blöschl, 1998; Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), 2015; MLIT and National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management (NILIM), 2023). In recent years, global high-resolution IDF datasets such as the Bottom Up Regionalized Global Extreme Rainfall (BURGER) dataset (Hoch et al., 2025) have been successively released. Non-stationary IDF analysis under the impact of climate change is also gaining global attention (Lima et al., 2016; Cannon and Innocenti, 2019; Jayaweera et al., 2025). In China, despite considerable progress in developing short-duration IDF curves (Ren et al., 2025), the fragmented governance between urban drainage (short duration) and river flood control (long duration) has weakened system resilience against extreme rainfall events (Zhou et al., 2022). In contrast, research in China on IDF curves that comprehensively consider both long and short durations started relatively late and has been conducted primarily on a localized, region-by-region basis.</p>
      <p id="d2e158">Traditional rainfall pattern analysis often assumes a spatially uniform distribution or relies on coarse zoning, while focusing on the temporal rainfall profile within a region. Zhang et al. (2021) summarized seven representative profiles. Common design rainfall profile methods include, for short-duration events, the Chicago hyetograph, Huff hyetograph, triangular hyetograph, and Pilgrim and Cordery hyetograph. For long-duration events, common methods include the Soil Conservation Service hyetograph (Soil Conservation Service, 1986) and the same-frequency amplification analysis method (Yan et al., 2020). Among these, the Chicago hyetograph and the same-frequency amplification analysis method (Li et al., 2024) are the ones used most widely for short- and long-duration rainfall, respectively. In practice, the Chicago hyetograph is often applied alone or integrated with the latter for long-duration events. To enhance the realism and engineering applicability of design scenarios, Yang et al. (2024) extracted representative temporal rainfall patterns from historical rainfall events through intelligent clustering and similarity assessment. Additionally, Qi et al. (2022) examined the impact of different rainfall patterns on flooding, finding that the single-peak pattern might lead to more severe results. As high-resolution observational data continue to accumulate and diversify, recent studies indicate that the spatial distribution characteristics of rainfall are key factors determining flooding characteristics (Costabile et al., 2023; Xu et al., 2025). The spatial non-uniformity of rainfall increases urban flooding areas and water volumes, thereby altering the spatial distribution patterns of flooding (Chen et al., 2022; Lin et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d2e162">The prolonged duration, massive cumulative rainfall, and extensive coverage of typhoon-related rainstorms shape their unique disaster-causing mechanisms. These characteristics make them more prone to triggering severe, urban-scale, and systemic urban flooding. Existing research, however, has overlooked these critical characteristics of heavy rainfall associated with such specific weather systems. Meanwhile, Ji et al. (2026) analysed hourly scale heavy rainfall events from landfalling typhoons in China. They found that events persisting for more than 12 h accounted for the highest proportion (39.93 %) and showed a substantial annual increase of 0.13 %. The average annual duration reached 19.93 h and lengthened by 0.03 h annually. Short-duration events (1–6 h) accounted for the lowest proportion (29.79 %) but the fastest growth rate (0.17 % annually), while their duration showed slight decrease.</p>
      <p id="d2e165">It is evident that research on urban storm characteristics and flood control strategies urgently requires greater focus on typhoon-induced precipitation, particularly the long-duration heavy rainfall events such systems generate. The outcomes of IDF curves are applied predominantly in the design of temporal rainfall patterns, while spatial variability is often addressed by zoning IDF curves based on regional rainfall characteristics. For temporal rainfall patterns, long-duration designs are sometimes oversimplified through mechanistic extension of short-duration design rainfall patterns, leading to distorted rainfall distributions; in other cases, reliance on a limited number of typical historical storm events restricts flexibility and generalizability. For spatial rainfall patterns, some studies rely on idealized scenarios constructed with mathematical functions for conducting stochastic experiments and thereby lack a physical basis (Lin et al., 2022). In contrast, other studies have utilized spatial rainfall observations from historical tropical cyclones to design spatially distributed events, offering an alternative that has greater physical grounding (Amorim et al., 2025; Kim et al., 2023; Nasr et al., 2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e168">This study selected Ningbo, a representative typhoon-affected city in China, to specifically investigate the IDF characteristics and key spatiotemporal rainfall patterns of typhoon rainstorms. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 introduces the study area and the data and methods used. Section 3 discusses the research findings, and Sect. 4 presents the derived conclusions and outlines further prospects.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d2e186">Ningbo, a sub-provincial city in Zhejiang Province, China (Fig. 1a), covers a land area of 9816 km<sup>2</sup>, has a population of 9.78 million people, and produced a GDP value of CNY 1814.77 billion  in 2024. It is located on the southern wing of the Yangtze River Delta (28°51<sup>′</sup>–30°33<sup>′</sup> N, 120°55<sup>′</sup>–122°16<sup>′</sup> E), bordered by the East China Sea to the east and Hangzhou Bay to the north. The region is characterized by varied topography that includes northeastern plains and southwestern hills (Fig. 1b). The study area has a dense network of rivers, including one of the eight major water systems of Zhejiang Province. Two major rivers converge within the urban area, flowing north-eastward into the East China Sea. Ningbo experiences a subtropical monsoon climate with average annual rainfall of 1539 mm. Rainfall is concentrated from May to September, mainly during the monsoon and typhoon seasons. As one of the regions in China most frequently and severely affected by tropical cyclones, Ningbo has experienced multiple severe urban flood events triggered by typhoons (e.g., Haikui in 2012, Fitow in 2013, In-Fa in 2021, and Muifa in 2022). Observations reveal substantial spatiotemporal variability in typhoon-related rainfall, making Ningbo an ideal study area.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e236">Overview of the study area. <bold>(a)</bold> Location of the study area, <bold>(b)</bold> the regional topography, and <bold>(c)</bold> the locations of national meteorological stations and the coverage of the China Meteorological Administration Land Data Assimilation System (CLDAS) grid. Base map of China: GS (2024) 0650. © National Geomatics Center of China. All rights reserved.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Basic data</title>
      <p id="d2e269"><list list-type="order">
              <list-item>

      <p id="d2e274">Historical tropical cyclone data were acquired from the best-track dataset maintained by the Shanghai Typhoon Institute of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA). This dataset has been quality-controlled and is recorded in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) (Ying et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2021).</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d2e280">Hourly precipitation data (Zhao et al., 2024) from 1951 to present for nine national stations in Ningbo (Fig. 1c) were extracted from the National Meteorological Information Center of the CMA. Yinzhou station was considered representative of the urban centre. Data from Zhenhai station were excluded because of missing records, and Shipu station was generally not considered. This dataset has undergone quality control and is recorded in Beijing Time (BJT).</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d2e286">Gridded precipitation data were sourced from the CMA Land Data Assimilation System (CLDAS) hourly product (Sun et al., 2020). This dataset integrates ground observations, satellite remote sensing, and numerical model data. The data have a spatial resolution of 0.0625° in both longitude and latitude. The spatial resolution of 0.0625° can be converted to linear distance using the great-circle distance formula, where the east–west distance depends on latitude. The data in this dataset are recorded in UTC, starting from 1 January 1998, 00:00:00.</p>
              </list-item>
              <list-item>

      <p id="d2e292">The Forest And Buildings removed Copernicus digital elevation model (FABDEM), developed jointly by the company Fathom (UK) and the University of Bristol (UK), is the first global digital elevation model (DEM) with forest and buildings removed presented at 30 m resolution. It is currently one of the most accurate free digital elevation model datasets worldwide, with a mean absolute vertical error of 3.41 m over global land points, 1.12 m over built-up areas, and 2.88 m over forested areas (Hawker et al., 2022).</p>
              </list-item>
            </list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Preprocessing of typhoon track and hourly precipitation data</title>
      <p id="d2e305">First, meteorological data required preprocessing (Fig. 2). This involved interpolation of typhoon track data, hourly precipitation separation of typhoons, and division of typhoon rainfall processes. The track locations of each typhoon were first interpolated to hourly resolution, and the area impacted directly by rainfall was then defined as being within 500 km of the typhoon location at each time step. The fixed 500 km radius remains the benchmark used most widely for typhoon rainfall estimation because it represents an empirical standard derived from typical typhoon circulation, observational data coverage, and robustness of climate statistics. Its effectiveness in capturing primary typhoon precipitation has been confirmed by observations from the Shanghai Typhoon Institute of the CMA (Ren et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2022; Morin et al., 2024; Kumar et al., 2025). To define rainfall processes, for each typhoon, single-station rainfall data were first sorted chronologically. Then, a rainfall event (or process) was defined as beginning when rainfall exceeded 0.1 mm h<sup>−1</sup>, and ending at the time of the final occurrence of measurable rainfall of more than 0 mm h<sup>−1</sup> that was followed immediately by two or more consecutive hours of zero rainfall. The next event was defined as beginning at the first instance of rainfall exceeding 0.1 mm h<sup>−1</sup> after the previous event had ended, and the process continued in this manner (Zhang, 2015; Tang et al., 2020).</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e346">Flowchart for extracting annual maximum typhoon rainfall series at specific durations for each station.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e355">For sample selection in IDF curve fitting specifically for typhoon rainfall, each station was processed independently. Within each rainfall event, a sliding window was moved with a time step of 1 h to compute the cumulative rainfall for window lengths of 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h (Sect. S1.1 and S1.2). For each window length, the event-specific maximum rainfall was determined by sorting and comparing the computed values. When identifying the annual maximum typhoon rainfall, the selected rainfall process for a given duration was not constrained by day or month boundaries, provided it did not cross year boundaries. For each duration (i.e., window length), the annual maximum was then determined by further comparison of these event-specific maxima across all events within a year.</p>
      <p id="d2e359">During the rationality check (Fig. 2), it was found that when rainfall events (or processes) were divided according to the above criteria, some typhoon influence processes might have been excessively segmented. This could have led to two issues: (1) annual maximum rainfall for longer durations being lower than that for shorter durations in the same year, and (2) insufficient valid samples for longer durations. The segmentation was adjusted to a typhoon-influence process when the first issue occurred. For each typhoon, single-station rainfall data were also first sorted chronologically. Then, a typhoon-influence process was defined as each continuous period during which the station remained within a 500 km radius of the typhoon location. Unlike the rainfall-event definition, which required specific rainfall intensity thresholds to initiate or terminate an event, this broader definition captured the entire duration of the direct influence of the typhoon (Sect. S1.2). Consequently, a single typhoon might have included multiple such processes if the station intermittently entered and exited the 500 km range. After optimizing the process segmentation, the rationality of the data was improved substantially and the occurrence of the second issue was alleviated accordingly.</p>
      <p id="d2e362">The first issue rarely persisted after the above adjustments. If it did, to ensure that no extreme values were missed, the hourly series corresponding to the short-duration maxima was extended to longer durations. For the year in which the issue was identified, the maximum rainfall value across all durations shorter than the target duration was extracted. Zeros were then prepended to the corresponding rainfall series, based on historical experience that a more hazardous rainfall peak usually occurs later. Then, the cumulative rainfall over this extended series was used to replace the original annual maximum rainfall for the longer duration (Sect. S1.3).</p>
