NHESS Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences NHESS Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 1684-9981 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/nhess-15-1721-2015 Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread – Part II: Ensemble Kalman Filter for the state estimation of a front-tracking simulator of wildfire spread Rochoux M. C. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-2213 1 2 3 4 Emery C. 1 2 5 Ricci S. 1 2 Cuenot B. 1 Trouvé A. 5 CERFACS, 42 avenue Gaspard Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse, CEDEX 01, France SUC/CNRS-URA1875, 42 avenue Gaspard Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse, CEDEX 01, France Ecole Centrale Paris, Grande Voie des Vignes, 92295 Châtenay-Malabry, France EM2C/CNRS-UPR288, Grande Voie des Vignes, 92295 Châtenay-Malabry, France Dept. of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, MD 20742, USA 04 08 2015 15 8 1721 1739 Copyright: © 2015 M. C. Rochoux et al. 2015 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/15/1721/2015/nhess-15-1721-2015.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/15/1721/2015/nhess-15-1721-2015.pdf

This paper is the second part in a series of two articles, which aims at presenting a data-driven modeling strategy for forecasting wildfire spread scenarios based on the assimilation of the observed fire front location and on the sequential correction of model parameters or model state. This model relies on an estimation of the local rate of fire spread (ROS) as a function of environmental conditions based on Rothermel's semi-empirical formulation, in order to propagate the fire front with an Eulerian front-tracking simulator. In Part I, a data assimilation (DA) system based on an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) was implemented to provide a spatially uniform correction of biomass fuel and wind parameters and thereby, produce an improved forecast of the wildfire behavior (addressing uncertainties in the input parameters of the ROS model only). In Part II, the objective of the EnKF algorithm is to sequentially update the two-dimensional coordinates of the markers along the discretized fire front, in order to provide a spatially distributed correction of the fire front location and thereby, a more reliable initial condition for further model time-integration (addressing all sources of uncertainties in the ROS model). The resulting prototype data-driven wildfire spread simulator is first evaluated in a series of verification tests using synthetically generated observations; tests include representative cases with spatially varying biomass properties and temporally varying wind conditions. In order to properly account for uncertainties during the EnKF update step and to accurately represent error correlations along the fireline, it is shown that members of the EnKF ensemble must be generated through variations in estimates of the fire's initial location as well as through variations in the parameters of the ROS model. <br><br> The performance of the prototype simulator based on state estimation (SE) or parameter estimation (PE) is then evaluated by comparison with data taken from a reduced-scale controlled grassland fire experiment. Results indicate that data-driven simulations are capable of correcting inaccurate predictions of the fire front location and of subsequently providing an optimized forecast of the wildfire behavior at future lead times. The complementary benefits of both PE and SE approaches, in terms of analysis and forecast performance, are also emphasized. In particular, it is found that the size of the assimilation window must be specified adequately with the persistence of the model initial condition and/or with the temporal and spatial variability of the environmental conditions in order to track sudden changes in wildfire behavior. The present prototype data-driven forecast system is still at an early stage of development. In this regard, this preliminary investigation provides valuable information on how to combine observations with a fire spread model in an efficient way, as well as guidelines to design the future system evolution in order to meet the operational requirements of wildfire spread monitoring.

 References Andrews, P. L., Cruz, M. G., and Rothermel, R. C.: Examination of the wind speed limit function in the Rothermel surface fire spread model, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 22, 959–969, 2013. Balbi, J.-H., Morandini, F., Silvani, X., Filippi, J.-B., and Rinieri, F.: A physical model for wildland fires, Comb. Flame, 156, 2217–2230, 2009. Buis, S., Piacentini, A., and Declat, D.: PALM: a computational framework for assembling high performance computing applications, Concurr. Comp.-Pract. E., 18, 247–262, 2006. Burgan, R.: 1988 revisions to the 1978 national fire-danger rating system, Technical Report Research Paper SE-273, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC, USA, 1988. Burgers, G., van Leeuwen, P., and Evensen, G.: Analysis scheme in the ensemble kalman filter, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 1719–1724, 1998. Chandler, C., Cheney, N., Thomas, P., Trabaud, L., and Williams, D.: Fire in Forestry. Volume I: Forest Fire Behavior and Effects, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983. Chong, D., Tolhurst, K. G., Duff, T. J., and Cirulis, B.: Sensitivity analysis of PHOENIX RapidFire, Bushfire CRC, University of Melbourne, 2013. Daley, R.: Atmospheric Data Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991. Dowdy, A., Mills, G., Finkele, K., and de Groot, W.: Australian fire weather as represented by the McArthur forest fire danger index and the Canadian forest fire weather index, Technical Report CAWCR Technical Report No. 10, Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, 2009. Filippi, J.-B., Bosseur, F., Mari, C., Lac, C., Le Moigne, P., Cuenot, B., Veynante, D., Cariolle, D., and Balbi, J.-H.: Coupled atmosphere-wildland fire modelling, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 1, 210–226, 2009. Filippi, J.