<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NHESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NHESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1684-9981</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/nhess-17-861-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>High-resolution modelling of atmospheric dispersion<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> of dense gas using TWODEE-2.1: application to the<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 1986 Lake Nyos limnic eruption</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Nyos limnic eruption}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Folch et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Folch</surname><given-names>Arnau</given-names></name>
          <email>afolch@bsc.es</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0677-6366</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Barcons</surname><given-names>Jordi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-1986</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kozono</surname><given-names>Tomofumi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>Antonio</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4987-6471</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>CASE Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Geophysics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Arnau Folch (afolch@bsc.es)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>13</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>861</fpage><lpage>879</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>October</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>May</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017.html">This article is available from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Atmospheric dispersal of a gas denser than
air can threat the environment and surrounding communities if the terrain and
meteorological conditions favour its accumulation in topographic depressions,
thereby reaching toxic concentration levels. Numerical modelling of
atmospheric gas dispersion constitutes a useful tool for gas hazard
assessment studies, essential for planning risk mitigation actions. In
complex terrains, microscale winds and local orographic features can have a
strong influence on the gas cloud behaviour, potentially leading to
inaccurate results if not captured by coarser-scale modelling. We introduce a
methodology for microscale wind field characterisation based on transfer
functions that couple a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model with a
microscale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model for the atmospheric
boundary layer. The resulting time-dependent high-resolution microscale wind
field is used as input for a shallow-layer gas dispersal model (TWODEE-2.1)
to simulate the time evolution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas concentration at different
heights above the terrain. The strategy is applied to review simulations of
the 1986 Lake Nyos event in Cameroon, where a huge CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud released by a
limnic eruption spread downslopes from the lake, suffocating thousands of
people and animals across the Nyos and adjacent secondary valleys. Besides
several new features introduced in the new version of the gas dispersal code
(TWODEE-2.1), we have also implemented a novel impact criterion based on the
percentage of human fatalities depending on CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and exposure
time. New model results are quantitatively validated using the reported
percentage of fatalities at several locations. The comparison with previous
simulations that assumed coarser-scale steady winds and topography
illustrates the importance of high-resolution modelling in complex terrains.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The atmospheric dispersion of gases (of natural, accidental or intentional
origins) can be very hazardous to life and the environment. In industry,
historic examples of tragic accidents include the dioxin release in Seveso
(Italy, 1976), the methyl isocyanate in Bophal (India, 1984), or the
petroleum gas explosions in Mexico City (Mexico, 1984), among several others
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. From the point of view of natural hazards, cold
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas released from natural Earth degassing can be of concern because,
being denser than air at standard temperature and pressure, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas
clouds hug the ground and spread downslopes governed by local topography and
near-surface winds. Under particular conditions (e.g. atmospheric stability),
gas can accumulate in topographic depressions reaching concentration levels
toxic for humans and animals. For example, many gas manifestations in Central
and Southern Italy, characterised by persistent CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, have
caused several periodic accidents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.2"/>. Another case of
natural origin, much rarer than diffuse emissions but potentially much more
hazardous, are limnic eruptions triggered during overturning of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich
volcanic lakes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, such as the eruptions that occurred
at lakes Monoun and Nyos (Cameroon) in 1984 and 1986, respectively.</p>
      <p>The most tragic event occurred on 21 August 1986 at Lake Nyos, when a
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas cloud spread across the surrounding valleys, suffocating
inhabitants and animals. On the 30th anniversary of this disaster, the
Commission on Volcanic Lakes of the International Association of Volcanology
and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior (IAVCEI) organised the workshop
“CVL9-Cameroon” (Yaounde, 14–20 March 2016) to gather scientific experts
from several disciplines with the objective of reviewing the groundbreaking
research advances in that field and discuss future road maps for research and
risk assessment and mitigation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.4"/>. One of the outcomes from
this workshop was that, despite the successful mitigation measures taken at
these two lakes (e.g. installation of degassing pipes, relocation of local
communities to safer settlements) reducing the level of hazard notably, there
is not yet a quantitative hazard assessment from volcanic lakes in Cameroon
or elsewhere in Africa (e.g. Lake Kivu in Democratic Republic of Congo and
Rwanda). In this regard, dense gas dispersal simulations and characterisation
of eruption/gas emission scenarios constitute the backbone of a probabilistic
quantitative hazard assessment.</p>
      <p>Few studies have been conducted to simulate atmospheric dispersion of dense
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> clouds from natural Earth degassing
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.
In particular, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.6"/> have recently used the TWODEE-2.0 model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.7"/> to simulate the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud from the 21 August
1986 Lake Nyos limnic eruption by considering various scenarios for cloud volume
and eruption duration estimated from previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.8"/>. For their simulations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.9"/> considered a
digital terrain elevation model with a resolution of 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Results
evidenced the strong effect of the topography and local wind field, leading
to different gas flow patterns across the different valleys of the complex
topography of the area. Despite some scenarios could reproduce lethal CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in many of the sites where fatalities did actually occur,
these simulations were unable to capture the full dispersal pattern given
some model limitations including, but not limited to, steady winds and gas
emission rates or insufficient accuracy of near-surface winds. This later
aspect is particularly critical on very complex terrains, where local-scale
(tens of metres) wind patterns and the resolution of the digital elevation
model (DEM) can have a strong influence on model results.</p>
      <p>Based on all these previous considerations, the objective of this paper is to
address high-resolution (tens of metres) numerical modelling of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
atmospheric dispersal in complex terrains. To this purpose, we introduce a
methodology for local wind field characterisation based on transfer functions
that couple mesoscale numerical weather prediction (NWP) models with a
microscale Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) computational fluid
dynamics (CFD) model for the atmospheric boundary layer. The resulting
high-resolution time-dependent wind field is given as input to the TWODEE
shallow-layer gas dispersal model to simulate the evolution of gas
concentration with time at different heights above the terrain. In addition
to coupling with mesoscale/microscale 4-D meteorological models,
the TWODEE-2.0 code has been improved (updated to version 2.1) in order to
overcome a few limitations, including the option to easily describe
time-dependent gas sources, heterogeneous terrain roughness, and assessment
of the impact through a novel probabilistic approach that estimates the
percentage of fatalities depending on gas concentration and exposure time
(dose) at near-ground levels. The new version of the code is applied to
reconstruct gas dispersion from the 1986 Lake Nyos event compared with
previous simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.10"/>, and results are used to illustrate
the model gain on the time evolution of the gas source.</p>
      <p>In this paper, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> overviews the main
characteristics of the TWODEE model and the modifications introduced to
account for heterogeneous high-resolution 4-D wind fields, time-dependent
source term, and terrain variable roughness. The new probabilistic impact
criterion for TWODEE model validation is also presented. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> summarises the events occurred at Lake Nyos and surroundings
during 21 and 22 August 1986 and the results (and limitations) from previous
simulation studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.11"/>. A novel strategy for high-resolution
local wind field characterisation on very complex terrains is presented on
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>. The methodology uses the concept of transfer
functions to couple the mesoscale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.12"/> model with the CFD code Alya <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.13"/>
adapted to atmospheric boundary layer flows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.14"/>. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> shows the TWODEE-2.1 model results for the 1986 Lake Nyos
case of study and discusses how and why the model new features increase the
accuracy of simulations. In addition, we also perform a model parametric
study varying the source term to constrain its intensity, evolution, and
duration. Finally, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/> summarises and discusses the
main results and future developments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>The TWODEE dense gas dispersal model</title>
      <p>TWODEE-2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.15"/> is a FORTRAN90 code for the
atmospheric dispersal of dense gases based on the shallow-layer approach.
Under the assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being the gas cloud depth and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> a
characteristic length), the 2-D shallow-layer approach allows a compromise
between more realistic but computationally demanding 3-D CFD models and
simpler 1-D integral models. The TWODEE family models build on the depth-averaged equations for a gas cloud resulting from mixing a gas of density
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an ambient fluid (air) of density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The integration of volume, mass, and momentum balance equations over the
mixed cloud depth from the ground to the top of the cloud yields to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.16"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M20" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>⊗</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the cloud depth (defined as the height below which 95 % of
the buoyancy is located), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the depth-averaged cloud
density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
depth-averaged cloud velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
ambient fluid (air) velocity vector, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ambient fluid
entrainment velocity modulus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas inflow velocity
modulus (source term), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the terrain elevation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is a drag coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the turbulent shear stress force (per
unit area), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are semi-empirical parameters.
The terms in the momentum equation (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) include the local time
derivative, the convective term, the pressure gradient (assumed hydrostatic
although the density profile can be non-uniform), the effect of terrain
slope, the surface shear stress (depending on the terrain roughness and
characterised by the drag coefficient), the force per unit area exerted by
turbulent shear stress, and, finally, the leading edge terms that account for
interaction among dense and ambient fluids. Given closure equations for the
drag coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, shear stress force <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
entrainment velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.17"/>, the set of
equations above can be resolved numerically to obtain cloud height and
vertically averaged density and velocity depending on terrain, source term
(definition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and ambient fluid velocity (wind field).