      <p id="d2e365">Annual sequence data for fitting were further screened to define impactful rainfall events (Fig. 2), with thresholds from the “<italic>Precipitation Classification Standard</italic>” (GB/T 28592-2012, 2012): 12 h rainfall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 mm or 24 h rainfall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 mm, depending on the longest duration in the given year. The selection of these thresholds could also balance the sample size requirements for fitting.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Fitting IDF curves based on annual maximum typhoon rainfall series</title>
      <p id="d2e401">The empirical frequency was calculated using the mathematical expectation formula recommended by the “<italic>Technical Guidelines for Establishment of Intensity–Duration–Frequency Curve and Design Rainstorm Profile,</italic>” issued jointly by the Ministry of Housing and Urban–Rural Development of the People's Republic of China and the CMA. The formula is expressed as follows:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M12" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the empirical frequency and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of samples. The samples are arranged in descending order as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, …, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For a given sample, its rank <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the count of occurrences greater than or equal to that sample.</p>
      <p id="d2e492">The Pearson-III distribution, Generalized Extreme Value distribution, Gumbel distribution, and Exponential distribution were selected for consideration, all of which are distributions commonly used distributions in extreme value analysis (Ghanmi et al., 2016; Gruss et al., 2025). Curve fitting, which seeks the best agreement between the frequency curve and the empirical data, was performed using a combined approach of objective fitting and optimized fitting methods. The key to curve fitting is the criterion used to measure the best agreement. This study considered three fitting criteria: the minimum sum of the squared deviations, the minimum sum of the absolute deviations, and the minimum sum of the squares of the relative deviations.</p>
      <p id="d2e495">Based on the fitting results, the curve fitting scheme was adjusted primarily to address the issue of intersecting fitted curves for different durations at the same station. This study adopted a variable ratio of the coefficient of skewness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the coefficient of variation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), using three strategies. The first strategy was to calculate the average ratio based on all durations at the station and set it as the standard value with an allowable error range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6, while setting some initial parameters of the fitting function based on the characteristics of the observed data (such as mean and variance). Second, the optimal parameters obtained for a given duration were used sequentially as the initial parameters for fitting the curve of the immediately longer duration. Finally, based on the intrinsic characteristics of the distribution functions, parameters were adjusted within a reasonable range. In this strategy, the constraint on the allowable error margin for the ratio was relaxed and thus the fitting error itself served as the primary control criterion.</p>
      <p id="d2e527">For error validation, with reference to the technical guidelines mentioned above, when the return period was between 2 and 20 years, the mean absolute root mean square error (RMSE) should not exceed 0.05 mm/min in areas with moderate rainfall intensity, whereas in areas with higher rainfall intensity, the mean relative root mean square error (MRRMSE) should not exceed 5 %. These two metrics can be expressed as follows:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M22" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RMSE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MRRMSE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the theoretical rainfall amount, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rainfall amount determined from the fitting values, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rainfall duration, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of samples. Meanwhile, reference was made to Appendix C of the “<italic>Ningbo Urban Drainage and Waterlogging Control Detailed Rules</italic>” (Yong DX/JS 021-2023, 2023) and to the “<italic>Standard of rainfall intensity computation</italic>” (DB 33/T 1191-2020, 2020). The fitted values were compared with results inversely calculated from formulas provided in the reference materials (Table 1). Additionally, graphical checks were conducted to examine whether the multi-duration IDF curves exhibited intersections under each combination of fitting functions and criteria for each station.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e716">Comparison of data sources and methods for IDF curves from different origins.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="2.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="3cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="1.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="3.8cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="center">IDF curves from DB33/T 1191-2020 and Yong DX/JS 021-2023 (durations: 5–180 min; return periods: 1–100 years) </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IDF curves in this study</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">County</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">IDF Curves (Rainstorm IntensityFormula)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Data Period &amp; Duration</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Selection Method /Theoretical Distribution</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Stationand level</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">Ningbo MainUrban Area</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6576.744</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.685</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lg</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.309</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.921</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Rainstorm intensity(L (s hm<sup>2</sup>)<sup>−1</sup>)); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Rainfall duration (min); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Return period (years);lg, Common logarithm (base 10))</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">1981–2014(34 years)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4" morerows="7">Annual maximum rainfall series for each duration/Gumbel</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">YinzhouNationalBasic</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6" morerows="7">– Comparison: 1980–2014  (35 years).  – Update: 1980–2024  (45 years).  – Annual maximum rainfall series for each duration.  – Exponential</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beilun</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2664.628</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.945</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lgP</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.262</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.763</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1980–2014 (35 years)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">BeilunNationalGeneral</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zhenhai</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2710.303</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.958</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lgP</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.050</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.769</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1980–2014 (35 years)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ZhenhaiNationalGeneral</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fenghua</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">799.935</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.750</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lgP</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.080</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.508</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1980–2014 (35 years)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">FenghuaNationalGeneral</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xiangshan</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1311.955</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.698</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lgP</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.741</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.575</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1980–2014 (35 years)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">XiangshanNationalGeneral</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ninghai</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1287.699</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.724</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lgP</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.676</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.579</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1980–2014 (35 years)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NinghaiNationalGeneral</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Yuyao</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2293.666</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.698</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lgP</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.770</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.723</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1980–2014 (35 years)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">YuyaoNationalGeneral</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cixi</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3075.584</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.854</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lgP</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.466</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.781</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1980–2014 (35 years)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CixiNationalBasic</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Extraction of typical spatiotemporal characteristics of typhoon rainfall</title>
      <p id="d2e1356">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering method remains a commonly used, intuitive, and effective approach for clustering rainfall patterns (Jin et al., 2024; Zhang and Fan, 2026). This method partitions the dataset into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distinct clusters by minimizing the within-cluster sum of the squared Euclidean distances between each sample and its corresponding cluster centroid. The algorithm iterates between two steps: (1) assigning each sample to the nearest centroid, and (2) updating each centroid as the mean of the samples assigned to that cluster, until convergence. Prior to clustering, the data were standardized. The optimal number of clusters was determined through repeated experimentation, combined with practical considerations, and by examining the behavior of clustering quality metrics.</p>
      <p id="d2e1373">The 24 h rainfall processes corresponding to the values in the curve-fitting sequences of all stations were selected as the analysis samples. Based on the temporal distribution characteristics of these processes, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means method was used to classify them into different temporal rainfall patterns. For the processes within each type, weighted rainfall values were calculated for each time step of the specific duration. The weights were assigned according to the actual rainfall at the corresponding time step in the processes. The weighted values for all time steps within the specific duration were then normalized to obtain temporal allocation weights.</p>
      <p id="d2e1383">Subsequently, gridded data covering the Ningbo region (Fig. 1c) and corresponding to the time ranges of the selected processes were extracted. According to the spatial distribution characteristics of the gridded data for each rainfall process, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering was performed again. For each grid, the weighted 24 h cumulative rainfall across processes with the same spatial type was computed, where the weight for each process was assigned according to its actual cumulative rainfall at that grid. These weighted values were then normalized to obtain spatial allocation weights (Sect. S2).</p>
