<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NHESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NHESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1684-9981</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/nhess-22-849-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Robust uncertainty quantification of the volume of tsunami ionospheric holes for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> towards low-cost satellite-based tsunami warning systems</article-title><alt-title>Robust uncertainty quantification of the volume of tsunami ionospheric holes</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Robust uncertainty quantification of the volume of tsunami ionospheric holes}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.~Kanai et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Kanai</surname><given-names>Ryuichi</given-names></name>
          <email>ryuichi.kanai.16@ucl.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Kamogawa</surname><given-names>Masashi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Nagao</surname><given-names>Toshiyasu</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-4191</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>Alan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Guillas</surname><given-names>Serge</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Space and Climate Physics, University College London, London, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Global Center for Asian and Regional Research, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute of Oceanic Research and Development, Tokai University, Shizuoka, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ryuichi Kanai (ryuichi.kanai.16@ucl.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>849</fpage><lpage>868</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>12</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e147">We develop a new method to analyze the total electron content (TEC) depression in the ionosphere after a tsunami occurrence. We employ Gaussian process regression to accurately estimate the TEC disturbance every 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using satellite observations from the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) network, even over regions without measurements. We face multiple challenges. First, the impact of the acoustic wave generated by a tsunami onto TEC levels is nonlinear and anisotropic. Second, observation points are moving. Third, the measured data are not uniformly distributed in the targeting range. Nevertheless, our method always computes the electron density depression volumes, along with estimated uncertainties, when applied to the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, even with random selections of only 5 % of the 1000 GPS Earth Observation Network System receivers considered here over Japan. Also, the statistically estimated TEC depression area mostly overlaps the range of the initial tsunami, which indicates that our method can potentially be used to estimate the initial tsunami. The method can warn of a tsunami event within 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the earthquake, at high levels of confidence, even with a sparse receiver network. Hence, it is potentially applicable worldwide using the existing GNSS network.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e177">The damage caused by tsunamis can be devastating. For example, almost 20 000 people died in the tsunami following the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake in Japan. One reason for such levels of casualties is that current tsunami height predictions are relatively unreliable, even following an identified earthquake event, and so early warning systems are not as effective as required. Initial sea surface deformations are typically indirectly determined from seismological inversions of the earthquake source. However, some of these early estimates are sometimes much lower than expected: for instance the initially estimated value for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 was used for warnings, but the actual magnitude was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.1.</p>
      <p id="d1e202">Research on tsunami warnings has been conducted for a long time and has undergone remarkable technical evolution with the development of various
technologies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.1"/>.  For example, in recent years, tsunami warning systems have been developed for
tsunamis of seismic origin in and around the Mediterranean Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e211">Furthermore, the initial-tsunami wave cannot be precisely inferred from seismic information alone due to the complexity of the relationship between
the earthquake source and the initial wave. For example so-called tsunami earthquakes generate much larger tsunamis than expected from the seismic
source, e.g., the 2010 Mentawai tsunami <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.3"/>, whereas some powerful earthquakes sometimes produce tsunamis much
smaller than expected, e.g., for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.6 2005 Nias earthquake. These deficiencies in the seismic approach become even greater when
considering additional contributions to the tsunami wave such as splay faults and submarine landslides not well picked up by seismic monitoring. One
could account for the uncertainties in the earthquake source estimates and propagate these to the initial-tsunami height in real time
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.4"/>, but these approaches cannot realistically model in 3D and in real time the seabed deformation arising from the earthquake
source due to epistemic, computational, and observational inadequacies.  In addition, in some cases, seismic gaps and coseismic slips do not overlap,
which makes tsunami prediction based on seismic data highly difficult <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.5"/>.  Hence, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.6"/> illustrate a
more advanced warning system that uses detecting devices such as pressure sensors and predicts tsunami heights using tsunami
information. Specifically, observations closely related to the actually generated tsunami wave are more likely to provide more precise warnings. One
example is the successful data assimilation of tsunami waves from buoys, with either dense or possibly sparse networks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.7"/>.  Still, some problems remain, such as the high maintenance cost of those devices and avoiding high ocean currents for installation
locations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.8"/>.  We explore here the use of real-time satellite data due to their global coverage, low expense, low maintenance,
and rapid access.</p>
      <p id="d1e244">A path towards accurate warnings is to estimate the tsunami ionospheric holes (TIHs) generated in the ionosphere after the initial-tsunami occurrence
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.9"/>. The formation of a TIH, which is a decrease in total electron content (TEC) in the ionosphere, can be explained by the following
physical mechanisms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.10"/>.  First, a displacement of the sea surface caused by a tsunami generates acoustic waves that
propagate vertically upward and reach the ionosphere.  Then, the plasma is moved along the magnetic field by the sound waves, and the downward flow is
larger than the upward flow partly because the gravity force causes downward motion.  The downward plasma causes recombination, and ion production is
suppressed, resulting in a decrease in TEC, and the depression in TEC is called a TIH.  The TIH observed in the ionosphere at the time of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake has been reproduced by performing numerical simulations of this physical phenomenon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e257">In Japan, the GPS Earth Observation Network System (GEONET), which is a network of more than 1200 receivers, enables us to observe the behavior of TEC in the ionosphere with a large number of data points.  The most prominent case of the TEC changes in the ionosphere observed by GEONET is the tsunami following the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. By focusing on the changes in the ionosphere after the earthquake and observing the high-frequency component of the TEC fluctuations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.12"/> observed a rapid decrease in TEC near the epicenter approximately 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the earthquake: the rapid fluctuation of the high-frequency component of TEC was detected as concentric waves that radiated outward, and these concentric waves were confirmed to have had a central point source. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.13"/> analyzed the unfiltered TEC fluctuations in which a significant decrease in TEC was observed, with an amplitude of up to 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TECU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (TEC units), which is 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">electrons</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and an area of 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.14"/> showed that the amplitude of the decrease in TEC exceeds 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TECU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, analyzing TEC without frequency filtering.</p>
      <p id="d1e335">Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.15"/> examined the behavior of the TEC depression in the ionosphere after the tsunami, examining the low-frequency
component of TEC in a variety of tsunami cases including the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. They discovered a positive correlation between the initial-tsunami
height and the rate of TEC depression.  It is thus likely possible to detect an initial tsunami by evaluating the magnitude of a TIH, which is the
reduction of TEC in the ionosphere.  However, it is still challenging to define the scale of a TIH, because even if a dense network of global navigation satellite system (GNSS)
receivers is maintained, such as in Japan, there are areas where TEC cannot be measured by the network.  Moreover, the TEC measurement locations
move in the same way as the satellite moves, and those locations are not uniformly distributed within the target range. The shape of the TIH cannot be
completely captured from the measurement points alone. In addition, in regions where GNSS observation networks are less dense, the number of available
data is even smaller, making it very difficult to detect the TIH confidently.</p>
      <p id="d1e341">To overcome these problems, we implement below a statistical method for the analysis of TEC using satellite data, which allows us to estimate TEC
values even over areas with no measurements and to evaluate the whole TIH even without a dense measurement network such as GEONET in Japan. Our
approach does not make any assumptions about the nature of the source of the tsunami.  This method enables us to calculate the volume (with uncertainty)
of the hole as an assessment of the scale of the TIH, and we propose to use its volume as a measure of the TIH. We believe that estimating the TIH
provides a new and important tool for tsunami early warning systems that is independent of seismology.</p>
      <p id="d1e344">In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, the pre-processing and characteristics of the data are described in detail to ensure that this study is
reproducible. In addition, we describe our surface-fitting method. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, we present the results of fitting surfaces computed by
our new method and the time series analysis of the TIH volume. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, we conclude and mention future possibilities offered
by this method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d1e368">In this study, TEC is calculated using GEONET data operated by the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, and the following assumptions are made
in processing the data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.16"/>. First, we approximate the F region, which contains many more electrons than other regions in the ionosphere, as a thin layer at an altitude of 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, because the two effects of the chemical reactions and diffusion are balanced, and the electron density is maximized at an altitude of 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to the results of the analysis of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.17"/> of ionogram information on the day of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, the electron density peak of the ionosphere was at an altitude of 306 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the data from Kokubunji, which is the closest to the epicenter at 440 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  This result suggests that the assumption of a hypothetical thin ionosphere at an altitude of 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in our analysis is reasonable.  Note that the analysis of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.18"/> was conducted for the 11 March 2011 earthquake, and a similar analysis is needed to determine whether setting the ionosphere to 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the most appropriate assumption for other earthquake cases.  The point where the line connecting a GNSS satellite and a receiver intersects with this approximated thin layer is called the ionospheric point (IP). The footprint of the IP to the surface is called the sub-ionospheric point (SIP).</p>
      <p id="d1e429">Two radio signals from the GNSS satellites, 1575.42 and 1222.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are transmitted to the GNSS receivers, and the propagation time of the
radio signals depends on the electron density in the atmosphere.  Therefore, TEC between the GNSS satellites and the GNSS receivers can be
estimated from the phase delay of these two types of radio signals.  This TEC, which is in the pathway between a satellite and a receiver, is called
the slant TEC, noting that in general the line of sight to the satellite is not vertical.  The slant TEC at the time of the earthquake is used as the
reference value for the time series slant TEC data.  The time series slant TEC is defined as the difference between the slant TEC and the reference
TEC value for each satellite receiver pair.</p>
      <p id="d1e440">For each time series slant TEC data, a quadratic fitting is performed by the ordinary least-squares method for data points from 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before
to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the time of the earthquake to be consistent with the previous study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.19"/>.  These fitting curves are assumed to
represent the time series slant TEC data, as it would have been in the absence of the effect of TEC depression caused by acoustic waves induced by the
tsunami because it takes almost 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for acoustic waves to reach the ionosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e470">Then, we calculate the difference between the fitting curves and the time series slant TEC for each case.  By multiplying the time series differences
by the cosine of the angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between the vertical upward direction and the straight line between the satellite and the receiver, we obtain
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vTEC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the variation of the vertical component of the slant TEC time series data. The conceptual diagram of the description of
the data processing so far is drawn in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e495">The schematic image of TEC depression detected by a satellite and a receiver.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e504">To apply a low-pass filter to this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vTEC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we take a 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> backward-moving average to obtain the low-frequency components of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vTEC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Since a TIH is a hole formed by the decrease of TEC, we want to focus on the decrease of TEC in our analysis. For this reason, in