Although TWODEE is a shallow water model, it can also estimate the vertical
density profile from the depth-averaged density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> assuming an
empirical exponential decay <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.18"/>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M37" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        from which the vertical concentration profile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (expressed in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the dosage <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Do</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during a time interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
can be computed as

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Do</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the background concentration (in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the so-called toxicity exponent.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>TWODEE-2.1</title>
      <p>The TWODEE code version 2.0 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.19"/> has been improved so that the
upgraded version 2.1 can deal with the following:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p>It can handle time-dependent heterogeneous wind fields furnished by mesoscale or microscale wind models. The previous code version admitted only a steady homogenous
wind profile or heterogeneous wind fields furnished by a meteorological
processor (included in the code distribution package) based on a diagnostic
wind model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="post">DWM</named-content></xref>. The DWM generates a gridded wind field
from input data (observations) at a point of the domain by adjusting the
domain-scale mean wind for terrain effects and performing a divergence
minimisation to ensure mass conservation. This implies an obvious limitation
if winds vary (e.g. during long-lasting emissions) or in very complex
terrains or large domains, where the winds adjusted by DWM can be notably
different depending on the location of the points where observations are
available. In contrast, the updated TWODEE code version can read outputs from
either the WRF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.21"/> mesoscale model (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>) or from CFD microscale model simulations. In the case of
WRF, a meteorological pre-processor reads the WRF model outputs for a
user-defined time interval (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> WRF output time steps) and performs an
interpolation from the WRF native grid (Arakawa staggered C grid in the
horizontal, pressure levels for the vertical) to a series of user-defined z
cuts on a terrain-following regular grid. In the case of microscale
simulations, the meteorological pre-processor reads outputs from the
ALYA-CFDWind model (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>) and, for each WRF time slice,
performs the mesoscale-to-microscale downscaling using
transfer functions as explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>. This results in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
downscaled wind fields on the same set of terrain-following z cuts. Whichever
the approach considered for the wind field (i.e. mesoscale WRF or WRF
downscaled with ALYA-CFDWind), TWODEE-2.1 reads winds
at the gridded z cuts and then interpolates to its computational mesh at a
user-defined reference height.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>TWODEE-2.1 can easily handle multiple point sources or time-dependent source terms by
using piece-wise constant pulses of arbitrary duration (the previous version had to use the “restart” option).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>It can deal with multiple input file formats for DEMs and terrain roughness. In addition, the model output has also
been generalized including netCDF and kml output file formats.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>It can assess the impact  of dense CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas dispersal.  According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
the long-term exposure limit (LTEL) of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is set at air concentrations of 0.5 % (5000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for exposures up to 8 h per day,
whereas the short-term exposure limit (STEL) is set at air concentrations of  3 % (30 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for exposures up to 15 min.
However, at higher concentrations/dosage, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> causes several adverse health effects when inhaled. Experience shows that CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> air
concentrations of around 5 % (50 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) produce heavy breathing, sweating, quicker pulse, weak narcotic effects, and headaches.
Under these concentrations, the exposure time to avoid the development of adverse health symptoms is only a few minutes. For example,
a 30 min exposure to 5 % concentration (50 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) produces intoxication manifested as headaches, dizziness, restlessness,
breathlessness, increased heart rate and blood pressure, and visual distortion. At around 10 % concentration (100 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
humans are affected by respiratory distress, impaired hearing, nausea, vomiting, and loss of consciousness in only 10 min.
Finally,
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> air concentrations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 % (150 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are considered lethal causing coma, convulsions, and rapid death. The UK
Health and Safety Executive (HSE; <uri>http://www.hse.gov.uk</uri>) developed an assessment of dangerous toxic substances, including CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, defining
the specified level of toxicity (SLOT) and the significant likelihood of death (SLOD) depending on concentration and duration of
exposure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.22"/>. Considering these values <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.23"/>, we assume a cumulative normal distribution for the
percentage of human fatalities:<disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M61" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>erf</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the probability of death, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
(expressed in %), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the exposure duration (expressed in minutes), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are empirical constants. After calibration of
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) with the HSE tabulated values (assuming SLOT at 3 %), we
obtained the following values for the constants: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.056</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.885</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.357</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.662</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.421</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.354</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Results are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, plotting the percentage of fatalities (probability
of death in %) as a function of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration for different exposure
durations. An impact criterion based on these empirical curves was added in
TWODEE-2.1 to compute, at each point of the computational domain, the
predicted percentage of fatalities at user-defined heights.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Percentage of fatalities (probability of death in %) depending on
exposure duration (in min) according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>). Values are shown
for different values of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration ranging from 7 to 14 %
vol.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>The 1986 Lake Nyos event and previous modelling results</title>
      <p>Lake Nyos (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) is one of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 volcanic
lakes scattered along the 1600 km long Cameroon Volcanic Line
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This lake became famous worldwide on Thursday
21 August 1986 after the occurrence of the most tragic limnic eruption ever
registered. During few (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5) hours, a huge (0.1–1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
gas cloud <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.25"/> released during the Lake
Nyos overturning spread downslopes from the lake (1100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
filling up the underlying Nyos valley and suffocating around 1700 people and
3000 cattle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.26"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Evidence from eyewitness reports
indicated that the cloud was directed primarily W-NW at around 21:00 LT
(20:00 UTC) affecting the bottom valleys of Cha and Fang (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>), but without causing reported deaths at the latter
location <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.27"/>. Following this initial dispersal phase, the gas
cloud direction shifted towards NE, probably as a consequence of a sudden
wind veer, filling up the Nyos valley down to the Subum village
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> line of sight from the lake), where the largest number
of casualties occurred. Deaths in humans and animals (including birds)
occurred at a distance of up to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> across the main and adjacent
secondary valleys <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.28"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Map of Cameroon showing the Lake Nyos area (red square).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Topographic map of the area around Lake Nyos showing elevation
contours (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> a.s.l.). The locations listed in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> are shown by halved circles coloured according the
percentage of fatalities (in %) reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.29"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>List of affected points with coordinates and percentage of observed
fatalities. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coordinates are in UTM zone 32N (datum WGS84). Points
starting with an L have been digitalised from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.30"/>; points
starting with an N were obtained by the authors after interviewing survivors
in situ. Comments as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.31"/> in their Table 1.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Point</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">long</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">lat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fatalities</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Comments</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">641 523</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">712 595</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.280</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.445</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">639 726</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">713 051</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.264</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.449</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">642 113</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">713 722</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.285</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.455</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">640 665</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">714 741</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.272</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.465</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">643 829</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">713 105</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.301</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.450</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">643 829</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">714 151</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.301</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.459</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">645 116</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">715 089</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.312</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.468</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">643 989</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">713 588</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.302</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.454</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">645 250</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">714 553</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.314</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.463</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">646 108</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">713 936</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.321</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.457</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">645 625</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">713 668</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.317</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.455</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">645 303</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">713 212</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.314</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.451</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">644 740</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">712 354</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.309</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.443</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">644 526</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">710 719</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.307</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.428</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">A man ran uphill, survived, all cows died</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">644 847</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">710 263</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.310</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.424</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">643 212</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">710 316</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.295</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.425</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Nobody at the compound, 50 cows died, 15 survived</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">644 392</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">709 566</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.306</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.418</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">643 131</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">709 512</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.294</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.417</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">645 411</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">711 121</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.315</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.432</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">641 523</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">715 813</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.280</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.474</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">642 193</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">715 974</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.286</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.476</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">642 756</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">716 296</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.291</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.479</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">642 944</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">711 174</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.293</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.432</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">642 622</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">715 035</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.290</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.467</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Nyos village: 6 lived, 600 died</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">642 113</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">711 174</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.285</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.432</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Upper Nyos: 150 survived, 0 died</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">642 327</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">709 861</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.287</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.420</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">645 303</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">708 493</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.314</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.408</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Several compounds, 40 survived, 0 died</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">635 865</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">716 376</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.229</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.480</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12 people survived</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">635 651</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">716 993</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.227</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.485</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">635 168</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">716 564</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.222</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.481</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">635 624</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">714 365</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.226</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.461</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3 people lived</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">635 222</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">714 714</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.223</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.464</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">635 195</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">715 277</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.223</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.470</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15 people died</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">636 991</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">715 679</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.239</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.473</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Cha village: 130 survived, 58 died</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">635 329</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">713 936</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.224</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.457</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">649 888</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">719 352</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.356</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.506</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Subum village: 400 lived, 400 died</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">647 341</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">714 499</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.332</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.462</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">647 743</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">714 446</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.336</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.462</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">648 655</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">714 231</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.344</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.460</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">648 199</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">712 408</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.340</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.443</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">647 556</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">711 496</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.334</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.435</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Mgombe: 160 lived</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">647 341</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">709 217</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.332</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.415</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Upper Mgombe: 150 lived</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">640 906</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">724 340</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.274</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.551</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">642 622</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">731 794</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.290</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.619</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">635 999</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">720 559</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.230</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.517</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">642 568</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">724 152</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.289</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.550</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">638 305</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">727 235</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.251</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.578</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">641 549</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">728 844</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.280</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.592</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">L49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">640 557</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">729 756</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.271</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">649 581</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">718 074</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.353</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.495</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">649 581</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">718 136</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.353</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.495</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">649 713</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">718 210</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.354</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.496</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">649 719</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">718 210</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.354</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.496</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.32"/> collected multiple testimonies of survivors that allowed
the authors to reconstruct the timeline of the event, locating where
casualties occurred, and constructing a map of the areas impacted by the
disaster (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and Fig. 1 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.33"/>). It
should be stressed that the percentages of fatalities reported by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.34"/> resulted from posterior interviews by anthropologists and
are subject to large uncertainties related to translation and interpretation,
approximate location of sites, and actual number of casualties.