      <p id="d2e1393">Temporal rainfall patterns were identified using two key indicators: the position of the rainfall peak and the precipitation proportions in three intervals divided equally. Previous studies focused on the location of heavy rainfall centres and the spatial gradient of rainfall to characterize the spatial distribution patterns (Chen et al., 2022; Lin et al., 2022). Based on these considerations, the classification indices for the spatial patterns in this study were defined as follows. First, the location of the concentrated or high-impact rainfall area was considered. The average position of the grids whose process-total rainfall was within the top 30 % of all grids within a given duration was computed, and its distance (Haversine formula) from the regional centre was taken as the first index. The location of the target point relative to the regional centre was represented by two indices: its east–west and north–south orientations. Next, the spatial gradient characteristics of rainfall were examined, with a focus on the dispersion of the high-impact rainfall area and the overall spatial gradient of precipitation, and two indices were calculated. The first index measures the regional contribution of the top 30 % of grids to the total rainfall over a region, reflecting rainfall concentration. The second index represents the contribution of the bottom 30 % of grids, indicating the proportion of rainfall in lightly affected areas. The 30 % threshold approximates a tercile split for distinguishing different impact levels.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Fitting results of IDF curves for typhoon rainfall</title>
      <p id="d2e1413">In this study, two sets of IDF curve fitting were conducted. The first was performed for the period 1980–2014, consistent with the data period coverage of existing IDF curves, which were published in 2015 and remain in current use. This period was selected because both the quantity and the quality of rainfall data have increased substantially since 1980, and the data naturally ended in 2014 based on the local practical conditions and demands of that time. The existing published IDF curves were derived using the complete mixed rainfall data, without distinguishing between typhoon and non-typhoon rainfall, and were focused primarily on short-duration events, with sliding windows of mainly of 6 h or less during sampling. Research indicates that most extreme hourly rainfall events are caused by non-typhoon systems that include surface fronts, vortex/shear lines, and weak synoptic forcing (Luo et al., 2016). Consequently, short-duration (e.g., hourly scale) extreme rainfall intensity/frequency information derived from complete mixed rainfall data will be higher than that derived from typhoon-only rainfall data. This can lead to fitted IDF curves with higher rainfall intensities for short durations. For long durations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 h), the results from mixed rainfall data may be distorted. The second fitting utilized typhoon rainfall data that covered 1980–2024 (i.e., updated to include recent years) to capture how the features of IDF curves have changed over time (compared with those for the 1980–2014 period).</p>
      <p id="d2e1423">By comparing the results obtained under different distributions (Sect. S3), the Exponential distribution combined with the minimum sum of squared deviations criterion (Fig. 3) was found to be generally applicable across all stations for the final fitting results. The optimal fitted curves are obtained through deterministic stepwise optimization. Starting from initial guesses, the method uses gradient information to determine the direction and step size for parameter updates within allowable ranges, systematically approaching the best fit. The process stops when the maximum iteration limit is reached or the convergence condition is met, yielding a uniquely determined optimal solution. The fitted  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios generally fall within the range of 2.5–4.0, concentrated predominantly between 3.0 and 3.5. These results are reasonable compared with the fixed values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> adopted in previous studies (Yu et al., 2021). It should be noted that the error threshold criterion mentioned in Sect. 2 was originally established only for short-duration events and did not distinguish between typhoon and non-typhoon rainfall. In this study, this criterion was used as a reference rather than being strictly enforced. Given the varied characteristics among different typhoons and the notable interannual differences in typhoon frequency, the threshold was reasonably relaxed. Furthermore, validation based on absolute error was found to be more suitable for assessing the results in this study. In practice, except for a very few cases where the absolute error was 0.06 mm min<sup>−1</sup>, all other results satisfied the condition of being <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 mm min<sup>−1</sup> (Sect. S4).</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1518">IDF curves for Yinzhou station (1980–2024) by duration. Solid lines represent observed results and dashed lines represent exponential fitting results, with different colours indicating different durations. Points on the two lines indicate rainfall intensity (mm) corresponding to specific return periods.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1528">Taking Yinzhou station as an example, the intensity–frequency curves of typhoon, non-typhoon, and complete rainfall data at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h are compared in Fig. 4. In this study, typhoon events were defined in terms of onset and termination based on their definition. For non-typhoon rainfall data and complete rainfall data, however, because no further differentiation of other weather systems is made, individual rainfall events lack clear physical boundaries. Therefore, a unified time-interval threshold is required to delineate independent rainfall processes and ensure consistency in the delineation criteria. When delineating rainfall processes from the complete rainfall data, the 24 h interval can ensure, to the greatest extent possible, that impact events of different typhoons are separated correctly. While this threshold may merge some short-duration storms separated by less than 24 h into a multi-peak, long-duration process, it does not exclude the storms themselves. Under the annual maximum sampling framework adopted in this study, processes are first delineated and then a moving window is applied. The peak rainfall intensity within any merged process is still retained and has the opportunity to be selected as the annual maximum value. Correspondingly, for non-typhoon rainfall data and complete rainfall data, the rainfall process is considered to have ended when a period of at least 24 consecutive hours without precipitation occurs thereafter. When the green line lies above the blue line, this indicates that typhoons are more likely to produce rainfall of a given intensity and that, for the same exceedance probability, they can generate more intense extreme rainfall. Comparison of the four subplots clearly shows that the blue and green curves begin to intersect at duration of 6 h and longer (Fig. 4b–d). As duration increases, the intersection position gradually moves toward the location of higher probability (Fig. 4c and d), indicating that the statistical characteristics of extreme rainfall exhibit clear dependence on duration and weather system. For short-duration extreme precipitation (e.g., 1 h) non-typhoon systems (such as the Meiyu front or severe convective weather) exhibit greater hazard potential (Fig. 4a). For long-duration extreme precipitation (e.g., 12 and 24 h; Fig. 4c and d, respectively), the rainfall intensity induced by typhoons can more readily reach or even exceed the levels associated with non-typhoon scenarios. This confirms quantitatively that typhoon systems are a key risk source for extreme precipitation under low frequency and long duration (e.g., those with a 100-year return period). The longer the duration, the greater the contribution of typhoons becomes to the statistical characteristics of extreme rainfall (Fig. 4b–d). Compared with non-typhoon convective systems with shorter lifespans and smaller spatial scales, the vast and more persistent rotational structure of typhoons enables them to sustain highly efficient moisture transport and convergent uplift over extended periods, thereby achieving substantial advantage in generating extreme accumulated rainfall. The above conclusions are generally applicable across all stations (Sect. S5), although minor differences exist.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1533">Annual maximum rainfall intensity–probability curves for Yinzhou Station during 1980–2014: <bold>(a)</bold> 1 h, <bold>(b)</bold> 6 h, <bold>(c)</bold> 12 h, and <bold>(d)</bold> 24 h, showing empirical probability points with connecting lines for complete (red), non-typhoon (blue), and typhoon (green) rainfall data, together with fitted intensity–frequency curves for typhoon rainfall (light green).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1554">This study compared the fitted results with currently published IDF curves. Intensities of typhoon rainfall at specific return periods are generally lower than those from the published IDF curves for short durations, but markedly higher for long durations, particularly for events with duration exceeding 6 h (Fig. 5a). Moreover, the differences are more pronounced for long durations after the data update (Fig. 5a). This reflects an essential difference in the dominant weather systems and physical mechanisms responsible for extreme rainfall across different durations. It is necessary to distinguish rainfall types (e.g., typhoon-type versus general-type) for differentiated design. The variation in intensity of typhoon rainfall with duration is more notable compared with the current IDF curves, and tends to stabilize after the 24 h processes (Fig. 5a). The newly developed curves reflect the unique characteristics of typhoons, exhibiting greater randomness and uncertainty. The primary hazard period is concentrated within 24 h, after which rainfall enters a phase of attenuation or stabilization. The applicability of the published IDF curves for extrapolating long-duration extreme rainfall intensities is limited (Fig. 5b). Designs based solely on the current IDF curves might result in insufficient drainage capacity for long-duration events. For urban drainage design, the intensity of typhoon rainfall within the 24 h window is a critical control target. Additionally, the hourly rainfall intensities produced by typhoons under high return periods remain comparable to the values of the published IDF curves at medium return periods (Fig. 5a). The non-typhoon weather systems make a greater contribution to extreme precipitation on the hourly scale, while typhoons, although responsible for a lesser contribution, remain capable of generating substantial hourly intensities. Extreme precipitation at longer durations (e.g., 24 h) driven by typhoon systems is characterized by higher accumulated rainfall rather than by instantaneous peak intensities of short-duration processes of convective weather systems (Fig. 5b). Comparison of the fitted results from different time periods revealed that the rainfall intensities derived from the 1980–2024 series are markedly higher than those obtained from the 1980–2014 series, with greater increase observed for longer durations compared with shorter ones (Fig. 5a). This indicates that the impact of typhoon precipitation has continued to intensify in recent years. Under the current changing conditions, precipitation events with high intensity and long duration that were previously less common are now more likely to occur (Fig. 5c). However, as indicated by the fitted data, this trend reflects an increase in the occurrence probability of such events, rather than a change in their extreme intensity.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1559">Comparison of fitted IDF curves from typhoon rainfall data (this study) and currently published IDF curves (derived from complete rainfall data without rainfall type distinction) for Yinzhou station. <bold>(a)</bold> Impact of data update on IDF curves: solid blue line represents the currently published IDF curves, dashed orange line represents the fitting curve for 1980–2014, and solid red line represents the fitting curve for 1980–2024. <bold>(b)</bold> Comparison of 24 h duration: blue bars represent the currently published IDF curves, orange bars represent the fitting curve for 1980–2014, and red bars represent the fitting curve for 1980–2024. <bold>(c)</bold> Change rate from the latest IDF curves to the currently published curves.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1577">Marked regional spatial variations are observed across county-level areas. As a representative coastal station, Beilun station exhibits distinct characteristics of typhoon precipitation. For this region, typhoons not only are the primary cause of high-impact extreme precipitation with long duration but also possess extreme hazard potential on short-duration scales, which is comparable to that of non-typhoon weather systems (Fig. 6a). Compared with Yinzhou station, Beilun station experiences considerably higher rainfall intensities. This phenomenon is related to its geographic location, which is more directly exposed to typhoons. The intensity at stations such as Fenghua and Ninghai is notably higher than that at Yinzhou station (table omitted). This difference is attributed primarily to the amplification effect of complex terrain on typhoon precipitation. Additionally, comparison of fitting results based on two periods, i.e., 1980–2014 and 1980–2024, across various stations revealed that extending the observation series generally leads to increase in typhoon rainfall intensity for the same duration and return period. This trend is most pronounced for Yuyao station and Cixi station, both located in northern Ningbo, as illustrated in Fig. 6b for Yuyao station. Statistics further show that the increase in rainfall intensity is driven primarily by a higher frequency of extreme precipitation rather than the surpassing of historical rainfall maxima. Under changing conditions, extreme precipitation from typhoons is transitioning from a “rare anomaly” into a “more frequent and high-risk phenomenon,” and thereby giving rise to new challenges for existing flood control and drainage systems.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e1583">Rainfall intensities for various durations and return periods. <bold>(a)</bold> Beilun station: published sources (upper left) and fitting results (upper right) for 1980–2014 and <bold>(b)</bold> Yuyao station: fitting results for 1980–2014 (lower left) and 1980–2024 (lower right). The currently published IDF table in <bold>(a)</bold> is based on complete rainfall data without rainfall type distinction, whereas the fitted IDF tables in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> are derived from typhoon rainfall data from this study.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Analysis of spatiotemporal patterns of typhoon rainfall</title>
