<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">NHESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">NHESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1684-9981</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/nhess-1-177-2001</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Historical and paleo-tsunami deposits on Kamchatka, Russia: long-term chronologies and long-distance correlations</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pinegina</surname>
<given-names>T. K.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bourgeois</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Volcanic Geology and Geochemistry, Far-East Division, Russian Academy of Sciences, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, 683006, Russia</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1310, USA</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2001</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>1</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>177</fpage>
<lpage>185</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2001 T. K. Pinegina</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2001</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/1/177/2001/nhess-1-177-2001.html">This article is available from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/1/177/2001/nhess-1-177-2001.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/1/177/2001/nhess-1-177-2001.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/1/177/2001/nhess-1-177-2001.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Along the
      eastern coast of Kamchatka, at a number of localities, we have identified
      and attempted to assign ages to deposits of both historic and prehistoric
      (paleo-) tsunamis. These deposits are dated and correlated using
      tephrochronology from Holocene marker tephra and local volcanic ash
      layers. Because the historical record of earthquakes and tsunamis on
      Kamchatka is so short, these investigations can make important
      contributions to evaluating tsunami hazards. Moreover, because even the
      historical record is spotty, our work helps add to and evaluate tsunami
      catalogues for Kamchatka. Furthermore, tsunami deposits provide a proxy
      record for large earthquakes and thus are important paleoseismological
      tools. The combined, preserved record of tsunami deposits and of numerous
      marker tephra on Kamchatka offers an unprecedented opportunity to study
      tsunami frequency. Using combined stratigraphic sections, we can examine
      both the average frequency of events for each locality, and also changes
      in frequency through time. Moreover, using key marker tephra as time
      lines, we can compare tsunami frequency and intensity records along the
      Kamchatka subduction zone. Preliminary results suggest real variations in
      frequency on a millennial time scale, with the period from about 0 to 1000
      A.D. being particularly active at some localities.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="9"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>