the following sections, we use the data of which the low-frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vTEC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is less than 1. The low-frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>vTEC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
hereinafter referred as TEC for the sake of simplicity.</p>
      <p id="d1e555">Since the time resolution of the available data is the 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interval, we set the time of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake
occurrence to 05:46:30 (UTC) even though the exact occurrence time is 05:46:18 (UTC) according to the Japan Meteorological Agency.</p>
      <p id="d1e566">In addition, the data include outliers due to broken receivers. We detected them using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nearest neighbor algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.20"/> and
removed these outliers from the data to be analyzed.  The general principle of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nearest neighbor algorithm is that for a given data point,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nearest neighbor data sets are identified, and labels are assigned to these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nearest neighbor data sets and the given data point.  Generally,
this method requires the definition of the metric for measuring the distance (similarity) between data points, and the number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> needs to be chosen
as well. Here, simple but effective choices are made: the Euclidean distance is used to measure the similarity, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the square root
of the number of data points in the targeting range.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e617">Panel <bold>(a)</bold> is the mesh elements and observed data, which is plotted with a blue marker, at 06:00:00 UTC. The number of mesh elements is about 5200. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> is the relationship between computational time and the number of the mesh elements to the 32nd power. The computation time is the average value of the time at 05:46:30, 06:00:00, 06:08:00, and 06:16:00. The orange solid line is the regression line. The coefficient is 0.000259, and the intercept is 12.044.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Robust fitting method with Gaussian process regression</title>
      <p id="d1e640">We analyze data over the area of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of latitude and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of longitude centered at 38.297<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 142.373<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, the
location of the epicenter of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake as reported by the USGS.  Gaussian process (GP) regression <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.21"/> is a method of
regressing a function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (here TEC is a function of horizontal coordinates) using a flexible nonlinear model based on a set of observed data.  A
GP is in fact a generalization of the multivariate normal distribution to infinite dimensions: any marginal distribution projected to finite
dimensions is multivariate normal. The fitted GP here probabilistically represents all possible TEC surfaces that interpolate (up to a so-called
nugget noise level) the observations.  We employ here the Matérn kernel with an additional nugget that accounts for some noise about the
observations:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>cov</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e858">Here, cov( ) means a covariance function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a modified Bessel function of the second kind, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Gamma function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are positive parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the variance of the noise (i.e., the nugget), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0 otherwise. The Matérn kernel's smoothness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> generates a GP whose smoothness relates to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and should thus be carefully chosen to match the smoothness of the function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. By setting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we use a kernel function that is twice differentiable, which, in our analysis, conforms very well to the physical phenomena of TEC reduction.</p>
      <p id="d1e1001">After fitting our GP, the joint distribution of the estimates at any new locations are estimated (with uncertainty) even in areas where there is no
measurement data. Here we predict the TEC surface over the area in increments of 0.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in both latitude and longitude. However, using 1200 receivers, it takes more than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to fit the full data due to costs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; that is, the computational cost is
proportional to the cubic of the number of data points <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1045">A stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) approach using the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.22"/> can reduce the cost of fitting the GP. Such an approach is not only faster but also has demonstrated that
spatial predictions are more accurate, less uncertain, and more robust than the standard covariance-based fitting of a GP, e.g., when mapping
stratospheric ozone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.23"/>. In other words, the estimated values provided by the method are closer to the true values and have less
dispersion in the spatial interpolation, and the method is robust against the absence of measurements. Exploiting Gauss–Markov random fields (GMRFs), the INLA-SPDE reduces costs to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for two dimensions.  The crucial point is that a Gaussian spatial process with a Matérn covariance function is the stationary solution to a certain SPDE that can be solved using finite-element
approaches and approximated using the INLA in the GMRF setting.  Nevertheless, some effort must be put into creating a reasonable mesh that solves the SPDE using finite elements, shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1077">The number of elements in the mesh cannot be too large, as the computational burden would become too high, and not too small, as the fitting surface
would not be a good approximation of the actual surface.</p>
      <p id="d1e1080">Using this INLA-SPDE method with about 5200 mesh elements, the average computational time to fit the full data and predict the surface in 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increments from 05:30:00 to 06:30:00 becomes less than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a standard deviation of less than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the average
computational time based on the standard GP regression method is more than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a standard deviation of more than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The
exact values are described in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1129">Computational time for the TEC surface fitting and the TEC value estimation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GP regression</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">INLA-SPDE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean time (s)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">763.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Standard deviation time (s)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">151.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1186">The red star is the epicenter, and the two large black circles are the outliers. Panels <bold>(a–d)</bold> are the TEC data measured by the GNSS network at 05:46:30, 06:00:00, 06:08:00, and 06:16:00 (UTC), respectively; 05:46:30 was the time of the earthquake occurrence. The black dashed line indicates the location of the axis of the Japan Trench.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1209">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> displays the measured TEC data at different times.  It can be seen that the measurement points are moving and are not
uniformly distributed in the targeting range, which is 33.297–43.297<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 137.373–147.373<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.  Moreover, although it can be confirmed from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c and d that the TIH is formed, we argue that a single data point alone such as the minimum TEC value is not enough to evaluate the scale of the TIH. Indeed, doing so accounts for neither the width nor the anisotropy of the TIH.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> highlights the fact that in order to properly evaluate the TIH, it is necessary to analyze the data using statistical methods, rather than using the observed data as is.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Outlier detection</title>
      <p id="d1e1243">For the two data points that are determined to be outliers by our method, we validate them as outliers as follows. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a is the 3D plot of the captured data by satellites at 06:00:00, and the two red dots are the points identified as outliers.  It is clear that these two outliers have very different values from their neighboring measurement points, but such spikes do not correspond to any genuine physical variations. These points will move further away from the surrounding points over time, and eventually, the absolute values of the two outliers reach over 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TECU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can distort the fitting surface considerably and prevent proper TIH analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1258">Panel <bold>(a)</bold> is the 3D plot of the captured data. The two red dots are outliers identified by our method. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> is the semi-variogram cloud of the data. In both panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>, the data depicted and analyzed are captured by satellites at 06:00:00 (UTC).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1279">In addition, to validate further, we create a semi-variogram cloud.  In the semi-variogram cloud, half the value of the squared difference between
feature values of two data points is plotted against the difference in geographical space between the two data points.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b shows the semi-variogram cloud of the data at 06:00:00 (UTC), where the red points are associated with points
considered outliers by our method.  We can see that these two points present extremely different values when compared to the other measurement
points. This corresponds to a clear lack of correlation between these two points and the rest of the data set.</p>
      <p id="d1e1285">Our method identifies the receivers that correspond to the outliers.  In this case, these outliers are observed by the receiver 960588 and 950175,
respectively.  According to the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, either the antennas of the receiver or the receiver itself was replaced by
a new one in the year following the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.</p>
      <p id="d1e1288">In the analysis, it is inappropriate to include observations measured by receivers that would have been broken.  Therefore, the exclusion of these
outliers is essential to the TIH analysis, and hence all the analyses in this study are implemented after removing the outliers.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1293">Left-hand side is for the full data; right-hand side is for the sparse data using only 5 % of the GEONET receivers. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> are measured TEC data. Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are measured TEC data (blue dots) and the fitting surface (red surface). Panels <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> are 2D projections of the fitting surface. Panels <bold>(g)</bold> and <bold>(h)</bold> are 2D projections of the 99 % one-sided CI of the fitting surface. The fitting surface is computed using the INLA-SPDE method. The black dashed line indicates the location of the axis of the Japan Trench.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Surface fitting with full data</title>
      <p id="d1e1335">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows that measured TEC data, 3D plot of its fitting surface, and 2D mapping of the fitting surface and confidence interval
(CI) for both full data and sparse data at 06:08:30 (UTC). Although Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a shows that the observed TEC decreases near the
epicenter, the position where it decreases the most and the range of the depression cannot be described in detail due to the limited number of data
points.  In addition, the degree of TEC decrease in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a and the 3D plot of the TEC depression represented by
blue dots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c show that the TEC values gradually change from 0 in the area where the TEC values continue to be stable to the
minimum value in the region where they are decreasing the most.  These facts indicate that, in the evaluation of a TIH, it is necessary to estimate the
TEC values where no captured data exist, in order to use a measure that can take the overall variation into account rather than using a single
data point.</p>
      <p id="d1e1346">Here, we present our method's success in surface fitting with uncertainty as expressed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c, e and g. In
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c, the fitting surface is depicted with red colors. The fitted surface in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c is an almost perfect fit to the TEC data observed by the satellites.  We can thus confirm that the TEC values on the surface do not change linearly from the stable area to its minimum. This fact indicates that the TEC oscillation, which is thought to be the effect of high-frequency components <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.24"/>, remains even after implementing the data pre-processing, which is a low-pass filter.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>e, which is the 2D projection of the fitting surface, shows that our method enables us to estimate the TEC values with a fine granularity even over the region where the data are not detected by the GNSS satellites and receivers. The estimated values are computed and displayed in increments of 0.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude and longitude. The
result shows that our method can capture the TIH anisotropic structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.25"/>.  In addition, the 2D projection result shows that the
epicenter of the earthquake and the place where the minimum TEC value is obtained are explicitly different. It is also found that the shape and region
of the TIH region are almost the same as those of the initial tsunami shown by the simulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.26"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Surface fitting with sparse data</title>
      <p id="d1e1384">Unlike the case of full data displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, it can be clearly seen from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b that the number of data
points in the sparse-data case is not sufficient to entirely analyze the TIH, where 95 % of the GNSS receivers are randomly removed from the observed
data.  This situation is highly possible in areas where a dense network of GNSS satellites and receivers has not been installed, and hence the
appropriate analysis for the TIH is almost impossible from the captured data.  Nevertheless, our new analysis method can overcome this sparse-data problem
effectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e1391">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d, the fitting surface and almost 5 % of captured data are depicted by a red surface and blue dots, respectively.