      <p id="d2e1615">The contribution of typhoons to extreme rainfall increases considerably with longer duration, and this characteristic is universal. The more severe impacts of extreme typhoon rainfall on the coastal and mountainous areas of the study region suggest that the recent increase in typhoon impacts is characterized by notable spatial non-uniformity. Additionally, thorough analysis of how these extreme 24 h rainfall records are realized through specific typhoon precipitation processes, including their spatiotemporal patterns, is crucial for rational design of drainage systems, reservoir operation strategies, and effective emergency management. Based on these findings, this study systematically extracted the key spatial and temporal patterns of rainfall by examining representative historical typhoon rainfall processes. Gridded data are available only from 1998 onward; therefore, to ensure consistency in the analysis of temporal and spatial patterns of rainfall, both analyses were based on station and gridded data from 1998 onwards.</p>
      <p id="d2e1618">The rainfall processes underlying the annual maximum 24 h rainfall sequences used for curve fitting at meteorological stations across Ningbo were extracted, and three distinct temporal patterns (Fig. 7d–f) were identified among the clustered rainfall processes (Fig. 7a–c). The proportions of the rainfall processes in the three categories were 33.77 %, 22.73 %, and 43.51 %; the corresponding mean peak rainfall coefficients were 0.79, 0.24, and 0.51. Additionally, as described in Section 2, each 24 h process was divided equally into three consecutive 8 h sub-phases. The proportion of event-total rainfall occurring in the sub-phase with the largest rainfall accumulation, averaged by category, was 60.69 %, 56.09 %, and 62.69 %, respectively. All differences in these indicators between categories were statistically significant. Temporal rainfall patterns in Ningbo are characterized primarily by the late-peaked pattern (Fig. 7d) and the central-peaked pattern (Fig. 7f). The late-peaked pattern and the early-peaked pattern (Fig. 7e) exhibit relatively typical single-peak structures, with rainfall being more concentrated and hourly rainfall intensity displaying a relatively abrupt pattern. The central-peaked pattern (Fig. 7f) is more uniform and moderate, featuring a double-peak structure.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e1623"><bold>(a–c)</bold> Temporal classification of typical 24 h typhoon rainfall processes, with rainfall processes extracted from different stations marked in different colours. Typical 24 h rainfall temporal patterns in Ningbo City (blue bars): <bold>(d)</bold> late-peaked pattern, <bold>(e)</bold> early-peaked pattern, and <bold>(f)</bold> central-peaked pattern. Chicago hyetograph under different rainfall peak coefficients for a 100-year return period (orange bars): <bold>(g)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(h)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(i)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1690">Using the current published IDF curves for Yinzhou station and the Chicago hyetograph method, the 24 h rainfall series at 5 min intervals was calculated. The rainfall peak coefficients for Ningbo, corresponding to Fig. 7d–f, were also applied, with the return period set to 100 years. Subsequently, the hourly rainfall pattern structure was derived by accumulating rainfall over 12 consecutive 5 min intervals. It can be observed that the rainfall distribution in the Chicago hyetograph is excessively concentrated within a very short period, with the proportion of rainfall during the peak period exceeding 0.4 (Fig. 7g–i). In contrast, typhoon rainfall patterns show more moderate hourly intensity and gradient variations, differing considerably from the patterns generated by the Chicago hyetograph method. Therefore, it is recommended that the Chicago hyetograph not be applied directly as the temporal rainfall pattern for long-duration rainfall processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e1693">The spatial distribution of rainfall varies among typhoon events in Ningbo. The spatial grid is densely distributed, enabling a more detailed description of the spatial distribution structure of each rainfall event compared with data from the sparse meteorological stations. Consequently, rainfall data for the grids corresponding to the occurrence time of the targeted 24 h events were extracted to facilitate a more refined and realistic analysis of the spatial pattern of rainfall. The accuracy of gridded data must be verified. It is also important to note that this accuracy refers to how closely the spatial structure of the rainfall is represented by the gridded data compared with station data, not as a comparison of specific rainfall amounts. The consistency between the two types of data was assessed using three indices. First, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was employed to examine their monotonic relationship (Fig. 8a). Second, rainfall intensities from both datasets were ranked and grouped into five equal percentiles (quintiles), and the adjacent percentile matching rate was calculated as the proportion of grids with a percentile difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 (Fig. 8b). Third, a spatial pattern shift index was constructed using rainfall magnitude-based weights to quantify the normalized displacement of rainfall centres between the two datasets (Fig. 8c). The median Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.638 (Fig. 8a), reflecting acceptable agreement between the gridded data and station observations in terms of spatial precipitation ranking. The median adjacent percentile match rate reached 0.803 (Fig. 8b), meaning that the precipitation category for most processes differs by no more than one level between the two datasets. With a median value of 0.031 (Fig. 8c), the spatial pattern shift index revealed that the precipitation centroids of the two datasets are aligned almost perfectly. All three metrics consistently showed that the gridded data reliably captured the spatial rainfall distributions reflected by the station observations.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e1705">Comparison of gridded data and station data for the spatial distribution of representative 24 h typhoon rainfall processes. Indicators to characterize spatial inconsistency: <bold>(a)</bold> Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (blue bars), <bold>(b)</bold> adjacent category match rate (purple bars), and <bold>(c)</bold> spatial pattern shift index (orange bars).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1723">The processes under each temporal category were further divided into two subcategories according to the position of the areas of heavy rainfall and the spatial dispersion characteristics of the precipitation. The statistical significance tests under each temporal pattern indicated marked differences in the structural indices between the two spatial rainfall patterns. Overall, the spatial patterns of rainfall can be summarized into the following two types. The first type can be described as the dispersed type, which predominates among the observed cases (Fig. 9a–c). This type is characterized by widespread rainfall coverage, with relatively scattered areas of heavy precipitation. The sample proportions for the three specific spatial patterns were 26.62 % (Fig. 9a), 12.99 % (Fig. 9b), and 37.66 % (Fig. 9c). The median proportions of rainfall contributed by the top 30 % of grids ranked by rainfall amount were 43.81 %, 43.52 %, and 42.70 % across the three rainfall patterns, while the corresponding values for the bottom 30 % were 16.55 %, 17.89 %, and 18.76 %, respectively. This type exhibits a reasonably uniform overall distribution, with centres of heavy rainfall scattered over high-elevation mountainous areas and with a gentle rainfall gradient. The second type is characterized by concentrated rainfall, with localized centres of heavy rainfall that account for a substantial proportion of the total regional rainfall (Fig. 9d–f). It also displays a markedly pronounced northward offset. Among the three specific spatial patterns, the sample proportions were 7.14 % (Fig. 9d), 9.74 % (Fig. 9e), and 5.84 % (Fig. 9f), with the latter accounting for the lowest share. Across the three rainfall patterns, the median proportions of rainfall contributed by the top 30 % of grids (ranked by rainfall amount) were 67.67 %, 58.69 %, and 63.77 %, while those for the bottom 30 % were 4.18 %, 8.16 %, and 6.53 %, respectively. The formation of this type might be more complex, potentially influenced by the inherent characteristics of typhoons (Yu et al., 2017; Li and Zhao, 2019; Lai et al., 2024) or by interactions between typhoons and other weather systems such as westerly troughs (He et al., 2020). This can be attributed to exceptionally abundant or sustained moisture transport, or to convergence, resulting in stronger localized impacts.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e1728">The three temporal rainfall patterns (late-peaked, early-peaked, and central-peaked), each with two spatial subtypes: <bold>(a, b, c)</bold> dispersed and <bold>(d, e, f)</bold> concentrated.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f09.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1744">Analysis of the spatial and temporal patterns of typhoon rainfall revealed that intrinsic typhoon characteristics and underlying surface properties both play important roles. The counterclockwise circulation of a typhoon shapes its asymmetric moisture transport, which is typically strongest on its northern side (Li and Zhao, 2019; Wu et al., 2024). The transport of warm and moist air from the eastern sea, driven by typhoons, creates favourable moisture conditions that facilitate the formation of heavy rainfall along the coast (Fig. 9d and f). As this warm, moist airflow, driven by the Coriolis force and pressure gradients, moves toward land, it interacts dynamically with complex underlying terrain (Feng et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2026). In areas with trumpet-shaped topography, pronounced windward slopes, or curved coasts, the airflow is forced to converge and ascend, greatly enhancing local updrafts and precipitation efficiency (Cheng et al., 2025), thereby shaping the final distribution of the centres of heavy rainfall (Fig. 9a–c). Rainfall over mountainous areas can sometimes intensify abruptly. Under typhoon conditions, the dynamic forcing of terrain on airflow can rapidly trigger or enhance convection within a short period. Additionally, the complex thermal properties of the underlying surface in mountainous regions tend to accumulate unstable energy locally, which can be released abruptly. These conditions might cause rainfall intensity to increase sharply over time (Fig. 7d and e) and exhibit localized intensification spatially (Fig. 9d and e). Unlike in mountainous regions, over the northern plains and other gently sloping areas where terrain forcing is weak, the occurrence of widespread heavy rainfall induced by typhoons often requires effective dynamic and thermal coordination with other large-scale weather systems such as westerly troughs and shear lines (Fig. 9d and f).</p>
      <p id="d2e1747">Further statistics were computed regarding the characteristics of typhoon intensity, translation speed, and track during the 24 h rainfall process of typical typhoons. Based on the median and mean values, stronger typhoons are associated with a larger and more dispersed spatial distribution of rainfall (Fig. 10a and b), while a slower average translation speed is associated with a longer duration within a certain region scale, resulting in stronger and more localized rainfall (Fig. 10c and d). For the central-peaked and spatially concentrated pattern, the regional concentration of rainfall might be related to other factors. In terms of track characteristics, cases with stronger local influence correspond to typhoon track endpoints that are further north (Fig. 10e). As the track endpoint moves further northwest, the typhoon rainfall impact area tends to extend further toward inland areas of the northwest (Fig. 10e and f). The overall tracks of typhoons are predominantly north-eastward and north-westward, with north-westward tracks being more frequent (Fig. 10g). This implies that, for the processes examined in this study, typhoons affecting the Ningbo region are mainly of the north-westward-track type. Combined with the rotational characteristics of typhoons, such tracks can bring a continuous supply of water vapor from the eastern sea.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e1752">Typhoon characteristics corresponding to typical 24 h rainfall processes under each spatiotemporal rainfall pattern (G1–G6): <bold>(a)</bold> maximum intensity, <bold>(b)</bold> mean intensity, <bold>(c)</bold> mean translation speed, <bold>(d)</bold> maximum translation speed, <bold>(e)</bold> latitude, and <bold>(f)</bold> longitude of the track endpoint, and <bold>(g)</bold> direction of the track start position relative to the endpoint during the 24 h rainfall process.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/4291/2026/nhess-26-4291-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and outlook</title>