Notwithstanding these limitations, data inferred from eye witnesses
constitute the only source of information available for indirect model
validation given the lack of any wind or gas concentration measurement at
Nyos on that time. At present, the level of risk at lakes Nyos and Monoun has
decreased notably after the successful deployment of degassing pipes in March
2001 and February 2003, respectively. The progressive gas removal resulted in
considerable deepening of the level of gas-rich water in a short period of
time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.35"/>. However, there is still the recognised
need to perform a quantitative CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> hazard assessment for several
reasons, including the possibility of future gas build-up or a breakthrough
of the dam built at the northern shore of the lake. Thus, for example,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.36"/> estimated that dam break could cause a sudden drop in lake
level by 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by decompression and inevitably a new gas
burst.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Previous modelling results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.37"/> scenario II
(4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of gas emission assuming a constant mass flux of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from a diffuse source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Left: maximum CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (%vol.) achieved
at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> height. Right: percentage of fatalities (in %) predicted by
the model applying Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> height. Halved circles
show the actual reported percentages at locations using the same colour
scale.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.38"/> have recently used the TWODEE-2.0 model to simulate four
different scenarios (released gas mass ranging from 0.29 to 1.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
wrongly reported in their table as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) using a 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution
DEM. Surface wind data resulted from applying the DWM mass-consistent
pre-processor to a constant wind profile extracted from the closest point of
the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis 1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.39"/>. As a result of this
limitation, none of their simulations was able to capture properly the cloud
dispersion pattern, strongly influenced by a sudden wind veering.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows, for illustrative purposes, results for
their scenario II, the one that better reproduced the observations (see
Fig. 5 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.40"/>, for other scenario results). In the following
sections, these previous simulations are revisited considering a higher DEM
accuracy (30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> instead of 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; from ASTER G-DEM, a product
of METI and NASA) and high-resolution transient microscale surface winds
derived from downscaling the Advanced
Research WRF (WRF-ARW) mesoscale winds with the ALYA-CFDWind
model.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>WRF-ARW model configuration and physical parameterisations used for
the 1986 Lake Nyos simulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center">WRF-ARW configuration </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model version</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.4.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Initial and lateral BCs</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NCEP/DOE Reanalysis 2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Domains</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">One parent and four nests</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Horizontal resolutions</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (parent) and 27, 9, 3, and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (nests)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Horizontal grid sizes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">110 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110 (parent) and 136 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 127, 121 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 133, 181 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 166, and 151 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 151 (nests)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical levels</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60 levels, with top at 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation length</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (spin-up of 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time step</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (parent), ratios of 1 : 3 for nests</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameterisation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Scheme</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Microphysics</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WRF single-moment six-class (WSM6) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.41"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cumulus</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Modified Kain–Fritsch (disabled for 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> nest) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.42"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface layer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MM5 Monin–Obukhov</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Land surface</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Unified Noah land surface model (LSM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.43"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Planet boundary layer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.44"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Long-wave radiation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rapid radiative transfer model (RRTM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.45"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Short-wave radiation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dudhia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.46"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Wind field characterisation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Mesoscale wind modelling using WRF-ARW</title>
      <p>The WRF is a fully compressible, nonhydrostatic mesoscale NWP model and
atmospheric simulation system designed to serve both operational forecasting
and atmospheric research needs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.47"/>. The model uses finite
differences schemes on a staggered horizontal Arakawa C grid and a
terrain-following vertical coordinate system to solve the atmospheric flow.
Here, the version 3.4.1 of the dynamical solver WRF-ARW was configured with
the physical parameterisations and schemes summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>
      <p>For the Nyos application, the WRF-ARW simulation starts on Thursday 21 August
1986 at 00:00 UTC lasting 48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (around 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are allowed for
model spin-up). Initial and daily (four times) boundary conditions driving WRF
come from the NCEP/DOE Reanalysis 2. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the
five domains used, consisting of one parent grid at 81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal
resolution, covering the African continent, and four nested domains at 27, 9, 3,
and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolutions, all centred around Lake Nyos. The
regional synoptic situation on Thursday, 21 August 1986 is illustrated in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, showing WRF-ARW results for the first nest domain
(27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution) at different times. It can be observed how a low-pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) region and its cyclonic
circulation located NE of Cameroon coexists with strong winds from both south and
north and a region of weak winds over NW Cameroon at around 16:00 UTC
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a). The simulations indicate that this situation
lasted for about 6 h until 22:00 UTC, when winds over Nyos became
stronger and pointed SE. In contrast, near-surface winds followed a very
different pattern (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) reflecting the topography-induced
forcing at lower atmospheric levels. However, given the orographic
complexity, the WRF-ARW results at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution (inner nest) are
still insufficient for driving high-resolution gas transport simulations,
indicating the need for an ulterior downscaling.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>WRF-ARW domains for the Nyos run. The model configuration consists
of one parent domain (d01) at 81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution and four nests
(d02 to d05) at 27, 9, 3, and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution centred at the Lake Nyos
(red triangle, not on scale). Colour contours indicate the WRF-ARW model
topography at each resolution.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Synoptic meteorological situation according to the WRF-ARW
simulation showing pressure contours (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and wind vectors
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for domain d02 (first nest, 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution
domain) at 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> height above sea level. Results for 21 August 1986
at 16:00 (left), 20:00 (centre), and 24:00 (right) UTC. The red triangle shows
the location of the Nyos Lake. For clarity, only a few model wind vectors are
shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Local meteorological situation according to the WRF-ARW simulation
showing terrain height contours (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> a.s.l.) and wind vectors
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for domain d05 (last nest, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution domain)
at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> above the surface. Results for 21 August 1986 at 16:00
(left), 20:00 (centre), and 24:00 (right) UTC. The red triangle shows the
location of the Nyos Lake. For clarity, only few model wind vectors are
shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Microscale wind modelling using ALYA-CFDWind</title>
      <p>ALYA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> is a high performance computing
(HPC) multi-physics parallel solver based on a finite element method
able to run with thousands of processors with an optimal scalability. Within
this multi-physics general framework, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.49"/> implemented a solver
for the atmospheric boundary layer based on the RANS equations and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> turbulence model
adapted to atmospheric flows in complex terrains. This model, called
ALYA-CFDWind, can handle thermal coupling assuming the Boussinesq
approximation although here we constrain to neutral atmospheric stability for
simplicity. The ALYA-CFDWind module, originally developed in the context of
wind energy, includes Coriolis effects, a consistent limitation of the mixing
length, a wall law for atmospheric boundary layers (logarithmic profile
depending on terrain roughness and wind friction velocity), automatic
meshing,
and generation of boundary conditions for atmospheric boundary layer wind
profiles over a flat terrain. In order to have consistent inflow boundary
conditions (i.e. flat terrain inflow profile) and also to prevent flow
recirculation at the outflow boundary, the ALYA-CFDWind computational domain
is made of an external flat buffer designed to accommodate the flow, an
adjacent transition zone, and an inner higher-resolution zone with the real
topography and where the flow is actually computed.</p>
      <p>For the Nyos case, the ALYA-CFDWind computational domain consists of an inner
zone of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution, a
transition zone of 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a flat buffer zone of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to
accommodate the flow. Along the vertical direction, the structured hexahedral
grid extends up to 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> above the terrain with 64 vertical layers
growing geometrically in size from 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at surface to 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
the top of the computational domain. The resulting computational mesh (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>) has a total number of grid points of about 30 million.