Despite the extremely small number of data points, our method is successful in surface fitting and uncertainty evaluation.</p>
      <p id="d1e1396">A 2D projection of the fitting surface with sparse data and its 99 % CI, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>f and h, shows that the location and range of
the TIH are adequately estimated and consistent with those of the full-data case shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>e and g.  To be more specific, our
method is able to estimate the anisotropic TIH, which is consistent with the location and shape of the initial tsunami.  The uncertainty naturally
increases by comparing Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>g with h, since the number of data points is smaller than that of the original data. These results demonstrate that our new method based on GP regression overcomes the sparse-data problem by implementing surface fitting that adequately estimated TEC variation with uncertainty and captured TIH shape.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1409">Table of the minimum TEC values and the receiver numbers that observed them at three different times.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" colsep="1">At 06:08:00 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" colsep="1">At 06:12:00 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7">At 06:16:00 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Minimum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Receiver number at</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Minimum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Receiver number at</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Minimum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Receiver number at</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">observed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">which the minimum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">observed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">which the minimum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">observed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">which the minimum</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">is observed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">is observed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">is observed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0043</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0589</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0043</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0043</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0043</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3007</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0951</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0951</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0592</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3005</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0950</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0950</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0950</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0587</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0587</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0587</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0587</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0215</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0212</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0212</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0582</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3023</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3032</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1995">In this study, surface fitting for the sparse data is performed using the data received by the remaining 5 % of receivers after randomly
excluding 95 % of the GNSS receivers. With such a small number of receivers, in theory it could happen that none of the 5 % of randomly
chosen receivers would observe the data points that exist in the specific TIH region of great importance for the detection of the tsunami.</p>
      <p id="d1e1998">In our analysis, the minimum number of GNSS receivers within the target area detecting data from the satellite between 05:46:30 and 06:16:30, which is
the period of analysis, is 832 (at 05:46:30), and 40 receivers were selected at random as a conservative estimate of 5 % of that number. Consider
the aforementioned case where only receivers that do not measure the TIH are randomly selected to make up these 40 units. For example, at 06:12:00, there
are 66 receivers receiving data with a TEC value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 or less and 25 receivers receiving data with a TEC value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 or less. At 06:12:00, there
are 917 receivers detecting data from the satellite in the target area, and the probability that at least 1 of the 40 receivers randomly selected
from these receivers contains 1 of the 66 receivers that receive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 or less TEC value is around 95 %.  Also, the probability that at least 1 of
these 40 receivers contains 1 of the 25 receivers that receive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 or less is approximately 70 %. Therefore, a random selection of receivers that
cannot measure the TIH can happen, though the probability of that is very low. In this experiment, we analyze the usefulness of surface fitting in the
sparse case, where there are receivers that measure the TIH.</p>
      <p id="d1e2029">The specific details of the situation of this experiment are described below: 10 experiments were conducted to randomly select 5 % of receivers,
and the minimum observed values measured in each case are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. With a rare exception, the receiver number
by which the minimum value is measured in each case is different.  For example, at 06:12:00, in the case of random 9, the minimum value is about
0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TECU</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> larger than the case with all data. Also, at 06:16:00, the minimum value of the full data is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.19, but there is only one case,
random 5, where the minimum value is less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2058">Three different sparse-data distributions, random 0, random 3, and random 8, and these fitting surfaces mapped in two dimensions at 06:12:00 (UTC). The black dashed line indicates the location of the axis of the Japan Trench.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2068">As described above, we can see that the minimum value and distribution of TEC are different when we randomly choose receivers. And the following
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows that our fitting method works for such different sparse distributions of TEC.  In the left half of
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, three sets of randomly chosen sparse data are drawn, indicating that the data points are distributed
differently.  On the right-hand side of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, the 2D projections of the fitting surface for these sparse data are
displayed, and it can be seen that the shape of the TIH is almost the same, though not exactly the same.  Specifically,
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b2 shows a slightly wider TIH form than Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a2, and
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c2 has a TIH that is evenly spread in the east–west direction compared to
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a2 and b2.  These results show that if we can measure a few observation points with reduced TEC, we can apply
our fitting method to capture a TIH even if there are far fewer data points relative to the original data.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2088">Comparison of the volume of the TIH calculated by sparse data (40 receivers) and the volume calculated using all data. Random choices are independently implemented 10 times. Points with square marks indicate the number of data points with a TEC value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 or less and the computed volume of the TIH; round marks and triangular marks indicate those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 or less and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 or less, respectively. The red color shows the data at 06:08:00. Also, blue and dark grey are at 06:12:00 and 06:16:00, respectively. The horizontal lines show the volumes calculated using all the data at 06:08:00, 06:12:00, and 06:16:00.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2118">How the calculation of the TIH volume, i.e., the volume of the area where the value of TEC is less than 0 in the target area, is affected in this
situation is analyzed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>.  The volume of the TIH is used as a measure to determine the effect. It can be seen
from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> that in each case, there are very few measurement points with a value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 or lower, and even the
number of measurement points with a value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 or less is fewer than 10. However, when compared to the volumes calculated using all the data
represented by the horizontally lines, it can be seen that across all cases the values are very close to one another, at each time of the three
selected times. Furthermore, although the number of data points below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 varies, the computed volumes are almost similar. Obviously, if there are no
data points in the TIH area, volume calculation itself is impossible but is highly unlikely as we explained above. However, if data points shown in
the figure are measured in the TIH, volume calculation is possible. Since a single receiver can receive data from multiple satellites, the number of
receivers needed to receive data in the TIH is extremely small.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2148">Expansion of the tsunami ionospheric hole. Panels <bold>(a1–a3)</bold> are plots of the TIH with TEC less than or equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2. Panels <bold>(b1–b3)</bold> and <bold>(c1–c3)</bold> are less than or equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4, respectively. These plots are at 06:08:00, 06:12:00, and 06:16:00 (UTC). The eight triangles are the south, north, west, east, northeast, southeast, northwest, and southwest directions from the tsunami source, respectively. The colors are pink, orange, brown, black, red, grey, yellow, and purple, respectively. The red-star mark is the location of the epicenter. The yellow-circle mark is the location of the estimated tsunami source. The black dashed line indicates the location of the axis of the Japan Trench.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>TIH expansion</title>
      <p id="d1e2199">Since we are able to estimate all the TEC variations in the target area, we analyze the shape of the TIH in detail using the observed data.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> displays the distribution of TEC below different levels at different times.  Specifically, in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a1 to a3, the shapes of the TIH limited to TEC values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 or less are drawn at 06:08:00, 06:12:00, and 06:16:00 (UTC).
Similarly, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b1 to b3 and c1 to c3, the shapes of TIHs with TEC values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 or less and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 or less, respectively, are drawn.  The tsunami source was set to 38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 143.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, which was calculated in a previous study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.27"/> as the average of tsunami sources obtained from previous research papers. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.28"/>, the initial tsunami reproduces the TIH, and the TIH is spread out over the initial tsunami. Then, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.29"/> use the TEC values around the tsunami source area to derive the relationship between the TIH and the initial tsunami. Based on these previous studies, using the observed data, the expansion of the TIH around the tsunami source was analyzed as follows.</p>
      <p id="d1e2257">As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a1 to a3, the region with TEC less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 can be seen to expand less to the northern direction than the other
directions.  In addition, a TEC decrease isolated from the TIH directly above the tsunami can be seen in the southwestern direction.  As an overall
trend, it can be said that the expansion of the TIH in the eastern and southwestern directions is more pronounced than in the other directions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2269">However, when we observed the behavior of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> b1 to b3, where the value of TEC is less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3, we found that the expansion of the TIH is different from that of the TIH with a TEC value less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 described in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a1 to a3.  First of all, the area of the TIH has not expanded as much as that of the TIH with TEC less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.  In addition, the southwestward expansion is not as large as that of the TIH in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a1 to a3.  For example, the eastward expansion appears to be the most pronounced, and also the northward expansion is less
pronounced than in other directions, which are similar characteristics.</p>
      <p id="d1e2300">In the case of the TIH with TEC less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4, shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c1 to c3, the westward expansion is smaller than the expansion in the
other directions.  In addition, the TIH center does not remain directly above the vicinity of the tsunami source but appears to be moving to the
southeast.  It can also be seen that the region where TEC is less than or equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 does not expand significantly during the period of 20 to
30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the earthquake, but it does not shrink significantly either.  In other words, when we focus on the TEC values below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4, the
shape of TEC is almost stable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>TIH expansion distance in each direction</title>
      <p id="d1e2342">From Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, it can be inferred that the time evolution of the shape of the region with small TEC variation and that with large
TEC variation do not necessarily coincide.  To investigate this point in more detail, we analyze the graphs with the distance in kilometers plotted by time
for the most expanded points in the eight directions from the tsunami source.  Here, the distance is computed by Hubeny's distance formula
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.30"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2350">Here, the location of the tsunami source is the same value used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.31"/>, and its coordinates are calculated by referring to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.32"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.33"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.34"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.35"/>. The eight directions are evenly divided into north, northwest,
west, southwest, south, southeast, east, and northeast from its tsunami center position.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2370">Expansion of the tsunami ionospheric hole. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> is the time series of the distance from the tsunami source in eight directions for the TIH with TEC less than or equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2. Panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> are the time series of distance with TEC less than or equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2411">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>, the distance between the most expanded point in the eight directions and the tsunami source when the TEC
value is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 or less (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 or less (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 or less
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c) are drawn, respectively.  The eight directions and the color coding for each are the same as in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2446">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a, it can be seen that the expansion in the northeastern direction progresses earlier than other directions. A little later, the eastward expansion continues to progress, and finally the eastward expansion progresses more than the northeastward expansion. The expansion to the south, after increasing for some reason, begins to decrease and then continues to expand again. Eventually, it will be as large as the eastward expansion. The westward expansion is a discontinuous movement due to the definition of distance and direction in this analysis. Specifically, as depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a2 and a3, the region with TEC less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 has a special shape in the western direction, and the distance in this direction tends to be more discontinuous than the distances in other directions. What is noteworthy is the expansion of the distance in the northern and northwestern directions. The progress of the distances in these directions is clearly smaller than those in other directions. For example, compared to the expansion in the eastern direction, the distance in the northern and northwestern directions is less than half. Also, it is worth mentioning the TIH withdrawal (05:59:30–06:01:00) in the southward direction. Due to the influence of the geomagnetic field, the plasma tends to move more to the south. In addition, the backward-moving average frequency filter applied in this study does not completely exclude the high-frequency component. For these reasons, we detected a decrease in the electron density as a result of the recombination caused by the oscillation of the plasma due to the high-frequency component on the southern side. This temporary decrease in electron density is caused by a different mechanism than the TIH formation, which is caused by the low-frequency component.</p>
      <p id="d1e2460">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b, the time evolution of the distances in all directions appears to be continuous. In this case, too, the expansion toward the northeast progresses in the initial stage, but then the expansion toward the east progresses significantly. The expansion in the southern direction can be said to be slower than that of the two directions mentioned above, but it eventually expands by the same distance as that in the eastern direction.  The southeastern direction shows a trend similar to the expansion in the southern direction, and although the initial expansion is not so large, the final value is large. It can be seen that the northern and southwestern directions do not expand as much even at the beginning and then remain in a stable state with almost the same value over time.  The northwestern direction, as with Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a, is one of the directions that does not expand the most.  The most significant difference between Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b and a is the expansion in the western direction. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a, the distance in the western direction expands discontinuously and finally reaches the highest value. On the other hand, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b, the distance in the western direction is the smallest in almost all time periods.</p>
      <p id="d1e2473">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c, the time at which the image begins to expand is greatly delayed because the threshold is set even smaller than in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a and b. Initially, the expansion in the northwestern and southern directions is significant, and as time passes, the expansion in the eastern direction becomes the largest. Eventually, the distance in the southeastern direction becomes larger than the distances in the other directions at the end of the period, but its maximum value is smaller than the value recorded by the eastern direction around 06:10:30 (UTC). The expansions in the northern and southwestern directions show almost the same development. For the northwestern and western directions, as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b, only the smallest expansion is shown during the period.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2484">The initial tsunami and TIHs with TEC values less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4. The blue area is the simulated initial tsunami by inversion analysis with 130 small basis functions implemented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.36"/>. In panels <bold>(a1–a3)</bold>, the red areas are TIHs with TEC less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3, while the dark grey areas in panels <bold>(b1–b3)</bold> illustrate TIHs with TEC less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4. Panels <bold>(a1)</bold> and <bold>(b1)</bold> are snapshots at 06:08:00 (UTC); panels <bold>(a2)</bold> and <bold>(b2)</bold> are at 06:12:00 (UTC); and panels <bold>(a3)</bold> and <bold>(b3)</bold> are at 06:16:00 (UTC). The black dashed line indicates the location of the axis of the Japan Trench.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>TIH overlapping with the initial tsunami</title>
      <p id="d1e2558">Unlike the high-frequency component of the TEC variation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.37"/>, the low-frequency component of the TEC variation displays large drops in
its values and remains fixed within a region, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. Since this TEC reduction is caused by the initial tsunami,
staying in the same location is theoretically correct. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, the initial tsunami estimated by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.38"/> using inversion analysis mostly overlaps with the TIH where the TEC reduction is large. Although there have been studies to
estimate the tsunami source using TEC fluctuation data, these studies estimate the tsunami source as a point <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.39"/>. We show here
for the first time that our method of estimating the entire TIH by GP regression can be used to estimate the initial-tsunami region as shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>. In the case of TEC values less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a1–a3, the TIH almost overlaps the initial-tsunami areas; in other words, the TIH with TEC values less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 is located in the region which is almost the same as the initial-tsunami
region, while Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b1–b3 with TEC values less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 shows that the TIH stays within the initial-tsunami region.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e2604">Uncertainty of the estimated TEC values at 06:08:00, 06:12:00, and 06:16:00. The uncertainty in this case is defined as 3 times the standard deviation. The area surrounded by the blue line is the simulated initial tsunami by inversion analysis with 130 small basis functions implemented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.40"/>. The black dashed line indicates the location of the axis of the Japan Trench.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2616">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> shows the uncertainty in estimating the values of TEC using the full data.  In this figure, the uncertainty
is defined as 3 times the standard deviation.  In general, interpolation between data points can be performed with a small uncertainty, while
extrapolation has a larger uncertainty.  Even in the case of interpolation, if the data points are sparse, the uncertainty will be large.  Therefore,
it can be seen from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> that the uncertainty is larger in areas where the measurement points are sparse or where
extrapolation is performed, as can be seen by comparing with Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2626">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, the initial-tsunami and TIH regions overlap, but at 06:12:00 and 06:16:00, the TIH region extends more toward the
eastern direction of the Pacific Ocean than the initial-tsunami region.  Specifically, this tendency is observed in the area east of the initial-tsunami area and west of the dotted line at 145.37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. In addition, the TIH region at 06:12:00 appears to be wider eastward of the Japan Trench than the TIH region at 06:16:00.  In this regard, for example, looking at the uncertainty values for each region listed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>, at 06:12:00, the uncertainty for the region east of the initial-tsunami region and west of the dotted line at
145.37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E is slightly larger. However, it is unlikely that this was the reason for capturing the non-overlapping phenomenon of the initial-tsunami and TIH regions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e2653">TIH and the initial-tsunami comparison. In the first row, the initial tsunami estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.41"/> is shown. In the second row, the initial tsunami estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.42"/> is shown. In both cases, the TIHs with TEC values less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 are described.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2675"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.43"/> show that acoustic waves propagate upward, which are gradually refracted, and their effects propagate horizontally in the ionosphere.