      <p id="d2e1792">Traditional urban flood defence designs fail to consider the spatiotemporal non-uniformity of typhoon rainfall because they are based on classic rainfall patterns. This study took Ningbo in China as a case study. It established county-level IDF curves for annual maximum typhoon rainfall at specific durations using meteorological station observations. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering method was then applied to extract typical spatiotemporal patterns of typhoon rainfall. The following three conclusions were derived.</p>
      <p id="d2e1802">The dominant role of typhoons in long-duration IDF relationships highlights the fundamental difference in their disaster-causing mechanisms compared with short-duration convective rainfall: the former triggers persistent urban flooding through cumulative rainfall, while the latter overwhelms the drainage system's instantaneous capacity with its peak intensity. Therefore, drainage and flood prevention design in typhoon-affected areas should account for the cumulative effects of long-duration rainfall and establish categorized IDF curves and differentiated strategies. The current published IDF curves underestimate extremes for such prolonged processes. Moreover, in recent years, heavy typhoon-related rainfall of long duration has shown a notable trend of increase, particularly in the north of the study region.</p>
      <p id="d2e1805">Typhoon rainfall processes have predominantly exhibited late-peaked and central-peaked temporal patterns. The profiles differ substantially from the single-peak Chicago hyetograph, making the latter unsuitable for directly simulating long-duration typhoon rainfall processes. Spatially, typhoon rainfall exhibits high inconsistency. The spatial structure of typhoon rainfall could be systematically categorized into two dominant types: dispersed and concentrated. The dispersed type corresponded to a relatively high proportion of samples and was characterized by extensive rainfall regions, scattered centres, and moderate gradients. Localized rainfall extent, asymmetric distribution, and concentrated intensity were the main features of the concentrated type of rainfall.</p>
      <p id="d2e1808">The dispersed type exhibited notable dependence on terrain, where topography might have also induced sudden intensification of rainfall over time. The concentrated type represented the primary mechanism for typhoon-induced regional localized extreme rainfall events, with more complex causation. The intrinsic characteristics of typhoons, together with interactions with other weather systems, regulated moisture transport and convergence processes, resulting in stronger spatial clustering of these rainfall types. Statistical results showed that stronger typhoons correspond to a larger rainfall-affected area and a more dispersed rainfall distribution. A slower average typhoon translation speed is associated with a stronger local concentration of rainfall. Additionally, the typhoon track is linked to the location of the rainfall-impacted region.</p>
      <p id="d2e1812">These findings provide a scientific basis for enhancing climate resilience and improving disaster prevention capabilities in coastal cities. Despite these findings, some issues still warrant further investigation. The widely used 500 km threshold adopted here is a physically grounded and validated benchmark for typhoon rainfall; however, this threshold warrants more thorough investigation. In addition, more physically consistent methods for dynamically identifying precipitation influence areas could be developed by combining high-resolution observations, numerical simulations, and artificial intelligence techniques. The 24 h inter-event threshold adopted in this study is a simplified approach with certain limitations. Future work will conduct more refined event delineation analyses, such as sensitivity comparisons using alternative thresholds. To simplify the analysis of the spatial rainfall patterns, it was assumed that the spatial patterns remained generally unchanged over time. In realistic scenarios, typhoon rainbands might evolve or remain relatively stable over time. Meng et al. (2025) indicated that the movement of centres of rainfall can also influence the spatial distribution of flooding. Additionally, future work could combine high-resolution numerical simulations to conduct more targeted and quantitative research, deepening the understanding of the dynamic–thermodynamic mechanisms underlying rainfall pattern formation under multi-factor coupling effects.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e1820">The best-track dataset for typhoons can be obtained from the official website of the Shanghai Typhoon Institute of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) at <uri>http://tcdata.typhoon.org.cn</uri> (last access: 1 April 2026). Due to legal restrictions, the hourly precipitation data used in this study cannot be publicly shared. For access requests, please visit the official website of the National Meteorological Information Center of the CMA at <uri>https://data.cma.cn</uri> (last access: 15 April 2026). FABDEM data is freely available for download via <uri>https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset?q=DEM&amp;level=top</uri> (last access: 3 September 2026) (Hawker et al., 2022).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e1832">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4291-2026-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4291-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e1841">CW contributed to data curation, the original draft preparation and editing of the manuscript, as well as methodology development, and validation. HR contributed to the development of the research methodology, reviewed and edited the manuscript and provided funding. YL participated in methodology refinement, reviewing and editing the manuscript, and visualization, and initiated the projects which supported this work. FR contributed to manuscript review and editing, funding acquisition, project administration, and resource provision.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e1847">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e1853">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e1859">The authors thank editors and reviewers for their constructive comments that helped improve the manuscript. The authors also appreciate the institutions that provided data support for this study. Financial support is gratefully acknowledged as follows: HR was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Meteorological Science and Technology (LaSW) project (2026QZA01), YL was supported by the Typhoon Scientific and Technological Innovation Group of China Meteorological Administration CMA2023ZD06 and the Basic Research Fund of Shanghai Typhoon Institute (2026JB05), FR was supported by the Key Laboratory of South China Sea Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Hainan Province (SCSF202307), and the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (42275037), and the Basic Research Fund of CAMS (2023Z016).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e1864">This study was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather Meteorological Science and Technology (LaSW) project (2026QZA01), the Typhoon Scientific and Technological Innovation Group of China Meteorological Administration CMA2023ZD06, the Basic Research Fund of Shanghai Typhoon Institute (2026JB05), the Key Laboratory of South China Sea Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Hainan Province (SCSF202307), the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (42275037), and the Basic Research Fund of CAMS (2023Z016).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e1870">This paper was edited by Zhe Li and reviewed by Qiang Wang and Mohamed ElSaadani.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Amorim, R., Villarini, G., Kim, H., Jane, R. A., and Wahl, T.: A Practitioner's Approach to Process-Driven Modeling of Compound Rainfall and Storm Surge Extremes for Coastal Texas, J. Hydrol. Eng., 30, 04025025, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6482" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6482</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Cannon, A. J. and Innocenti, S.: Projected intensification of sub-daily and daily rainfall extremes in convection-permitting climate model simulations over North America: implications for future intensity–duration–frequency curves, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 421–440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-421-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-19-421-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Chan, F. K. S., Gu, X., Qi, Y., Thadani, D., Chen, Y. D., Lu, X., Li, L., Griffiths, J., Zhu, F., Li, J., and Chen, W. Y.: Lessons learnt from Typhoons Fitow and In-Fa: implications for improving urban flood resilience in Asian Coastal Cities, Nat. Hazards, 110, 2397–2404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05030-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-021-05030-y</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chen, G., Hou, J., Wang, T., Lv, J., Jing, J., Ma, X., Yang, S., Deng, C., Ma, Y., and Ji, G.: The effect of spatial-temporal characteristics of rainfall on urban inundation processes, Hydrol. Process., 36, e14655, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14655" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.14655</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, L.-W., Yu, C.-K., and Chen, S.-P.: Identifying mechanisms of tropical cyclone generated orographic precipitation with Doppler radar and rain gauge observations, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00921-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-025-00921-4</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Costabile, P., Costanzo, C., Kalogiros, J., and Bellos, V.: Toward Street-Level Nowcasting of Flash Floods Impacts Based on HPC Hydrodynamic Modeling at the Watershed Scale and High-Resolution Weather Radar Data, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2023WR034599, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr034599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023wr034599</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>DB 33/T 1191-2020: Zhejiang Province Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development: Standard of rainfall intensity computation, Hangzhou, China, <uri>https://www.biaozhuns.com</uri> (last access: 27 August 2026), 2020 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Emanuel, K.: Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane Harvey's rainfall, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 12681–12684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716222114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1716222114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Z., Liao, C., and Zeng, J.: Comparative analysis of heavy rainfall area between landfalling typhoon LUPIT (2109) and typhoon LISA (9610), Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., 13, 175–186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcrr.2024.08.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tcrr.2024.08.006</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>GB/T 28592-2012: National Standardization Administration of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China: Grade of precipitation, China Standard Press, Beijing, China, <uri>https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/gb</uri> (last access: 3 September 2026), 2012 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Ghanmi, H., Bargaoui, Z., and Mallet, C.: Estimation of intensity-duration-frequency relationships according to the property of scale invariance and regionalization analysis in a Mediterranean coastal area, J. Hydrol., 541, 38–49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Gruss, Ł., Willems, P., Tomczyk, P., Pollert Jr., J., Pollert Sr., J., Märtner, C., Czaban, S., and Wiatkowski, M.: Evaluation of the Dual Gamma Generalized Extreme Value distribution for flood events in Poland, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5165–5184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5165-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-29-5165-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Hawker, L., Uhe, P., Paulo, L., Sosa, J., Savage, J., Sampson, C., and Neal, J.: A 30 m global map of elevation with forests and buildings removed, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 024016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>He, L., Chen, S., and Guo, Y.: Observation characteristics and synoptic mechanisms of Typhoon Lekima extreme rainfall in 2019, J. Appl. Meteor. Sci., 31, 513–526, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11898/1001-7313.20200501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.11898/1001-7313.20200501</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Hoch, J., Probyn, I., Marra, F., Lucas, C., Savag, J., Win, O., Sampson, C., and Addor, N.: BURGER: A bottom up regionalization approach for global sub daily Intensity Duration Frequency data, Water Resour. Res., 61, e2024WR039773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039773" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024WR039773</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Hosking, J. R. M.: L-Moments: Analysis and Estimation of Distributions Using Linear Combinations of Order Statistics, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 52, 105–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01775.