The Coriolis force was set to that of a latitude of 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and the
maximum mixing length was calculated depending on the wind at top as in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.50"/>. As boundary conditions, we prescribed the wind at top
(geostrophic wind) to a reference value of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ms</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> considering
different geostrophic wind directions (sectors) at 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals. One
ALYA-CFDWind simulation was performed for each reference direction of the
geostrophic wind (i.e. 24 different runs are necessary to scan all
possible geostrophic wind directions). Assuming self-similarity, these
reference runs can be scaled to actual velocity and interpolated in direction
during the meso-to-micro downscaling strategy (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>)
depending on the mesoscale (WRF) time-dependent geostrophic wind direction
and intensity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Meso-to-micro downscaling strategy</title>
      <p>Mesoscale NWP models like WRF-ARW can be used to forecast winds at horizontal
resolutions down to around 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This grid resolution may be
insufficient to drive subsequent gas dispersion simulations over complex
terrains, where sub-grid-scale topographic features can alter near-surface
winds and therefore the resulting gas dispersal pattern. For this reason, a
meso-to-micro downscaling strategy may be necessary in order to capture
wind-forcing effects caused by the local sub-grid topography.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Detail of the ALYA-CFDWind computational mesh (50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
horizontal resolution) around the Nyos Lake. The bottom-left inset shows the
extent of the computational domain composed of three differentiated zones, flat
buffer (red), transition (pale blue), and inner domain (green) at
50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution containing the detailed terrain information. The
arrows indicate the approximate gas flow path according to observations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>At present, model downscaling is the subject of active research within the
atmospheric and wind engineering communities, with two well-differentiated
strategies dominating the scene. On the one hand, statistical downscaling
methodologies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.51"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> build on
finding correlations between global/regional model simulations and
observations during long periods of time in order to identify patterns used
to forecast in time and space by extrapolation. This has proven to be
effective for some applications (e.g. wind farm power production forecast)
but requires long series of wind observations that, for the application
considered here, do not exist. On the other hand, dynamical or physical
downscaling (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="altparen.52"/>) couples different nested models so
that the outer mesoscale model furnishes boundary conditions to the inner
microscale solver at each model time integration step. The inner microscale
model can range in complexity from simpler mass-consistent diagnostic models
to a CFD solver. This option is clearly more attractive but, apart from the
higher computational cost, still presents some challenges related to not
well-resolved inconsistencies in the physics of models across scales. On top
of this, a pure dynamical downscaling approach becomes computationally
prohibitive for hazard assessment purposes, where climatically representative
wind series have to be considered (note that this implies thousands of
coupled simulations in order to statistically cover all meteorological
situations with its associated probability). Given these constrains, we adopt
an intermediate physical–statistical strategy based on transfer functions, a
concept inspired on methodologies used for microscale wind resource
assessment over regional scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.53"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>The idea behind transfer functions is simple. Given a mesoscale wind field
(in our case WRF-ARW at 1 or 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> grid resolution, see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>) and a set of microscale wind fields, each characterised by a
reference wind direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and intensity (in our case 24 ALYA-CFDWind
runs at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> grid resolution and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> geostrophic wind binning,
see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>), the transfer functions determine a new
(downscaled) wind field as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M157" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WRF</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WRF</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the resulting downscaled wind velocity,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the point-dependent transfer function at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WRF</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the WRF wind velocity interpolated to the (finer)
microscale mesh, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ALYA-CFDWind velocity for a
reference wind direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
CFDWind velocity for the same direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over a radius of
influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (of size similar to that of the WRF cells). Note that, by
construction, at each point, the CFD field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over
its circumference of influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> equals the WRF velocity interpolated at
that point. In other words, the resulting downscaled wind field coincides on
average (over a WRF cell) with that of the mesoscale model but, at the same
time, it has all the local wind fluctuations around this mean (caused by the
microscale topographic forcing) which cannot be captured by the (coarser)
mesoscale grid. Moreover, the methodology is thought to preserve flow
characteristics due to the thermal stratification present in the WRF model.</p>
      <p>A central point in this hybrid downscaling methodology is how to determine
the reference wind direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and then how to link it consistently
with the mesoscale flow. For this, we adopt the following strategy to obtain
downscaled 2-D fields at given heights <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the terrain:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p>The first step consists of extracting from the microscale computational domain (ALYA-CFDWind) a series of 2-D plains
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>2-D</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at user-defined heights above the terrain (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 10, and 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Each of these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>2-D</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
planes is then decomposed in a series of structured patches or segments <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, allowing for some overlap at the borders of
the sub-domains (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∪</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>2-D</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∩</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∅</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In particular, we consider here one squared
patch around each WRF mass point with sizes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WRF</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WRF</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,   <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WRF</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WRF</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the WRF cell area (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>For each sub-domain  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the reference wind direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is computed as the averaged WRF velocity
over the segment. Note that, for small computational domains or flat terrains, few variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are expected across
different segments <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, over large areas or in very complex terrains, synoptic-scale effects may result on variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at different segments.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>For each sub-domain  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,  the microscale (ALYA-CFDWind) reference solution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is determined by performing a linear interpolation between the two reference runs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that limit the bin direction containing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For example, if for a given segment and time one has <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, then
the bin-bounding solutions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. precomputed solutions for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) are combined to obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>A smoothing operation in the overlap regions between neighbouring sub-domains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is performed. This is necessary because
different values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in adjacent segments can result on discontinuous values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFD</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across segments. In
particular, we consider a simple weighted interpolation in the regions with overlap.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>Finally,  the transfer functions is applied using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) to scale the microscale wind modulus and obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">down</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Segmentation strategy adopted for downscaling on a 2-D plane
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mtext>2-D</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A patch or segment <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined for each WRF-ARW
grid mass point (black squares) containing many ALYA-CFDWind grid points (red
small squares). The last plot shows the overlapped region.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Wind vectors at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> above terrain as given by WRF-ARW at
3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution (left column) and the downscaling (right column) for
21 August 1986 at 18:00 (top), 19:00 (middle), and 21:00 (bottom) UTC. For
visualisation and point-to-point comparison purposes, WRF results have been
interpolated to the CFD mesh and, when necessary, extrapolated below its
lower level. The red triangle shows the location of the Lake Nyos.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=404.029134pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> compares the 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution WRF results at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> above the terrain with the downscaled
field at the area of interest around the Lake Nyos. This figure highlights
the local information added by the microscale model over mountainous areas
and valleys, where WRF shows a smoother behaviour. Unfortunately, no surface
wind data existed at that time to validate these results. However, some
consistency with reports exists. For example, a strong microscale wind
rotation from NE to SW (wind origin direction) is clearly visible along the
Nyos valley from 18:00 to 21:00 UTC, in agreement with cloud dispersal
reports indicating two differentiated dispersal phases. In order to
illustrate this phenomenon, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> plots time series of
10 m wind velocity and direction from 16:00 to 24:00 UTC at two locations
of special interest, the lake itself and a point at the bottom of the Nyos
valley (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Note how near-surface wind direction
changes sharply at both locations between 17:30 (wind from NE) and 19:30
(wind from SW) UTC. A systematic WRF model error phase of about 3 h seems to
exist because dispersal reports suggest such a strong wind veering occurring
after 22:00 LT (21:00 UTC). In any case, these wind field variations
strongly indicate the need for including time-dependent heterogeneous winds
for the gas dispersal simulations. Finally, it is worth looking at the
atmospheric stability during the time of the event since this parameter also
favours the accumulation of dense gas at depressions.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> plots the static stability versus time, clearly
reflecting a unstable to stable transition related to the diurnal cycle
occurring at around 16:00 UTC.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time series of 10 m wind speed and direction at two points located
at the Nyos Lake <bold>(a, c)</bold> and at the bottom of the Nyos
valley <bold>(b, d)</bold>. Results from WRF simulations at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution (blue lines) and downscaling using ALYA-CFDWind at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(red lines). Wind direction criterion is that of the coming direction; i.e.
0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates wind coming from the N, 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> coming from the E. Note the sudden short-lived wind veering from NE to SW starting at
around 18:00 UTC.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Source term settings used in the different groups of simulations.
Table shows the considered ranges for eruption starting time, total CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emitted mass, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass flux, and constant of decay (or growth) for the
exponential phase.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Run</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Starting time</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Total mass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mass flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Constant of decay (growth)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">group</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">UTC</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(given parameter)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">for the exponential</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Constant (180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17:30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78–1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10–20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Linear decrease (180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17:30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78–1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">from 19–28 to 1–2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Linear increase (180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17:30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78–1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">from 1–2 to 19–28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exponential decrease (180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17:30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78–1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2–10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Exponential increase (180 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17:30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78–1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Constant  (60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17:30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16–2.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1–15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2–4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">exponential decrease (120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(for constant phase)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Constant  (30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16:30, 17:00,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16–2.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1–50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2–25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">exponential decrease (90 to 210 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17:30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(for constant phase)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Static stability (gradient of potential temperature in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus time at the same two points than in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> (lake in blue and valley in red) according to WRF
simulations at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution. The potential temperature gradient
has been computed using WRF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels 1 and 6, at roughly 12 and
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> above terrain, respectively. Positive values indicate stable
atmosphere. Note the transition from unstable to stable stratification
occurring after 16:00 UTC.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>High-resolution dispersal modelling results</title>
      <p>Once the high-resolution winds (i.e. WRF-ARW winds downscaled with
ALYA-CFDWind using transfer functions) have been obtained for the period and
area of interest, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind values every 20 min (i.e. three times
hourly) were given to the TWODEE-2.1 model together with the 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution DEM and the definition of the source term to simulate the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
cloud dispersal. Our simulations assume the eruption started at 17:30 UTC
(18:30 LT), i.e. 2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> advanced with respect to eyewitness reports.