According to this principle, the TIH is expected to spread evenly in the east–west direction of the tsunami generation area.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.44"/>, who
analyzed the measured data, showed that slant TEC decreased in the area east of the tsunami generation area after the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.  The
reason why the TIH calculated by our method appears to be extended to the east of the Japan Trench when compared to the initial-tsunami area is that
the initial-tsunami height is highest on the Japan Trench.  The acoustic waves from the highest region on the trench propagate into the atmosphere and
affect the neutral atmosphere evenly in the east–west direction, resulting in the recombination of ions and electrons, causing the TIH to spread in
the east–west direction around the trench.  Therefore, we believe that the estimation by our method correctly captures the variation of the electron
density.  In future reverse calculations of the initial-tsunami area and height based on TIH information, it is necessary to take into account that
the area with the highest initial tsunami has a large impact on TIH formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2683">Also, the initial tsunamis estimated by other researchers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.45"/> show that the initial-tsunami regions overlap the TIH region
as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>, where these initial tsunamis are roughly estimated by looking at them. In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.46"/>, they used an algorithm developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.47"/> to compute the initial sea surface displacement based on their fault-determination procedure. On the other hand, in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.48"/>, they investigated the effect of the rupture process on a tsunami source inversion. Estimated sea surface elevation of a tsunami source by their inversion method based on the assumption of finite rupture velocity of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown.  These results indicate that our TIH estimates overlap not only with the initial tsunami estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.49"/> but also with the initial tsunami determined by other researchers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <label>3.7</label><title>Detailed comparison between TIH depth and initial-tsunami height</title>
      <p id="d1e2729">In this section, the relationship between the TIH and the initial tsunami is analyzed in more detail with the help of data provided by Tatsuhiko Saito, the first author of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.50"/>. Based on the assumption that the TIH is triggered by tsunamis, it is expected that the locations of high tsunamis and high TEC reduction in the TIH are in close proximity to each other.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e2737">Overlap of initial tsunami and TEC. Panels <bold>(a1–a3)</bold> are plots of TEC values and contours of the initial-tsunami height by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.51"/>. The horizontal and vertical red dashed lines indicate the latitude and longitude where the initial tsunami reaches its highest height. Panels <bold>(b1–b3)</bold> and <bold>(c1–c3)</bold> show the initial-tsunami height and TEC values at the latitude and longitude where the initial-tsunami height is the highest, respectively. The initial-tsunami height corresponds to the scale on the left axis (blue), and the TEC value corresponds to the scale on the right (red).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e2760">Initial-tsunami height and time series variation of TEC from 05:46:30 to 06:16:30 (UTC). Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the TEC time series when the initial-tsunami height is fixed at the highest latitude, and panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the TEC time series when the longitude is fixed. The initial-tsunami height corresponds to the scale on the left axis (blue), and the TEC value corresponds to the scale on the right (red).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2776">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a1 to a3 show the contour lines of the initial-tsunami height and the overlaid TIH that is plotted at three different
time points.  From these figures, it can be seen that the region with the largest decrease in TEC and the region with the highest initial-tsunami wave
height are very close to each other.  Furthermore, the decrease in TEC appears to correspond with the increase in the initial-tsunami height.</p>
      <p id="d1e2781">To make a more precise comparison in this regard, graphs comparing the initial tsunami and TIH at the latitude and longitude where the initial-tsunami
height is the highest are illustrated in the second and third rows of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>, respectively.  From the figures shown in the second
line, it can be seen that the longitude with the largest decrease in TEC and the longitude with the highest initial-tsunami height roughly match.  On
the western side of the location where the initial tsunami is highest, the area where the tsunami height starts to increase and the area where TEC
starts to decrease appear to be almost the same, but this is not necessarily the case on the eastern side.</p>
      <p id="d1e2786">From the figures shown in the third row, the latitudes with the largest decrease in TEC and the highest initial-tsunami height roughly matched, and
unlike the east–west asymmetry when the latitude is fixed, the TEC decrease is generally symmetrical in the north–south direction. This symmetry
seems to correspond to the shape of the initial tsunami.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e2791">The time series of TIH volume for full data and sparse data with a one-sided CI. The red solid line is the volume calculated with a fitting surface for full data. The solid yellow line and the solid blue line are a one-sided 80 % CI and 99 % CI, respectively. The dashed lines are for sparse data with only 5 % of receivers. The horizontal black line is a provisional threshold. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the TEC surface computed based on GP regression. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the TEC surface computed based on GP regression using the INLA-SPDE method.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/849/2022/nhess-22-849-2022-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2806">Furthermore, the time series variation of TEC from 05:46:30 to 06:16:30 (UTC) is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>, when fixed at the
latitude and longitude with the highest initial-tsunami height, respectively.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>a shows that the TEC decrease
is the largest in the region where the initial-tsunami height is the highest when we observe the time series variation of TEC for 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after
the earthquake. However, in the process of TEC decrease, it is also observed that there is a time period when TEC decreases the most in a slightly
western region.  In more detail, we can see that the area where TEC is decreasing the most is slightly moving from the west to the east and expanding
with a larger decrease.  In addition, there is an asymmetry of TEC decrease in the east–west direction.</p>
      <p id="d1e2822"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>On the other hand, from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>b, the TEC decrease appears to be symmetrical in the north–south direction when the
longitude is fixed at the position where the initial tsunami is highest. However, by checking the details of the time series change of TEC decrease,
we can see that the position where the TEC decreases the most is moving from north to south, and the decrease is expanding.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS8">
  <label>3.8</label><title>TIH volume computation</title>
      <p id="d1e2836">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/> shows the time series of the TIH volume, which is computed by the trapezoidal quadrature method for the region where TEC
estimated by surface fitting has a negative value. In other words, the volume between the flat surface, where the TEC values are equal to 0, and
the fitting surface, which has a negative value, is calculated.</p>
      <p id="d1e2841">The main effect by acoustic waves induced by the initial tsunami is the reduction of TEC in the ionosphere by moving the plasma along the
magnetic field and causing recombination.  More specifically, although there are regions where TEC increases due to complex physical mechanisms,
the magnitude of the initial tsunami can be assessed by focusing on the decrease in TEC. Therefore, the volume of the region with a negative TEC
value is considered to be related to the magnitude of the initial tsunami.</p>
      <p id="d1e2844">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>a, surface fitting is implemented with simple GP regression, while the INLA-SPDE method is applied to the GP
regression process in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>b. The solid lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>a and b display the TIH volumes computed for the full
data, and the dashed lines are for the sparse data.  In the case of the sparse data, we repeat 10 times the random selection of 5 % of the
receivers and the GP regression to fit the surfaces and then calculate the average value using each computed volume.  This iterative process is
intended to exclude a possible influence of the random seed used in the sparse-data selection on the results.  As shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, the measurement points are moving and not uniformly distributed in the targeting range. Still, the time series of the
computed TIH volumes looks continuous, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>a and b.</p>
      <p id="d1e2857">The volume of the TIH begins to increase almost 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the earthquake occurrence and continues to increase until about 28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
after the earthquake shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>a and b. More specifically, the reason the volume of the TIH continues to increase until
28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the earthquake is that the TIH is formed by the extremely low-frequency component of acoustic waves that travel from the sea
surface to the ionosphere.  The recombination of plasma and electrons caused by this low-frequency component is the direct cause of the TIH, and this
recombination takes time, so the volume continues to increase over a long period of time.  Simulations of TIH formation using a physical model
presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.52"/> also show that the TIH forms over a similar time period.  The past study of actual post-earthquake TEC variation data has
confirmed that the percentages of TEC depressions for huge simulated tsunamis reach almost 40 times as large as those for smaller simulated tsunamis
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.53"/>. In this context, a huge simulated tsunami means a tsunami with a simulated initial-tsunami height of around 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a
small simulated tsunami means a tsunami with a simulated initial-tsunami height of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or less in their study.  Although it is impossible to
understand the time evolution of TIH volume in advance, since no study has considered and analyzed the entire TEC variation in the targeting range
under the extremely complex TIH mechanism and our new method is applied to only one tsunami case, it is a sufficiently conservative estimate that the
threshold is set to about 10 %–20 % of the maximum TIH volume according to the aforementioned previous study.  Therefore, if the volume
exceeds this threshold, it is reasonable to draw the conclusion that a huge tsunami is being generated. Though it is impossible to describe what
the definition of a huge tsunami in an explicit and strict manner is, since there is no general definition of a huge tsunami, a huge tsunami in this