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01775.x</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Jayaweera, L., Wasko, C., Nathan, R., Syktus, J., and Eccles, R.: Evaluation and projection of extreme rainfall from a large ensemble of high–resolution regional climate models in Australia, Weather and Climate Extremes, 50, 100818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2025.100818" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.wace.2025.100818</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Ji, J., Wang, Y., Jiang, T., Zhai, J., Sang, W., and Wu, H.: Analysis of characteristics of heavy rainfall events induced by landfalling tropical cyclones in China from 1980 to 2020, Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2026.03.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2026.03.006</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Jin, C., Yuan, W.-X., Zhou, H., et al.: Application of Partitioning Clustering in Short-duration Storm Pattern Design, China Water &amp; Wastewater, 40, 113–119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.19853/j.zgjsps.1000-4602.2024.03.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.19853/j.zgjsps.1000-4602.2024.03.017</ext-link>, 2024 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Kim, H., Villarini, G., Jane, R., Wahl, T., Misra, S., and Michalek, A.: On the generation of high-resolution probabilistic design events capturing the joint occurrence of rainfall and storm surge in coastal basins, Int. J. Climatol., 43, 761–771, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7825" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.7825</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Kossin, J. P.: A global slowdown of tropical-cyclone translation speed, Nature, 558, 104–107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0158-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-018-0158-3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Kumar, M. S., Geethalakshmi, V., Pazhanivelan, S., Subrahmaniyan, K., Dheebakaran, G., Saravanakumar, V., Bhuvaneswari, K., and Pugazenthi, K.: Tropical cyclone-induced rainfall estimation using the distance approach: a systematic review, Nat. Hazards, 121, 22297–22339, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07689-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-025-07689-z</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Lai, Y., Gu, X., Wei, L., Wang, L., Slater, L. J., Li, J., Shi, D., Xiao, M., Wang, L., Guan, Y., Kong, D., and Zhang, X.: Slower-decaying tropical cyclones produce heavier precipitation over China, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00655-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-024-00655-9</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Lanciotti, S., Ridolfi, E., Russo, F., and Napolitano, F.: Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves in a Data-Rich Era: A Review, Water, 14, 3705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223705" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w14223705</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Li, L. and Chakraborty, P.: Slower decay of landfalling hurricanes in a warming world, Nature, 587, 230–234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2867-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-2867-7</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Li, X., Hou, J., Wang, Z., Wang, T., Lv, J., and Li, D.: Numerical simulation of the influence of design rainstorm pattern on urban flood in narrow valley, Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, <uri>https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1675.T.20240830.0937.002</uri> (last access: 18 April 2025), 2024 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y. and Zhao, D. J.: Climatology of Tropical Cyclone Extreme Rainfall over China from 1960 to 2019, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 320–332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1080-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-021-1080-4</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Lima, C. H. R., Kwon, H. H., and Kim, J. Y.: A Bayesian beta distribution model for estimating rainfall IDF curves in a changing climate, J. Hydrol., 540, 744–756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.062</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Lin, B., Bonnin, G. M., Martin, D., Parzybok, T. M., Yekta, M., and Riley, D.: Regional frequency studies of annual extreme precipitation in the United States based on regional L-moments analysis, in: Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, New York, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1, 16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/40856(200)219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/40856(200)219</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Lin, R., Zheng, F., Ma, Y., Duan, H.-F., Chu, S., and Deng, Z.: Impact of Spatial Variation and Uncertainty of Rainfall Intensity on Urban Flooding Assessment, Water Resour. Manag., 36, 5655–5673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03325-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11269-022-03325-8</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Liu, L. and Wang, Y.: Trends in Landfalling Tropical Cyclone–Induced Precipitation over China, J. Climate, 33, 2223–2235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0693.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0693.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Yu, H., Ying, M., Zhao, B., Zhang, S., Lin, L., Bai, L., and Wan, R.: Western North Pacific tropical cyclone database created by the China Meteorological Administration, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 690–699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0211-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-020-0211-7</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Lu, Y., Chen, P., Yu, H., Fang, P., Gong, T., Wang, X., and Song, S.: Parameterized Tropical Cyclone Precipitation Model for Catastrophe Risk Assessment in China, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 61, 1291–1303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0157.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0157.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Luo, Y., Wu, M., Ren, F., Li, J., and Wong, W.-K.: Synoptic Situations of Extreme Hourly Precipitation over China, J. Climate, 29, 8703–8719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0057.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0057.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Meng, D., Liao, Y., Deng, Z., Chen, Y., Lai, C., Chen, X., and Wang, Z.: Spatially moving non-uniform rainstorms may exacerbate urban flooding disasters, J. Hydrol., 660, 133374, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133374</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Water Management and National Land Protection Bureau: Methods for setting design maximum external forces for creating flood and internal water inundation assumptions[R], Tokyo: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, <uri>https://www.mlit.go.jp/river/shishin_guideline/pdf/shinsuisoutei_honnbun_1507.pdf</uri> (last access: 27 August 2026), 2015 (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Water Management and National Land Protection Bureau, River Environment Department, Flood Control Planning Office and National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management (NILIM), River Research Department, Flood Disaster Research Laboratory: Guidelines for the examination and creation of multi-stage flood inundation assumption maps and flood risk maps[R], Tokyo: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism., <uri>https://www.mlit.go.jp/river/shishin_guideline/pdf/guideline_kouzuishinsui_2301.pdf</uri> (last access: 27 August 2026), 2023 (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Morin, G., Boudreault, M., and García-Franco, J. L.: A Global Multi-Source Tropical Cyclone Precipitation (MSTCP) Dataset, Sci. Data, 11, 609, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03395-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-024-03395-w</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Nasr, A. A., Wahl, T., Rashid, M. M., Jane, R. A., Camus, P., and Haigh, I. D.: Temporal changes in dependence between compound coastal and inland flooding drivers around the contiguous United States coastline, Weather Clim. Extremes, 41, 100594, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2023.100594" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.wace.2023.100594</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Qi, W., Ma, C., Xu, H., and Zhao, K.: Urban flood response analysis for designed rainstorms with different characteristics based on a tracer-aided modeling simulation, J. Clean. Prod., 355, 131797, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131797</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Ren, F., Wang, Y., Wang, X., and Li, W.: Estimating tropical cyclone precipitation from station observations, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 24, 700–711, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-007-0700-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-007-0700-y</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Ren, Z., Sang, Y. F., Cui, P., Chen, F., and Chen, D.: A dataset of gridded precipitation intensity-duration-frequency curves in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Scientific Data, 12, 3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04362-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-024-04362-1</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Sivapalan, M. and Blöschl, G.: Transformation of point rainfall to areal rainfall: Intensity-duration-frequency curves, J. Hydrol., 204, 150–167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00117-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00117-0</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Soil Conservation Service: Urban hydrology for small watersheds, Technical Release No. 55 (TR-55), US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, <uri>https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/publications/WinTR-55setupV2.0.0on16July2022.exe</uri> (last access: 3 September 2026), 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Su, Z., Ren, F., Wei, J., Lin, X., Shi, S., and Zhou, X.: Changes in Monsoon and Tropical Cyclone Extreme Precipitation in Southeast China from 1960 to 2012, Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., 4, 12–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6057/2015TCRR01.02" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6057/2015TCRR01.02</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Sun, S., Shi, C., Pan, Y., Bai, L., Xu, B., Zhang, T., Han, S., and Jiang, L.: Applicability Assessment of the 1998–2018 CLDAS Multi-Source Precipitation Fusion Dataset over China, J. Meteorol. Res., 34, 879–892, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9101-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13351-020-9101-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Tang, Q., Bao, Y., Chen, C., Wang, T., Wu, J., Yu, T., and Zheng, X.: Spatio-temporal characteristics of rainstorm in Kunshan and reckoning of designed rainstorm intensity formula, J. Trop. Meteorol., 36, 683–698, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2020.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2020.062</ext-link>, 2020 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Li, S., Guan, X., He, Y., Cao, C., Lian, L., and Zhang, L.: Unveiling the Link Between Extreme Precipitation Events and Flood Disasters in China: From 3D Perspective, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4728" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2025-4728</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S., Ruan, W., Li, X., and Yao, H.: Divergences in typhoon and non-typhoon extreme rainfall trends and their spatial variations at multiple timescales in typical region of southeastern China, Atmos. Res., 330, 108590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108590" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108590</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wu, M., Dong, M., Chen, F., and Chen, Y.: Characteristics of extreme hourly precipitation induced by tropical cyclones in Zhejiang, China: A comparative analysis based on two different datasets, Atmos. Res., 311, 107712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107712</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Xu, H., Tian, Z., Sun, L., Ye, Q., Ragno, E., Bricker, J., Mao, G., Tan, J., Wang, J., Ke, Q., Wang, S., and Toumi, R.: Compound flood impact of water level and rainfall during tropical cyclone periods in a coastal city: the case of Shanghai, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2347–2358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2347-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-22-2347-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Xu, S., Wang, Q., Yu, J., Zhao, G., Ji, H., Yue, Q., Zheng, Y., Xu, H., Li, H., and Yao, X.: The impact of the spatiotemporal structure of rainfall on flood response over a piedmont urban basin: An approach coupling machine learning and hydrologic modeling, J. Hydrol., 659, 133160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133160</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Yan, Z., Xia, J., Song, J., Zhao, L., and Pang, G.: Research progress on design hyetographs in small and medium-scale basins, Progress in Geography, 39, 1224–1235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.07.