This source term shift in the dispersal simulations was necessary because of
the WRF model phase error discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>. However,
given the large uncertainties in the source term concerning eruption
duration, intensity, and evolution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass flow rate with time, we
performed a source term characterisation considering different sets of
simulations, each set with different source term characteristics (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>):
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p>Eruptions lasting 3 h with a constant CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission but varying  source intensity. This is similar to the scenarios considered by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.54"/>, who ranged
the source intensity between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="altparen.55"/>) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.56"/>) (Group 1 in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>Eruptions lasting 3 h with a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission decreasing linearly and considering different time rates and source intensities
(Group 2).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>Eruptions lasting 3 h with a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission increasing linearly and considering different time rates and source intensities
(Group 3).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>Eruptions lasting 3 h with a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission decreasing exponentially considering different decay rates and source intensities
(Group 4).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>Eruptions lasting 3 h with a CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission increasing exponentially considering different growth rates and source intensities
(Group ).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>Eruptions with an initial phase with low constant CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission followed by a burst and exponential decay considering different durations for each phase, decay
rates and source intensities (groups 6 and 7). In addition, eruption durations for these groups were varied between 2 and 4 h as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.57"/>.</p></list-item></list>
Results for all these simulations (a total of 62 source term scenarios) were
validated on a point-by-point basis comparing the TWODEE-2.1 predicted
probability of fatalities with the actual percentage of fatalities reported
at 53 locations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). When defining a metric for the
skill score of a simulation, it is important to consider whether observations are
distributed well across the possible range of values or not. In our case, for
example, 29 observations of 53 (i.e. 55 %) and 8 observations of 53
(i.e. 15 %) have 0 and 100 % of observed fatalities, respectively. It
means that around 70 % of the values are at the tails of the distribution
and, consequently, the evaluation of scores without binning would lead to
biassed skills, favouring those scenarios in which the source intensity
(emitted mass) is largely under- or overpredicted. In order to prevent this, we
adopt binning strategy and evaluate scores first for each discrete bins and
then globally by averaging over all bins. Ideally, the number of bins should
scale as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> so that, in our case (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), around seven bins would be
recommendable. However, in order to avoid having bins with little or even no
observations, we considered the following five-class binning for the percentage
of fatalities: the first bin 0–5 % (no significant mortality), the second bin
5–35 %, the third 35–65 %, the fourth 65–95 %, and the fifth 95–100 % (total
mortality). This allows us to compute the Pearson cumulative test statistic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Source term characteristics of the best-fit simulation showing total
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted mass, mass flux variation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and mean absolute error
(MAE) considering the five-class binning criterion.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Duration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total mass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mass flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MAE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4 for 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> followed by a burst</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">to 18 and 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> exponential decay</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p><disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M267" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of bins, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of observations
(localities) within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th bin, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of model
localities laying in the same bin. However, we also compute the
total mean absolute error (MAE) as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M272" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        with
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M273" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAE</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PM</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where (MAE)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bin absolute error, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the number of observations
(localities) in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th bin, PO is the observed percentage of
fatalities, and PM is the modelled probability at the same locality.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Best-fit simulation results. Left: maximum CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
(%vol.) achieved at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> height. Right: percentage of fatalities
(in %) predicted by the model applying Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
height. Halved circles show the actual reported percentages at locations
using the same colour scale.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Histogram showing the fit between observations (green bars) and
best-fit run (red bars) across the bins. Results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.58"/> are
also shown for comparison (blue bars).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f14.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>As a best-fit criterion we considered the lowest value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but trying
also to minimise MAE. We found that the higher-score simulations belong to
the same group of source term runs – a source with two phases: an initial
phase with a constant CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission followed by a second phase with
exponential source strength decay (group 6). This is a consistent result.
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/> summarise the
characteristics of the source term for the highest ranked run. The total
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted mass is 0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, released over 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value
is in good agreement with previous independent estimations, ranging from
0.29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.59"/> to 1.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.60"/>. In contrast, the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and MAE are 4.98 and 34.7 %, respectively,
giving a very good fit across all bins (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>). For
comparison, the scenario II in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.61"/> (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>) gives a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 7.61 and a MAE of 36.6 %,
substantially higher even if the characteristics of the source term are
similar to our best-fit runs both in terms of duration (4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and total
mass (1.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). These differences can be explained because of the
high-resolution time-dependent winds, which are able to capture the wind
veering leading to the differentiated cloud dispersal branches (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>). This can also be observed by looking at the
evolution of concentration with time at different locations. As observed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>, the TWODEE-2.1 simulations can reproduce a first
W-NW branch affecting the bottom valleys of Cha and Fang (location L34)
followed by a gas cloud direction shift towards NE affecting Subum
village (location L36). According to simulations, this occurred around 2 h after the eruption onset (i.e. 20:30 LT). Considering the
2–3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shift necessary to correct the meteorological (WRF) phase error,
this is in excellent agreement with eyewitness reports.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Evolution with time (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
(%vol.) at different locations for the best-fit simulation. Results at
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> height. Location L05 is near the Lake, L24 at the Nyos valley,
L34 near Cha (W branch), and L36 near Subum (E branch). See
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for details.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/17/861/2017/nhess-17-861-2017-f15.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and discussion</title>
      <p>We have developed a high-resolution numerical model for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> atmospheric
dispersal in complex terrains by introducing a methodology for time-dependent
microscale wind characterisation based on transfer functions that couple a
mesoscale numerical weather prediction model with a microscale computational
fluid dynamics model for the atmospheric boundary layer. The model was
applied to reconstruct the source conditions and the catastrophic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dispersal at Lake Nyos in 1986. Simulation results were compared with the
observed fatalities through a novel probabilistic approach. We found that the
new model with high-resolution time-dependent winds shows better agreement
with the observations compared with previous simulations, indicating that the
model is capable of performing gas dispersal hazard assessment on very
complex terrains in the future.</p>
      <p>The optimal runs (higher scores for percentage of fatalities) shared same
source evolution pattern: an initial phase with a low constant CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission and a second phase with a burst followed by exponential decay in
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass flux. This suggests additional information about physical processes
at Lake Nyos during the 1986 limnic eruption. The scenario is compatible with
a gas eruption that started locally in some region of the lake, continuously
emitting a relatively low amount of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> near the equilibrium state;
then a perturbation, likely due to the gas ascent itself or to other
mechanism(s), grew that destabilised the whole lake and triggered the
exponential phase by overturn of the different layers in the lake in a
supersaturation state. One simple model explaining the exponential decay
during the second phase is that the driving force for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission is an
overpressure in the lake, such as caused by CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> supersaturation, and the
temporal change in the overpressure is controlled by the emitted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux,
like it occurs in a volatile supersaturated magma chamber. This model can be
simply formulated as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.62"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M303" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        and
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M304" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the emitted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the overpressure, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are two constants. These equations lead to the solution of exponential
decay form for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M311" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the initial value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although the precise mechanism in
the lake during the limnic eruption is still under discussion, we can infer
from the above model that the second phase is simply explained by a
relaxation process of supersaturation state in the lake. Although further
investigations for the dynamics of lake water are necessary for reproducing
the physical process of the limnic eruption in detail, the features of the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission obtained in this study may provide strong constraints on
physical modelling in the lake.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>We use no new data; all datasets have been taken from
previous publications of other authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Arnau Folch has implemented the improvements to the TWODEE code and
written the bulk of the manuscript with input from all authors. Jordi Barcons and Arnau Folch
have performed the wind field characterisation. Tomofumi Kozono has configured and
performed TWODEE simulations. Antonio Costa has characterised the scenarios, defined the
strategy for the impact criterion, and contributed to the text. All authors
reviewed the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Jordi Barcons has been partially funded by the Industrial Doctorate Program of the
Catalan Government (eco/2497/2013). We also thank the two anonymous reviewers
for their comments and suggestions. Finally, our colleagues Greg Tanyileke,
Fantog Wilson, and Romaric Ntchantcho from the Institut de Recherches
Géologiques et Minières (IRGM) (Cameroon) are warmly thanked for
their field guidance and scientific discussions during the workshop “30 years
of Lake Nyos disaster” (Yaounde, 14–20 March 2016).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: G. Macedonio<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aka and Yokoyama(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Aka, F. T. and Yokoyama, T.: Current status of the debate about the age of
Lake Nyos dam (Cameroon) and its bearing on potential flood hazards, Nat.