-B., Pialat, X., and Clements, C.: Assessment of FOREFIRE/MESONH for wildland fire/atmosphere coupled simulation of the FireFlux experiment, Proc. Combust. Inst., 34, 2633–2640, 2013. Finney, M. A.: FARSITE: Fire area simulator – model development and evaluation, Forest Service, US Dept. of Agriculture, Research Paper RMRS-RP-4, 1998. Finney, M. A., Grenfell, I. C., McHugh, C. W., Seli, R. C., Trethewey, D., Stratton, R. D., and Brittain, S.: A method for ensemble wildland fire simulation, Environ. Model. Assess., 16, 153–167, 2011. Fouilloux, A. and Piacentini, A.: The PALM project: MPMD paradigm for an oceanic data assimilation software, Lect. Notes Comput. Sc., 1685, 1423–1430, 1999. Hirsch, K.: Canadian forest fire behavior prediction (FBP) system: User's guide, Technical report, Northern Forest Centre, Special Report No. 7, 1996. Kochanski, A. K., Jenkins, M. A., Mandel, J., Beezley, J. D., and Krueger, S. K.: Real time simulation of 2007 Santa Ana fires, Forest Ecol. Manag., 294, 136–149, 2013. Lagarde, T., Piacentini, A., and Thual, O.: A new representation of data assimilation methods: the PALM flow charting approach, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 189–207, 2001. Linn, R., Reisner, J., Colman, J. J., and Winterkamp, J.: Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 11, 233–246, 2002. Mandel, J. and Beezley, J. D.: Morphing Ensemble Kalman filter, Tellus A, 60, 131–140, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00275.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00275.x</a>, 2007. Mandel, J., Bennethum, L. S., Beezley, J. D., Coen, J. L., Douglas, C. C., Minjeong, K., and Vodacek, A.: A wildland fire model with data assimilation, Math. Comput. Simulat., 79, 584–606, 2008. Mandel, J., Beezley, J. D., and Kochanski, A. K.: Coupled atmosphere-wildland fire modeling with WRF 3.3 and SFIRE 2011, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 591–610, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-591-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-591-2011</a>, 2011. Mell, W., Jenkins, M. A., Gould, J., and Cheney, P.: A physics-based approach to modeling grassland fires, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 16, 1–22, 2007. Noble, I., Bary, G., and Gill, A.: McArthur's fire danger meters expressed as equations, Aust. J. Ecol., 5, 201–203, 1980. Pannekoucke, O., Berre, L., and Desroziers, G.: Background error correlation length-scale estimates and their sampling statistics, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 497–511, 2008. Paugam, R., Wooster, M. J., and Roberts, G.: Use of handheld thermal imager data for airborne mapping of fire radiative power and energy and flame front rate of spread, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 3385–3399, 2013. Riggan, P. and Robert, G.: Airborne remote sensing of wildland fires, in: Wildland Fires and Air Pollution, edited by: Bytnerowicz, A., Arbaugh, M., Andersen, C., and Riebau, A., Developments in Environmental Science 8, Elsevier, 139–168, 2009. Rochoux, M. C.: Vers une meilleure prévision de la propagation d'incendies de forêt: evaluation de modèles et assimilation de données, Ph.D. Thesis (written in English: Towards a more comprehensive monitoring of wildfire spread – Contributions of model evaluation and data assimilation strategies), Ecole Centrale Paris (France), 2014. Rochoux, M. C., Ricci, S., Lucor, D., Cuenot, B., Trouvé, A., and Bart, J.-M.: Towards predictive simulations of wildfire spread using a reduced-cost Ensemble Kalman filter based on Polynomial Chaos approximations, Proceedings of the Summer Program, Center for Turbulence Research, July 2012, NASA AMES, Stanford University, USA, 2012. Rochoux, M. C., Cuenot, B., Ricci, S., Trouvé, A., Delmotte, B., Massart, S., Paoli, R., and Paugam, R.: Data assimilation applied to combustion, C. R. Mecanique, 341, 266–276, 2013a. Rochoux, M. C., Delmotte, B., Cuenot, B., Ricci, S., and Trouvé, A.: Regional-scale simulations of wildland fire spread informed by real-time flame front observations, Proc. Combust. Inst., 34, 2641–2647, 2013b. Rochoux, M. C., Ricci, S., Lucor, D., Cuenot, B., and Trouvé, A.: Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread – Part I: Reduced-cost ensemble Kalman filter based on polynomial chaos surrogate model for parameter estimation, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2951–2973, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2951-2014">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2951-2014</a>, 2014a. Rochoux, M. C., Emery, C., Ricci, S., Cuenot, B., and Trouvé, A.: Comparative study of parameter estimation and state estimation approaches in data-driven wildfire spread modeling, VII International Conference on Forest Fire Research, Coimbra (Portugal), 14–20 November, 2014b. Rothermel, R. C.: A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels, USDA Forest Service, Research Paper INT-115, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment, Ogden, UT:40, 1972. Sandberg, D .V., Riccardi, C. L., and Schaaf, M. D.: Reformulation of Rothermel's wildland fire behaviour model for heterogeneous fuelbeds, Can. J. Forest Res., 37, 2438–2455, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X07-094">https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-094</a>, 2007. Sullivan, A. L.: Wildland surface fire spread modeling, 1990–2007: 2. Empirical and quasi-empirical models, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 18, 369–386, 2009. Tymstra, C., Bryce, R. W., Wotton, B. M., Taylor, S. W., and Armitage, O. B.: Development and structure of Prometheus: the Canadian Wildland Fire Growth Simulation Model, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Information Report NOR-X-417, 2010. Van Wagner, C.: Development and structure of the canadian forest fire weather index system, Technical Report 35, Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1987. Wooster, M. J., Roberts, G., Perry, G., and Kaufman, Y. J.: Retrieval of biomass combustion rates and totals from fire radiative power observations: FRP derivation and calibration relationships between biomass consumption and fire radiative energy release, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D24311, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006318">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006318</a>, 2005. Wooster, M., Robert, G., Smith, A., Johnston, J., Freeborn, P., Amici, S., and Hudak, A.: Thermal infrared remote sensing, in: Thermal Remote Sensing of Active Vegetation Fires and Biomass Burning Events, Volume Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing 17, Springer, 347–390, 2013.