<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NHESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NHESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1684-9981</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/nhess-2-137-2002</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Snow fences on slopes at high wind speed: physical modelling in the CSTB cold wind tunnel</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Naaim-Bouvet</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Naaim</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Michaux</surname>
<given-names>J.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Cemagref, Torrent and Avalanche Research Unit, 2 rue de la Papeterie, BP 76, F-38402 Saint-Martin-d’Hères, France</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2002</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2</volume>
<issue>3/4</issue>
<fpage>137</fpage>
<lpage>145</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2002 F. Naaim-Bouvet et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2002</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/2/137/2002/nhess-2-137-2002.html">This article is available from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/2/137/2002/nhess-2-137-2002.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/2/137/2002/nhess-2-137-2002.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/2/137/2002/nhess-2-137-2002.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>In order to determine the effect of
      steep slopes on snowdrift generated by snow fences, we have conducted
      physical modeling experiments in the CSTB (Centre Scientifique et
      Technique du Bâtiment) cold wind tunnel as part of the European project
      &amp;quot;Access to Large Facilities&amp;quot;. After an overview of previous
      studies and an accurate description of the drifting snow process inside
      the experimental chamber,&amp;nbsp; we present the main results obtained. (1)
      On flat areas, even for high wind speed, the acknowledged results for
      moderate wind are still valid: the porous snow fence (50%) is the most
      efficacious and the bottom gap increases the efficacy of the dense snow
      fence. (2) The steeper the slope is, the less effective all tested snow
      fences are. Their effectiveness decreases considerably: the snow catch is
      approximately divided by two for a slope of 10°. (3) Contrary to flat
      areas, on steep slopes, the &amp;quot;efficacy&amp;quot; is greater for a dense
      snow fence.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="9"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>