Hazards, 65, 875–885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0401-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11069-012-0401-4</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Apsley and Castro(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Apsley, D. and Castro, I.: A limited-length-scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> model for
the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 83, 75–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000252210512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1000252210512</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Avila et al.(2013)Avila, Folch, Houzeaux, Eguzkitza, Prieto, and
Cabezon</label><mixed-citation>Avila, M., Folch, A., Houzeaux, G., Eguzkitza, B., Prieto, L., and Cabezon,
D.: A Parallel CFD Model for Wind Farms, Procedia Comput. Sci., 18,
2157–2166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.386</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Baxter and Kapila(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Baxter, P. and Kapila, M.: Acute health impact of the gas release at Lake
Nyos, Cameroon, 1986, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 39,
265–275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(89)90064-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0377-0273(89)90064-4</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Britter(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Britter, R.: Atmospheric dispersion of dense gases, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,
2, 317–344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.21.010189.001533" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.fl.21.010189.001533</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Burton et al.(2017)Burton, Dudhia, Gadian, and Mobbs</label><mixed-citation>Burton, R. R., Dudhia, J., Gadian, A. M., and Mobbs, S. D.: The use of a
numerical weather prediction model to simulate the release of a dense gas
with an application to the Lake Nyos disaster of 1986, Meteorol. Appl., 24,
43–51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/met.1603</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Castro et al.(2014)Castro, Santos, and da Costa</label><mixed-citation>Castro, F., Santos, C., and da Costa, J.: One-way mesoscale-microscale
coupling for the simulation of atmospheric flows over complex terrain, Wind
Energy, 18, 1251–1272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1758" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/we.1758</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Chen and Dudhia(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model
with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation
and Sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Chiodini et al.(2004)Chiodini, Cardellini, Amato, Boschi, Caliro,
Frondini, and Ventura</label><mixed-citation>Chiodini, G., Cardellini, C., Amato, A., Boschi, E., Caliro, S., Frondini,
F.,
and Ventura, G.: Carbon dioxide Earth degassing and seismogenesis in central
and southern Italy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L07615, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019480" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL019480</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Chiodini et al.(2010)Chiodini, Granieri, Avino, Caliro, Costa,
Minopoli, and Vilardo</label><mixed-citation>Chiodini, G., Granieri, D., Avino, R., Caliro, S., Costa, A., Minopoli, C.,
and
Vilardo, G.: Non-volcanic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Earth degassing: case of Mefite
dAnsanto (Southern Apennines), Italy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L11303,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042858" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL042858</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Costa and Chiodini(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Costa, A. and Chiodini, G.: Modelling Air Dispersion of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
Limnic Eruptions, 451–465, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin,
Heidelberg, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36833-2_20" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-36833-2_20</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Costa et al.(2005)Costa, Macedonio, and Chiodini</label><mixed-citation>Costa, A., Macedonio, G., and Chiodini, G.: Numerical model of gas dispersion
emitted from volcanic sources, Annu. Geophys., 48, 805–815,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3236" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4401/ag-3236</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Costa et al.(2008)Costa, Chiodini, Granieri, Folch, Hankin, Caliro,
Avino, and Cardellini</label><mixed-citation>Costa, A., Chiodini, G., Granieri, D., Folch, A., Hankin, R., Caliro, S.,
Avino, R., and Cardellini, C.: A shallow- layer model for heavy gas
dispersion from natural sources: application and hazard assessment at Caldara
di Manziana, Italy, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 9, Q03002,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GC001762</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Devis et al.(2013)Devis, van Lipzig, and Demuzere</label><mixed-citation>Devis, A., van Lipzig, N. P. M., and Demuzere, M.: A new statistical approach
to downscale wind speed distributions at a site in northern Europe, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2272–2283, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50245" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50245</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Douglas and Kessler(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Douglas, S. and Kessler, R.: Users Manual for the Diagnostic Wind Model,
EPA-450/4-90-007C, volume iii, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), San Rafael, CA, USA, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Dudhia(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Dudhia, J.: Numerical Study of Convection Observed during the Winter Monsoon
Experiment Using a Mesoscale Two-Dimensional Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 46,
3077–3107, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Evans et al.(1994)Evans, White, Tuttle, Kling, Tanyileke, and
Michel</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, W. C., White, L. D., Tuttle, M. L., Kling, G. W., Tanyileke, G., and
Michel, R. L.: Six years of change in Lake Nyos, Cameroon, yield clues to
the past and cautions for the future, Geochem. J., 28, 139–162, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Folch et al.(2009)Folch, Costa, and Hankin</label><mixed-citation>Folch, A., Costa, A., and Hankin, R.: twodee-2: A shallow layer model for
dense gas dispersion on complex topography, Comput. Geosci., 35,
667–674, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.017</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Hankin and Britter(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Hankin, R. K. S. and Britter, R. E.: TWODEE: The Health and Safety
Laboratory
shallow layer model for heavy gas dispersion. Part 1. Mathematical basis and
physical assumptions, J. Hazard. Mater., A66, 211–226, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Harper(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Harper, P.: Assessment of the major hazard potential of carbon dioxide
(CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), Report, UK Health and Safety Executive, UK, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Hong and Lim(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, S.-Y. and Lim, J. O. J.: The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics
Scheme (WSM6), J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 129–151, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Houzeaux et al.(2009)Houzeaux, Vázquez, Aubry, and
Cela</label><mixed-citation>Houzeaux, G., Vázquez, M., Aubry, R., and Cela, J.: A massively parallel
fractional step solver for incompressible flows, J. Comput. Phys., 228,
6316–6332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.05.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jcp.2009.05.019</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Huppert and Woods(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Huppert, H. E. and Woods, A. W.: The role of volatiles in magma chamber
dynamics, Nature, 6915, 493–495, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature01211</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Janjic(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Janjic, Z.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: further developments of
the convection, viscous sublayer and turbulence closure schemes, Mon.
Weather Rev., 122, 927–945, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Kain(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Kain, J. S.: The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 43, 170–181, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Kalnay et al.(1996)Kalnay, Kanamitsu, Kistler, Collins, Deaven,
Gandin, Iredell, Saha, White, Woollen, Zhu, Leetmaa, Reynolds, Chelliah,
Ebisuzaki, Higgins, Janowiak, Mo, Ropelewski, Wang, Jenne, and
Joseph</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo,
K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
77, 437–471, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Kanari(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Kanari, S. I.: An inference on the process of gas outburst from Lake Nyos,
Cameroon, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 39, 135–149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(89)90054-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0377-0273(89)90054-1</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Kirchmeier et al.(2014)Kirchmeier, Lorenz, and
Vimont</label><mixed-citation>Kirchmeier, M. C., Lorenz, D. J., and Vimont, D. J.: Statistical Downscaling
of Daily Wind Speed Variations, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 660–675,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0230.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0230.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Kling et al.(1986)Kling, Clary, Compton, Devine, Evans, Humphrey,
Koenigsberg, Lockwood, Tuyrle, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Kling, G. W., Clary, M. A., Compton, H. R., Devine, J. D., Evans, W. C.,
Humphrey, A. M., Koenigsberg, E. J., Lockwood, J. P., Tuyrle, M. L., and
Wagner, G. N.: The 1986 Lake Nyos Gas Disaster in Cameroon, West Africa,
Science, 236, 169–175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.236.4798.169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.236.4798.169</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Kling et al.(2005)Kling, Evans, Tanyileke, Kusakabe, Ohba, Yoshida,
and Hell</label><mixed-citation>Kling, G. W., Evans, W. C., Tanyileke, G., Kusakabe, M., Ohba, T., Yoshida,
Y., and Hell, J. V.: Degassing Lakes Nyos and Monoun: defusing certain
disaster, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 14185–14190,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502274102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0502274102</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kusakabe et al.(2008)Kusakabe, Ohba, Issa, Yoshida, Satake, Ohizumi,
Evans, Tanyileke, and Kling</label><mixed-citation>Kusakabe, M., Ohba, T., Issa, Yoshida, Y., Satake, H., Ohizumi, T., Evans,
W. C., Tanyileke, G., and Kling, G. W.: Evolution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in lakes
Monoun and Nyos, Cameroon, before and during controlled degassing, Geochem.
J., 42, 93–118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.42.93" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2343/geochemj.42.93</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Le Guern et al.(1992)Le Guern, Shanklin, and Tebor</label><mixed-citation>Le Guern, F., Shanklin, E., and Tebor, S.: Witness accounts of the
catastrophic event of August 1986 at Lake Nyos (Cameroon), J.
Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 51, 171–184,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(92)90067-N" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0377-0273(92)90067-N</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Lockwood and Rubin(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Lockwood, J. P. and Rubin, M.: Origin and age of the Lake Nyos maar,
Cameroon, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 39, 117–124,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(89)90052-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0377-0273(89)90052-8</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Mlawer et al.(1997)Mlawer, Taubman, Brown, Iacono, and
Clough</label><mixed-citation>
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough,
S. A.:
Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated
correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
16663–16682, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Pierret et al.(1992)Pierret, Berne, Roussel, and
Le Guern</label><mixed-citation>Pierret, R., Berne, P., Roussel, C., and Le Guern, F.: The Lake Nyos
disaster: model calculations for the flow of carbon dioxide, J. Volcanol.
Geoth. Res., 51, 161–170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(92)90066-M" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0377-0273(92)90066-M</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Ranaboldo et al.(2013)Ranaboldo, Giebel, and Codina</label><mixed-citation>Ranaboldo, M., Giebel, G., and Codina, B.: Implementation of a Model Output
Statistics based on meteorological variable screening for short-term wind
power forecast, Wind Energy, 16, 811–826, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1506" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/we.1506</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Rouwet et al.(2016)Rouwet, Tanyileke, and Costa</label><mixed-citation>Rouwet, D., Tanyileke, G., and Costa, A.: Cameroon's Lake Nyos gas burst:
30 years later, EOS, 97, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2016EO055627" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2016EO055627</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Sanz Rodrigo et al.(2010)Sanz Rodrigo, Garcia, Cabezón, Lozano,
Martí, and García</label><mixed-citation>
Sanz Rodrigo, J., Garcia, B., Cabezón, D., Lozano, S., Martí, I.,
and García, B.: Downscaling mesoscale simulations with CFD for high
resolution regional wind mapping, in: Proc. European Wind Energy Conference,
20–23 April 2010, Warsaw, Poland, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Skamarock et al.(2008)Skamarock, Klemp, Dudhia, Gill, Barker, Duda,
Huang, Wang, and Powers</label><mixed-citation>
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, M., Duda,
K. G., Huang, X. Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the
Advanced Research WRF Version 3, Tech. rep., National Center for Atmospheric
Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA , 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Tuttle et al.(1987)Tuttle, Clark, Compton, Devine, Evans, Humphrey,
Kling, Koenigsberg, Lockwood, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Tuttle, M., Clark, M., Compton, H., Devine, J., Evans, W., Humphrey, A.,
Kling, G., Koenigsberg, E., Lockwood, J., and Wagner, G.: The 21 August
(1986) Lake Nyos gas disaster, Cameroon, Tech. rep., US Geol Surv Open-File
Rept, available at: <uri>https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1987/0097/report.pdf</uri> (last access: 12 June 2017), 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Vázquez et al.(2016)Vázquez, Houzeaux, Koric, Artigues,
Aguado-Sierra, Arias, Mira, Calmet, Cucchietti, Owen, Taha, Burness, Cela,
and Valero</label><mixed-citation>Vázquez, M., Houzeaux, G., Koric, S., Artigues, A., Aguado-Sierra, J.,
Arias, R., Mira, D., Calmet, H., Cucchietti, F., Owen, H., Taha, A., Burness,
E. D., Cela, J., and Valero, M.: Alya: Multiphysics engineering simulation
toward exascale, J. Comput. Sci., 14, 15–27,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2015.12.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jocs.2015.12.007</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Zhang(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y.: Dynamics of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-driven lake eruptions, Nature, 379, 57–59,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/379057a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/379057a0</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>High-resolution modelling of atmospheric dispersion of dense gas using TWODEE-2.1: application to the 1986 Lake Nyos limnic eruption</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Atmospheric dispersal of a gas denser than
air can threat the environment and surrounding communities if the terrain and
meteorological conditions favour its accumulation in topographic depressions,
thereby reaching toxic concentration levels. Numerical modelling of
atmospheric gas dispersion constitutes a useful tool for gas hazard
assessment studies, essential for planning risk mitigation actions. In
complex terrains, microscale winds and local orographic features can have a
strong influence on the gas cloud behaviour, potentially leading to
inaccurate results if not captured by coarser-scale modelling. We introduce a
methodology for microscale wind field characterisation based on transfer
functions that couple a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model with a
microscale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model for the atmospheric
boundary layer. The resulting time-dependent high-resolution microscale wind
field is used as input for a shallow-layer gas dispersal model (TWODEE-2.1)
to simulate the time evolution of CO<sub>2</sub> gas concentration at different
heights above the terrain. The strategy is applied to review simulations of
the 1986 Lake Nyos event in Cameroon, where a huge CO<sub>2</sub> cloud released by a
limnic eruption spread downslopes from the lake, suffocating thousands of
people and animals across the Nyos and adjacent secondary valleys. Besides
several new features introduced in the new version of the gas dispersal code
(TWODEE-2.1), we have also implemented a novel impact criterion based on the
percentage of human fatalities depending on CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and exposure
time. New model results are quantitatively validated using the reported
percentage of fatalities at several locations. The comparison with previous
simulations that assumed coarser-scale steady winds and topography
illustrates the importance of high-resolution modelling in complex terrains.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Aka and Yokoyama(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Aka, F. T. and Yokoyama, T.: Current status of the debate about the age of
Lake Nyos dam (Cameroon) and its bearing on potential flood hazards, Nat.
Hazards, 65, 875–885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0401-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0401-4</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Apsley and Castro(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Apsley, D. and Castro, I.: A limited-length-scale <i>k</i>-<i>ϵ</i> model for
the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 83, 75–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000252210512" target="_blank">doi:10.1023/A:1000252210512</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Avila et al.(2013)Avila, Folch, Houzeaux, Eguzkitza, Prieto, and
Cabezon</label><mixed-citation>
Avila, M., Folch, A., Houzeaux, G., Eguzkitza, B., Prieto, L., and Cabezon,
D.: A Parallel CFD Model for Wind Farms, Procedia Comput. Sci., 18,
2157–2166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.386" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.386</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Baxter and Kapila(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Baxter, P. and Kapila, M.: Acute health impact of the gas release at Lake
Nyos, Cameroon, 1986, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 39,
265–275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(89)90064-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0377-0273(89)90064-4</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Britter(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Britter, R.: Atmospheric dispersion of dense gases, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,
2, 317–344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.21.010189.001533" target="_blank">doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.21.010189.001533</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Burton et al.(2017)Burton, Dudhia, Gadian, and Mobbs</label><mixed-citation>
Burton, R. R., Dudhia, J., Gadian, A. M., and Mobbs, S. D.: The use of a
numerical weather prediction model to simulate the release of a dense gas
with an application to the Lake Nyos disaster of 1986, Meteorol. Appl., 24,
43–51, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1603" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/met.1603</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Castro et al.(2014)Castro, Santos, and da Costa</label><mixed-citation>
Castro, F., Santos, C., and da Costa, J.: One-way mesoscale-microscale
coupling for the simulation of atmospheric flows over complex terrain, Wind
Energy, 18, 1251–1272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1758" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/we.1758</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chen and Dudhia(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model
with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation
and Sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Chiodini et al.(2004)Chiodini, Cardellini, Amato, Boschi, Caliro,
Frondini, and Ventura</label><mixed-citation>
Chiodini, G., Cardellini, C., Amato, A., Boschi, E., Caliro, S., Frondini,
F.,
and Ventura, G.: Carbon dioxide Earth degassing and seismogenesis in central
and southern Italy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L07615, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019480" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004GL019480</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Chiodini et al.(2010)Chiodini, Granieri, Avino, Caliro, Costa,
Minopoli, and Vilardo</label><mixed-citation>
Chiodini, G., Granieri, D., Avino, R., Caliro, S., Costa, A., Minopoli, C.,
and
Vilardo, G.: Non-volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> Earth degassing: case of Mefite
dAnsanto (Southern Apennines), Italy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L11303,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042858" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GL042858</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Costa and Chiodini(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Costa, A. and Chiodini, G.: Modelling Air Dispersion of CO<sub>2</sub> from
Limnic Eruptions, 451–465, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin,
Heidelberg, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36833-2_20" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36833-2_20</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Costa et al.(2005)Costa, Macedonio, and Chiodini</label><mixed-citation>
Costa, A., Macedonio, G., and Chiodini, G.: Numerical model of gas dispersion
emitted from volcanic sources, Annu. Geophys., 48, 805–815,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3236" target="_blank">doi:10.4401/ag-3236</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Costa et al.(2008)Costa, Chiodini, Granieri, Folch, Hankin, Caliro,
Avino, and Cardellini</label><mixed-citation>
Costa, A., Chiodini, G., Granieri, D., Folch, A., Hankin, R., Caliro, S.,
Avino, R., and Cardellini, C.: A shallow- layer model for heavy gas
dispersion from natural sources: application and hazard assessment at Caldara
di Manziana, Italy, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 9, Q03002,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GC001762" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GC001762</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Devis et al.(2013)Devis, van Lipzig, and Demuzere</label><mixed-citation>
Devis, A., van Lipzig, N. P. M., and Demuzere, M.: A new statistical approach
to downscale wind speed distributions at a site in northern Europe, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2272–2283, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50245" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50245</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Douglas and Kessler(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Douglas, S. and Kessler, R.: Users Manual for the Diagnostic Wind Model,
EPA-450/4-90-007C, volume iii, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), San Rafael, CA, USA, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Dudhia(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Dudhia, J.: Numerical Study of Convection Observed during the Winter Monsoon
Experiment Using a Mesoscale Two-Dimensional Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 46,
3077–3107, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Evans et al.(1994)Evans, White, Tuttle, Kling, Tanyileke, and
Michel</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, W. C., White, L. D., Tuttle, M. L., Kling, G. W., Tanyileke, G., and
Michel, R. L.: Six years of change in Lake Nyos, Cameroon, yield clues to
the past and cautions for the future, Geochem. J., 28, 139–162, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Folch et al.(2009)Folch, Costa, and Hankin</label><mixed-citation>
Folch, A., Costa, A., and Hankin, R.: twodee-2: A shallow layer model for
dense gas dispersion on complex topography, Comput. Geosci., 35,
667–674, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.017" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.017</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Hankin and Britter(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Hankin, R. K. S. and Britter, R. E.: TWODEE: The Health and Safety
Laboratory
shallow layer model for heavy gas dispersion. Part 1. Mathematical basis and
physical assumptions, J. Hazard. Mater., A66, 211–226, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Harper(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Harper, P.: Assessment of the major hazard potential of carbon dioxide
(CO<sub>2</sub>), Report, UK Health and Safety Executive, UK, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hong and Lim(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hong, S.-Y. and Lim, J. O. J.: The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics
Scheme (WSM6), J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 129–151, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Houzeaux et al.(2009)Houzeaux, Vázquez, Aubry, and
Cela</label><mixed-citation>
Houzeaux, G., Vázquez, M., Aubry, R., and Cela, J.: A massively parallel
fractional step solver for incompressible flows, J. Comput. Phys., 228,
6316–6332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.05.019" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.05.019</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Huppert and Woods(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Huppert, H. E. and Woods, A. W.: The role of volatiles in magma chamber
dynamics, Nature, 6915, 493–495, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01211" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature01211</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Janjic(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Janjic, Z.: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: further developments of
the convection, viscous sublayer and turbulence closure schemes, Mon.