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.07.014</ext-link>, 2020 (in Chinese). </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Z., Wang, J., Liu, J., Wang, H., Mei, C., and Li, F.: Construction of urban rainfall scenario database and matching technology for predicting rain fall, Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 55, 13–24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2024.10.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2024.10.002</ext-link>, 2024 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Ying, M., Zhang, W., Yu, H., Lu, X., Feng, J., Fan, Y., Zhu, Y., and Chen, D.: An overview of the China Meteorological Administration tropical cyclone database, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 287–301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Yong DX/JS 021-2023: Ningbo Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau: Rules for Urban Flooding Prevention and Control in Ningbo, Ningbo, China, <uri>http://zjw.ningbo.gov.cn</uri> (last access: 3 September 2026), 2023 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Yu, C., Xu, Q., Yang, Y., Ma, G., and Gao, X.: Intensity formula and design hyetograph for long-duration storm in Xiong'an New District, Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 37, 78–85, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.05.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.05.012</ext-link>, 2021 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Yu, Z., Wang, Y., Xu, H., Davidson, N., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., and Yu, H.: On the Relationship between Intensity and Rainfall Distribution in Tropical Cyclones Making Landfall over China, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 2883–2901, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0334.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0334.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H. and Fan, K.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering analysis of autumn rainfall patterns over West China and their underlying mechanisms, Atmos. Res., 334, 108745, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2026.108745" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2026.108745</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, M., Xu, M., Wang, Z., and Lai, C.: Assessment of the vulnerability of road networks to urban waterlogging based on a coupled hydrodynamic model, J. Hydrol., 603, 127105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127105</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Q., Lai, Y., Gu, X., Shi, P., and Singh, V. P.: Tropical cyclonic rainfall in China: Changing properties, seasonality, and causes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 4476–4489, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JD028119</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X.: The Features of Summer Precipitation and the Influence of Design Storm in Beijing Area, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, <uri>https://www.cnki.net</uri> (last access: 4 September 2026), 2015 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Zhang, Q., Ju, X., Xiao, D., Yang, H., Chen, J., Liao, J., and Deng, Y.: Analysis of the Characteristics of Short Term Extreme Precipitation in China in the Last 30 Years, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 48, 1144–1156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2212.22118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2212.22118</ext-link>, 2024 (in Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, C., Chen, P., Yang, S., Zheng, F., Yu, H., Tang, J., Lu, Y., Chen, G., Lu, X., Zhang, X., and Sun, J.: The impact of Typhoon Lekima (2019) on East China: a postevent survey in Wenzhou City and Taizhou City, Front. Earth Sci., 16, 109–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-020-0856-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11707-020-0856-7</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Analysis of urban-scale typhoon precipitation characteristics and spatiotemporal patterns: a case study of Ningbo, China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Amorim, R., Villarini, G., Kim, H., Jane, R. A., and Wahl, T.: A Practitioner's Approach to Process-Driven Modeling of Compound Rainfall and Storm Surge Extremes for Coastal Texas, J. Hydrol. Eng., 30, 04025025, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6482" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6482</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cannon, A. J. and Innocenti, S.: Projected intensification of sub-daily and daily rainfall extremes in convection-permitting climate model simulations over North America: implications for future intensity–duration–frequency curves, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 421–440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-421-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-421-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chan, F. K. S., Gu, X., Qi, Y., Thadani, D., Chen, Y. D., Lu, X., Li, L., Griffiths, J., Zhu, F., Li, J., and Chen, W. Y.: Lessons learnt from Typhoons Fitow and In-Fa: implications for improving urban flood resilience in Asian Coastal Cities, Nat. Hazards, 110, 2397–2404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05030-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05030-y</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, G., Hou, J., Wang, T., Lv, J., Jing, J., Ma, X., Yang, S., Deng, C., Ma, Y., and Ji, G.: The effect of spatial-temporal characteristics of rainfall on urban inundation processes, Hydrol. Process., 36, e14655, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14655" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14655</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, L.-W., Yu, C.-K., and Chen, S.-P.: Identifying mechanisms of tropical cyclone generated orographic precipitation with Doppler radar and rain gauge observations, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00921-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00921-4</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Costabile, P., Costanzo, C., Kalogiros, J., and Bellos, V.: Toward Street-Level Nowcasting of Flash Floods Impacts Based on HPC Hydrodynamic Modeling at the Watershed Scale and High-Resolution Weather Radar Data, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2023WR034599, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr034599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr034599</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
DB 33/T 1191-2020: Zhejiang Province Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development: Standard of rainfall intensity computation, Hangzhou, China, <a href="https://www.biaozhuns.com" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 August 2026), 2020 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Emanuel, K.: Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane Harvey's rainfall, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 12681–12684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716222114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716222114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, Z., Liao, C., and Zeng, J.: Comparative analysis of heavy rainfall area between landfalling typhoon LUPIT (2109) and typhoon LISA (9610), Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., 13, 175–186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcrr.2024.08.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcrr.2024.08.006</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
GB/T 28592-2012: National Standardization Administration of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China: Grade of precipitation, China Standard Press, Beijing, China, <a href="https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/gb" target="_blank"/> (last access: 3 September 2026), 2012 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ghanmi, H., Bargaoui, Z., and Mallet, C.: Estimation of intensity-duration-frequency relationships according to the property of scale invariance and regionalization analysis in a Mediterranean coastal area, J. Hydrol., 541, 38–49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.002</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gruss, Ł., Willems, P., Tomczyk, P., Pollert Jr., J., Pollert Sr., J., Märtner, C., Czaban, S., and Wiatkowski, M.: Evaluation of the Dual Gamma Generalized Extreme Value distribution for flood events in Poland, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5165–5184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5165-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5165-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hawker, L., Uhe, P., Paulo, L., Sosa, J., Savage, J., Sampson, C., and Neal, J.: A 30&thinsp;m global map of elevation with forests and buildings removed, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 024016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, L., Chen, S., and Guo, Y.: Observation characteristics and synoptic mechanisms of Typhoon Lekima extreme rainfall in 2019, J. Appl. Meteor. Sci., 31, 513–526, <a href="https://doi.org/10.11898/1001-7313.20200501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.11898/1001-7313.20200501</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoch, J., Probyn, I., Marra, F., Lucas, C., Savag, J., Win, O., Sampson, C., and Addor, N.: BURGER: A bottom up regionalization approach for global sub daily Intensity Duration Frequency data, Water Resour. Res., 61, e2024WR039773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039773" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039773</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hosking, J. R. M.: L-Moments: Analysis and Estimation of Distributions Using Linear Combinations of Order Statistics, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 52, 105–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01775.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01775.x</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jayaweera, L., Wasko, C., Nathan, R., Syktus, J., and Eccles, R.: Evaluation and projection of extreme rainfall from a large ensemble of high–resolution regional climate models in Australia, Weather and Climate Extremes, 50, 100818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2025.100818" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2025.100818</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ji, J., Wang, Y., Jiang, T., Zhai, J., Sang, W., and Wu, H.: Analysis of characteristics of heavy rainfall events induced by landfalling tropical cyclones in China from 1980 to 2020, Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, <a href="https://doi.org/10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2026.03.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2026.03.006</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jin, C., Yuan, W.-X., Zhou, H., et al.: Application of Partitioning Clustering in Short-duration Storm Pattern Design, China Water &amp; Wastewater, 40, 113–119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.19853/j.zgjsps.1000-4602.2024.03.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.19853/j.zgjsps.1000-4602.2024.03.017</a>, 2024 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, H., Villarini, G., Jane, R., Wahl, T., Misra, S., and Michalek, A.: On the generation of high-resolution probabilistic design events capturing the joint occurrence of rainfall and storm surge in coastal basins, Int. J. Climatol., 43, 761–771, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7825" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7825</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kossin, J. P.: A global slowdown of tropical-cyclone translation speed, Nature, 558, 104–107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0158-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0158-3</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kumar, M. S., Geethalakshmi, V., Pazhanivelan, S., Subrahmaniyan, K., Dheebakaran, G., Saravanakumar, V., Bhuvaneswari, K., and Pugazenthi, K.: Tropical cyclone-induced rainfall estimation using the distance approach: a systematic review, Nat. Hazards, 121, 22297–22339, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07689-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07689-z</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lai, Y., Gu, X., Wei, L., Wang, L., Slater, L. J., Li, J., Shi, D., Xiao, M., Wang, L., Guan, Y., Kong, D., and Zhang, X.: Slower-decaying tropical cyclones produce heavier precipitation over China, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00655-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00655-9</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lanciotti, S., Ridolfi, E., Russo, F., and Napolitano, F.: Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves in a Data-Rich Era: A Review, Water, 14, 3705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223705" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223705</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, L. and Chakraborty, P.: Slower decay of landfalling hurricanes in a warming world, Nature, 587, 230–234, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2867-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2867-7</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, X., Hou, J., Wang, Z., Wang, T., Lv, J., and Li, D.: Numerical simulation of the influence of design rainstorm pattern on urban flood in narrow valley, Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, <a href="https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1675.T.20240830.0937.002" target="_blank"/> (last access: 18 April 2025), 2024 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Y. and Zhao, D. J.: Climatology of Tropical Cyclone Extreme Rainfall over China from 1960 to 2019, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 320–332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1080-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1080-4</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lima, C. H. R., Kwon, H. H., and Kim, J. Y.: A Bayesian beta distribution model for estimating rainfall IDF curves in a changing climate, J. Hydrol., 540, 744–756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.062</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, B., Bonnin, G. M., Martin, D., Parzybok, T. M., Yekta, M., and Riley, D.: Regional frequency studies of annual extreme precipitation in the United States based on regional L-moments analysis, in: Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, New York, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1, 16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/40856(200)219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/40856(200)219</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, R., Zheng, F., Ma, Y., Duan, H.