context means a tsunami with the same magnitude as the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. By convention, tsunamis triggered by a magnitude of about nine earthquakes are considered to be huge tsunamis. Also, in this analysis, a provisional threshold is set to 200 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TECU</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2924">In the case of the full data, both panels show that the volumes calculated from the fitting surface (but not accounting for uncertainties in the
approximation) reach the threshold 1 and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> earlier, respectively, than the volumes of 80 % and 99 % CI.  Similarly, in the case of
the sparse data, the time difference is about 2 and 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, to reach the threshold for the volumes computed from the fitting
surface and both CIs. It means that thanks to our uncertainty computations, making sure that a warning is at a high level of confidence, based on
data, of either 80 % or 99 % results in delays for advisories of only, respectively, 1–2 or 2–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2951">The warning system based on this method is highly feasible because surface fitting and the estimation of the TEC values for the full data can be
processed in less than 1 min based on the INLA-SPDE method. However, in the case of the sparse-data fitting, our implementation of the INLA-SPDE
method sometimes fails due to the geometric meshing optimized for larger data sets, where the benefit of this method is. Nevertheless, the robustness
and feasibility of this method never deteriorate because it is possible to compute the surface and estimated values in less than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
sparse-data case based on the standard GP regression method.  Our method is the first to demonstrate that we can calculate the volume of TIHs
accurately in real time and use it as a measure of TIHs even when only a limited number of measurement points are available.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2972">In this paper, we compute the volume of the ionospheric depression generated by a tsunami, in real time and with enough confidence to issue
warnings. The surface fits the TEC data using a Gaussian process regression after removing outliers. It enables us to estimate the TEC values over the
entire target area. Furthermore, uncertainty can be properly evaluated for the estimated values of TEC according to the density of observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e2975">The TIH captured by our method is located east of the epicenter. This is consistent with the initial tsunami estimated by other research groups being
east of the epicenter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.54"/>. Also, the estimated TIH almost overlaps with the initial-tsunami area
estimated by three different research groups.  In the ionosphere, the anisotropic conductance and geomagnetic-field directions theoretically cause
ionospheric currents to have complex shapes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.55"/>. We concretely show here that the estimated TIH can be anisotropic using observed
TEC data and a statistical approach.</p>
      <p id="d1e2984">As shown in our results, this new method is robust, as it works in situations where measurements are not uniformly distributed and moving and TIHs display
anisotropy and even if the number of observed data points is sparse. Since our estimates of the shape of the anisotropic TIHs reflect the signature
of the initial-tsunami wave, we demonstrate that using one specific data point such as the minimum observed value as a scale of a TIH
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.56"/> is insufficient to characterize the initial wave. Our computation of the volume of TIHs as a measure to assess the scale of TIHs
fully takes into account the spatial variations of the TEC depression generated by the tsunami over the domain, including any anisotropy.</p>
      <p id="d1e2990">In addition, although there have been papers referring to a TIH based on observational data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.57"/>, it was impossible to
give a detailed explanation of the temporal variation of the TIH in those papers due to data limitations.  Using our method, however, the detailed TIH
expansion analysis based on different thresholds becomes possible.  One of the findings is that the way in which the region with small TEC variation
expands is dramatically different from that with large TEC variation expands.  In our study, it is confirmed that the northward expansion is smaller
than the southward expansion, no matter at which threshold level the TIH expansion is checked.  This is consistent with the outcomes in previous
studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.58"/> that in the Northern Hemisphere, the interaction of the geomagnetic field with the movement of charged particles in acoustic
waves may have attenuated northward propagation.  This result is also consistent with the simulated results of previous studies using 3D
simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.59"/>, where the TEC decrease in the southern direction was larger than that in the northern direction.  While
the results of the 2D simulations did not show a relatively large decrease in TEC to the south <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.60"/>, the 3D simulations did
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.61"/>, and we have demonstrated this through statistical analysis based on satellite captured data.</p>
      <p id="d1e3009">As for the high-frequency component of the TEC variability, past studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.62"/> analyzing observational data have confirmed that the
eastward propagation of the TEC fluctuation is faster than the westward propagation.  Although our analysis is focused on the low-frequency component,
we have confirmed for the first time that the westward expansion of the TIH with TEC less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3, estimated by this new method, is less rapid than the
eastward expansion.  However, no similar simulation results have been reported so far for the asymmetry in the east–west direction found in our
analysis based on the measured data. Furthermore, the westward expansion observed for TEC values below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 cannot be satisfactorily explained by the
relevant previous studies, and further detailed analysis is needed.  Previous papers based on observation data without imposing frequency filters
mention that the TIH stops just above the tsunami source, but a more detailed analysis in our study shows that the TIH with a threshold of TEC variation
below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 expands over time.  The TIH separated by each of these thresholds overlaps with the initial-tsunami region calculated by other research
groups <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.63"/>.  In the previous study using TEC observational data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.64"/>, the tsunami source is
analyzed, but the result is a point estimation.  On the other hand, our method can estimate the tsunami region because it is possible to cover all the
targeting area. More significantly, the time series change of the TIH fixed at the latitude and longitude where the initial tsunami is the highest shows
for the first time that the TIH reflects the shape of the initial tsunami at that fixed latitude and longitude. This is a fact that could not be found in
the previous analysis that used only observation data. From this fact, it is expected that the TIH information can be used to estimate not only the
initial-tsunami area but also its shape.</p>
      <p id="d1e3043">We also believe that our method can estimate the initial tsunami independently from previous methods.  Previous methods include, for example, the
method of estimating a tsunami from the source and magnitude of an earthquake. By detecting seismic waves at multiple observation points, it is possible
to calculate the approximate location of the earthquake and to some extent the exact size and magnitude of the earthquake within 2 min.  Based
on this information, the initial tsunami can be estimated.</p>
      <p id="d1e3046">In addition, a method has been developed to calculate the initial shape of a tsunami in reverse by calculating the shift of vessel speed due to the
passage of a tsunami from the data of the automatic identification system (AIS), which is required to be installed on ships sailing in the area. This
method is expected to be used to predict the initial tsunami around the world.  However, some problems exist, such as the fact that the exact
magnitude of a huge earthquake with a magnitude greater than 8 is not immediately known, the fault displacement (estimated from seismic waves) does
not always match the initial sea level change, and the initial sea level change cannot be known.</p>
      <p id="d1e3049">In addition to the above methods, Japan has developed a system called the REal-time GEONET Analysis system for Rapid Deformation monitoring (REGARD),
which analyzes GEONET data in real time and extracts crustal deformation during earthquakes to automatically estimate fault models and earthquake
scale within 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the earthquake.  Moreover, the Seafloor Observation Network for Earthquakes and Tsunamis along the Japan Trench
(S-NET) has been established on the seafloor from off of Boso to off of Tokachi.  The data are collected in real time 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> every day.  This system is
expected to be used to accurately predict the initial tsunami.  As a matter of course, it is difficult to accurately estimate the initial-tsunami
information because no estimation method is perfect and the area covered may be limited.</p>
      <p id="d1e3068">Therefore, in addition to the various existing initial-tsunami estimation methods mentioned above, if the initial-tsunami shape and height estimation
based on our developed TIH estimation can be realized in the future, it is expected that the combination of these methods will enable us to realize
an even more accurate estimation of initial-tsunami height and range.  From this point of view, even if it takes about 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to obtain the initial-tsunami information, we believe it is beneficial.</p>
      <p id="d1e3079">Furthermore, the existence of the second and third waves can be estimated by looking at the time variation of the TIH.  Since the presence of large second
and third waves affects the shape of the TIH, it can be used to determine whether the tsunami warning should be maintained or canceled after it is
issued.  In fact, after the 2011 earthquake in Japan, it took 1.5 d for the tsunami warning to be lifted.  This is an advantage of our
method, even if it takes time to obtain useful information.</p>
      <p id="d1e3083">As for the method to obtain the initial-tsunami information by calculating an inverse from the TIH information, we expect that the combination of the
TIH estimated by our method and the acoustic wave propagation model may be able to estimate the initial-tsunami area.  At present, although
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.65"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.66"/> have been able to reproduce the TIH quite accurately, they have not yet been able to reproduce it
completely.  Therefore, we expect to be able to back-calculate the region of the initial tsunami at an early stage by supplementing the simulation
model with model discrepancies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.67"/>, which is a statistical method that takes into account the differences between actual
measurements and model outputs for estimation and history matching <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.68"/>, which can limit the likelihood region of model parameters.
There have been attempts to construct tsunami early warnings using TEC variations.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.69"/> demonstrate that the location of the
tsunami source can be estimated from 10 IPs by observing TEC variations with a high-pass filter using methods that consider the propagation speed
such as the circle method, the ray-tracing technique, and the beam-forming technique.  However, these methods only identify the tsunami source with
uncertainty and do not take into account the scale and range of the initial tsunami.  As larger initial tsunamis cause larger decreases in TEC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.70"/>, if a TIH volume reaches a certain threshold, then it indicates that a large-scale initial tsunami has occurred.