Weather Rev., 122, 927–945, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Kain(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Kain, J. S.: The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 43, 170–181, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Kalnay et al.(1996)Kalnay, Kanamitsu, Kistler, Collins, Deaven,
Gandin, Iredell, Saha, White, Woollen, Zhu, Leetmaa, Reynolds, Chelliah,
Ebisuzaki, Higgins, Janowiak, Mo, Ropelewski, Wang, Jenne, and
Joseph</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A.,
Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo,
K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR
40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
77, 437–471, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kanari(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Kanari, S. I.: An inference on the process of gas outburst from Lake Nyos,
Cameroon, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 39, 135–149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(89)90054-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0377-0273(89)90054-1</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Kirchmeier et al.(2014)Kirchmeier, Lorenz, and
Vimont</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchmeier, M. C., Lorenz, D. J., and Vimont, D. J.: Statistical Downscaling
of Daily Wind Speed Variations, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 660–675,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0230.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0230.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Kling et al.(1986)Kling, Clary, Compton, Devine, Evans, Humphrey,
Koenigsberg, Lockwood, Tuyrle, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
Kling, G. W., Clary, M. A., Compton, H. R., Devine, J. D., Evans, W. C.,
Humphrey, A. M., Koenigsberg, E. J., Lockwood, J. P., Tuyrle, M. L., and
Wagner, G. N.: The 1986 Lake Nyos Gas Disaster in Cameroon, West Africa,
Science, 236, 169–175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.236.4798.169" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.236.4798.169</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Kling et al.(2005)Kling, Evans, Tanyileke, Kusakabe, Ohba, Yoshida,
and Hell</label><mixed-citation>
Kling, G. W., Evans, W. C., Tanyileke, G., Kusakabe, M., Ohba, T., Yoshida,
Y., and Hell, J. V.: Degassing Lakes Nyos and Monoun: defusing certain
disaster, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 14185–14190,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502274102" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0502274102</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Kusakabe et al.(2008)Kusakabe, Ohba, Issa, Yoshida, Satake, Ohizumi,
Evans, Tanyileke, and Kling</label><mixed-citation>
Kusakabe, M., Ohba, T., Issa, Yoshida, Y., Satake, H., Ohizumi, T., Evans,
W. C., Tanyileke, G., and Kling, G. W.: Evolution of CO<sub>2</sub> in lakes
Monoun and Nyos, Cameroon, before and during controlled degassing, Geochem.
J., 42, 93–118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.42.93" target="_blank">doi:10.2343/geochemj.42.93</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Le Guern et al.(1992)Le Guern, Shanklin, and Tebor</label><mixed-citation>
Le Guern, F., Shanklin, E., and Tebor, S.: Witness accounts of the
catastrophic event of August 1986 at Lake Nyos (Cameroon), J.
Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 51, 171–184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(92)90067-N" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0377-0273(92)90067-N</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Lockwood and Rubin(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Lockwood, J. P. and Rubin, M.: Origin and age of the Lake Nyos maar,
Cameroon, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 39, 117–124,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(89)90052-8" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0377-0273(89)90052-8</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Mlawer et al.(1997)Mlawer, Taubman, Brown, Iacono, and
Clough</label><mixed-citation>
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., and Clough,
S. A.:
Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated
correlated-k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102,
16663–16682, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Pierret et al.(1992)Pierret, Berne, Roussel, and
Le Guern</label><mixed-citation>
Pierret, R., Berne, P., Roussel, C., and Le Guern, F.: The Lake Nyos
disaster: model calculations for the flow of carbon dioxide, J. Volcanol.
Geoth. Res., 51, 161–170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(92)90066-M" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0377-0273(92)90066-M</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Ranaboldo et al.(2013)Ranaboldo, Giebel, and Codina</label><mixed-citation>
Ranaboldo, M., Giebel, G., and Codina, B.: Implementation of a Model Output
Statistics based on meteorological variable screening for short-term wind
power forecast, Wind Energy, 16, 811–826, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1506" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/we.1506</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Rouwet et al.(2016)Rouwet, Tanyileke, and Costa</label><mixed-citation>
Rouwet, D., Tanyileke, G., and Costa, A.: Cameroon's Lake Nyos gas burst:
30 years later, EOS, 97, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2016EO055627" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2016EO055627</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Sanz Rodrigo et al.(2010)Sanz Rodrigo, Garcia, Cabezón, Lozano,
Martí, and García</label><mixed-citation>
Sanz Rodrigo, J., Garcia, B., Cabezón, D., Lozano, S., Martí, I.,
and García, B.: Downscaling mesoscale simulations with CFD for high
resolution regional wind mapping, in: Proc. European Wind Energy Conference,
20–23 April 2010, Warsaw, Poland, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Skamarock et al.(2008)Skamarock, Klemp, Dudhia, Gill, Barker, Duda,
Huang, Wang, and Powers</label><mixed-citation>
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, M., Duda,
K. G., Huang, X. Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the
Advanced Research WRF Version 3, Tech. rep., National Center for Atmospheric
Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA , 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Tuttle et al.(1987)Tuttle, Clark, Compton, Devine, Evans, Humphrey,
Kling, Koenigsberg, Lockwood, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
Tuttle, M., Clark, M., Compton, H., Devine, J., Evans, W., Humphrey, A.,
Kling, G., Koenigsberg, E., Lockwood, J., and Wagner, G.: The 21 August
(1986) Lake Nyos gas disaster, Cameroon, Tech. rep., US Geol Surv Open-File
Rept, available at: <a href="https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1987/0097/report.pdf" target="_blank">https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1987/0097/report.pdf</a> (last access: 12 June 2017), 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Vázquez et al.(2016)Vázquez, Houzeaux, Koric, Artigues,
Aguado-Sierra, Arias, Mira, Calmet, Cucchietti, Owen, Taha, Burness, Cela,
and Valero</label><mixed-citation>
Vázquez, M., Houzeaux, G., Koric, S., Artigues, A., Aguado-Sierra, J.,
Arias, R., Mira, D., Calmet, H., Cucchietti, F., Owen, H., Taha, A., Burness,
E. D., Cela, J., and Valero, M.: Alya: Multiphysics engineering simulation
toward exascale, J. Comput. Sci., 14, 15–27,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2015.12.007" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2015.12.007</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Zhang(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y.: Dynamics of CO<sub>2</sub>-driven lake eruptions, Nature, 379, 57–59,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/379057a0" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/379057a0</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