-F., Chu, S., and Deng, Z.: Impact of Spatial Variation and Uncertainty of Rainfall Intensity on Urban Flooding Assessment, Water Resour. Manag., 36, 5655–5673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03325-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03325-8</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, L. and Wang, Y.: Trends in Landfalling Tropical Cyclone–Induced Precipitation over China, J. Climate, 33, 2223–2235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0693.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0693.1</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, X., Yu, H., Ying, M., Zhao, B., Zhang, S., Lin, L., Bai, L., and Wan, R.: Western North Pacific tropical cyclone database created by the China Meteorological Administration, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 690–699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0211-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0211-7</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, Y., Chen, P., Yu, H., Fang, P., Gong, T., Wang, X., and Song, S.: Parameterized Tropical Cyclone Precipitation Model for Catastrophe Risk Assessment in China, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 61, 1291–1303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0157.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0157.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luo, Y., Wu, M., Ren, F., Li, J., and Wong, W.-K.: Synoptic Situations of Extreme Hourly Precipitation over China, J. Climate, 29, 8703–8719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0057.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0057.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meng, D., Liao, Y., Deng, Z., Chen, Y., Lai, C., Chen, X., and Wang, Z.: Spatially moving non-uniform rainstorms may exacerbate urban flooding disasters, J. Hydrol., 660, 133374, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133374</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Water Management and National Land Protection Bureau: Methods for setting design maximum external forces for creating flood and internal water inundation assumptions[R], Tokyo: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, <a href="https://www.mlit.go.jp/river/shishin_guideline/pdf/shinsuisoutei_honnbun_1507.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 August 2026), 2015 (in Japanese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Water Management and National Land Protection Bureau, River Environment Department, Flood Control Planning Office and National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management (NILIM), River Research Department, Flood Disaster Research Laboratory: Guidelines for the examination and creation of multi-stage flood inundation assumption maps and flood risk maps[R], Tokyo: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism., <a href="https://www.mlit.go.jp/river/shishin_guideline/pdf/guideline_kouzuishinsui_2301.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 August 2026), 2023 (in Japanese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morin, G., Boudreault, M., and García-Franco, J. L.: A Global Multi-Source Tropical Cyclone Precipitation (MSTCP) Dataset, Sci. Data, 11, 609, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03395-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03395-w</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nasr, A. A., Wahl, T., Rashid, M. M., Jane, R. A., Camus, P., and Haigh, I. D.: Temporal changes in dependence between compound coastal and inland flooding drivers around the contiguous United States coastline, Weather Clim. Extremes, 41, 100594, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2023.100594" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2023.100594</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Qi, W., Ma, C., Xu, H., and Zhao, K.: Urban flood response analysis for designed rainstorms with different characteristics based on a tracer-aided modeling simulation, J. Clean. Prod., 355, 131797, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131797" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131797</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ren, F., Wang, Y., Wang, X., and Li, W.: Estimating tropical cyclone precipitation from station observations, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 24, 700–711, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-007-0700-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-007-0700-y</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ren, Z., Sang, Y. F., Cui, P., Chen, F., and Chen, D.: A dataset of gridded precipitation intensity-duration-frequency curves in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Scientific Data, 12, 3, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04362-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04362-1</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sivapalan, M. and Blöschl, G.: Transformation of point rainfall to areal rainfall: Intensity-duration-frequency curves, J. Hydrol., 204, 150–167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00117-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00117-0</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Soil Conservation Service: Urban hydrology for small watersheds, Technical Release No. 55 (TR-55), US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, <a href="https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/publications/WinTR-55setupV2.0.0on16July2022.exe" target="_blank"/> (last access: 3 September 2026), 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Su, Z., Ren, F., Wei, J., Lin, X., Shi, S., and Zhou, X.: Changes in Monsoon and Tropical Cyclone Extreme Precipitation in Southeast China from 1960 to 2012, Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., 4, 12–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.6057/2015TCRR01.02" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6057/2015TCRR01.02</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, S., Shi, C., Pan, Y., Bai, L., Xu, B., Zhang, T., Han, S., and Jiang, L.: Applicability Assessment of the 1998–2018 CLDAS Multi-Source Precipitation Fusion Dataset over China, J. Meteorol. Res., 34, 879–892, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9101-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9101-2</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, Q., Bao, Y., Chen, C., Wang, T., Wu, J., Yu, T., and Zheng, X.: Spatio-temporal characteristics of rainstorm in Kunshan and reckoning of designed rainstorm intensity formula, J. Trop. Meteorol., 36, 683–698, <a href="https://doi.org/10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2020.062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2020.062</a>, 2020 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, J., Li, S., Guan, X., He, Y., Cao, C., Lian, L., and Zhang, L.: Unveiling the Link Between Extreme Precipitation Events and Flood Disasters in China: From 3D Perspective, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4728" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4728</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, S., Ruan, W., Li, X., and Yao, H.: Divergences in typhoon and non-typhoon extreme rainfall trends and their spatial variations at multiple timescales in typical region of southeastern China, Atmos. Res., 330, 108590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108590" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108590</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, M., Dong, M., Chen, F., and Chen, Y.: Characteristics of extreme hourly precipitation induced by tropical cyclones in Zhejiang, China: A comparative analysis based on two different datasets, Atmos. Res., 311, 107712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107712" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107712</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, H., Tian, Z., Sun, L., Ye, Q., Ragno, E., Bricker, J., Mao, G., Tan, J., Wang, J., Ke, Q., Wang, S., and Toumi, R.: Compound flood impact of water level and rainfall during tropical cyclone periods in a coastal city: the case of Shanghai, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2347–2358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2347-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2347-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, S., Wang, Q., Yu, J., Zhao, G., Ji, H., Yue, Q., Zheng, Y., Xu, H., Li, H., and Yao, X.: The impact of the spatiotemporal structure of rainfall on flood response over a piedmont urban basin: An approach coupling machine learning and hydrologic modeling, J. Hydrol., 659, 133160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133160</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yan, Z., Xia, J., Song, J., Zhao, L., and Pang, G.: Research progress on design hyetographs in small and medium-scale basins, Progress in Geography, 39, 1224–1235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.07.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.07.014</a>, 2020 (in Chinese).


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Z., Wang, J., Liu, J., Wang, H., Mei, C., and Li, F.: Construction of urban rainfall scenario database and matching technology for predicting rain fall, Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 55, 13–24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2024.10.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2024.10.002</a>, 2024 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ying, M., Zhang, W., Yu, H., Lu, X., Feng, J., Fan, Y., Zhu, Y., and Chen, D.: An overview of the China Meteorological Administration tropical cyclone database, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 287–301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yong DX/JS 021-2023: Ningbo Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau: Rules for Urban Flooding Prevention and Control in Ningbo, Ningbo, China, <a href="http://zjw.ningbo.gov.cn" target="_blank"/> (last access: 3 September 2026), 2023 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, C., Xu, Q., Yang, Y., Ma, G., and Gao, X.: Intensity formula and design hyetograph for long-duration storm in Xiong'an New District, Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 37, 78–85, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.05.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.05.012</a>, 2021 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, Z., Wang, Y., Xu, H., Davidson, N., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., and Yu, H.: On the Relationship between Intensity and Rainfall Distribution in Tropical Cyclones Making Landfall over China, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 2883–2901, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0334.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0334.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, H. and Fan, K.: <i>K</i>-means clustering analysis of autumn rainfall patterns over West China and their underlying mechanisms, Atmos. Res., 334, 108745, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2026.108745" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2026.108745</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, M., Xu, M., Wang, Z., and Lai, C.: Assessment of the vulnerability of road networks to urban waterlogging based on a coupled hydrodynamic model, J. Hydrol., 603, 127105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127105</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Q., Lai, Y., Gu, X., Shi, P., and Singh, V. P.: Tropical cyclonic rainfall in China: Changing properties, seasonality, and causes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 4476–4489, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028119</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, X.: The Features of Summer Precipitation and the Influence of Design Storm in Beijing Area, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,
<a href="https://www.cnki.net" target="_blank"/> (last access: 4 September 2026), 2015 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, Y., Zhang, Q., Ju, X., Xiao, D., Yang, H., Chen, J., Liao, J., and Deng, Y.: Analysis of the Characteristics of Short Term Extreme Precipitation in China in the Last 30 Years, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 48, 1144–1156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2212.22118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2212.22118</a>, 2024 (in Chinese).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhou, C., Chen, P., Yang, S., Zheng, F., Yu, H., Tang, J., Lu, Y., Chen, G., Lu, X., Zhang, X., and Sun, J.: The impact of Typhoon Lekima (2019) on East China: a postevent survey in Wenzhou City and Taizhou City, Front. Earth Sci., 16, 109–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-020-0856-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-020-0856-7</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