For example, in Fig. 3 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.71"/>, we can see the positive correlation between the percentage of TEC depression and simulated initial-tsunami height. To relate our measure, that is, the volume of the TIH, to a corresponding measure of the tsunami size, it is necessary to apply the method
to other tsunami cases in future work.  As a result, we expect to be able to derive a detailed relationship between the volume of the TIH and the
initial tsunami.  Therefore, using our method, it is possible to build an early warning system that issues a tsunami warning when the volume of the
TIH exceeds a certain threshold, taking uncertainty into consideration.  In our analysis, we set a provisional threshold at
200 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TECU</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and it is clear that the volumes calculated using both full data and sparse data exceed the threshold within
15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the earthquake occurrence or sooner with a lower threshold.  Even carrying out the computations in the most exacting case, using
99 % CI and sparse data (5 % of the total observations) only delays the warning by around 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We anticipate that more numerical
work, more physical understanding of possible natural levels of TEC variations, and more data analysis will be required to establish more finely the
thresholds at which advisories can be issued and thus shorten the advisories to possibly 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or so.  Although, in some cases, tsunamis
reach the coast very fast, to apply our method there must be a minimum window of almost 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between generation and arrival.  However, this
is perfectly valid for tsunami hazard assessment over populous regions with larger arrival times, as for example tsunami hazard assessment in the city
of Victoria, British Columbia, from a tsunami generated in the Cascadia subduction zone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.72"/>.  Our implementation on the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake in Japan demonstrates that our method works well there. Hence it is very likely that this method can be applied to tsunamis around the
world, caused by any kind of sources. This may enable the construction of a robust worldwide tsunami early warning system using the volume of TIHs as
an index.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3162">GPS data were provided by the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. Currently, the data can be purchased from the Japan Association of Surveyors at <uri>http://www.jsurvey.jp/eng.htm</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.73"/>. Several software packages are used for the data preprocessing. These software can be downloaded from the following URLs.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3173"><uri>https://terras.gsi.go.jp/ja/crx2rnx.html</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.74"/></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3181"><uri>http://www.ep.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~heki/software.htm</uri>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.75"/>.</p></list-item></list></p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3189">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-849-2022-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-849-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3198">RK conceptualized the project and methodology, curated the data, performed the formal analysis and investigation, created the visualizations, and wrote the original draft of the paper. MK acquired project funding, curated the data, and worked with the software. TN acquired project funding, curated the data, worked with the software, and reviewed and edited the paper. AS supervised the project, conceptualized the methodology, and reviewed and edited the paper. SG conceptualized and supervised the project, acquired project funding, performed the investigation, and reviewed and edited the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3204">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3211">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3217">The authors acknowledge the use of the UCL Myriad High Performance Computing Facility (Myriad@UCL), as well as associated support services, in the completion of this work. Ryuichi Kanai is supported by the Japan Student Services Organization. This research was partly supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology through a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B, no. 17H02058, 2017–2020, Masashi Kamogawa) and Earthquake Research Institute (University of Tokyo) cooperative research program (Masashi Kamogawa and Ryuichi Kanai). Serge Guillas was supported by the projects “Uncertainty Quantification of complex computer models. Applications to tsunami and climate” (EPSRC grant no. EP/N510129/1) and “Real-time Advanced Data assimilation for Digital Simulation of Numerical Twins on HPC” (EPSRC grant no. EP/T001569/1) of The Alan Turing Institute. Masashi Kamogawa was supported by Adaptable and Seamless Technology transfer Program through Target-driven R &amp; D (A-STEP) from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (grant no. JPMJTM19YG). The authors are grateful to Tatsuhiko Saito, the first author of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.76"/>, for sharing his data of the estimated initial tsunami in his paper. In creating Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>, we use his data to show the contour and the shape of the initial tsunami. Kosuke Heki <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.77"/> at Hokkaido University kindly provided us with GNSS data conversion software. We also appreciate the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, which provided GPS data conversion software.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3237">This research has been supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (grant no. 17H02058); the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (grant nos. EP/N510129/1 and EP/T001569/1); Tokai University (grant no. IORD2018-01); and the Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-driven R&amp;D (grant no. JPMJTM19YG).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3243">This paper was edited by Maria Ana Baptista and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Amato et~al.(2021)Amato, Avallone, Basili, Bernardi, Brizuela, Graziani, Herrero, Lorenzino, Lorito, Mele et~al.}}?><label>Amato et al.(2021)Amato, Avallone, Basili, Bernardi, Brizuela, Graziani, Herrero, Lorenzino, Lorito, Mele et al.</label><?label amato2021seismic?><mixed-citation>Amato, A., Avallone, A., Basili, R., Bernardi, F., Brizuela, B., Graziani, L., Herrero, A., Lorenzino, M. C., Lorito, S., Mele, F. M., Michelini, A., Piatanesi, A., Pintore, S., Romano, F., Selva, J., Stramondo, S., Tonini, R., and and Volpe, M.: From Seismic Monitoring to Tsunami Warning in the Mediterranean Sea, Seismol. Res. Lett., 92, 1796–1816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/0220200437</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Astafyeva et~al.(2013)Astafyeva, Shalimov, Olshanskaya, and Lognonn{\'{e}}}}?><label>Astafyeva et al.(2013)Astafyeva, Shalimov, Olshanskaya, and Lognonné</label><?label Astafyeva2013?><mixed-citation>Astafyeva, E., Shalimov, S., Olshanskaya, E., and Lognonné, P.:
Ionospheric response to earthquakes of different magnitudes: Larger quakes perturb the ionosphere stronger and longer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1675–1681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50398</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bernard and Titov(2015)}}?><label>Bernard and Titov(2015)</label><?label bernard2015evolution?><mixed-citation>Bernard, E. and Titov, V.:
Evolution of tsunami warning systems and products, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 373, 20140371, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0371" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2014.0371</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brynjarsd\'{o}ttir and O'Hagan(2014)}}?><label>Brynjarsdóttir and O'Hagan(2014)</label><?label brynjarsdottir2014?><mixed-citation>Brynjarsdóttir, J. and O'Hagan, A.: Learning about physical parameters: The importance of model discrepancy, Inverse Probl., 30, 114007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Chang et~al.(2015)Chang, Guillas, and Fioletov}}?><label>Chang et al.(2015)Chang, Guillas, and Fioletov</label><?label chang2015spatial?><mixed-citation>Chang, K.-L., Guillas, S., and Fioletov, V. E.: Spatial mapping of ground-based observations of total ozone, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4487–4505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4487-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-4487-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cover and Hart(1967)}}?><label>Cover and Hart(1967)</label><?label Cover1967?><mixed-citation>Cover, T. and Hart, P.:
Nearest neighbor pattern classification, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 13, 21–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964</ext-link>, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Giles et~al.(2021)Giles, Gopinathan, Guillas, and Dias}}?><label>Giles et al.(2021)Giles, Gopinathan, Guillas, and Dias</label><?label giles2020faster?><mixed-citation>Giles, D., Gopinathan, D., Guillas, S., and Dias, F.:
Faster than real time tsunami warning with associated hazard uncertainties, Front. Earth Sci., 8, 560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.597865" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2020.597865</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Grilli et~al.(2013)Grilli, Harris, Bakhsh, Masterlark, Kyriakopoulos, Kirby, and Shi}}?><label>Grilli et al.(2013)Grilli, Harris, Bakhsh, Masterlark, Kyriakopoulos, Kirby, and Shi</label><?label Grilli2013?><mixed-citation>Grilli, S. T., Harris, J. C., Bakhsh, T. S. T., Masterlark, T. L., Kyriakopoulos, C., Kirby, J. T., and Shi, F.:
Numerical simulation of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami based on a new transient FEM co-seismic source: Comparison to far-and near-field observations, Pure Appl. Geophys., 170, 1333–1359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0528-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00024-012-0528-y</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hatanaka(2022)}}?><label>Hatanaka(2022)</label><?label Hatanaka2022?><mixed-citation>Hatanaka, Y.: RNXCMP software, Geospatial Information Authority of Japan [code], <uri>https://terras.gsi.go.jp/ja/crx2rnx.html</uri>, last access: 8 March 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heki(2022)}}?><label>Heki(2022)</label><?label Heki2022?><mixed-citation>Heki, K.: L4 generation from RINEX observation data file and Satellite position calculation from RINEX orbit data file in Earth-Centered Earth-Fixed system [code], <uri>http://www.ep.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~heki/software.htm</uri>, last access: 8 March 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heki and Ping(2005)}}?><label>Heki and Ping(2005)</label><?label heki2005?><mixed-citation>Heki, K. and Ping, J.:
Directivity and apparent velocity of the coseismic ionospheric disturbances observed with a dense GPS array, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 236, 845–855, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.010</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kakinami et~al.(2012)Kakinami, Kamogawa, Tanioka, Watanabe, Gusman, Liu et~al.}}?><label>Kakinami et al.(2012)Kakinami, Kamogawa, Tanioka, Watanabe, Gusman, Liu et al.</label><?label Kakinami2012?><mixed-citation>Kakinami, Y., Kamogawa, M., Tanioka, Y., Watanabe, S., Gusman, A. R., Liu, J.-Y., Watanabe, Y., and Mogi, T.: Tsunamigenic ionospheric hole, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L00G27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL050159</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kamogawa et~al.(2016)Kamogawa, Orihara, Tsurudome, Tomida, Kanaya, Ikeda et~al.}}?><label>Kamogawa et al.(2016)Kamogawa, Orihara, Tsurudome, Tomida, Kanaya, Ikeda et al.</label><?label Kamogawa2016?><mixed-citation>Kamogawa, M., Orihara, Y., Tsurudome, C., Tomida, Y., Kanaya, T., Ikeda, D., Gusman, A. R., Kakinami, Y., Liu, J.-Y., and Toyoda, A.: A possible space-based tsunami early warning system using observations of the tsunami ionospheric hole, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 37989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37989" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep37989</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lay et~al.(2011)Lay, Ammon, Kanamori, Yamazaki, Cheung, and Hutko}}?><label>Lay et al.(2011)Lay, Ammon, Kanamori, Yamazaki, Cheung, and Hutko</label><?label lay2011mentawai?><mixed-citation>Lay, T., Ammon, C. J., Kanamori, H., Yamazaki, Y., Cheung, K. F., and Hutko, A. R.: The 25 October 2010 Mentawai tsunami earthquake (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8) and the tsunami hazard presented by shallow megathrust ruptures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046552</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lindgren et~al.(2011)Lindgren, Rue, and Lindstr{\"{o}}m}}?><label>Lindgren et al.(2011)Lindgren, Rue, and Lindström</label><?label lindgren2011explicit?><mixed-citation>Lindgren, F., Rue, H., and Lindström, J.:
An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 73, 423–498, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2019)Liu, Lin, Tsai, Liu, Hattori, Sun, and Wu}}?><label>Liu et al.(2019)Liu, Lin, Tsai, Liu, Hattori, Sun, and Wu</label><?label liu2019ionospheric?><mixed-citation>Liu, J.-Y., Lin, C.-Y., Tsai, Y.-L., Liu, T.-C., Hattori, K., Sun, Y.-Y., and Wu, T.-R.:
Ionospheric GNSS total electron content for tsunami warning, J. Earthq. Tsunami, 13, 1941007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431119410070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/S1793431119410070</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et~al.(2020)Liu, Lin, Chen, Wu, Chung, Liu, Tsai, Chang, Chao, Ouzounov et~al.}}?><label>Liu et al.(2020)Liu, Lin, Chen, Wu, Chung, Liu, Tsai, Chang, Chao, Ouzounov et al.</label><?label liu2020?><mixed-citation>Liu, J.-Y., Lin, C.-Y., Chen, Y.-I., Wu, T.-R., Chung, M.-J., Liu, T.-C., Tsai, Y.-L., Chang, L. C., Chao, C.-K., Ouzounov, D., and Hattori, K.: The source detection of 28 September 2018 Sulawesi tsunami by using ionospheric GNSS total electron content disturbance, Geoscience Letters, 7, 1–7, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00160-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40562-020-00160-w</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lorito et~al.(2011)Lorito, Romano, Atzori, Tong, Avallone, McCloskey, Cocco, Boschi, and Piatanesi}}?><label>Lorito et al.(2011)Lorito, Romano, Atzori, Tong, Avallone, McCloskey, Cocco, Boschi, and Piatanesi</label><?label lorito2011limited?><mixed-citation>Lorito, S., Romano, F., Atzori, S., Tong, X., Avallone, A., McCloskey, J., Cocco, M., Boschi, E., and Piatanesi, A.:
Limited overlap between the seismic gap and coseismic slip of the great 2010 Chile earthquake, Nat. Geosci., 4, 173–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1073</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Maeda et~al.(2011)Maeda, Furumura, Sakai, and Shinohara}}?><label>Maeda et al.(2011)Maeda, Furumura, Sakai, and Shinohara</label><?label Maeda2011?><mixed-citation>Maeda, T., Furumura, T., Sakai, S., and Shinohara, M.:
Significant tsunami observed at ocean-bottom pressure gauges during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 63, 53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5047/eps.2011.06.005</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Maruyama et~al.(2011)Maruyama, Tsugawa, Kato, Saito, Otsuka, and Nishioka}}?><label>Maruyama et al.(2011)Maruyama, Tsugawa, Kato, Saito, Otsuka, and Nishioka</label><?label Maruyama2011?><mixed-citation>Maruyama, T., Tsugawa, T., Kato, H., Saito, A., Otsuka, Y., and Nishioka, M.:
Ionospheric multiple stratifications and irregularities induced by the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 63, 65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5047/eps.2011.06.008</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5047/eps.2011.06.008</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ohta et~al.(2012)Ohta, Kobayashi, Tsushima, Miura, Hino, Takasu et~al.}}?><label>Ohta et al.(2012)Ohta, Kobayashi, Tsushima, Miura, Hino, Takasu et al.</label><?label Ohta2012?><mixed-citation>Ohta, Y., Kobayashi, T., Tsushima, H., Miura, S., Hino, R., Takasu, T., Fujimoto, H., Iinuma, T., Tachibana, K., Demachi, T., Sato, T., Ohzono, M., and Umino, N.: Quasi real-time fault model estimation for near-field tsunami forecasting based on RTK-GPS analysis: Application to the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.0), J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, B02311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008750" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JB008750</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Okada(1985)}}?><label>Okada(1985)</label><?label okada1985surface?><mixed-citation>Okada, Y.:
Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 75, 1135–1154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0750041135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/BSSA0750041135</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rasmussen and Williams(2006)}}?><label>Rasmussen and Williams(2006)</label><?label Williams2006?><mixed-citation>Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K. I.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, <uri>https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/gaussian-processes-machine-learning</uri> (last access: 8 March 2021), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rue et~al.(2009)Rue, Martino, and Chopin}}?><label>Rue et al.(2009)Rue, Martino, and Chopin</label><?label rue2009approximate?><mixed-citation>Rue, H., Martino, S., and Chopin, N.:
Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 71, 319–392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{A.~Saito et~al.(2011){Saito}, Tsugawa, Otsuka, Nishioka, Iyemori, Matsumura et~al.}}?><label>A. Saito et al.(2011)Saito, Tsugawa, Otsuka, Nishioka, Iyemori, Matsumura et al.</label><?label Saito2011?><mixed-citation>Saito, A., Tsugawa, T., Otsuka, Y., Nishioka, M., Iyemori, T., Matsumura, M., Saito, S. and Chen, C. H. and Goi, Y., and Choosakul, N.: Acoustic resonance and plasma depletion detected by GPS total electron content observation after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 63, 863–867, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5047/eps.2011.06.034</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{T.~Saito et~al.(2011){Saito}, Ito, Inazu, and Hino}}?><label>T. Saito et al.(2011)Saito, Ito, Inazu, and Hino</label><?label Saito2011tsunami?><mixed-citation>Saito, T., Ito, Y., Inazu, D., and Hino, R.: Tsunami source of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, Japan: Inversion analysis based on dispersive tsunami simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L00G19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049089</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Salmanidou et~al.(2021)Salmanidou, Beck, Pazak, and Guillas}}?><label>Salmanidou et al.(2021)Salmanidou, Beck, Pazak, and Guillas</label><?label salmanidou2021?><mixed-citation>Salmanidou, D. M., Beck, J., Pazak, P., and Guillas, S.: Probabilistic, high-resolution tsunami predictions in northern Cascadia by exploiting sequential design for efficient emulation, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3789–3807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3789-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-21-3789-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Satake et~al.(2013)Satake, Nishimura, Putra, Gusman, Sunendar, Fujii, Tanioka, Latief, and Yulianto}}?><label>Satake et al.(2013)Satake, Nishimura, Putra, Gusman, Sunendar, Fujii, Tanioka, Latief, and Yulianto</label><?label satake2013tsunami?><mixed-citation>Satake, K., Nishimura, Y., Putra, P. S., Gusman, A. R., Sunendar, H., Fujii, Y., Tanioka, Y., Latief, H., and Yulianto, E.:
Tsunami source of the 2010 Mentawai, Indonesia earthquake inferred from tsunami field survey and waveform modeling, Pure Appl. Geophys., 170, 1567–1582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0536-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00024-012-0536-y</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sato et~al.(2017)Sato, Tanabe, Murase, Tominari, and Kawai}}?><label>Sato et al.(2017)Sato, Tanabe, Murase, Tominari, and Kawai</label><?label sato2017application?><mixed-citation>Sato, F., Tanabe, T., Murase, H., Tominari, M., and Kawai, M.:
Application of a wearable GPS unit for examining interindividual distances in a herd of Thoroughbred dams and their foals, Journal of Equine Science, 28, 13–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.28.13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1294/jes.28.13</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shinagawa et~al.(2013)Shinagawa, Tsugawa, Matsumura, Iyemori, Saito, Maruyama et~al.}}?><label>Shinagawa et al.(2013)Shinagawa, Tsugawa, Matsumura, Iyemori, Saito, Maruyama et al.</label><?label Shinagawa2013?><mixed-citation>Shinagawa, H., Tsugawa, T., Matsumura, M., Iyemori, T., Saito, A., Maruyama, T., Jin, H., Nishioka, M., and Otsuka, Y.: Two-dimensional simulation of ionospheric variations in the vicinity of the epicenter of the Tohoku-oki earthquake on 11 March 2011, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5009–5013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057627" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL057627</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Takagawa and Tomita(2012)}}?><label>Takagawa and Tomita(2012)</label><?label takagawa2012?><mixed-citation>
Takagawa, T. and Tomita, T.: Effects of Rupture Processes In an Inverse Analysis On the Tsunami Source of the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake, in: The Twenty-second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 17–22 June 2012, Rhodes, Greece,
ISBN 978-1-880653-94-4, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tanioka and Gusman(2018)}}?><label>Tanioka and Gusman(2018)</label><?label tanioka2018near?><mixed-citation>Tanioka, Y. and Gusman, A. R.:
Near-field tsunami inundation forecast method assimilating ocean bottom pressure data: A synthetic test for the 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunami, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 283, 82–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.08.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pepi.2018.08.006</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{The Japanese government(2022)}}?><label>The Japanese government(2022)</label><?label Japanese2022?><mixed-citation>The Japanese government: Japan Association of Surveyors website,
<uri>https://jsurvey.jp/eng.htm</uri>, last access: 8 March 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tsugawa et~al.(2011)Tsugawa, Saito, Otsuka, Nishioka, Maruyama, Kato et~al.}}?><label>Tsugawa et al.(2011)Tsugawa, Saito, Otsuka, Nishioka, Maruyama, Kato et al.</label><?label Tsugawa2011?><mixed-citation>Tsugawa, T., Saito, A., Otsuka, Y., Nishioka, M., Maruyama, T., Kato, H., Nagatsuma, T., and Murata, K. T.: Ionospheric disturbances detected by GPS total electron content observation after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 63, 875–879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5047/eps.2011.06.035</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vernon et~al.(2014)Vernon, Goldstein, and Bower}}?><label>Vernon et al.(2014)Vernon, Goldstein, and Bower</label><?label vernon2014?><mixed-citation>Vernon, I., Goldstein, M., and Bower, R.: Galaxy formation: Bayesian history matching for the observable universe, Stat. Sci., 29, 81–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1214/12-STS412" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1214/12-STS412</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{W\"{a}chter et~al.(2012)W{\"{a}}chter, Babeyko, Fleischer, H{\"{a}}ner, Hammitzsch, Kloth, and Lendholt}}?><label>Wächter et al.(2012)Wächter, Babeyko, Fleischer, Häner, Hammitzsch, Kloth, and Lendholt</label><?label wachter2012development?><mixed-citation>Wächter, J., Babeyko, A., Fleischer, J., Häner, R., Hammitzsch, M., Kloth, A., and Lendholt, M.: Development of tsunami early warning systems and future challenges, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1923–1935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1923-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-12-1923-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et~al.(2019)Wang, Maeda, Satake, Heidarzadeh, Su, Sheehan, and Gusman}}?><label>Wang et al.(2019)Wang, Maeda, Satake, Heidarzadeh, Su, Sheehan, and Gusman</label><?label wang2019tsunami?><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Maeda, T., Satake, K., Heidarzadeh, M., Su, H., Sheehan, A., and Gusman, A.:
Tsunami data assimilation without a dense observation network, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 2045–2053, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080930" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL080930</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zettergren and Snively(2019)}}?><label>Zettergren and Snively(2019)</label><?label Zettergren2019?><mixed-citation>Zettergren, M. and Snively, J.:
Latitude and Longitude Dependence of Ionospheric TEC and Magnetic Perturbations From Infrasonic-Acoustic Waves Generated by Strong Seismic Events, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 1132–1140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081569" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL081569</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zettergren et~al.(2017)Zettergren, Snively, Komjathy, and Verkhoglyadova}}?><label>Zettergren et al.(2017)Zettergren, Snively, Komjathy, and Verkhoglyadova</label><?label Zettergren2017?><mixed-citation>Zettergren, M., Snively, J., Komjathy, A., and Verkhoglyadova, O.:
Nonlinear ionospheric responses to large-amplitude infrasonic-acoustic waves generated by undersea earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 2272–2291, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JA023159</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Robust uncertainty quantification of the volume of tsunami ionospheric holes for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake:  towards low-cost satellite-based tsunami warning systems</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Amato et al.(2021)Amato, Avallone, Basili, Bernardi, Brizuela, Graziani, Herrero, Lorenzino, Lorito, Mele et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Amato, A., Avallone, A., Basili, R., Bernardi, F., Brizuela, B., Graziani, L., Herrero, A., Lorenzino, M. C., Lorito, S., Mele, F. M., Michelini, A., Piatanesi, A., Pintore, S., Romano, F., Selva, J., Stramondo, S., Tonini, R., and and Volpe, M.: From Seismic Monitoring to Tsunami Warning in the Mediterranean Sea, Seismol. Res. Lett., 92, 1796–1816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200437</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Astafyeva et al.(2013)Astafyeva, Shalimov, Olshanskaya, and Lognonné</label><mixed-citation>
Astafyeva, E., Shalimov, S., Olshanskaya, E., and Lognonné, P.:
Ionospheric response to earthquakes of different magnitudes: Larger quakes perturb the ionosphere stronger and longer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1675–1681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50398</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bernard and Titov(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Bernard, E. and Titov, V.:
Evolution of tsunami warning systems and products, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 373, 20140371, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0371" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0371</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Brynjarsdóttir and O'Hagan(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Brynjarsdóttir, J. and O'Hagan, A.: Learning about physical parameters: The importance of model discrepancy, Inverse Probl., 30, 114007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Chang et al.(2015)Chang, Guillas, and Fioletov</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, K.-L., Guillas, S., and Fioletov, V. E.: Spatial mapping of ground-based observations of total ozone, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4487–4505, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4487-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4487-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Cover and Hart(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
Cover, T. and Hart, P.:
Nearest neighbor pattern classification, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 13, 21–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964</a>, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Giles et al.(2021)Giles, Gopinathan, Guillas, and Dias</label><mixed-citation>
Giles, D., Gopinathan, D., Guillas, S., and Dias, F.:
Faster than real time tsunami warning with associated hazard uncertainties, Front. Earth Sci., 8, 560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.597865" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.597865</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Grilli et al.(2013)Grilli, Harris, Bakhsh, Masterlark, Kyriakopoulos, Kirby, and Shi</label><mixed-citation>
Grilli, S. T., Harris, J. C., Bakhsh, T. S. T., Masterlark, T. L., Kyriakopoulos, C., Kirby, J. T., and Shi, F.:
Numerical simulation of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami based on a new transient FEM co-seismic source: Comparison to far-and near-field observations, Pure Appl. Geophys., 170, 1333–1359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0528-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0528-y</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Hatanaka(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Hatanaka, Y.: RNXCMP software, Geospatial Information Authority of Japan [code], <a href="https://terras.gsi.go.jp/ja/crx2rnx.html" target="_blank"/>, last access: 8 March 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Heki(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
Heki, K.: L4 generation from RINEX observation data file and Satellite position calculation from RINEX orbit data file in Earth-Centered Earth-Fixed system [code], <a href="http://www.ep.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~heki/software.htm" target="_blank"/>, last access: 8 March 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Heki and Ping(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Heki, K. and Ping, J.:
Directivity and apparent velocity of the coseismic ionospheric disturbances observed with a dense GPS array, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 236, 845–855, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.010</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Kakinami et al.(2012)Kakinami, Kamogawa, Tanioka, Watanabe, Gusman, Liu et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Kakinami, Y., Kamogawa, M., Tanioka, Y., Watanabe, S., Gusman, A. R., Liu, J.-Y., Watanabe, Y., and Mogi, T.: Tsunamigenic ionospheric hole, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L00G27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050159</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Kamogawa et al.(2016)Kamogawa, Orihara, Tsurudome, Tomida, Kanaya, Ikeda et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Kamogawa, M., Orihara, Y., Tsurudome, C., Tomida, Y., Kanaya, T., Ikeda, D., Gusman, A. R., Kakinami, Y., Liu, J.-Y., and Toyoda, A.: A possible space-based tsunami early warning system using observations of the tsunami ionospheric hole, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 37989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37989" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37989</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Lay et al.(2011)Lay, Ammon, Kanamori, Yamazaki, Cheung, and Hutko</label><mixed-citation>
Lay, T., Ammon, C. J., Kanamori, H., Yamazaki, Y., Cheung, K. F., and Hutko, A. R.: The 25 October 2010 Mentawai tsunami earthquake (M<sub>w</sub> 7.8) and the tsunami hazard presented by shallow megathrust ruptures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046552</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Lindgren et al.(2011)Lindgren, Rue, and Lindström</label><mixed-citation>
Lindgren, F., Rue, H., and Lindström, J.:
An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 73, 423–498, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Liu et al.(2019)Liu, Lin, Tsai, Liu, Hattori, Sun, and Wu</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J.-Y., Lin, C.-Y., Tsai, Y.-L., Liu, T.-C., Hattori, K., Sun, Y.-Y., and Wu, T.-R.:
Ionospheric GNSS total electron content for tsunami warning, J. Earthq. Tsunami, 13, 1941007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431119410070" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431119410070</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Liu et al.(2020)Liu, Lin, Chen, Wu, Chung, Liu, Tsai, Chang, Chao, Ouzounov et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J.-Y., Lin, C.-Y., Chen, Y.-I., Wu, T.-R., Chung, M.-J., Liu, T.-C., Tsai, Y.-L., Chang, L. C., Chao, C.-K., Ouzounov, D., and Hattori, K.: The source detection of 28 September 2018 Sulawesi tsunami by using ionospheric GNSS total electron content disturbance, Geoscience Letters, 7, 1–7, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00160-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00160-w</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Lorito et al.(2011)Lorito, Romano, Atzori, Tong, Avallone, McCloskey, Cocco, Boschi, and Piatanesi</label><mixed-citation>
Lorito, S., Romano, F., Atzori, S., Tong, X., Avallone, A., McCloskey, J., Cocco, M., Boschi, E., and Piatanesi, A.:
Limited overlap between the seismic gap and coseismic slip of the great 2010 Chile earthquake, Nat. Geosci., 4, 173–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1073</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Maeda et al.(2011)Maeda, Furumura, Sakai, and Shinohara</label><mixed-citation>
Maeda, T., Furumura, T., Sakai, S., and Shinohara, M.:
Significant tsunami observed at ocean-bottom pressure gauges during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 63, 53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.005</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Maruyama et al.(2011)Maruyama, Tsugawa, Kato, Saito, Otsuka, and Nishioka</label><mixed-citation>
Maruyama, T., Tsugawa, T., Kato, H., Saito, A., Otsuka, Y., and Nishioka, M.:
Ionospheric multiple stratifications and irregularities induced by the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 63, 65, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.008</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Ohta et al.(2012)Ohta, Kobayashi, Tsushima, Miura, Hino, Takasu et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Ohta, Y., Kobayashi, T., Tsushima, H., Miura, S., Hino, R., Takasu, T., Fujimoto, H., Iinuma, T., Tachibana, K., Demachi, T., Sato, T., Ohzono, M., and Umino, N.: Quasi real-time fault model estimation for near-field tsunami forecasting based on RTK-GPS analysis: Application to the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake (<i>M</i><sub>w</sub>&thinsp;9.0), J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, B02311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008750" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008750</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Okada(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Okada, Y.:
Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 75, 1135–1154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0750041135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0750041135</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Rasmussen and Williams(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K. I.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, <a href="https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/gaussian-processes-machine-learning" target="_blank"/> (last access: 8 March 2021), 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Rue et al.(2009)Rue, Martino, and Chopin</label><mixed-citation>
Rue, H., Martino, S., and Chopin, N.:
Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 71, 319–392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>A. Saito et al.(2011)Saito, Tsugawa, Otsuka, Nishioka, Iyemori, Matsumura et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Saito, A., Tsugawa, T., Otsuka, Y., Nishioka, M., Iyemori, T., Matsumura, M., Saito, S. and Chen, C. H. and Goi, Y., and Choosakul, N.: Acoustic resonance and plasma depletion detected by GPS total electron content observation after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 63, 863–867, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.034</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>T. Saito et al.(2011)Saito, Ito, Inazu, and Hino</label><mixed-citation>
Saito, T., Ito, Y., Inazu, D., and Hino, R.: Tsunami source of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, Japan: Inversion analysis based on dispersive tsunami simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L00G19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049089</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Salmanidou et al.(2021)Salmanidou, Beck, Pazak, and Guillas</label><mixed-citation>
Salmanidou, D. M., Beck, J., Pazak, P., and Guillas, S.: Probabilistic, high-resolution tsunami predictions in northern Cascadia by exploiting sequential design for efficient emulation, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3789–3807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3789-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3789-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Satake et al.(2013)Satake, Nishimura, Putra, Gusman, Sunendar, Fujii, Tanioka, Latief, and Yulianto</label><mixed-citation>
Satake, K., Nishimura, Y., Putra, P. S., Gusman, A. R., Sunendar, H., Fujii, Y., Tanioka, Y., Latief, H., and Yulianto, E.:
Tsunami source of the 2010 Mentawai, Indonesia earthquake inferred from tsunami field survey and waveform modeling, Pure Appl. Geophys., 170, 1567–1582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0536-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0536-y</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Sato et al.(2017)Sato, Tanabe, Murase, Tominari, and Kawai</label><mixed-citation>
Sato, F., Tanabe, T., Murase, H., Tominari, M., and Kawai, M.:
Application of a wearable GPS unit for examining interindividual distances in a herd of Thoroughbred dams and their foals, Journal of Equine Science, 28, 13–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.28.13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.28.13</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Shinagawa et al.(2013)Shinagawa, Tsugawa, Matsumura, Iyemori, Saito, Maruyama et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Shinagawa, H., Tsugawa, T., Matsumura, M., Iyemori, T., Saito, A., Maruyama, T., Jin, H., Nishioka, M., and Otsuka, Y.: Two-dimensional simulation of ionospheric variations in the vicinity of the epicenter of the Tohoku-oki earthquake on 11 March 2011, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5009–5013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057627" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057627</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Takagawa and Tomita(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Takagawa, T. and Tomita, T.: Effects of Rupture Processes In an Inverse Analysis On the Tsunami Source of the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake, in: The Twenty-second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 17–22 June 2012, Rhodes, Greece,
ISBN 978-1-880653-94-4, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Tanioka and Gusman(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Tanioka, Y. and Gusman, A. R.:
Near-field tsunami inundation forecast method assimilating ocean bottom pressure data: A synthetic test for the 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunami, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 283, 82–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.08.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.08.006</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>The Japanese government(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
The Japanese government: Japan Association of Surveyors website,
<a href="https://jsurvey.jp/eng.htm" target="_blank"/>, last access: 8 March 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Tsugawa et al.(2011)Tsugawa, Saito, Otsuka, Nishioka, Maruyama, Kato et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Tsugawa, T., Saito, A., Otsuka, Y., Nishioka, M., Maruyama, T., Kato, H., Nagatsuma, T., and Murata, K. T.: Ionospheric disturbances detected by GPS total electron content observation after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 63, 875–879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.035</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Vernon et al.(2014)Vernon, Goldstein, and Bower</label><mixed-citation>
Vernon, I., Goldstein, M., and Bower, R.: Galaxy formation: Bayesian history matching for the observable universe, Stat. Sci., 29, 81–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1214/12-STS412" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1214/12-STS412</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Wächter et al.(2012)Wächter, Babeyko, Fleischer, Häner, Hammitzsch, Kloth, and Lendholt</label><mixed-citation>
Wächter, J., Babeyko, A., Fleischer, J., Häner, R., Hammitzsch, M., Kloth, A., and Lendholt, M.: Development of tsunami early warning systems and future challenges, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1923–1935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1923-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1923-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Wang et al.(2019)Wang, Maeda, Satake, Heidarzadeh, Su, Sheehan, and Gusman</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Maeda, T., Satake, K., Heidarzadeh, M., Su, H., Sheehan, A., and Gusman, A.:
Tsunami data assimilation without a dense observation network, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 2045–2053, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080930" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080930</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Zettergren and Snively(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Zettergren, M. and Snively, J.:
Latitude and Longitude Dependence of Ionospheric TEC and Magnetic Perturbations From Infrasonic-Acoustic Waves Generated by Strong Seismic Events, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 1132–1140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081569" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081569</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Zettergren et al.(2017)Zettergren, Snively, Komjathy, and Verkhoglyadova</label><mixed-citation>
Zettergren, M., Snively, J., Komjathy, A., and Verkhoglyadova, O.:
Nonlinear ionospheric responses to large-amplitude infrasonic-acoustic waves generated by undersea earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 2272–2291, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023159</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
